Re: Musharraf returns
Next martial law will result in no more Pakistan on the map of the world.
Actually, it is other way round. Pakistan would break up not due to military rule (where most benefit), but because of political rule, as people are suffering and country is going down the drain in every way, creating feelings that in such country where corruption, nepotism and mismanagement is rife, why one stay united.
One can imagine that whenever Pakistanis get into trouble, be they in Baluchistan, Sindh, Punjab, KPK, or Kashmir, they look towards military to give them relief, and no one even trust those politicians who they themselves voted …
In this election, EC decided to introduce a box so that people can vote that they do not want to approve any politician contesting election, but politician protested, as they know that this box would win in every constituency, and politician mandate would become joke, hence box got removed.
I bet if there would be a box on ballet paper asking people to vote military rule (as a candidate) then military would win most Pakistani constituencies.
Just imagine … Pakistan is a country where Prime Minister (Gillani) makes statement that if Pakistanis want to live in Pakistan then bear whatever corruption, nepotism and mismanagement political government do, else leave Pakistan (as if, Pakistan iss kay baap kee jageer hay). Minister makes statement that he also has right to do corruption (Jatoi). Senator makes statement that it is our culture to bury women alive (Zahri). President (Zardari) makes statement that promises are not Quranic words that it should be honoured. Leader of opposition party and prime minister twice (Nawaz Shreef) blatantly lies that he did not made any agreement and when agreement comes out he says that it was for five year, than later admits that he made 10 years agreement (actually, for him also agreements are not Quranic verses that it could not be violated, as practically he violated the agreement he made) … and so on. ... Are they politician who could command respect? ... No, these thugs are all jokers and Pakistanis are idiots to get con by jokers.
Anyhow, as the system is in Pakistan, where there is no security and character check for politicians and once in power no one can do anything to them (other than army), martial law is certainty.
Politicians avoid martial law in other countries not because army are law abiding, but because security system and check-balance on corruption is very strong in these countries, where a lowest level police officer (Tulla, aikkani, or chawanni in Pakistani terminology) can arrest even Prime Minister if Prime Minister is guilty of any crime, corruption or misbehaviour.
In such countries, politicians rule not because constitution dictates, but because of their high moral ground that demands respect and other powers in country could not throw them out of power easily … even army of these countries have respect of the politician because of moral high standing of politician in power and army (as well as other citizen) trusts that if politicians would try to do corruption, nepotism, or harm the country than civil force implementing law would get them (book them), persecute them, and put them in jail … but that is not the case in Pakistan, as in Pakistan, politician consider that it is their right to do whatever they like (corruption, nepotism, mismanagement, or whatever) and prime minister, chief minister or even lower level minister can sack any government servant as he likes without any cause, reason or going through procedure. Such can only happen in monarchy, and it could never happen in democracy, as in democracy no politician in power can sack any government servant, rather there is system and procedure, and sacking of any person can only happen with cause and after going through the system and procedure (without any biases or personal reasons).