Re: Muslim Blood - Cheap Commodity by Yvonne Ridley
Sorry, Ali_R, but you think **those hadith are authentic and authoritative and you **think they should be regarded as almost as importantly as the Quran itself. Nobody can say they absolutely "know" those things are true. Only Muslim tradtion, history and culture makes you think you do. Sorry, but a collection of traditions put together 200 years after the death of Muhammed doesn't qualify as known fact.
Seminole, If you think logically you will see that almost nothing (historically speaking) had proofs except those many even we know as history Itself (another collection of sayings and words of those who lived at that time). I had backed the authenticy of S. Bukhari, I did It on purpose to let you know that not every HADITH is as authentic as the Hadith collection of S. Bukhari.
However If you speak on such proves....where is the proof on +5 million jews have been brutally murdered by Nazi's at WWII. Besides some collections of jewish authors claiming these facts to be true. (Not arguing on either I myself do believe in it or not. So refrain from this topic please!).
Back to the main topic Itself. Something you failed to learn is that Religion needs a belief(er).
If one doest then even religious historic events seem to him/her as fiction and fanstasies of mullahs, sufis and prophets regardless of many facts and figures mentioned by them. Since many go by the words of "Seeing is believing..." and I believe you to consider yourself to be one of them.
Thus I would take my claim over S. Bukharis Hadiths to be fool-proof very serious.
And next time before discussing with me you rather differ between the truth you know and reject and the lies you accept and publish here to prove your point.