Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

The illegal dictator was the worse thing which happened to Pakistan perhaps even worse than Ziaulhaq.

As a dictator cannot see an inch beyond his survival, he always considered Taliban as his insurance to stay in power. He did not want to miss an opportunity to become a global player in Afghan war and when Taliban regime ended in Afghanistan he allowed these talibans to settle and prosper in our nothern areas.

After the collapse of taliban government in Afghanistan, he rigged 2002 elections to bring MMA to power in NWFP. He flirted with all sort of jihadis from other areas in Pakistan like Lashkaretayyaba famed Masood Azhar and gave them protection all through his tenure.

This disgusting illegal dictator should be brought to justice for all the crimes he has done against Pakistan…

DAWN.COM | Pakistan | Talibanisation & Musharraf

Talibanisation & Musharraf By Shehryar Mazari
Wednesday, 06 May, 2009 | 09:56 AM PST | The Taliban crisis is a direct result of Pervez Musharraf’s rule. While most people rightly blame Ziaul Haq for the rise of religious extremism in Pakistan, Musharraf’s role in bringing about Talibanisation in the country has been greatly overlooked.

Three decades ago Zia Haq chose the Hezb-i-Islami leader, Gulbadin Hikmatyar, as his favoured successor to Soviet rule in Afghanistan. After Zia’s death, the security establishment disenchanted with Hikmatyar’s lack of success replaced him in 1994 with the recently discovered Taliban. The Taliban’s seizure of Kabul in 1996 provided a boost for Pakistan’s security establishment. It provided Pakistan a foothold in Afghanistan and much-desired strategic regional depth to counter India.

Following the 9/11 attack in the US by Al Qaeda which was being sheltered by the Taliban Musharraf was forced to disown the Taliban regime. However, within days he announced on TV ‘I have done everything for the … Taliban when the whole world was against them….We are trying our best to come out of this critical situation without any damage to Afghanistan and the Taliban.’

Shortly afterwards, when the Taliban were ousted by the US-led invasion, Musharraf allowed tens of thousands of Taliban to enter Pakistan’s tribal belt, believing that opposing them would sideline Pakistan from the regional power game in Afghanistan. What was not revealed then was that a large number of Al Qaeda militants had used this opportunity to stealthily move into Pakistan as well. However, fearing direct US intervention, Musharraf vocally denied their existence within Pakistan.

Perhaps he imagined that the extremists would remain quiescent in Pakistan’s mountainous borderlands, but this was not to be.** The military dictator’s personal agenda soon came in the way: Having flouted the constitution by coup d’état, Musharraf, like previous military dictators, became desperate for legal protection. This legal cover could only be provided by a compliant parliament.

Misusing his powers as army chief, Musharraf used his agencies to ensure that the 2002 election was rigged in Sindh and Punjab against the PPP and PML-N. This led to a rise of a motley bunch of politicians under the façade of the PML-Q. However, real damage was done in the NWFP and Balochistan, where the security agencies ensured the success of the religio-political alliance of the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal. As part of an understanding, Fazlur Rehman ensured that the MMA’s newly elected members of parliament united with the PML-Q to pass the 17th Amendment, legitimising all Musharraf’s unconstitutional acts.**

Perceiving the two popular political parties — the PPP and PML-N — as a threat to his power, Musharraf became an inadvertent hostage to the MMA’s blackmailing. His backtracking in 2006 on repealing the Hudood Ordinances was just one example. The seats MMA ‘won’ in the National Assembly gave it serious clout in national affairs. Worse was that it also dominated the NWFP and Balochistan governments. The MMA government of NWFP moved quickly to impose a Taliban-like agenda. In a short space of time, the MMA produced a fertile environment for the spread of religious militancy throughout the NWFP and parts of Balochistan.

While the Taliban were perceived as essential to future Afghan policy, similar leniency was also applied to militant groups habitually infiltrating the Kashmir ceasefire line. The post-9/11 international crackdown on terrorism had given Musharraf much cause for worry. Initially he went on the offensive, proclaiming these militants valiant freedom fighters — in other words ‘good jihadists’ vs Al Qaeda, the ‘bad jihadists’.

However, the international pressure became too much to bear. Consequently, many of these groups were officially banned by Islamabad, and thus were forced to go underground and operate under different names. It became a game of smoke and mirrors.** Every now and then a militant leader would be placed under house arrest and then released a few days later. Militant groups would be officially condemned on television while their workers continued to collect donations under different guises.** While the Musharraf regime kept up appearances with the West, it felt impelled to maintain a working relationship with the MMA for its political survival. It also continued its linkages with the numerous politico-religious militant groupings in pursuit of its strategy for Afghanistan and India.

The MMA’s policy of providing succour to religious militancy, combined with Musharraf’s strategy of benign indifference, at best, towards the Taliban and Kashmiri militants, led to a perfect jihadi storm. Provided freedom, the militant groups gained momentum and developed linkages with each other and in some cases with Al Qaeda itself.

Soon the Taliban, with its new allies, spread its tentacles from Waziristan to the rest of Fata and later to Swat and beyond. Moreover, some of the militant groupings active in Kashmir had by now joined up with these transnational jihadist forces. Talibanisation had begun in earnest.

The Taliban crisis is a direct result of Musharraf’s legacy. For self-preservation he deliberately weakened the secular political structure, replacing it with a political environment which proved extremely conducive for religio-political militant groups that now threaten the existence of Jinnah’s Pakistan — ironically created as a refuge for the subcontinent’s Muslims.

It is time for a rethink. In this post-Musharraf scenario one can appreciate our security establishment’s preoccupation with external threats; that is their job after all. Nonetheless, why relentlessly pursue a policy to defend Pakistan externally which may, in itself, ultimately lead to the country’s destruction from within? Yes, hostility from neighbouring countries is a disturbing reality. But need we continue with a bungled policy which has led to destruction from within and failure without; Afghanistan remains a troubled dream and Kashmir a hopeless mirage.

It is time for an open discourse between parliamentary leaders and the security establishment to find a better solution to our problems. The protection of Pakistan’s river resources from encroachment is of vital importance; the survival of millions depends upon these rivers. However, this begs the question: if Pakistan disappears under the onslaught of religiosity, what use will all this water be? So, no matter how serious the water issue may be, it should, along with Kashmir, yield to a more pressing concern.

Obviously today’s most burning issue is the Talibanisation of large swathes of our country from where it appears to be spreading day by day, night by night. There is little point in berating the culprit. Recently in a foreign interview Musharraf offered his presidential services to save Pakistan from ‘self-destruction’. He is obviously delusional.

And the solution? All civil society can do is raise its voice as loudly as possible; the best the parliamentarians can do is pass sensible legislation; and the best the government can do is issue prudent instructions (which may or may not be obeyed). In the end, the answer can only lie with the army. Let us hope it now fulfills its primary responsibility to the people of Pakistan.

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

MUSH WAS THE WORST THING THAT EVER HAPPENED TO PAKISTAN

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

Now I would pay money to see his apologists (mushtards) come up with the funniest excuses.

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

The illegal dictator was the worse thing which happened to Pakistan perhaps even worse than Ziaulhaq.

Soooooooooo true.

And the worse thing he did was the Lal Mosque operation.

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

I see this thread has been conveniently ignored :)

Now my beef is the people who supported him so blindly, many of them just based on his ethnicity and support for their favorite party are now asking us to stand up against the tali-buns, a menace that their own hero nurtured and created. Maybe if these people start condemning him for what he did, then others will take them seriously and follow heed.

Let me Laugh my ass off, any person who have little knowledge of how Afghan war was funded, how Taliban’s were created. How Kashmir Jihad was funded, how local religious groups were funded & equipped with weapons. What is Jihad Council.. and else.. will only laugh on it.

According to author all the Taliban’s came from Afghanistan ..:rotfl:: .. keep sticking your head under the sand !

At first Zia-ul-Haq let them in Pakistan then Musharraf saved them by not attacking.Idiot generals of Pakistan.Look what is happening to country.

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

This is the problem with dictatorships. People who ever supported Musharraf need to realise that because they dont have popular support, they need to engineer support from abroad.

I firmly believe that Musharraf allowed the problem to fester and acted half heartedly against the Taleban primarily because his support base needed to be shown how valuable he was. Similarly the Lal Masjid was allowed to grow to crisis proportions before action was taken.

Let us hope that our army now counters this menace once and for all, and stops the geo-political gamesmanship we undertake at the cost of our own civilians.

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

so yeah mush was the worst that happened to pakistan.. but have you guys ever stopped and thought what the heck are we doing now? we love living in past and not present.

i hate mush as much as i hated zia .. i hate zardari as much as i hate altaf, nawaz ..

but the reality of the day is that we have a problem in our hands and we now don't have mush, so stop living in the past and please get our heads together to figure out a solution. Blame game can only go so far..

I regard Musharraf 2nd to Ziaul Haq. All this problem’s root-cause is Ziaul Haq. Zia’s biggest blunder was to open flood-gates for Afghan refugees who merged in Pakistani population, very small number of them were kept in refugee camps only perhaps the poorest of them. Then next biggest blunder was to indoctrinate whole nation of supporting “jihad”, used Saudi money to open flood-gates for uncontrolled madrassahs who mostly teach Wahabi-style extremism.

We all know there are different gangs of militants, one is TTP which is mostly Pakistani, then we have some Afghani Talibans who have assimilated into groups like TNSM or other militant groups.

Its not about living in past, its about correcting our mistakes, we need to punish people who do wrong. Zia is dead we can’t punish him but Musharraf is alive who should be punished and made an example out of him.

Our heads together does no good, we had our heads together for the last decade too, and the guy still made a kabariya out of the country. Furthermore, these days Zardari is on a good leash, following the massive success of the long march, rising popularity of pmln and kiyani's danda. Now if we make an example out of musharraf, by either hanging him or exiling him, zardari would become Mr. -100%.

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

Looks like some of you were born in 1999 and don't remember anything before that.

and they know so much about Zia? wow.

and what is the best thing that has ever happened to Pakistan?

Taliban?

How can one entity be used for both best and worst? :hehe:

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

musharraf worse than zia ul haq? why i totally agree with you! :k:

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

^^ how exactly is musharraf worse than zia?

I think Musharraf was the best leader Pakistan had since Jinnah

Re: Musharraf was responsible for rise of Taliban in Pakistan

So Musharraf’s orders to fight extremists in North and South Waziristan was nothing more than makhian-maaring and taalian-bhajaa-ing?

I’m sure the Pakistani soldiers in N and S Waziristan churian pehnay huay thay…

:rolleyes:

Musharraf fought pretty well ag/Extremists. I’m only sorry he did not level Lal Masjid to the ground and have every inhabitant either hospitalized with an inpatient psychiatrist, or placed into life-long jail for sheer stupidity.

There you go, this is why your posts seem meaningless. You are no different from those who glorify leaders like Altaf bhai on ethnic lines. You think Musharraf was the charismatic scotch drinking liberal that fought the taliban. Sorry sis, but thats not the case. Read a little more as to how he screwed up the whole situation when he brought in the MMA to legalize his illegit and unconstitutional moves. p.s. you might want to read as to why musharraf was ‘trashed’ by the white house and what they think about the deals he used to make with the exteremists because I feel you really need to catch up.

and i think i am the queen of england. rationaly i cannot debate with your thoughts.