Achcha
… Yazdi Bhai jaan … Is it you writing or your nasha built on chamak from Nawaz? ![]()
Reading your post, it seems that either you are supplier of weed or wrote high on Gaanjja. Lagta hay aap nay Lahori daru peena shrou kar diay hay ![]()
As for English, obviously I do not write in English people of Lahori Peela school use, so it is not my fault what you understand out of what I write. Aap kay liya tou woh English chahyia jo Ganja Nawaz, ishaq Dagga, yea Ahsan Thugga use karta hay … no problem.![]()
As for ranking, I am sure that they have never taught such subject in Lahori Peela School, so you would not understand. Obviously, you do not need any teaching as it needs lot of brain cell to understand things. But then, since you showed ignorance of ranking method and that is obvious from your standard of education, I am explaining here for those who may have similar misunderstanding and may be surprised why I put rank of Mustafa kamal from that magazine as No 1. (I am sorry that I do not know English taught in Lahori Peela School, so you and most from ‘Lahore Peela School’ may not understand what I am writing :))
When 3 out of 60 are chosen as best without particular ranking for any of them, than all 3 are equal and takes the rank of No 1. If ranking is done than also top 3 with equal ranking would be considered as No 1 and next would take the ranking of No 4. As the magazine claimed that they did not ranked any mayor, still they chose 3 as ‘Mayors of the moment’ who obviously stand above others as far as magazine is concerned, then when we talk about ranking of mayors, all 3 would be considered as No 1. Since Magazine considered Mustafa Kamal as amongst those 3 ‘Mayors of the moment’ without ranking, Mustafa Kamal rank amongst 60 Mayors would be No. 1 (shared by other 2).