Live Updates of Azadi March

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

More international media coverage on this:

Fresh Clashes Break Out in Pakistan

Clashes Continue Between Antigovernment Crowds, Police as Crisis Threatens Sharif’s Grip on Power

By SAEED SHAH and
QASIM NAUMAN

Updated Sept. 1, 2014 5:14 p.m. ET

Antigovernment protesters on Monday briefly occupied the headquarters of the country’s state television, causing its broadcast to go blank, in a further escalation of the political crisis that is threatening to bring down the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. Photo: Getty Images

ISLAMABAD—Fresh clashes between antigovernment protesters and police broke out in the Pakistani capital’s government quarter on Monday, a day after the military warned the administration of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif against “further use of force” to quell the spreading unrest.
Pakistan’s military also deployed armed soldiers around government buildings, checking the protesters’ advance on the prime minister’s official residence as darkness fell in Islamabad.
The police, which had been at the forefront of resisting the protesters over the weekend, retreated to the edge of the government quarter.
The renewed violence, which adds to a political crisis that threatens to bring down Mr. Sharif’s government, came as the military denied Monday that it had asked the prime minister to quit or that it was supporting the protesters.

Opposition supporters beat a policeman during antigovernment protests in Islamabad on Monday.Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Some Pakistani media had reported that army chief Gen. Raheel Sharif had advised Mr. Sharif to step down at a meeting that took place Monday.
“Army is an apolitical institution and has expressed its unequivocal support for democracy at numerous occasions. It is unfortunate that Army is dragged into such controversies,” the military said. The military’s spokesman said on Twitter that reports the army chief had asked Mr. Sharif to resign were “baseless.” The prime minister’s office also denied that any such message was conveyed.
“The military would never directly tell the prime minister to resign,” said a security adviser familiar with the military’s thinking. “That would allow him to become a political martyr.”
Aides said the prime minister was determined to resist pressure to resign. The government privately believes that the protesters are supported by the military, in a bid to weaken or oust the prime minister.
Mr. Sharif told a meeting of leaders of other political parties that “he will not resign or go on leave under any pressure,” his office said in a statement.
“The constitution is supreme here, and we will not allow its supremacy to be damaged at any cost,” the statement said.
Earlier Coverage

Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan and Muslim cleric Tahir ul Qadri led thousands of protesters in a march to Islamabad on Aug. 15 for a sit-in in front of Pakistan’s parliament, demanding Mr. Sharif’s resignation and alleging that the ruling party rigged last year’s elections. Mr. Sharif denied fraud allegations and most court challenges to the election’s results had been unsuccessful.
Mr. Khan is pressing for fresh elections, while Mr. Qadri is calling for “revolution.” As a softer alternative, Mr. Khan has suggested that the prime minister leave his office on a “holiday” for a month, while a promised judicial investigation into the election-rigging allegations takes place.
Many analysts believe that even if the prime minister survives for the time being, his influential brother, Shahbaz Sharif, could be made to resign as chief minister of Punjab, the country’s most populous province. In June, police in Punjab opened fire on Mr. Qadri’s headquarters, killing at least 10 of his followers, an action that first ignited the political turmoil.
The Supreme Court may now emerge as the arbitrator of the crisis, lawyers said, with hearings on the issue due on Tuesday.
Over the weekend, three protesters died and more than 500 were injured in clashes with police using tear gas, rubber bullets and baton charges, as the demonstrators had attempted to march on the prime minister’s house.
Earlier Monday, antigovernment protesters briefly occupied the headquarters of the country’s state television, where they smashed equipment and caused its broadcast to go blank for almost an hour. Armed soldiers and paramilitary Rangers forces arrived at the scene by noon local time, prompting the protesters to leave the building. The soldiers surrounded the compound.
Protesters also made further attempts Monday to move toward the prime minister’s official residence, gaining some ground and leading to fresh casualties among both police and protesters, with hospitals reporting that at least one demonstrator was brought in with rubber-bullet injuries.
Parliament, the prime minister’s residence and office, the president’s office, the Supreme Court and ministries are all located in Islamabad’s government quarter. The police forces that were previously deployed around these buildings were replaced Monday with soldiers. Many embassies, including the U.S. Embassy, are located in the area.
Mr. Sharif came to power after a landslide victory in the May 2013 elections. His previous stint in power was ended by a 1999 military coup, and he has been at loggerheads with the country’s powerful military establishment over a series of issues, including the trial of former dictator Pervez Musharraf on treason charges and the civilian government’s attempts to improve relations with India.
Talat Hussain, a leading political talk-show host, said the military’s aim was to “dilute” Mr. Sharif, either by weakening or ousting him. But Mr. Sharif has refused to be shunted out of office, meaning the military would have to stage an outright takeover to remove him, he said.
“Nawaz Sharif is saying you’ll have to drag me out, and with me will go the parliament and the constitution,” said Talat Hussain, a leading political talk-show host.
The armed forces have directly ruled Pakistan for half its 67-year history. Democracy was restored in 2008, after the latest period of military rule. Analysts believe the military, which is battling Taliban and al Qaeda jihadists in the northwest, doesn’t want to directly assume power at this time. A coup would imperil U.S. aid that Washington pegs at some $3 billion a year, U.S. officials say.
The military said the army chief met with his top commanders late Sunday. Afterward, the military advised the government to go back into talks with protest leaders.
“While reaffirming support to democracy, the conference reviewed with serious concern the existing political crisis and the violent turn it has taken, resulting in large-scale injuries and loss of lives,” a statement from the military said. “It was once again reiterated that the situation should be resolved politically without wasting any time and without recourse to violent means.”

Fresh Clashes Break Out in Pakistan - WSJ

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

You did not connect the dots, but gave laundry list of things that you think are terrible about NS & I agree with most of them. When I said connecting dots I was taking about a plan put in action by ex ISI chief to safe Mushrraf from facing law & that all started in March/April of this year. TuQ was brought in for that specific purpose and IK hitched his wagon with TuQ and now stands exposed…just like another power hungry and corrupt politician. Btw, I’m not supporting NS, but the system. If the system collapses the country will, too. Just look at what is happening across the ME. If IK’s goal is to turn Pakistan in Iraq I hope he fails & I’d take corrupt NS/AAZ over IK any day.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

I know. :) My point was the major reason why someone like Imran Khan is relevant is because of the policies of Nawaz Sharif. It is not like he has been in governance before, as a minister of chief minister of a province. He is not even a politician, he has not been through the system like others. You can call that lack of experience as a flaw.

And I also agree that this new drive may be sponsored (for Musharraf, or something else), I have not agreed with the stance of making Nawaz Sharif resign, not with mere thousands on the roads. Had he been able to gather a larger momentum, a few hundred thousand, then the government would be under pressure. Imran should have just taken the 5 points PML-N agreed on and had them timed.

But I don't agree that the system will collapse if Nawaz Sharif resigns. His party can appoint another Prime Minister in his stead. And I also don't agree that Imran Khan wants to turn Pakistan into Iraq. That is not going to happen, unless something big goes wrong. There are forces at play that will stop it. Let's not compare ourselves to the mess that is Middle East.

Pakistan is not the fallout of the Ottoman Empire, they will always be better in every way imaginable.

What I am trying to get at is that if you don't support Imran Khan then don't support him. But that is no reason to put your weight behind the corruptness that is PML-N or even PPP. Both parties, if they are to become something need to be freed from the shackles of their current leaders, and good people need to brought forward. That is not going to happen anytime soon, but to support them, for me, is unthinkable.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Gullu butt breaks windows of a car and he becomes worst enemy of society. While "millions" of PTIAT supporters beat up policeman, SSP, destroy public buildings and yet they are revolutionaries. Dont forget its PTI people who beat up express staff when they filmed them flirting with girls.

I say gullu butt looks like saint in front of these guys. Ek car ka sheesha hi tou hai, koi SSP ka sir thodi hai.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

^ lagtaa hai Gullu Butt Roop nagar, Prem Gali, Kholi # 420 kaa rihaaishii hai? :hehe: :smiley: :stuck_out_tongue:

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

IK/PTI has chance. They are running KPK. IK can become CM if he wants to. What is stopping him? Let him match his words with his actions maybe entire country would back him next time around.

[quote]
But I don't agree that the system will collapse if Nawaz Sharif resigns. His party can appoint another Prime Minister in his stead. And I also don't agree that Imran Khan wants to turn Pakistan into Iraq. That is not going to happen, unless something big goes wrong. There are forces at play that will stop it. Let's not compare ourselves to the mess that is Middle East. Pakistan is not the fallout of the Ottoman Empire, they will always be better in every way imaginable.
[/quote]

Anything can happen at this point and international press is already questioning safety of Pakistan's nuclear weapons. And what is he trying to achieve with his antics by saying don't pay tx and attacking state buildings? Are those qualities of a leader?

[quote]
What I am trying to get at is that if you don't support Imran Khan then don't support him. But that is no reason to put your weight behind the corruptness that is PML-N or even PPP. Both parties, if they are to become something need to be freed from the shackles of their current leaders, and good people need to brought forward. That is not going to happen anytime soon, but to support them, for me, is unthinkable.
[/QUOTE]

I agree with you on that part, but my problem is politics should not be about personalties, but about system. Once you have strong working system it will filter out corrupts like NS and others.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

I thought that you are educated, progressive, and believe on justice, and still you are trying to compare coconut with banana? How is that? Think and think again, as it seems Shareef Brothers are eating lot of Nihari and Payea, releasing gas, that is polluting air in Lahore and poisoning thinking of some people there.

Akbar Bugti: took up arms against the state and his demand was personal that is not even basic right (to keep Dera-Bugti B-classified area). He was fighting state because state wanted to give equal right to all Bugtis in dera Bugti so that all Bugtis can be treated equally under Pakistani law and have access to police and court … make Dera Bugti A-classified area, just like any area of Pakistan where citizens can approach courts to get justice and right what is given to all Pakistanis under Pakistani constitution (except those Pakistanis who live in B-classified areas of Baluchistan). While Akbar Bugti wanted to keep the area (Dera Bugti) under his personal control (control of tribal leaders) … stopping conversion of Dera Bugti area from B-classified where tribal leaders rule and Pakistanis living there do not have any human rights that all Pakistanis have, to A-classified area so that Pakistanis in Dera-Bugti get same right what other Pakistanis have.

Akbar Bugti was fighting state army with sophisticated arms (Missiles, Grenades and AK47) so that a system of injustice in Dera Bugti stays, where he (as tribal leader) rules doing all sorts of atrocities and injustices on Pakistanis living in Dera Bugti, without any restraint or fear of law, something not only unethical but no Pakistani (or human being) deserves.

Imran Khan and TUQ: These people are protesting unarmed and demanding freedom and justice for all Pakistanis, demanding that all Pakistanis should have same right and should be treated equally, and that no one steals people’s mandate using Dhandla (heavy rigging). Their protest is peaceful and it is about demanding basic rights.

Imran and TUQ are protesting unarmed in state so that they can get freedom, justice and rights for all Pakistanis, what every human being deserves.

Now to compare both above, and say that one is same as other, is not only dishonesty but unjust, zulum and big sin (gunnah-e-Kabeera … as it is Gunah-e-Kabeera to stand with injustice and exploitation … by considering just and rightful demand = unjust and inhuman demand).

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Of Imran Khan and his links with

ISLAMABAD: There is nothing new in Javed Hashmi’s allegation that Imran Khan is pursuing the agenda of ‘the badge-bearers’, given the fact that he had been repeatedly accused by his political opponents of getting the backing of the mighty establishment at the time of the 2013 general elections, with an assurance that he would be the next PM.

The only new thing is that the latest allegation comes from none other than Makhdoom Javed Hashmi — the right hand man of Imran Khan whose credibility is unquestionable. Hashmi, also known as the angry man of Pakistan politics, seems to have concluded after spending almost three years with Imran that he (Imran) was being used by those who wanted to derail the hard-won democracy. While making astonishing disclosures at his press conference, Hashmi quoted Imran as saying: “The badge-bearers’ wanted the PTI protesters to move along with those of Tahirul Qadri’s PAT and we can’t move forward without them.”

However, well-informed circles in the security establishment strongly refute the impression that Imran was being backed by some serving elements in the Pakistani security establishment. To substantiate their claim, they refer to Federal Information Minister Pervez Rasheed’s August 11, 2014 statement that Imran Khan was acting on the advice of former chief of the Inter-Services Intelligence Lt Gen (retd) Ahmed Shuja Pasha. The minister referred to some recent media reports about the clandestine meetings between Pasha and Imran at Shafqat Mahmood’s residence in the first week of August 2014. Pervaiz alleged that the former spymaster, who was involved in promoting the PTI in the past, had met Imran and advised him on the long march plan he was executing to topple the Nawaz Sharif government.

Pervaiz Rasheed’s claims raise a key question in the present volatile situation whether the former spy chief is backing Imran without the support of his former institution. The answer to that question will establish where the buck will stop for the prime minister. But one thing is for sure — the former spymaster had been backing Imran since 2011. To recall, the largest-selling British national daily The Sunday Times had claimed in a story on November 21, 2011 that Imran Khan was recently introduced to Cameron Munter, American Ambassador to Pakistan, in the presence of Lt Gen Ahmed Shuja Pasha, the ISI chief. The report stated: “Imran Khan is said to have gained the backing of the all-powerful security establishment, which has grown tired of the corruption pervading the two traditional political groupings, the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), led by President Asif Ali Zardari, and the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), led by Nawaz Sharif, a former prime minister”.

**The Sunday Times report further added: “Although they do not publicly admit to favouring any party, it is an open secret that the military leadership, and the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), are backing Imran Khan’s campaign. A senior official confirmed that he had the support of the army, but said his rise would cause more political damage to Sharif, the opposition leader and an outspoken military critic, than to the ruling PPP. Others view Imran Khan as a third force to break the dominance of Pakistan’s two largest political parties. Imran Khan is reluctant to criticise the military establishment publicly, but he emphasises that he will not be a puppet of the generals. “Obviously you have to work with them but it doesn’t mean you have to work under them,” he told The Times.

To tell the truth, Lt Gen (retd) Ahmed Shuja Pasha was overwhelmingly involved in national politics till his retirement in March 2012. He was the only ISI chief to have been accused of hatching conspiracies not only against the PPP government but also against the PML-N. While former prime minister Yusuf Raza Gilani had accused Pasha of taking up the Memogate scandal to pressurise the government into granting him yet another extension in service, the PML-N had described him as the most terrible ISI chief Pakistan has had since 1988.**

Addressing a press conference in Islamabad on** March 11, 2012, the then opposition leader in the National Assembly Ch Nisar Ali Khan had openly accused Ahmed Shuja Pasha of indulging in politics and misusing the political cell of the ISI to persuade several politicians to join Imran Khan’s Tehrik-e-Insaf.** It was in this background that the PML-N leadership had heaved a sigh of relief when the Zardari-led PPP government had decided not to grant a third extension to the controversial spymaster. While the PML-N top brass had publicly campaigned against Pasha, the PPP leaders, including Asif Zardari and Yusuf Raza Gilani, were not less thrilled after finally getting rid of the controversial spymaster.

That the ISI had been deeply involved in politics under Lt Gen Pasha’s command since the 2008 general elections can be further gauged from a US diplomatic cable, which was made public in December 2010. In that cable, the WikiLeaks had quoted interior minister Rehman Malik as telling the then American ambassador Anne Patterson that it was not General Ashfaq Kayani but Ahmed Shuja Pasha who was hatching conspiracies against President Asif Zardari.

The US Embassy cables revealed that Rehman Malik had sought an urgent appointment with Ms Anne Patterson in November 2009, saying that Ahmed Shuja Pasha was hatching plots to dislodge President Asif Ali Zardari, and adding that the president needed political security at this stage. However, Patterson was certain that the ISI chief could not do it alone. Although, Shuja Pasha’s close circles strongly refute all these allegations as a pack of lies, his critics insist that his tenure (October 2008 to March 2012) will always be remembered for all the wrong reasons, mainly due to his overwhelming involvement in politics. But quite interestingly, despite the fact that he is now stationed in Dubai as the National Security Adviser to the UAE government, Pasha is still being discussed in the power corridors as someone who is still trying to promote Imran Khan as the next ruler of Pakistan.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Ego.

He could even have made a totally new, young chief minister in KPK, and kept his string in his hands. Not someone that already has the baggage of history like Khattak. I will, however, say that there is a lot of development in the province not all of which is reported.

I have had friends tell me that the police is now depoliticized, most government departments are functioning much better than before. And well, I am yet to hear a mega corruption scandal in KPK. For my money, in terms of management, that is the best province in Pakistan currently. I only wish it was highlighted better.

Let’s not bring nuclear weapons into it, though.

Nukes aren’t exactly jelly beans that anyone can go in and capture. In fact, Nawaz Sharif with his recent antics has defamed the military. Those who question will point to fact that even if our military is not rogue, there are elements in it that are. Not the way to go, but what can you expect from an illiterate prime minister.

Oh, and also this notion does not hold that Taliban or any other terrorist group will now onto Islamabad or our military installation in thousands and try to capture it. Our intelligence may be sleeping, but it is not dead. No one will try it, but if they do, they will eat submachine gun bullets. As I said, this is not the Middle East. It never will be. We have our own unique problems.

I believe that too. In fact, my belief is that nothing should be about personalities.

If I like and respect someone I do so because of what they do, how they behave. Not worship them blindfolded. Goes for politicians, sportsmen, anyone, really. Except for cartoons and characters. That, I can get behind without any issues. And that is because they are not real.

But to end this on your point on systems, you will never get systems working when you have corrupts like Nawaz Sharif and others on top. You just never will. Maybe in decades or a hundred years, things will automatically correct themselves, but by that time it will be too late. It is the lack of system that allows individuals like Nawaz Sharif to get to the top, after all. Him and his cronies.

You and I both want the best for Pakistan. The only difference is that I am not willing to settle for the lesser evil!

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Please spare my education while expressing your opinions.. I will not tolerate personal remarks from any one who-so-ever..

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Peaceful protestors.. my foot !!!

Sharmila faruqi ‏@sharmilafaruqi 7m
RT @ShamaJunejo: pray for #AsmatullahJunejo](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=AsmatullahJunejo)
He is so brave that even with head injuries insisting to go on duty. pic.twitter.com/TUbp25nI0o”

sherryrehman ‏@sherryrehman 27m
Really @Rezhasan: Peaceful protesters?: LIVE Supporters beat a riot policeman in Islamabad | http://www.dawn.com/news/1129011/

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Khara Jhoot

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Bhai jaan, aap ko atni garmee kewn charhi huie hay? I appreciated you and your education, but you are getting upset. :)

I thought that you are educated, progressive, and believe on justice,*

That is what I thought of you ... so do you think, what I think of you is wrong?

Later part what I wrote is something I did not expected from you (that is why I wrote ... Still **... and it means, that even though you are educated, progressive, and believe on justice ... **still ... you are comparing two different things as one ...

Niow where you came up with idea that I am questioning your education or whatever?

If you do not agree with what I think of you and what I mentioned what I think of you ... than I am sorry, my mistake.

Example: *I would not say about NS, that he is honest and truthful, **still he said something wrong … unless I believed that he is honest and truthful.

If I would comment on NS wrong statement than I would say that, this Corrupt, Thug, Liar and cheat said something wrong as usual.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

#PTI_trolls](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=PTI_trolls) ko jo milta hai chap dete hain. Who cares about real/fake/legitimacy.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

isse kehte hain ‘apna thooka aap chatna’. khair (gandi) siyasat main sab chalta hai :sunnyboy:

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Dont worry, #immo](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=immo) would have some excuse for this as well. Followers won’t mind anything because #immo](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=immo) said so.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Army’s questionable decisions - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

The carefully constructed veneer of neutrality that the army leadership had constructed through much of the national political crisis instigated by Imran Khan and Tahirul Qadri has been torn apart.

First, came the army’s statement on Sunday, the third in a series of statements in recent days on the political crisis, which quite astonishingly elevated the legitimacy and credibility of the demands of Imran Khan, Tahirul Qadri and their violent protesters above that of the choices and actions of an elected government dealing with a political crisis.

Consider the sequence of events so far. When the army first publicly waded into the political crisis, it counselled restraint on all sides — as though it was the government that fundamentally still had some questions hanging over its legitimacy simply because Imran Khan and Tahirul Qadri alleged so.

Next, the army crept towards the Khan/Qadri camp by urging the government to facilitate negotiations — as though it was the government that was being unreasonable, and not Mr Khan and Mr Qadri.

Now, staggeringly, the army has ‘advised’ the government not to use force against violent protesters and essentially told it to make whatever concessions necessary to placate Mr Khan and Mr Qadri.

It is simply extraordinary that it is the PAT and PTI supporters who want to break into and occupy state buildings, but it is the government that has been rebuked.

It’s as if the army is unaware — rather, unwilling — to acknowledge the constitutional scheme of things: it is the government that is supposed to give orders to the army, not the other way around.

The government has already issued its order: invoking Article 245.

On Saturday, as violent thugs attacked parliament, it was surely the army’s duty to repel them.

But the soldiers stationed there did nothing and the army leadership the next day warned the government instead of the protesters — which largely explains why the protesters were able to continue their pitched battles with the police and attacked the PTV headquarters yesterday.

If that were not enough, yesterday also brought another thunderbolt: this time from within the PTI with party president Javed Hashmi indicating that Mr Khan is essentially doing what he has been asked and encouraged to do by the army leadership.

It took the ISPR a few hours to respond with the inevitable denial, but a mere denial is inadequate at this point. The functioning of the state stands paralysed because a few thousand protesters and their leaders have laid siege to state institutions.

Where is the army condemnation of that?

Would the army allow even a handful of peaceful protesters to gather outside GHQ for a few hours?

The army is hardly being ‘neutral’. It is making a choice.

And, it is disappointing that choice is doing little to strengthen the constitutional, democratic and legitimate scheme of things.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

What an utter disgrace!

He was clearly lying and the script handed to him backfired.

I hope his political career is over for good.

From top of my head, I can think of at least five PTIians who may very well form a PTI two and become quite successful, but I doubt anyone would want associate with him. Nor he has any credibility left to attract people and win their trust.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

Out Of Line

inShare
Out Of Line

September 02, 2014 1

Perhaps the most distressing aspect of this ongoing political turmoil is that it has brought the armed forces back on the political forefront. They stand now where they do not belong, and they’re saying things which do not suit their constitutional position. The Corps Commanders Conference on Sunday was convened to discuss the ongoing political crisis. While the generals deliberated behind closed doors, the rest of the country waited anxiously. Let’s stop here for a moment and ask ourselves: why were we afraid that they might come out and announce everyone’s going home, including the Prime Minister? Is it because of history alone or does it have something to do with how the military is currently behaving? Hours later, the meeting was over and a perplexing press statement was released.
Other than “reaffirming support to democracy”, it expressed serious concerns over the “violent turn” the ongoing crisis had taken, “resulting in large scale injuries and loss of lives”, and decided that “further use of force will only aggravate the problem.” It went on to reiterate that the “situation should be resolved politically without wasting any time and without recourse to violent means”. What we have here is military commanders issuing public advisories to the elected government, which should be simply unacceptable. Of course, the military can apprise the Prime Minister of its political analysis of the situation, but that too can happen behind closed doors, the same way they held their meeting and reached a conclusion. Also, the issue at hand is Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s resignation being demanded by a mob which has already attacked state buildings. What kind of a solution is being suggested here, which neither wastes time nor involves use of force? Why is anything being suggested at all? Moreover, who exactly is being asked here to refrain from using force? Is it the Police, which is answerable to the Interior Minister, who is answerable to the elected Prime Minister? Where in the constitution does it state that the military will direct the government on how it should perform its job? While protestors cross one red line after the other, what option does the government have but to use force to prevent them from taking the law into their hand? Will the military act on the same advice when dealing with protestors outside GHQ, who wish to storm in ‘peacefully’? Are we making a mistake in interpreting the press release? It is possible, but an error in this regard can be forgiven seeing that the press statement leaves plenty of room for interpretation, maybe not unintentionally.
Towards the end, the statement reads that the Army will play “its part in ensuring security of the state and will never fall short of meeting national aspirations.” Yes, the nation hopes so; because the PTV building came under attack by protestors on Monday, and there are people still sleeping outside the Parliament in violation of the law. Yes, the nation hopes that its beloved Army will continue to follow the constitution, and yes, it hopes against hope, that the Army will never again fall short of meeting national aspirations.

Re: Live Updates of Azadi March

leekin jenuine troll sirf jasos hey jo is tarah key chanel pakr laita hein aor burger jawab dinay k like naheen rahtey hein :hbk:

#josos_troll](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=josos_troll)
lulz](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=lulz)