Mirza attacks Prophet ISA AS of the Holy Quran

[submitmj]

@crankthatskunk

Submitmj,

I have listed evidence from the Holy Quran in my article “Mirza a false Prophet”.
Verses 25:50/52 on the topic of “Nazir” or Warner in English, and 3:81 on the oath of the Prophets.

These two verses compliment the verse you quoted. Do you want to debate these two verses with me? Can you justify the claim of Mirza “Duniya me aik Nazir aya” when the Quranic evidence in 25:52/52 is against the claims of Mirza?

What did Mirza meant when he said, “Khuda aus ko Qabool kareega”?

Please explain this and prove that Mirza can be a Nazir first and foremost, against the clear cut decree of Allah SWT in the Holy Quran; Allah SWT will not send any more Warners to the World after Prophet Muhammad SAW.

I’m not sure what you are talking about. What is there to debate. I believe the Mirza IS NOT a prophet because Muhammad was the last prophet. I believe Mirza IS NOT a messenger because he has no proof from GOD.

Perhaps you should read my posting more carefully before jumping to conclusions.