Musharraf admits Kashmir militants trained in Pakistan

[Sa1eem]

Re: Musharraf admits Kashmir militants trained in Pakistan

@kakaballi

^ I did. Yes, I am serious.

What are/were we training militants for? Politics 101?

Ok… let me try to answer what you wrote (as what I understand).

^ What are militants doing there? using ‘love’ to gain control over Kashmir? Why are we supporting militancy beyond our own borders?

Who says that Pakistan is supporting militancy beyond own border? Anyhow, if Pakistan does that then Pakistan would be wrong.

[Supporting militancy in kashmir is not supporting militancy beyond our border. Kashmir is disputed territory and Pakistan has claim over it. Until that dispute is not resolved, Kashmir for Pakistan would fall within Pakistani border, though occupied by foreign forces]

If this is all true, then Pakistan has a right to support Taliban to gain control over Kashmir because they have a claim over the country. India has a right to support BLA because they have a right to fight for freedom from Pakistan?

What Taliban has to do with Pakistan or Kashmir?
[Actually, these thugs are fighting Pakistan to impose their devilish believes over Pakistan and Pakistanis are defending themselves from these thugs militarily and intellectually].

What India has to do with BLA?
Does India claims Baluchistan is disputed territory and they have right over Baluchistan, so they have right to support BLA?

Were there any justifiable reasons for India to support Mukti Bahini?

Obviously there was no justifiable reason for India to support Mukhti Bahini. Pakistan always considered that as Indian interference in Pakistani affairs.

Anyhow, Indian justified their interference in East Pakistan on world forums by saying that over 10 million BDs were pushed into India due to Pakistani oppression in East Pakistan, that was putting burden on India and gave them moral right to interfere.

I am just saying that what he said was right but what we are doing is wrong. Military solutions to political problems have always brought devastation to Pakistan… 1971, Kargil, Taliban, Baluchistan, MQM, Tribal areas…

Why what we are doing is wrong? Kashmir is disputed territory. Pakistan has claim over Kashmir. India is occupying Kashmir using force. Pakistan has to support Kashmiris to fight Indians in every ways, not just for Kasmiries but also because Kashmir is disputed territory and Pakistan has claim.

India occupied Siachen across ‘line of control’ in 80s same way Pakistan occupied Kargil across ‘line of control’ in 90s. No difference. If India can justify their occupation then Pakistan could have done that too. Only difference is that, Indian politicians fought their case properly on international forum but Pakistani politicians put down their shalwar on international forum. At least idiot Nawaz could have told Clinton that Pakistan would pull out of Kargil if India pulls out of Siachen, but no, when Clinton shouted at him, he has to start p*ssing and wetting his Shalwar.

If you are politically weak, have no say in international affairs, you do not go and try spreading violence. That’s what Taliban do. You make yourself politically stronger, build moral grounds, be economically influential and world would listen to you.

Pakistan is not spreading violence in Kashmir, Pakistan is only supporting Kashmiris fight for their right, not because Pakistan does that as routine, but because Kashmir is disputed territory and Pakistan is part of that dispute.