Need some information 4 Ahmedies

[kchughtai]

@crankthatskunk

Ahaaa, foolish Qadianis never ever stop to amaze me. I told you, one of your cultists already had a debate with me on this article. In the end he ran away as usual. But you didn’t take my hint. I am not going to waste my time in lengthy and useless arguments but cut short the jest of his arguments and my response to his arguments.

“Mirza said Aloome-Tabai never remain the same. To cut short the arguments I decided to use the word Scientists for this word Tabai to cover all or any branch of the Science Mirza meant. Therefore, Mirza says that scientific opinion were that the heavens revolves and the earth is static, now the scientists think that earth revolves, or you can use spin instead of revolve.

Fact; no scientists ever said that Earth is static. Therefore, it is the word of Mirza not scientists. Mirza believed earth was static not Scientists.

I challenge Qadianis around the world to produce authenticated findings from any experiment done by the scientists which says that Earth is static. Any quote from any credible scientists from the history to state that Earth is static.

If you fail to provide any evidence then the implications rightly are it is the idea of Mirza that earth is static.

I hope clever Qadianis now can understand my argument. Or they have the choice to produce the evidence. Any takers?

Wow what a masterpiece of reasoning…

If he said that 'earlier physicists [or people having knowledge of physical sciences of certain time.] thought that ‘Earth is stationary’. How does that become his own belief? What a dimwit…

He(as) was saying that
the knowledge we get from Allah is always true but this is not the case with sciences. If a certain principle/law [provided by the scientists] is accepted today, doesn’t mean that it will not change with further research. So we shouldn’t take sciences of certain era as perfect and treat them as word of Allah.
Human knowledge is limited and humans may not be able to fully understand the true science/reasoning behind everything in the universe.

and why he said that. he said:

It is not wise to reject miracles just on this basis that ‘We haven’t seen such a thing ever happening before’.

i.e.,

**It is not wise to make contemporary scientific laws or ideas as standard for understanding the nature of miracles. Humans may not fathom the actual functioning /reasoning /knowledge of all the things in nature.
**

Aristotle, Plato and most physicists[theorists or otherwise] before Copernicus believed that Earth is at the center of universe and is stationary.
Did he(as) mention laboratory experiments? You had enough of twisting turnings and deceiving . Stop it now.

Aristotle
Read this article. Aristotle did experiments/observations fit for his time to prove his point.

My ‘Sarkari’ and ‘ghair Sarkari’ muslim brothers and sisters! try reading that passage yourself and let me know what did you understand?

Here is the link
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/religion-scripture/358335-need-some-information-4-ahmedies.html#14

Mr. KCChugtai, any comments for the proofs of 90 years life of Jesus AS in Kashmir from the Holy Quran?

Let Jesus (as) rest in peace for a while.