More barbarity from the Israelis

Yes i know u have hamid ansari
manmohan singh
and that italia gori whom u like to worship only because she is gori white chick
suppose she was bangladeshi or even Indian she would have never be allowed to do what she is doing, its got to do with inferiority complex.

So all those PUPPIES you have mentioned do not impress me mate because they do not have any power its only symbolic, only to fool the minorities.

if you wanna listen to the minorities then FIX the Kashmiri problem u do not listen to them what are u talking about miniorities mate.

Re: More barbarity from the Israelis

are hindus really intollerant.....

muslim mosque in delhi start azan at 4.45 in the morning on louspeakers...(loudspeaker are banned from 10PM till 6 AM)

muslims occupy main roads to offer friday namaz at many places in new delhi and create a mess...

Re: More barbarity from the Israelis

Babri Masjid was burned down.
Gujrat Massacres.

Saudis are only ppls on earth who seem to have some respect about Islamic principals. Rest (Majority of them not all) are just bunch of munafiqeen who would swear about Islam, but they shy away from Implementing shariyah, coz of its rigorous rulings. And the ahadith they posted suggest to destroy all idols, and idols were generally meant to worship. What happened to idolators/mushrikeen after the holy prophet conquered Mecca? Did he allow them to continue with their idol worship or broken all their idols?

[QUOTE]
The hadith you posted does not give out any ruling and especially when there are incidents when Umar ibn Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), when a Muslim from the Bakr tribe killed a Christian of Hira, his verdict was that the killer be handed over to the heir of the deceased who could either accept blood money or kill him. The heir decided to take his revenge and the Muslim was killed.

And when a similar incident happened in the time of Umar ibn Abdul Aziz, the fate of the killer was the same. The unequivocal legal Islamic verdict was that the life of a Dhimmi was equal to the life of a Muslim and so was his blood money.Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him) spelled out this principle: Whoever has accepted our protection (*Dhimmi) his blood is like our blood and his blood money is like our blood money.”* This was not a sound byte meant for the media. It was the law of the land.

[/QUOTE]

Plz make it habit to give reference when U are engaged in debates on sensitive issues like this one, just a brotherly piece of advice to U.

Perhaps following ahadith will convince U about Islamic ruling on apostasy.

[QUOTE]

Volume 9, Book 84, Number 64: Sahin Bukhari
Narrated 'Ali:
Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah's Apostle, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky than ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith) then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy). No doubt I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection."

[/QUOTE]

Perhaps those bloody killers known as Talibaan are ensuring their reward taking lessons from this Sahih Bukhari. They claim that they are killing the infidels only,dont they???

[QUOTE]

Volume 9, Book 92, Number 388: Sahih Bukhari
Narrated Abu Huraira: When Allah's Apostle died and Abu Bakr was elected as a Caliph after him, some of the Arabs reverted to disbelief, 'Umar said to Abu Bakr, "How dare you fight the people while Allah's Apostle said, I have been ordered to fight the people till they say 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah' And whoever says: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' waves his wealth and his life from me unless he deserves a legal punishment lusty, and his account will be with Allah! Abu Bakr said, "By Allah, I will fight him who discriminates between Zakat and prayers, for Zakat is the Compulsory right to be taken from the wealth By Allah, if they refuse to give me even a tying rope which they use to give to Allah's Apostle, I would fight them for withholding it." 'Umar said, 'By Allah, It was nothing, except I saw that Allah had opened the chest of Abu Bakr to the fight, and I came to know for certain that was the truth."

[/QUOTE]

Further U wrote.

[QUOTE]

There's no ayah in Quran that states the worldly punishment for apostates but there are more than few verses that talk about the grand punishment for a muslim who changes his religion.

Ahadith give the details of punishment for an apostate only if he leaves the muslim community and wages war against them.

The blood of a Muslim who testifies that there is no god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah is not lawful to shed unless he be one of three: a married person who commits adultery, in which case he is to be stoned to death; or someone who goes out waging war against Allah and His Messenger, in which case he is to be killed, crucified, or expelled from the land; or someone who killed another, in which case he is to be killed in retaliation. (Abu Dawud and `A'ishah)

[/QUOTE]

I agree there is no ayah in holy quran which talks of punishment to apostates, but still there is one which suggest the punishment for a hypocrite who turn renegade, care to explain this one Sister??

[QUOTE]

4:88 (Y. Ali) Why should ye be divided into two parties about the Hypocrites? Allah hath upset them for their (evil) deeds. Would ye guide those whom Allah hath thrown out of the Way? For those whom Allah hath thrown out of the Way, never shalt thou find the Way.

4:89 (Y. Ali) They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks

[/QUOTE]
.

What I understand from those two ayahs, ALLAH is telling the believers that hypocrites cant be guided coz ALLAH himself had made the hypocrites go astray, but in next verse ALLAH is ordering that they should be killed if they turn apostates.

Will U kindly tell me that why the above quoted verse should not be taken as ALLAH's clear cut commands to kill apostates?

And permit me to tell U that the hadith U have quoted without any number means noting in this debate, and secondly its not at all more reliable than Sahih Bukhari when its contradicting it.

[QUOTE]

There is no Shariah in Saudi. The SAudi rulers are secularists who have separated the sacred law from state affairs and they carry out strict punishments for common people just to control them.

Saudi is no different than other muslim states, infact they are worse than others.

Western countries are more suitable for Shariah than muslim countries because West has already adopted half of Islamic Law.

[/QUOTE]

There is Shariyah in Saudi only, U can spread lies about them coz U possibly dont like their rigorous shariyah.

And will U kindly let me know how the country U are living in has adopted Islamic laws? I take this just like another excuse muslims over the world give about not living under Shariyah, the ultimate laws of ALLAH.

Peace to U.

I think that U should not forget ur Tahzeeb and show some Adaab while discussing. The words U have used for Smt. Sonia Gandhi are unbecoming for a Muslim. And I hope U are one.

We have given similar respect to Smt. Indra Gandhi too and she was an Indian. Smt Sonia Gandhi is an Indian too. So plz correct urself if U feel so.

Im sure that next time U will post, U will learn to behave properly.

Yes these two shameful incidents did happen in India. Babri Masjid was not burned down but was demolished by religious fanatics. Its a blot on our face and we accept it.

Meri jaaaan don't worry :)

Of course comming from your beloved neighboring countrymen you do not take it i don't blame you for that. Anything comming from neighboring country disgust you even when its true.

New Delhi, May 12: In a huge blow to xenophobia the world over, recent years have seen emerge in the US, UK and Canada a rising galaxy of Indian stars on their political horizon - but India is cutting itself in two, riven over the emergence of one foreigner on the national political firmament - Sonia Gandhi.

Rule Sonia! Is India xenophobic?

(Press Trust of India)

In fact, so great was the divide in the country when the Congress party came to power (as part of UPA) that the prospect of Sonia donning the mantle of the Prime Minister of India threatened to unleash a virtual civil war in the country.

Although the fire was being fanned by the 2004 General Election losers Bharatiya Janata Party yet it was also true that both in urban and rural areas common citizens were up in arms over the return of a foreigner into power after the fall of the British Empire here in 1947.

The rift was enough to make Sonia renounce her chance at making history by appointing the ever-popular, though political pygmy, Dr Manmohan Singh as the premier. It took the wind out of the sails of the BJP and other parties. The issue died, or has it?

So chill please!! Face the truth and the facts before blaming your beloved neighbour.

Meri jaan? hmmmmmmm some problems take its own time to recover.

Mere mohtaram bhai aur parosi, in 2004 elections, Smt. Sonia Gandhi was projected the future PM of India and Indians voted for her party. What does that mean? That means that majority of Indians wanted to see her as its PM.

Now what the defeated BJP is yelling is of no use. Losers make noise and U have to adjust with it.

Next time too, in 2009 the Congress fought under leadership of Sonia Gandhi and she won with flying colours.

So I would advise U not to speak language of BJP ppls and call Smt. Sonia Gandhi a foriegner, she is as much Indian as Advani or Sri Hamid Ansari. Hope U got it.

Peace to U.

Yaar these were not my words!! :)
I only wish you were as reasonable and rational thinking when concerning talking about Pakistan then i would be the happiest man lolz

Mere bhai aap bhi galat baat kahne se kabhi perhez nahin karte. Meri sari posts ko filter kijiye aur batayiye ki maine kya unreasonable kaha Pakistan ke liye? Ur time starts now.

islam does not allow construction of mosque at a disputed territory...and destruction of worship places of other faiths....let some muslim correct me!

a mosque at ayodhya was built after destryoing a temple....i think muslims should have corrected this un-islamic historical mistake.

re gujurat..godhra or no godhra...hindus had no right to attack and kill muslims...

though, still i have to meet a muslim who repents for godhra carnage....what these people do is that they show us the bannerjee committee report and have thorougly rejected the nanawati commission report.......

let me pls correct you, that in 2004 general election....sonia gandhi was not projected for pm ship by the congress party.

What? What is that supposed to mean?

If you wanna talk about Islamic verdict, quote the whole chapter from each hadith book about the subject. You cannot quote one hadith to prove your point.

In your head...lol

Yeah whatever.

Re: More barbarity from the Israelis

hareem01, why so obsessed with making Muslims dominant? Are you still interested in subjugating non-Muslims and apostates?

Re: More barbarity from the Israelis

lolz

It's saddening that people support Zionists and their American supporters, even though they openly practice anti-Islam, anti-semitic, apartheid policies.

What's so wrong about it? Why is it pis*ing you off?
Yes, Muslims need to be dominant to kick Islam's enemies out of Islam's holy land.

Many so-called “Christian” countries have very high percentages of atheist populations.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Europe_belief_in_god.svg

Who are these enemies? Non-Muslims in general?

Simple:

'You are either with us (Muslims) or against us (Muslims)'