Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

According to Tarikh-nama-Herat of Saif Harvi , in the 13th century, the tract of land from Mastung to Quetta to Duki (Through Sibi) to Rojhun Mazari was an integral part of the history’s first semi-sovereign state of Afghanistan, of which capital was at Mastung. At that time the Afghan tribes Nahars and Kungs or kangs were powerful predatory tribes in the Siwi to Rujhan area because it is stated in the said book the Kurt/Mughal forces attacked these “Afghan thieves” in a place situated 70 Farsakhs (about 20 miles) south of Duki. According to Col.H.S.Jerrets English translation of Ain-i-Akbari Vol.II (page 336) and also according to Cambridge history of India Vol.III (page 503) Rai Sahra of the Afghan clan of Langahs used to rule Siwi immediately before 1440 A.D. In the same year he is stated to have captured multan from his son-in-law Shiekh Yusuf Qureshi. The Shiekh went to Delhi and sought refuge with Sultan Behlol lodhi whereas Rai Sahra assuming the title of Sultan Qutubuddin ruled Multan for the next 16 years until he died in 1456 A.D and was succeeded by his son Sultan Hussain I. This Langah ( Afghan) rule of Siwi in the 15th century is the least known episode although it has the effect of further eroding the authenticity of that part of Baloch epic poetry which assign the same period in the plains of Siwi and Dhadar to its own legendary of the Rind and Lashar tribes.

Towards the end of 15th and in the beginning of 16th century A.D, Siwi fort was ruled by Bahadur Khan of Sindh and then by one sultan Purdil Barlas whose forces were thrown out by the forces of Shah Baig son of Zannun Beg Arghun. In 1543 A.D Siwi fort was visited by the fugitive Mughal King Humayun along with his infant son Akbar, the future great Mughal and the emperor of India. The father and the son found the Arghuns in the possession of the fort . Mullah Mehmud Jiskani, the author of Tazkir-ul-bar, assigns 15th century for the occupation of Siwi by the Pannis. According to the Akbar-nama of Abul fazal and Akbar-nama of Faizi Sirhindi , by 1575 A.D Panni Afghans were already in control of Siwi fort. They, therefore must have been present in the general area of Siwi much before that date since it is likely that their conquest of Sibi or Siwi would have taken some considerable time.

It is therefore historically incorrect to claim that the Siwi fort was either built or was ever ruled by the legendary Baloch Hero Mir Chakar Rind . He is said by the Baloch historians to have lived and fought between 1450-1550 A.D whereas Siwi town as well as Siwi fort existed centuries before this period and were ruled in turn by epic Hindu kings Brahmuns, Buddhists, Persians, Turks, Mughals and Afghans. In the latter case Afghan presence in Siwi, which may have commenced in Al-Beruni times, continued right upto May 1879 when it gave way to the British supremecy over Sibi, Duki, Loralai and Pishin in accordance with stipulations of the treaty of Gandmak. As a matter of fact the Baloch people had not even entered the upper Sindh plains till about 1580 A.D. The Ain-i-Akbari clearly describes the amount of land revenue as well as the Afghan land owners of Duki, Harnai and Siwi tract. At that time in the whole length of this plain either there were no Baloch land owners at all or, as Major Raverty states, only one Mahal near Sukkar/Bhakkar by the name of “Jatoi: contained people belonging to the Baloch race. This is the reason that word Balochistan , first used by Abu Fazal , applied to the northern locality of Sukkar in Sindh rather than to any area covered by the present day Sibi , Quetta, Zhob divisions.

Over a dozen or so Baloch historians writing on the exploits of Mir Chakar’s exploits in the Sibi-Dhadar plains have relied almost entirely on legendary tales. It is only fair to expect them to conduct further research to see how much of the fiction contained in the Baloch epic poetry may be accepted as authentic history and for what reasons. Beside , said Baloch historians, when their works are studied critically , do not agree with one another, on the specific dates of the life, events and activities of the legendary heroes.

All the authentic books dealing with Siwi during the 15th and 16th centuries fail to make any mention even of the name of this legendary hero. Not only this, these histories show that Siwi, during the period in question, was ruled by different other rulers including Mongoloid Turk extraction. Nor is there any graveyard in the vicinity of Siwi to show that some of the legendary Rind and Lashar heroes or their companions , killed in frequent battles, lie buried in the area where they area said to have lived , fought and died. In this connection reader may refer to the Babar-nama, Tarikhe-Masumi, Tarikhe-Mazare-Shahjehani, Tarikhe-Farishta, Tuhfa-i-Akbar-Shahi, Ain-i-Akbari, Akbar-nama and Major Raverty notes on Balochistan. All the Baloch historians have based their accounts , not on historical records but on legends.

The British histrorian Major Raverty maintains that Mir Chakar lived, fought and died , not in Siwi, but over a hundred miles north of Multan and that too as an ordinary zamindar under the supremacy of Suri and his subordinate Niazi Afghans. The same author also quotes an article by Longworth Dames published in the “Journal of the Bengal asaitic society”| For the year 1880 in which the author had himself doubted the contention that the old Siwi fort was ever built by Mir Chakar Rind. On the contrary Dames thought Shah Baig Arghun really built the fort of Siwi.

Tareekh-e-Farishta contain nothing about the so called Rind-Lashar wars and the legendary baloch heroes of Siwi-Dhadar area. There is however mention of Ismael Khan, Ghazi khan and Futeh khan, the chiefs of the Dodai Balochs, having waited on Sher Shah Suri some where in the present Punjab area. This happened at a time when the vanquished King Humayun fled in the direction of Sindh (1542/1543 A.D) and the victor Sher Shah had assumed formally the title of the King of the India. At another place following account has been recorded ,

“meanwhile Haibat khan (Niazi) was sent to wrest Multan out of the hands of the Balochies who had occupied it. Futeh Khan Baloch was in consequence was attacked and expelled and the whole country submitted to the arms of Dilhy, Haibat khan received the title of Azam Humayun and government of Multan.”

Another interesting details in Tarikh-i-Farishta ,

“The method of measurement was the general practice throughout the kingdom, the only exception being the country around Multan which suffered greatly from the disorders. Sher Shah ordered Haibat khan to expel the Balochis who had plundered and taken possession of those parts of the country during the times of Mongol raids. Haibat Khan defeated the Balochi chiefs and restored the country to its former state”

In Tarikh-i-Shershahi/Tuhfai-Akbar-Shahi by abbas Khan Sarwani there is a mention in Multan area of one “Chakar Rind”. He has been shown to be an ordinary hakim of Satgarah (place in Okara, Punjab) and on one occasion is ordered by Haibar Khan Niazi to prepare himself for the visit and review of his armed men by Niazi. This sudden news greatly upsets Chakar Rind who is shown, in the manuscript, to have thereby thrown in panic,
The relevant lines on page 92 and 93 read as follows,

“When Sher Shah had laid siege to the fort of Raisin, he received a letter from Khawwas khan saying that he and Niazi had developed some differences between themselves. “The letter contained a request that Sher Shah should, therefore , summon one of the two. Having gone through the letters of Khawwas , Sher Shah summoned khawwas khan, Isa Khan Niazi and Haseeb khan. Then he conferred the country of Punjab on Haibat Khan Niazi and ordered him to rescue and rehabilitate Multan which had been usurped by the Balochs. He was also to chastise Fateh Khan Jat of Qabula, who had been, during the Mughal period, laying waste to the country upto Panipat. As soon as Haibat khan received these orders , he summoned the representative of Chakar Rind – The hakim of Satgarah . The representative was told to go and inform Chakar Rind that Haibat khan Niazi was going to tour those areas . Chakar should be prepared to present his contingent for parade/review. One who related the story that he had heard it from Wakil Fateh khan kanbo that when he went to Chakar Rind and disclosed to him what Haibat Khan Niazi has said, the former was thrown in panic, he had no time either to a reception or to put together the ‘lashkar’ as demanded. At this time Haibat khan Niazi was merely two day’s distance away. Next morning the news came that Haibat khan Niazi had already arrived. Hearing this, Chakar became nervous, although he did manage to get on his horseand to go out to receive the dignity.”

A careful reading of the relevant Persian text suggests that Chakar Rrind was not even ‘Mir’ Chakar Rind, a title conferred on him by his well-wishers posthumously. He was one of the several ordinary subordinate “Hakims” under the general command of Afghan forces viz Haibat khan Niazi – operating against the Balochs of Multan under the orders of Sher Shah Suri. Besides , far from being a hero of balochs, Chakar is shown bothy by legend as well as history , as a notable who was subordinate of Suri and Niazi Afghans.

We have the testimony of failry reliable records that like Alberuni’s India, Tarikh-Namah-Heart, Tarikhi Makhzani Afghani, Tarikh-i-farishta , Ain-i-Akbari etc etc which say that in the 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th centuries, the whole of Koh-e-Sulayman area down to the valley of Sindh was inhabited by Afghans.

Marris who are stated to be Rinds of Mir Chakar’s party actually obtained Kahan , Mawand and Kohlu area from Nahars , Hasni Tarins and Zarkuns with the military assistance of Mir Naseer Khan of kalat in the 18th century. Some details of these events havc been provided in Mr. O.T Duke’s report on Thal-Chotili and Harnai district, compiled in 1883 A.D. Rai Bahadur Hitu Ram on page 681 of his Tarikh Balochistan has recorded that in a Leghari Barkhan there is a mosque which has, affixed to it, an inscription in a stone. According to this inscription , the mosque was built in 770 A.H i.e 1368 A.D by one Malik Boya Musiani Tarin – indicating that Tarins were there in western Dera Ghazi khan as far back as 14th century. It may be recalled that According to Tarikh-Namah Heart, compiled by Saifi, the area of later day Quetta , Loralai and Sibi divisions was known as “Afghanistan” in 1249 A.D.

According to Tarikhi Sindh (volume vi part one page 392) of Ghulam Rasool Mehr, the Dhahdar area was in possession of Barozais, with Malik Kala khan Barozai listed as owner of land thereof , upto the times of Mian Nur Muhammad Kalhora (1719-1753 A.D). Graves of Panni notables such as Junaid Khan Barozai , Mirza Khan Barozai, and well known Mullah Misri Afghan are present in Dhadar. The town of Dhadar formed the first capital of the Panni tribe of Afghans on their arrivals in the plains. It was also the place where Dara Shikoh, the Mughal prince, visited Juanid khan, the first Barozai chief and in the vicinity of which many of the famous Baruhi Afghan battles were fought towards the end of seventeenth century A.D.

Both the legend as well as the history of Chakar Rind career at Multan make out Chakar as an ally and an instrument of the military strategy of Afghans rather than a Baloch national hero. Last not the least. In March 1992 Chakar khan Baloch , editor of monthly magazine “Balochi Douya Multan” called upon the Baloch historians to come up with solid historical evidence to prove Chakar Rind’s existence in Siwi. No one has ever responded to his clarion call.
(A-Aziz-Luni)

Sources/References

  1. The Ain I Akbari : Abū al-Faz̤l ibn Mubārak, 1551-1602
  2. The Akbarnama
  3. Tareekh Farishta
  4. Al-Harawi – The Tarikh Nama-i-Harat
  5. Tuhfa-i-Akbarshahi (Tarikh-i-Shershahi)
  6. Alberuni’s India. An account of the religion
  7. Notes on Afghanistan and Baluchistan by Major Henry George Raverty
  8. Babar-Namah

http://historyofpashtuns.blogspot.co…akar-rind.html

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

I was wrong in calling him a badit, looter etc, Chakar Rind was infact a loyal subordinate of Afghans under command of Haibat Khan Niazi, it seems he was even providing a contingent of his men to fight with his own turbulent balochis of multan for the cause of Afghans. My respect for Mir chakar

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

Moreover the tales of Mir chakar rind accompanying humayun to delhi with large baloch army, is fabricated stuff. Mughal court historians doesnt even mention any name by Mir chakar, except in tarikhi-shershahi where he is mentioned as petty "emir/hakim" of satagarah of Afghan governament. Infact abu fazal in ain-i-akbari talks about presence of panni afghans in sibi, that mir masum was with an army to defeat them. In the book land revenue system of sibi is recorded, no mention of balochs but panni afghans. It is even mentioned panni afghans of sibi had to provide 200 cavalary and 300 foot for mughal army. Later we see, barozais were given rule of upper sindh by mughals (the one betraying, arresting dara shikoh in sindh was barozai panni afghan from sibi). Daud khan panni from sibi became commander in chief of mughal army and then was appointed governor of arcot and later viceroy for Deccan. It was with assistance of mir nasir khan barahui that marris took kohlu from zarkuns (an afghan tribe) and later , after second anglo-afghan war, Afghans lost sibi division to british. Taking advantage of the situation, marris made incursions into sibi by defeating weakened barozais, so presence of balochs in sibi is rather recent, in 19th century.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

THE MYTH OF BALLUCHI NATIONALISM | Pakpotpourri2’s Blog

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

Is this thing related to present Baluchi struggle?

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

Hence proved: One person's villain is other person's hero :)

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

^Also perspective do change after more reading. :)

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

Indeed. Interesting thing is that tomb of chakar rind in sataghara (in okara) confirms the fact written in 1580 in tuhfa-i-akbaShahi , that he was a "hakim" (local ruler" of sataghara town. The tomb is not of a king, but of a noble/chief, the type of which see across hindostan. Another amusing fact is that he was one of the numerous subordinate of Haibat khan Niazi and we are told that niazi makes a sudden visit to him to review his contingent, chakar rind gets "panicked" on hearing this. Now baloch legend/fiction tell us that Mir chakar killed haibat khan and drank blood in his skull. Sounds interesting but it is nothing more than fictional tale. All the historians of akbar court, and local sources of ghakkars of potohar ,tell us that Haibat khan niazi aka azam humayun rebelled against islam shah suri and sought refuge among ghakkars on defeat. This initiated islam shah suri's war against ghakkars. Finally haibat khan ran away to kashmir, where he was killed along with his family.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

Another claim of Baloch historians is that large number of baloch soldiers under chakar rind accampanied humayun to delhi and helped him winning the throne. No court historian of mughal emperor akbar talks about it. Now you will even find even minor details in Ain-i-akbari and Akbar-nama, forexample the whole account of their ghakkar allies of potohar is recorded, all the names of ghakkar chieftains are mentioned along with thir history and abu fazal tell us that ghakkar chiefs were given ranks befitting to their status (even daughater of ghakkar chief was wedded to mughal prince). On the other hand there is not even mention of any person let alone king by name of chakar rind.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

I was Wrong Haibat khan niazi pathan was not killed by Mir chakar Rind rather he was defeated by Mir Chakar Rind in Multan as he killed Mir chakars's son Mir mando rind in Multan mir chakar was not under haibat khan niazai stop lying and misleading the people with ur fabricated garbage

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

as for siwi fort so Mir Chakar ruled Balochistan from the siwi fort and Sibi was capital of Baluchistan at that time domki lehri are rind by origin who have been living in sibi since the time of Mir chakar rind and lashari have also been living in sibi since then yes marri and bugti came afterwars in sibi and barozai pathans also came aftarwards in sibi its a baloch land not pathan land sibi or bolan ki taraf boori niga se dekho ge to tumari akein nikal dengay or wese mar k bagahen gay jese quetta me mar k bagaya tha 1980s me jub chapal chor k baag gahe thay coward people

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

**and as for Kohlu so After the end of the Baloch civil wars a group of Rind tribesmen in the command of Mir Bijar Khan preferred to stay in mountains of Kohlu instead to go with Mir Chakar Khan Rind in a migration towards Punjab. In a ferocious mood Mir Chakar called Mir Bijar Khan "Marri" and left that group of Rinds, which later became known as the Marri. Mir Bijar Khan was killed byBuledis in 1520 CE. His people are now called Bijarani, a sub-tribe of Marri.and noori naseer khan deserted hasni baloch tribe from kohlu cause they were also living in kohlu with marries before hasni baloch tribe formed an alliance with luni pathans and started fighting against marries in kohlu they counld not defeat Marris and hasni baloch tribe also revolted against khan of kalat noori naseer khan so naseer khan came defeated hasni and luni pathans and forced hasni baloch tribe to leave from kohlu so they left kohlu and spread all over balochistan during the same period zarkoon pathan came to take refuge in kohlu later Marris offered them a defensive and offensive alliance. According to a treaty the area surrounding Kohlu town was given to the Zarkoons by marri baloch

as for baloch so rind lashari chandio have been living in bolan Dhadar since the time of mir chakar rind the tomb of hani baloch is still standing in daddar bolan who died in the 16th century to deny the lies shouted by opportunistic pathans, barozai were sent by mughals in the 17th century but then khan of kalat mir Ahmad khan the great defeated them and kicked them out of bolan then barozai fled to sibi then in the 18th century noori naseer khan the great defeated them in sibi then they agreed to except baloch as their king forever Langah and Lodhi were rajput dynasties not afghani dynasties **

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

**Mughal emperor humayun was helped by sanjrani baloch in chagai and humayun was also helped by basko baloch of multan in 1555 baloch joined the army of humayun and after the defeat of suri afghans in delhi vast jagir lands were granted to baloch by humayun in punjab and india thats why baloch also live in india sahiwal was given to mir chakar rind by humayun thats why sahiwal is full of rind baloch even to this day baloch live in large number in multan too but there is no afghan in punjab except in miawali for god sake stop lying marwai pathan southern punjab is completely under the baloch hand its full of baloch even to this day **

http://oi59.tinypic.com/29wu79e.jpg

http://oi60.tinypic.com/k9e6uv.jpg

http://oi60.tinypic.com/11lqzrr.jpg

Origins and History of Jats and Other Allied Nomadic Tribes of India: 900 B …

By B.S. Nijjar Mir Chakar Rind the Great Rind Hero
**
now marwati go and sell naswar in quetta aj kal ap naswar kuch zeyada lerahe hain i answered u now its enough for ur nationalistic garbage bye :)**

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

It is clear from historical records, Chakar Khan Rind was an ordinary subordinate of Afghans, and was assigned task of governing sataghara. The ballads and epic poetry about fictional version of Mir chakar Rind belong to literature not history.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

As for as Siwi is concerned, in old times it was seat of hindu people called siwis, then Afghans conquered it. The siwi fort itself was built by Arghuns of kandahar, by shah beg arghun. Humayun when visited siwi fort along with his infant , it was in the possession of Arghuns. Court historian of Akbar, records in Ain i akbari, that inhabitants of Siwi/sibi are panni afghans and expeditions were sent against them. Even today Pannis live in sibi.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

sibi historically belongs to baloch not panni wanni if still barozai want to have sibi then they have to fight with domki lehri bugti marri raisani and bangulzai baloch tribes is barozai ready to do that lol and bolan also historically belongs to the baloch if barozai want to have that to then they have to fight with rind raisani kurd bagulzai satakzai and many other baloch tribes of bolan is panni tanni ready to do that lol

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

no denying that siwi was seat of hindu which later became seat of mir chakar rind in the 15th century and Arghun were not pashtun and real inhabitants of siwi sibi were hindu not pathans get it kiddo! so stop dreaming pashtun land is only from zhob to pishin to ziarat to loralai thats it , while the baloch land is from quetta to gawadar to lasbela ok

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

Who said Arghuns were pashtuns? Beta dont jump to your own conclusions. And we are not discussing property rights but history. Dhadar , Sibi , dhadar , mastung and kohlu were once pashtun areas but are now inhabited by brahuis and balochs. Demographics of the region was never constant in the history, forexample the siwis, the hindu people are nowhere to be found in sibi. Another example is kohlu, it was inhabited by zarkun, a pashtun tribe. Zarkuns got weakened by wars with bugtis and marris took advantage of it by taking possession of kohlu from zarkuns. This happened with assisstance of mir nasir khan. Another example is dhadar area, it belonged to panni afghans but ahmad shah abdali gifted it to khan of kalat along with Quetta which belongs to kasi afghans.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

By the way , your favourite source, Naseer dashti's books are banned in pakistan for obvious reasons. Besiding writing nationalistic garbage history, he is anti-state and traitor. Governament/army and FC is doing wonderful job in keeping check on the nationalistic anti-pakistani literature of baloch separatists which is funded by indians, they are corrupting the minds of baloch youth.

Re: Mir Chakar Rind : History vs Legend

stop ur bull**** ! Dhadar , Sibi , dhadar , mastung kohlu have always been baloch areas not pathan and Ahmed shah abdali pathan gifted only quetta to noori naseer khan not bolan fazool bakwas nai karo me tum ko already jawab de choka hun is baath ka so just keep quite and leave