It is surprising that we have two threads on same topic and Mods did not join them together. :). Anyhow:
… Yar, dil aur demag per say ‘tasub aur nafrat’ ka niqab utthao bhai phir aqal bhie achchi tarah kaam karay gee. 
… Actually I read the news you posted … and because of that news I promoted Mustafa Kamal from position 2 to position 1, as that is what the news you posted says. :). Please read below.
#46](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/6139640-post46.html) (permalink
Anyhow, to make your life easy and make you understand better, I am putting few easy questions. Once you will go through the questions and would answer them, you will know that what I wrote is true, that is, Mustafa Kamal was ranked No. 1 ‘Mayor of present time’ by FP without even declaring that … as calling him ‘Mayor of the moment’ is same as calling him ‘Best Mayor of present time’.
Question one: Out of 60 Mayors representing 60 cities, did magazine ‘Foreign Policy’ chose some better than others by declaring them ‘Mayors of the moment’?
If your answer is ‘No’ than you are fine, but if your answer is ‘Yes’ than obviously those who were chosen as ‘Mayors of the moment’ are above in rank to those who were not chosen as ‘Mayors of the moment’. Now, if your answer is yes, please answer next question.
Question two: Did magazine ‘Foreign Policy’ chose Mustafa kamal as amongst ‘Mayors of the moment’ or not?
If your answer is ‘No’ than you are fine as Mustafa Kamal is out of ranking list, but if your answer is ‘Yes’ than please answer next question.:
Question three: Did magazine ‘Foreign Policy’ gave ranks to those exceptional Mayors they chose as ‘Mayors of the moment’?
If your answer is ‘Yes’ than rank of Mustafa Kamal is what FP gave to him amongst ‘Mayors of the moment’. As for those who are not chosen as ‘Mayors of the moment’ stands below chosen ones in ranking. Anyhow, if ‘Mayors of the moment’ are not ranked as the clarification of ‘FP’ says, than obviously all who are chosen as ‘Mayors of the moment’ stand equal in ranking with each other, and share the rank of ‘No 1’ above other Mayors who were not chosen as ‘Mayors of the moment’.
Since your referred news says that 3 out of 60 were chosen as ‘Mayors of the moment’ and there was no ranking between these three, than all these 3 stand equal at ‘best Mayors of the time’ and ranked as No 1.
I hope that you would be able to understand this simple fact, but if not, please let me know ‘why?’. 
Example: Just imagine that after going through posts of all members, management of ‘Gup Shup’ declares that ‘members of the moment’ are A, B, and C. Obviously, management in this way would not be ranking the members, but indirectly they would be, and by declaring some members as ‘members of the moment’ they would be making them ranked above other members.