Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
You are such a sensationalist drama queen :queen:
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=187286
I don’t know about you, but sounds like a condemnation to me.
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
MQ:
I'll make you a deal. The next time some terrorists say "in the name of the father, son and holy ghost, we announce the judgment of God" and then behead some unfortunate person, I'll refer to the perpetrators as Christian terrorists. Does that make you happy?
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
^ you forgot the disclaimer attached. try again..
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
No no no it will NOT. See how typical of you to make a joke out of it. Im not laughing. I know these idiots use religion. But thats just it. They use it. So why dont people see that? People arent that stupid are they?
Plus I wouldnt make a deal with you if my life depended on it.
Maddy – aww thank you. 
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
How quaint. And when the Americans and British bomb the crap out of Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s done in the name of freedom, democracy, and all that stuff. So, is that “demorcratic” terrorism?
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
So…you will now start calling Americans freedom-terrorists?
Or does bombing civilians not count?
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
The disclaimer didn’t make it any less unconditional.
She condemned the attack and added that to prevent more attacks, the issues that drive men to these kind of evil acts should be addressed.
She did not say that if only the underlying issues did not occur, then she would condemn the acts.
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
We muslims hereby UNCONDITIONALLY condemn these atrocities.
AND the atrocities commited by the US and Britain 
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
^ chanda if you want to make that argument, then the diference is painfully obvious. Even in Iraq. US and British when they go to afghan and iraq go out of their way to not harm civilians, infact most countries in armed conflicts go out of their way to not harm civilians. But apparently the ISLAMIC TERRORISTS have a deal with GOD that they must target civilians.
When innocents are killed no one rejoices in America. When WTC towers came down, there were street parties in the muslim world. Learn the differece
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
MQ likes attention, she probably doesnt actually have an opinion. Things that have happened are so much more on a grander scale and matter eons more than the screeching ramblings of a teachers assistant in some cannuck town. Why do you people bother?
Your intelligence is on a par to hers as you always fall for it. Unless you enjoy it, which is stupid - as its hardly a brain tingling debate.
Mq, we have established by your past ramblings that you are not above lying for attention, but some things are scared. Reply as you will, Im off to see my father whos just come home.
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
Maddy, you should have quoted the whole post by her. Here is what she followed the above with;
"I agree with maddy and Kaleem. As Muslims we are against taking lives of innocents. We are against such horrific killings.
**However, there is always something that sets them off. **In order to prevent such in the future, what people need to do is think about why it happened and what can be changed to stop such things in the future."
THAT TO ME IS NOT UNCONDITIONAL
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
There was an article in the Economist magazine a couple of months ago that would question that. The journalist strongly implied that US soldiers would not hesitate to kill civilians rather than run the risk of injury.
An example of the point: The journalist reported that it was known that Iraqi insurgents use cell phones to detonate IEDs. He interviewed a US soldier who admitted that whever one IED would go off, soldiers would look around and shoot anyone in the vicinity holding a cell phone. The soldier admitted that they had probably killed a lot of innocent people that way.
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
What is the condition to the condemnation? As I said, her saying that it was wrong is NOT conditional upon anything else.
She doesn’t say that it would be wrong if it were not a reaction to something else.
She says that it is wrong AND it is a reaction to something else.
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
I get enough attention from where I want it and you and matsui are the last people I need it from. I am flattered - no really I am - but no thanks.
Matsui – save me the trouble and give hiccup some attention. She is feeling left out.
maddy – Just leave it. Who cares what he thinks or wants to think.
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
hiccup wrapped it up pretty nicely. why do people even bother arguing with MQ? even dogs stop chasing their tails in circles after a while.
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
What’s the matter? Lost the argument?
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
If I have to repeat myself twice without getting through to YOU, then I rather have you drink listerine.
Re: “Muslim Terrorists”
MQ has her point of view and we can all agree to disagree to it or vice versa, no need to get ugly about it.
Peace 
Have an anda
Re: "Muslim Terrorists"
Hiccy, I grew up playing basketball. When I used to play in the local park with the brothers, you had to bring the A game, when I played with the guys in the church league, you could mail it in. I consider these interactions with MQ, the latter.