Mutawatir Ahadith superceding Holy Quran's Ayats

Re: Mutawatir Ahadith superceding Holy Quran's Ayats

My point is, it's yours and not extracted from any Quranic principle or otherwise. That's fair enough, but besides the point.

[quote]

i only say , look towards Quran and hadees with one point of view
either it should be secular or believers
not separate

[/quote]

No, the Quran is divine, the Hadith were recorded by scholars. The Hadtih, the concept of four schools, and so on...these are wonderful innovations...but secondary to the faith.

The idea that we rely on the Hadith (note the capital...when we speak of Hadith we're talking about a very specific body of work) for any fundemental aspect of our faith is a bit misleading, as they would have been transmitted anyhow. It's silly to think that no one in the early days knew how to pray until the Hadith were compiled. And it's silly to think that had the Hadith not been compiled, we wouldn't know. There are many aspects of Islam, in fact the most important, that are "live" aspects, and had been continuously practiced since day one.

[quote]

wrong, from the time of Hazoor PBUH
and he gave premission to write his words to many sahaba

[/quote]

Permission is not the same as ordering scribes to record his every word. As I said, it was a good practice, but hardly on par with the memorization and collection of the Quran.

[quote]

compilation of hadees is different then what ahadees is
[/quot]

In the end, we have what we have. It was a "best effort" attempt. Not so with the Quran. We have it, and it's complete.

[quote]

sorry you forgot , the isnad for Quran is being motawatir , told to many by Hazoor PBUH

[/quote]

No, that's not the point of isnad. The Point of Isnad is to establish a reliable chain of transmitters. As I said, the Quran was compiled during the life of the Prophet, and collected into a book form by Abu Bakr. No Isnad was needed. There is no place where we can 'verify' each ayat as reliably transmitted by so-and-so. There were enough people around to not require that, not to mention the fact that it was written down.

The rest of your argument relies on people rejecting the Sunnah. Most here don't. Nowhere does it imply that what we managed to collect is as divine as the Quran itself.

The collection of the Hadith was done by the whim of latter day scholars. It was never ordered as an important aspect of the faith in the early days. An important body of work, but it's not even close to the Quran.