Peace hareem,
I m not talking of Kaabah but rest of Mecca. And I just noted again the typical muslim view that whole Kaabah changed their faith instantly once the holy prophet entered it. If U can answer my question without any religious bias then plz tell me if this story sounds worth believing??? Can ppls who were so obsessed with idol worshipping till just few days back became muslim overnight? Sounds fishy to me.
Then you should read books on islamic history written by non-biased authors like Karen Armstrong.
LOL, its not me who is taking out any ruling by reading any hadith, rather its those pious jihadis who untill few years back were darling of an entire Nation. But if the hadith is sahih, than no one can stop them to take their ruling out of it, unless one is a kind of muslim who issue fatwa declaring interest given by banks as halal.
No one can stop them but it doesn't mean that knowing that those people have no authority and permission for giving fatwas you still believe them and try to completely ignore the rulings given by the rightous scholars and people with knowledge and authority.
If I want to learn about Christianity I wouldn't go and learn it from the US politicians who ordered the murder of millions of Iraqis and Afghanis.
Similarly, if you are sincere then you should present Islamic rulings from the right authorities. Usama bin Laden or his followers don't have any authority over Islamic Law and they're not qualified to give rulings based on a sahih hadith.
Sahih hadith means that its chain of narration is not broken, that's it.
Not probably,but there are fair chances that they took lessons from Mahabharata. BTW are U aware of the fact that Mahabharat is just an epic and not a sacred religious scripture of hindus? And plz make no mistake about radical muslims taking their lessons from holy quran and sahih ahadith. There is pleanty much in those sacred scriptures which can easily misinterpretated to brainwash any reigious muslim and convince him that ALLAH wants Infidels to be killed. This is happening in Nations where religion has been given too much importance and a way to achieve Jannah.
I can see that you yourself is not ready to accept the true Islamic Laws and keep on insisting that Radicals's interpretations are real and thus Islam is a radical religion.
People who wants to make havoc will do anything and misinterprete anything no matter if they follow a religion or not.
What Jews are doing in Israel is against the teachings of their Scriptures, Christians are told to turn the other cheek but how many Christians are doing that?
And talking about the Secularism, the most terrible wars happened in the era of Secularism. So where do you draw the lines?
Fact is that radicals are exist in every religion, nation and ideology.
Well hareem,I have already written whatever I needed to prove that the lesson of killing innocents comes directly from (Mis)interpretation of holy quran and ahadith. now what is defination of an innocent could differ between a secular and a muslim and further a radical muslim. I m well aware of the fact that almost all educated muslims know this fact, but most of them dont want to talk about it due to their religious compulsions and few who want to talk about it are intimidated by fellow muslims.
No U are wrong, lets examine the verses again.
What I understand from above verses is that ALLAH is telling muslims that HE has made those hypocrites gone astray and in next verse ALLAH says that if they turn renegades/apostates than kill them. Where question of a hypocrite turning apostate arises? he is already non believer.
Well if U consider sunnan Abi Daud more reliable than sahih bukhari than U are entitled for it.
Peace.
First of all, you need to know that there's a principal that if a person leaves God then God leaves him even more.
And hypocrites are not non-believers according to Quran. Quran talks about three types of humans, Believers[mu'mineen], Disbelievers[kuffar] and hypocrites[munafiqeen]. Sometimes non-muslims can be Believers too. Hypocrites are worse than disbelievers according to Islam.
Islamic rulings are not given based on only Sahih Bukhari and sahih Muslim, there are main six books that are considered most important and Sunnan Abi Dawud is one of them.
It's not logical to just read the most harsh incident from Bukhari and make that a law, Shariah is not a simpletons math.