Re: Of graduates, fake degrees and national pride
could the mods please keep the MQM/non-MQM backchat out of this thread, it has very little relevance here.
I am not suggesting that people who do not go to good schools cannot be successful in life. With hard work and dedication some of them do manage to get into the top universities and colleges of Pakistan and if anything do even better than the ones who were literally spoon fed. But we need to have a certain standard for people willing to contest the election and literally deciding our destiny. Without the condition of good education anyone with money, even a kiryana farosh would get into politics, do we really want to see that?
John Major (I believe) and Winston Churchill for instance were not graduates but since the standard of education is generally so high in England, it did not matter for them.
I dont see anything wrong with a kiryana farosh getting into politics. We should infact give respect to merchants and traders and farmers.
What you dont see is that the government restricting elected representatives along educational lines is implicitly state enforced class warfare. While living in NWFP I used to teach students of a government school in the area for their coming matric exam. I am yet to see more eager students at that age, they used to walk/cycle miles to get to that class, and afforded us respect as teachers I have never seen. They had not however had a maths teacher since the eight grade. There was one student in that class of twenty who had the slightest idea what was going on. Guess who that was, the rich kid, who could afford to pay for a private tutor. The rest sat there blankly, barely conversant in urdu/english (another form of class warfare). If you remember the matric curriculum, there was a section on Surds. After teaching for half an hour I came to realise that many students did not even know what a square root meant. It is clear to me that the only person who would've passed the matric exams was the one who's parents could afford tuition. That is no measure of intelligence or capacity to be a local leader.
This is not some rural backwood, I am speaking of a relatively developed small town (thanks to the Tarbela dam and university). It is easy to blame the people or some feudal class for not educating people. We are a poor country, and we will remain a poor country for the foreseeable future. Even if we invest massively in education, what laws like these mean is that you are disenfranchising people based on their social class, even in places where issues like feudalism dont exist (there is relatively little feudalism in NWFP). Disenfranchising the people who most need representation.
If the issue is that these people dont perform, that is because parliament doesnt perform. What issue has this parliament EVER solved? And is that really because of the education of its constituents?
The parliament HAS no power. If and when it does, and when that is percieved to be true, people will elect those who perform for their localities, whether they be educated or not has no relevance.