Re: My HAIRY child
I wanted to write A LOT more in my first post, but had to attend to some urgent matter....
Guys, i can take a laugh and joke, and i don't know if it's cos i've got a bun in the oven that my emotions are magnified x100 but i'm seriously surprised, saddened, disgusted and horrified by some of the responses here... i think it's pretty barbaric that some people are removing hair off children... at such a young age, and with such extreme measure such as waxing!
I've honestly never heard of this atta besan whatever method... i even asked my mum during our normal daily call... even she hasn't heard of it...
Firstly, the excess hair in young children, like i said before, is due to a normal bodily protection mechanism...this is called Lanugo hair. It grows for the purpose of insulation for your baby. The reason why i said models have excess hair also, is because when you are in starvation mode, the body automatically tries to protect itself by making up for the fat and insulation lost, thus Lanugo hair is triggered. Now i understand that some people think that rubbing the hair will make it fall out quicker, but i think it's wholly unecessary.
Secondly, NJ, i understand that your child is 3 years of age. This is still very young, and the excess hair could indeed be due to Lanugo hair still being active. I've known of cases where a 5 year old still has Lanugo hair, so please wait before executing one of these drastic desi totkay.
Thirdly, you say it's primarily on her back. This makes me think that it either is indeed Lanugo, or the unfortunate south asian excess hair gene.
I was going to say it may be some form of hypertrichocis, but as it's just on the back, i really want to reiterate to not do anything with the hair on her back, and wait to see if nature takes it course.
I can see i'm heavily outnumbered, but i had to give my two pence worth, else i would've been disgusted with myself. :)