Re: Long March Declaration — A post-mortem
Not really. What army do is kick few thugs on their butt and show them how to run the country where corruption is low, development is high, management is good, opportunities for people is better, growth is higher, inflation is lower, nepotism is minimum, stability is wide spread … and so on. After 8 to 11 years they give the country to thugs again hoping that thugs would change, but thugs are like ‘kuttay kee tayrhee dum’ so what army can do? They come back to make that dum straight but again once they let it go it becomes tayrhee. 
Yea, I know the difference between ‘has matured’ and ‘started to mature’. I feel you have not read my post carefully where I compared Indian democracy with Pakistani democracy, so if Indian democracy has started to mature then Pakistani democracy has certainly surpassed maturity of Indian democracy
Actually, I can assure you that the system that is prevailing in India, democracy there would never mature as it would need bloody revolution for India to mature democratically.
In my opinion, Pakistani democracy, especially after 3 doses from long serving dictators, has matured quite a bit, much more than Indian democracy. If TUQ dose sets in than we would see much better democratic government in Pakistan. Actually TUQ dose is also dose given by dictator (Article 62 and 63).
Fact is that, democracy, freedom of speech, right to protest, right to complain, and freedom of media goes hands in hands, and in Pakistan, democracy, freedom of speech, right to protest, right to complain, as well as freedom of media is much more matured and in much advance stage than in India.
If Pakistan manages to tackle corruption in the country, Kharjee problems effectively, and ‘law and order’ situations then Pakistan would be a very pleasant country to live.