‘Lightly beating’ wife permissible, says CII’s proposed women protection bill!!!

[Monk]

Re: ‘Lightly beating’ wife permissible, says CII’s proposed women protection bill!!!

@Mostar95

Valuable writing on facebook!

Islam & public policy
Was there something wrong with vacuum tubes of the early 20th century, floppy discs of 70s, video tapes in the Betamax format introduced in 1975, or a DX2 CPU of 1992?
No!Not when all this technology was created. The problem is that all this stuff is now obsolete.
Similarly what Maulana Sherani and the Council of Islamic Ideology is proposing on women status could be right 1450 years ago, but today in a civilized world it is no more valid, though it is completely in accordance with the teachings of Islam.
Now somebody would say that the Islam of Maulana Sherani is not the true Islam. Well, nobody has the authority to decide which Islam is the true one. And if you bring Islam in public life then you simply cannot pick and choose Islam of your choice.You will have to accept the full package. And full package is the Islam of the Barelvi,the Islam of Deobandi,the Islam of Ahle Hadis and the Islam of Shia, the Islam of the scholarly and the Islam of the mullah. As an example we see that textbooks for Shias and deduction of zakat in banks is not the same as for Sunnis.
And let me also flag that all the aforementioned brands of Islam derive their strength from the same Quran and Sunnah.
And now if you contend that teachings of Islam were for a particular era,this position would conflict with the concept of universality of Islam. Islam which came into existence 1450 years ago is for all times to come as we have been told.Hence,either Islam is for a particular period or it is universal.
Therefore, we can safely conclude that Islam is no more practicable in the modern world as we have become much more civilized. As an example even the most religious woman in Pakistan would not accept wife battering or sharing her husband with another,though Islam permits both. Interpretations of the Quran are in thousands and thousands more will appear yet it would remain as elusive as ever.
So let it be in the private domain of individuals as it cannot be modified and can never be enforced in public life. Or it will result in total chaos. By the way what is there in Islam which was not there in intellectual discourse before Islam and which is not there in conventional widom after Islam.
The only solution is to separate public life from private life and let the practice of Islam remain in the private domain of each individual.
In other words Islam has to have no role in public policy.
Waseem Altaf

Civilized ???
Are less people being killed in violence ?
Are women any safer ??

This thing what CII said, is meant to be a LAW… not teaching for husbands.
AS in if women come in police station.. and say “my hubby grab my cell phone and send I hate you message to my mother”
or "my husband pushed me .. " Police would say… “can not help you here”

It does not mean… such couple should not seek counseling.. advice.. help from family.

I do not agree with this law.. but I disagree more with stupidity going on for 5 pages now.

=========================================================================

and *piarey muslamaano grow *the hell up… seriously… Any time some say islam first and @#$% after… for @#$% first and islam after… that does
not make it your responsibility to defend islam. You need to identify @#$% ..
You live in west… you are going to see much more stupid sh!#… with word islam before or after it…
No need to jump into it every time…
Grow the hell up… Take a class in logic.. or logical thinking or some thing like that.