small point here. in debates it is usually incumbent on someone making the claim to provide the evidence. burqaposhx, you're the one claiming that the children were sleeping in the same room as the militants.
Look Ravage bro.
In logic there is a concept called deductive reasoning or DR.
DR is sufficient when a direct documentary evidence is not available. Do you think Taliban are putting Youtube movies of the drone attacks where they show exactly who died in the attack?
So here is the DEDUCTIVE logic
A) In all the drone attacks a single home is destroyed.
B) Majority of the drone attacks occur between 1 am to 3 am
C) In most of the drone attacks, a specific room is targeted and destroyed.
X--- Based on A) If a drone kills children, in all the cases children were inside the targeted home
Y--- Based on B), the children who died were sleeping
Z --- Based on C), the children who died were in the same room
Tell me if you agree with X, or Y, or Z or all of them?
p.s. If you do have a documentary evidence that children who died were playing soccer in field that is 5 miles from the terrorists' hideout, then you win. Otherwise it is just a behas brai behas.
Even with all of his BS rhetoric, burqa has yet again failed to provide proof. He is a true failure in this regard.
So now we can safely say the burqa was lying when he said that kids were sleeping in the same room as "militants", and there were no millitants in the same room as those kids.
Please, burqa, post more of your lies for my entertainment.
Even with all of his BS rhetoric, burqa has yet again failed to provide proof. He is a true failure in this regard.
So now we can safely say the burqa was lying when he said that kids were sleeping in the same room as "militants", and there were no millitants in the same room as those kids.
Please, burqa, post more of your lies for my entertainment.
Aaah the one-liner jokes that would fetch a lot applause in the Islamists hall of shame.
So have you proven that children who died were playing soccer in field that is 5 miles from the terrorists' hideout?
FYI. Most of the members of Islamists hall of shame are in fact are not really Muslims.
....
I don't have to prove ...
The term "proof" (or the verb prove) comes from the branch of knowledge called "Logic". The same branch also provides us with the concept of the "Deductive and inductive reasoning".
And someone clearly doesn't know these aspects. Perhaps it is time to take Logic 101.
Premise A was an emphasis on “individual” homes in a village (as opposed to the carpet bombing of the whole village).
Premise A leads us to prove by DR that children were in the targeted home (as opposed to playing in a soccer field far away from the militants.)
So your question is not clear.
Are you trying to split hair on one home vs. two homes? If that is the case, the targets still is an individual home owned by terror sympathizer who is housing terrorists in the middle of women and children.
Bro! Learn from Ravage (or PM him). He can explain to you. He has at least college education and duly understands the basic logic .
Firstly, I am not your bro because I am not a Muslim.
Secondly, you know nothing about my educational background.
Thirdly, you don't understand logic at all.
Fourthly, you still haven't given any evidence whatsoever. Continue to live in your fictional world where militants are sleeping the same room as "militants" because they have bad parents.
Firstly, I am not your bro because I am not a Muslim.
...
Ok. bro was as a respect. If you don't like that, Here is another option.
Sir! Attend a college and take some courses on logic.
Happy?
.... you know nothing about my educational background.
..
Sir. Either paste your high school certificate or show some logical reasoning in your posts. If you can't provide either of them, then the reader is left to guess (unfortunately).
[quote]
Either paste your high school certificate or show some logical reasoning in your posts.
[/quote]
You have not shown any logical reasoning in any of your posts on GS. Why is that? Is it because you believe in fictional stories about "militants" sleeping in the same room as kids?
Since all 1,476 of your posts on GS are pathetic, juvenile, ignorant and illogical, you need to post your matric certificate first!
Re: Obama's first blood = 3 children dead, countless others
Moonshiner I am suprised you still waste time with these people. Let them live in their world, where they read a caption of news on CNN's ticker and think they have everything figured out. Let them live in that fantasy.
Alleged , and suspected never means anything to pro-US supporters despite the atrocities US has committed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. They will justify killing of ANYONE based on whatever the US does. So its pointless, when the poison is removed from their minds, inshAllah they will one day see the truth, but if they dont want to listen and argue on baseless facts and assumptions, then dont bother. Keep posting the truth for others to read.
....... argue on baseless facts and assumptions,...
So what is your "truth" about the most recent drone attack of 3am? How did the kids got in the destroyed homes at 3am? Did US bring the kids in the house or Talib-Kuffars put the kids in the harms way?
Moonshiner I am suprised you still waste time with these people. Let them live in their world, where they read a caption of news on CNN's ticker and think they have everything figured out. Let them live in that fantasy.
Alleged , and suspected never means anything to pro-US supporters despite the atrocities US has committed in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. They will justify killing of ANYONE based on whatever the US does. So its pointless, when the poison is removed from their minds, in*shAllah they will one day see the truth,* but if they dont want to listen and argue on baseless facts and assumptions, then dont bother. Keep posting the truth for others to read.
Last time i checked Talibans/Jihadi's are chopping off heads, destroying girls schools, music shops.. why your eyes are closed on these atrocities done by flag barriers of Islam?
