Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

Its only a week after the blasts, let the investigations be completed and we shall know the full picture. After 9/11 when America blamed Saudis the next day, the muslim world said that how can they know so fast and so we are innocent. Now after a week of the blasts, they say you have no concrete evidence so far and so we are innocent.

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?


so come back and cry after you have evidence, till then good bye!

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

It is the Pakistanis who are crying hoarse about their innocence. But eventually skeletons come out of the closet.

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

you better send such messages via PM, do not digress thread!

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?


I thought it was Indian cow crying Pakistan's hand, so you agree then Pakistan doesn't have any hand in it all.

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

I heard that all bombed wagons were I-class...does that suggest some unhappy group or class of the society...

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

Its a shame, but u r right. The international media only fans the issue and fails to point out that Pak has done more against terrorism then other other country post 9/11. More attacks take place in Pak then in India, or as a matter of fact any other country who is not suffering from a war. These facts fail to be a factor.

Indian govt is a cry-baby and they can do no better then blame Pak for ev thing. Lashkar is banned in Pak and have been responsible for many attacks in Pak. Why would Pak back them. In Zia’s time, you could argue that Pak backed certain militant groups, but now?? I dont think so.

Give credit where due, Musharraf govt has done an astronomical amount of work to root out terrorism in the region. We would have had more attacks like the train bombings if someone else was in power.

Re: Not blaming Pakistan anymore?

Here is a quote from The Dawn columnist Irfan Husain:

The truth is that there is seldom a smoking gun after such atrocities. If the plot succeeds, the evidence is usually destroyed. In any case, unless a culprit is caught red-handed, it is virtually impossible to prepare a case that will stand up in a court of law

Source: http://www.dawn.com/weekly/mazdak/mazdak.htm

The kind of proof required to convict some of theft or murder is not the kind of proof required to accuse of another country e.g Pakistan of spreading terrorism. From what happened in London, you still maintain your innoncence? Or do you just not want to see the turth even if it is staring at you in the face?