Peace kchughtai
No, he Isa (AS) is already a prophet but will be the last to die, but not the last to 'become' - i.e. not the last to be born or be given prophethood. ** I hope this is very clear, because this is often repeated by Ahmadis and the reply is often given by us to fall on deaf ears. Our distinction of Finality of Prophethood stems from **the fact of the last one to be given prophethood not the last one to live on Earth.
Please take notice on what you said above that i highlighted. You indirectly are taking away the prophethood of Jesus (AS) when He returns. Does this not go against your belief? if it does not, then it sure does go against Quran, where He is the RasulAllah.
Last means the last to die. Its got nothing to do with who was 'born' first. your interpretation of the word khataman nabiyeen means 'the last' prophet. Last in what sense then?
On other hand, Ahmadis interpretation of Khatmannabiyeen is that He SAW was the greatest, most exalted, most perfect, and no Prophet has ever been given such status as Muhammad SAW.
Heres a scenerio for you, which i posted in another thread as well. This scenerio can be applied right here on GS as well.
I write something in thread A and then post it.
I then write something in thread B and post it too.
This is how thread B comes on top of thread A
I then go back in thread A, and edit my post.
Thread B will still be on top of the page, while if you see , the last thread i posted/edited was in thread A
My last post will be considered only the one where i posted/edited the last. It does not mean which threads out of these i posted first. If i keep editing my posts on other threads, it will start becoming my 'last' post. Again, what we are concentrating here is the 'last' and not which was written first.
Jesus (AS) of nazareth, according to you will live amongst mankind and die. Hence, although believing in Islam and what not, He died the 'last'. Does not matter if He (AS) came before Huzoor Anwar (SAW). Again, we are talking about the 'last' and not the first.
PS: how is it appropriate for you to say that Isa (AS) can come after hazrat Muhammad PBUH and still not contradict your definition of khatme naboowat. You've got to pick either one belief. Either theres no prophet after Muhammad PBUH,(that includes Isa AS) or if there is , then your interpretation of Khatme nabuwat is false.
PS2: alas, how important it is for you to save the meaning of khatme nabuwat that Mullahs did, and in the meantime bringing someone prior to Muhammad PBUH's era back and not calling him Prophet , just so you can save the meaning of the word 'khatam'. But, alas again... how the term khatam cannot carry one simple meaning of it. (either last and no one after, or either someone after but khatam still means last ). Amazing stuff.