Premise A was an emphasis on “individual” homes in a village (as opposed to the carpet bombing of the whole village).
Premise A leads us to prove by DR that children were in the targeted home (as opposed to playing in a soccer field far away from the militants.)
So your question is not clear.
Are you trying to split hair on one home vs. two homes? If that is the case, the targets still is an individual home owned by terror sympathizer who is housing terrorists in the middle of women and children.
Or is is something else? 