Let us discuss

Assalam O Alaikum

Brother Imran and other, let us discuss here the differences which separates us. Let us first start with basic differences, i leave it up to you to choose the topic.

Assalam O Alaikum

Brother Abdullah,

                Your opinion of history is somewhat personal, as the fact remains that whatever you
                have in your hands right now in form of books, hadiths, sayings etc etc, fit in the
                description of Historical data, of course, logically speaking..

                If you want to base the discussion on Quran and two Sahih books, that is fine,
                although I do wanna mention that Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim may be considered
                the error-proof books from majority of muslims, but throughou the history many many
                scholars have provided valid proofs to invalidate that perception. Before we start on
                Sahih books, or for that matter any book, as a neutral reader/critique, it is inevitable
                to search and find out the information about the author and how he has known by his
                counterparts and his character to see if there were any biased output or literature
                due to weakness either in his personality or cultural forces which made him unable to
                write the just and neutral findings. Do you agree with that??? 

                I don't know the grasp of your knowledge in Islamic studies/history/Fiqah/Hadiths, but
                I can assure you that these types of discussions called , Mazakaras Aur
                Mounazarass, have been done many many times in recent past like few decades ago
                as well as way back several centuries and there have been volumes and volumes of
                books written on this subject, i.e, Aqeedas of Shias Versus Sunnis or Five disciplines
                of Islam such as Hanafi,Malaki, Shahfayii,Hanubali, Jafari

I am sorry, I posted this in other thread. Before we start this discussion, I would like to know your input on the rules of discussions and what will be the base of it. Plus, what evidence you would consider valid enough in regards to different topics such as Sayings/Fatwas of Learned Scholars, Al-azhar University's Grand Mufti, religious books etc etc.

[This message has been edited by Imranz (edited December 10, 1998).]

In the name of the ar Rahman and ar Rahim

Quran, Hadith and History
The Ahl al bayt

THE FORMER PROPHETS AND THEIR AHL AL BAYT
In the lives of the past prophets, their families have had played a prominent role in supporting them against their opponents. Musa, when commanded by God to go and preach Pharaoh (Quran, 20:24), makes this prayer:

'(Moses) said: “O my Lord! Expand me my breast: easy my task for me; and remove the impediment from my speech. So that they may understand what I say: And give me a minister from my family (waziiram min ahlii), Aaron my brother; and add to my strength through him, and make him share my task.’ (Quran, 20:25-32). God answered his prayer: ‘(God) said: “Granted is thy prayers, O Moses!” (Quran, 20:36). In another place God says: ‘(Before this), We sent Moses the Book, and appointed his brother Aaron with him as minister’. (Quran, 25:35).

We also find in the Quran, that after the death of the prophets, their descendants become their spiritual and material heirs. God says:

'God did chose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham and the family of Imran above all people – offspring, one of the other; and God heareth and knoweth all things.’ (Quran, 3:33-4) At another place in the Quran, God says:

‘Those were some of the prophets on whom God did bestow His grace – of the posterity of Adam, and of those whom We carried (in the ark) with Noah, and of the posterity of Abraham and Israel – of those whom We guided and chose; whenever the signs of (God) were rehearsed to them, they would fall down in prostrate adoration and in tears.’ (Quran, 19:58).

The chain of the prophets and their families is described in more detail in the following verses: ‘And we gave him Isaac and Jacob: all (three) were guided: and before him we guided Noah, and among his progeny, David, Solomon, Job, Joseph, Moses and Aaron: thus do we reward those who do good: and Zakariyya and Yahya, and Jesus and Elias, all in the ranks of the righteous: and Ismail and Elisha and Jonah and Lot, and to all we gave favour above the nations: (to them) and their fathers, and progeny and brethren: We chose them, and We guided them to a straight way. This is the guidance of God: He giveth that guidance to whom he pleaseth of His worshippers. If they were to join other gods with Him, all that they did would be in vain. These were the men whom We gave the book and authority and prophethood: if these reject them, Behold! We shall entrust their charge to a new people who reject them not.’ (Quran, 6:84-9).

This eminent position of the families and the descendants of the past prophets offers us a parallelism between the history of the former prophets in the Quran and that of the Prophet Muhammad.

PROPHET MUHAMMAD AND HIS AHL AL BAYT
Tradition of the ‘two weighty things’
Based on a mutawatir tradition (as explained by M.M Azami, a ‘report of a large number of narrators whose agreement upon a lie is inconceivable’. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature, p. 43) upon whose authenticity all Muslims agree, the Prophet informed his followers on several occasions that he would leave them two precious/weighty things and that if Muslims adhere to both of them, they will never go astray after him. They are the Book of God (Quran) and the members of the house of the Prophet (the ahl al-bayt).

It is narrated by Abul Husain Muslim b. al Hajjaj al Nisapuri (also known as Muslim) in his work Sahih Muslim (as well as many other sources) that:

Someday (after his last pilgrimage) the Messenger of God, stood to give us a speech beside a pond, which is known as Khum (Ghadir Khum), located between Mecca and Medina. Then he praised God and reminded of Him, and then said: “O’ people! Behold! It seems the time approached when I shall be called away (by God) and I shall answer that call. Behold! I am leaving for you two precious things. First of them is the book of God in which there is light and guidance … The other one is my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God about my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God about my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God about my ahl al bayt. (three times).”

 Sahih Muslim, Chapter: The virtues of the companions, Section: The virtues of 'Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1873, tradition: 36. For English version, Chapter CMXCVI, v4, p1286, tradition: 5920
Understanding the tradition
Before proceeding further, it would be beneficial to explain certain words that occur in the tradition, the elucidation of whose meaning is essential for understanding its meaning and import. ‘Thaqalayn’, is the dual of thaql, meaning weight, burden and load and is used figuratively for anything that is important, superior, precious, paramount, significant, weighty, indispensable, essential, of solemn and serious concern of possessing primacy and priority. E. W. Lane in the Arabic-English Lexicon, while defining thaql, writes, ‘A thing, or things, that a man has with him, of such things as burden him’ … ‘Anything held in high estimation, in much request, and preserved with care. (K, TA.) Hence the tradition, [Verily I am leaving among you the two objects of high estimation and of care, the Book of God, and my kindred, or near kindred]: (K :)or they are this called because of the heaviness of acting the manner required by them.

The plural of thaql, that is athqal occurs in the Quran in the following surah, When earth is shaken with a mighty shaking and earth brings forth her burden (athqal), and many says, ‘What ails her?’ Upon that day she shall tell her tidings for that her Lord has inspired her. (Quran, 99:1-5) The word thaql is also to be found in the suras 16:7, and 29:13. The exegetes interpret the word athqal as referring either to the bodies of the dead of mankind that shall be resurrected on the day of resurrection, or to the precious minerals and treasures that lie buried in the earth (Lisan al’arab, Ibn Manzur, v2 p112, Asas al-balaghah, al Zamakhshari, p46). The dual thaqalan which occurs in 55:31 is interpreted as referring to the species of mankind and jinn, who are most significant creatures that inhabit the earth. According to an interpretation quoted by al Razi, the designation thaqalan (the dual form of thaqal, “a thing of weight”) signifies that both these categories of human beings are liable to, and therefore burdened with, sinning. (The Message of the Quran, M. Asad, p826, note 14). To sum up, the word thaql has connotations akin to those of the word ‘weighty’ in the English language. In any case, the prophetic tradition itself explains the word thaqalayn as referring to the Quran and the ahl al bayt of the Prophet.

Another word that also needs some elucidation is itrah. The lexicographers explain itrah as meaning one’s own kindred, in particular one’s children, grandchildren and descendants as well as the children of one’s paternal uncles. (Lisan al arab, v9 p34, Asas al balaghah, p292). Ibn Manzur, in his dictionary, Lisan al arab, after giving the above meaning of itrah, refers to Ibn Sayyidah’s statement that by itrah of the Prophet are meant his descendants through his daughter, Lady Fatimah. Then he cites authorities such as Ibn al Athir and Ibn al Arabi to the effect that by itrah are meant one’s closest relations: i.e. children and descendants. He also refers to the opinions, which give a broader meaning to the word, covering remoter blood relations.

The fact of the matter remains that the Prophet has placed those to whom he refers to as his itrah, and ahl al bayt by the side of the Quran as the second source of guidance for his community until the judgement day implies that he was not referring to ordinary individuals from among his close relations and descendants.
Is the honor due to relationship?
It may appear that the selection of the members of the house of the Prophet as a source of guidance is due to their blood relationship. If so, then it would not be in accord with the spirit of the Islamic teachings. To bestow on them such a unique honor, is in conflict with the following principles,

  1. All people in the eyes of God are equal, for the Quran declared: O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, that Ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honored of you in the sight of God is (he who is) most righteous of you. And God has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). (Quran, 49:13)

  2. God does not penalize or reward a servant of His for the sins or good deeds of his parents or his close and distant relatives, as He, states in the Quran: O mankind! Do your duty to your Lord and fear a day when no father can avail aught for his son, nor son avail aught for his father. Verily the promise of God is true: let not then this present life deceive you. Nor let the chief deceiver deceive you about God. (Quran, 31:33)

Kinship to the Prophet, does not mean acceptance by God, nor does it secure for his relatives a place in paradise or insure them against divine punishment. God, according to Islamic teachings has created paradise for whoever obeys Him and the place of punishment for whoever dis-obeys him, regardless of family affiliation, nationality or race. The Quran even contains a chapter defaming Abu Lahab who was an uncle of the Prophet: Perish the hands of Abu Lahab, perish he … (Quran, 111:1).

Thus the truth is that the word ‘ahlal bayt’ means only the chosen relatives of the Prophet. These chosen individuals are not chosen or honored because of their relationship to the Prophet, but because of their virtues.

Tradition of the ‘Quran and my Sunnah’
The Sunnis voice their objection to the said tradition of the two weighty things, wording it differently to read, ‘I have left among you the book of God and my sunnah’.

Needless to say, both traditions do not contradict one another, because the authentic ‘sunnah’ is preserved with the ahl al bayt, and the residents of the house know better what their house contains.

However, there is sufficient evidence that stems from the presence of traditions in the works of the Sunnis, that lends credence to the import of the tradition ‘ … the book of God my sunnah’, as un-authentic. If the tradition was authentic, Umar thus would not have been justified to say that ‘Book of God is sufficient’ as recorded by Abu Abdullah Muhammad b. Ismail b. Ibrahim b. al Mughira al Ja’fi (also known as Bukhari), through Ibn 'Abbas:

When the time of the death of the Prophet approached while there were some men in the house, and among them was 'Umar Ibn al-Khattab, the Prophet said: “Come near let me write for you a writing after which you will never go astray.” 'Umar said: “The Prophet is seriously ill, and you have the Quran, so God’s Book is sufficient for us.” The people in the house differed and disputed. Some of them said, “Come near so that God’s Apostle may write for you a writing after which you will not go astray,” while the others said what 'Umar said. When they made much noise and quarreled greatly in front of the Prophet he said to them, “Go away and leave me.” Ibn 'Abbas used to say, "It was a great disaster that their quarrel and noise prevented God’s Apostle from writing a statement for them.

 Sahih al-Bukhari, chapter: It is disliked to differ, [v9, p. 346-7, tradition: 468] and chapter: The saying of the patient: ‘Go away from me’, [v7, p. 389, tradition: 573]
 Sahih Muslim, chapter of “Kitab al-Wasiyya” in section “Bab tark al-wasiyya,” 1980 Edition, Arabic version (Saudi Arabia), v3, p1259, tradition: 1637/22. For english version: Chapter DCLI ‘He who has not anything with him to will away should not do it’. [v3, pp870, tradition: 4016]
Compilation of traditions
Secondly, had the tradition reading ‘… the book of God and my sunnah’ been authentic, traditions (hadith) of the Prophet would have been recorded earlier than the time of ‘Umar b. Abd al Aziz (or even a little later), as recorded.

And ‘Umar bin Abdul Aziz wrote to Abu Bakr bin Hazm, ‘Look for the knowledge of hadith and get it written, as I am afraid that religious knowledge will vanish and the religious learned men will pass away (die). Do not accept anything save the hadiths of the Prophet (upon whom be peace,). Circulate knowledge and teach the ignorant, for knowledge does not vanish except when it is kept secretly. (to oneself). (Sahih al Bukhari, The Book of Knowledge, Chapter: How the (religious) knowledge will be taken away? v1, pp79.)

Thirdly, had the tradition reading ‘ … the book of God and my sunnah’ been authentic, the traditions of the Prophet would have had put down in writing during his life-time. To quote a historian,

In the days of the first four Caliphs, Islamic jurisprudence and traditions were widely studied. They were also taught by a number of teachers. All this was however done orally: and nothing was reduced to writing. The Umayyads were the first to order muslims to write. Ibn ‘Abd al Barr, in his book Jami’ bayan al ‘ilm, has quoted the Imam al Zuhri as saying: We did not like to transfer knowledge to paper, but at last a time came when men in authority compelled us to do so. (Jami’ bayan al ‘ilm, Cairo edition., p.136).

Muawiya was the first to encourage writings. He invited Ubaid ibn Sharya to come from Yemen and compile a history of the ancients. The book is named Akhbar la Madiyin. (Fihrist of Ibn Nadim, p.244).

Next to Muawiya came ‘Abd al Malik ibn Marwan, who ascended the throne in the year 65 A.H (684 C.E). He ordered the scholars to write books of every type and every topic. Said ibn Jubair, the greatest scholar of the day was ordered to write a tafsir (commentary of the Quran). This, the Imam did and the tafsir was deposited in the state library. The tafsir considered to have been written by ‘Ata ibn Dinar, is the same that Said had written. ‘Ata had somehow, secured it from the royal library. (Mizan al I’tidal, Ata Ibn Dinar’s version).

The reign of ‘Umar bin Abd al Aziz gave a fresh impetus to literary activity. Orders were promulgated all over the empire for sayings of the Prophet to be complied into the form of books. Sad bin Ibrahim who was a famous traditionist and Qadhi (judge) of Medina, was asked to write into books a very large number of traditions: and they were all sent to various parts in the Muslim empire. Ibn ‘Abd al Barr, in his Jami’ Bayan al ‘Ilm, quoted ibn Ibrahim as saying: Umar ibn Abd al Aziz ordered us to collect the traditions. We did so and wrote a large number of volumes; and Umar ibn Abd al Aziz sent one set to each of the parts of his empire. (Jami’ Bayan al ‘ilm, Cairo edition, p. 36)

 Siratun Nabi, The Life of the Prophet, Shibli Numani, Chapter: Biography and Ilm al Kalam, Section: Written Literature Under State Patronage, v1 pp17-18

Apart from the above considerations, on tracing the source of this report from Abu Huraira which states “Quran and sunnah” it has not been recorded in any of the six authentic Sunni collections of the traditions (sihah as sitta). Not only that, but also al-Bukhari, al-Nisa’i, and al-Dhahabi and many others rated this report (Quran and sunnah) to be weak because of its weak isnad (as explained by M.M Azami, ‘ isnad, according to Arabic lexicography means the thing on which another relies. As we rely on the narrators for the knowledge of the statement of the Prophet this chain is called isnad.’ Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature, p.32).

Moreover, the word “sunnah” in itself does not serve the purpose of knowledge. All muslims irrespective of their persuasions claim that they follow the sunnah of the Prophet. The differences among muslims surfaces from the transmitted Prophetic traditions through different avenues. Such traditions serve as an explanatory means of the Quran upon whose authenticity all muslims agree. Thus, a divergence in the transmitted traditions, has led to a differing in the interpretation of Quran and the prophetic sunnah. All muslims, as a result, splintered into different schools, groups, offshoots, which is believed to add up to seventy three groups.

The Prophet as usual thus clarifies:

I am leaving for you two precious and weighty Symbols that if you adhere to both of them you shall not go astray after me. They are: the Book of God and my progeny, that is my ahl al bayt. The Merciful has informed me that these two shall not separate from each other till they come to me by the Pool (of Paradise).

 Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 662-663,328
 al-Mustadrak, al-Hakim, Chapter: Understanding (the virtues) of Companions, v3, pp 109,110,148,533 who wrote this tradition is authentic (sahih) based on the criteria of the two shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim).
 Sunan, Daarami, v2, p432
 Musnad, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v3, pp 14,17,26,59, v4, pp 366,370-372,v5, pp 182,189,350,366,419
 Fadha’il al-Sahaba, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p585, tradition: 990
 al-Khasa’is, al-Nisa’i, pp 21,30
 al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar Haithami, Ch. 11, section 1, p230
 al-Kabir, al-Tabarani, v3, pp 62-63,137
 Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Chapter al-I’tisam bi Habl God v1 p44.
 Tafsir, Ibn Kathir (complete version), v4, p113, under commentary of verse 42:23 of Quran (four traditions).
 al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Ibn Sa’d, v2, p194, Pub. Dar al-Sadr, Lebanon.
 al-Jami’ al-Saghir, al-Suyuti, v1, p353, and also in v2
 Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haithami, v9, p163
 al-Fatih al-Kabir, al-Binhani, v1, p451
 Usudul Ghaba fi Ma’rifat al-Sahaba, Ibn al-Athir, v2, p12
 Jami’ al-Usul, Ibn al-Athir, v1, p187
 History, Ibn Asakir, v5, p436
 al-Taj al-Jami’ Lil Usul, v3, p308
 al-Durr al-Manthur, al-Hafidh al-Suyuti, v2, p60
 Yanabi al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, pp 38,183
 Abaqat al-Anwar, v1, p16 … and many more …

The members of the Prophet’s family (the ahl al bayt) always were distinguished by virtue of their knowledge of the Quranic sciences and Prophetic tradition (sunnah), and hence the general masses looked upon them as poles of guidance. Said Nursi reflects on the same observation as follows:

Thus, this is why this truth was made known in hadiths under the heading of following the Book and the Prophet’s practices (sunnah). That is to say, what was required from the family of the Prophet in respect of the function of prophethood were the practices of the Prophet. Just as some one who abandoned the Prophet’s practices could not truly be a member of his family, so too such a person could not be a true friend to them.

Also, the reason he desired the Community to gather around his family was that, with God’s permission, he knew his family were going to become numerous with the passing of time, and that Islam was going to become weak. Therefore an extremely strong and numerous mutually supportive group of people was necessary so that it could be the means to and centre for the spiritual and moral progress of the Word of Islam. With Divine permission, he thought of this, and desired that his community should gather around his family. (The Fourth Flash, Flashes Collection, Section: First Station, Said Nursi, p.38)

It would only be a logical consequence to state that those vested with knowledge, understood the sunnah better than any one else.

Narrated Umm Salama:

The Messenger of God said: “'Ali is with the Quran, and the Quran is with 'Ali. They shall not separate from each other till they both return to me by the Pool (of Paradise).”

 al-Mustadrak, al-Hakim, v3, p124 on the authority of Umm Salama
 al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar, Ch. 9, section 2, pp 191,194
 al-Awsat, al-Tabarani; also in al-Saghir
 Tarikh al-Khulafaa, Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, p173
Ahl al Bayt and similitude to the Ark of Noah
The story of the ark of Noah remains a reminder, an everlasting sign and warning to mankind – a sign of deliverance to the righteous. God says in the Quran: ‘He (once) set Noah to his people, and he tarried among them a thousand years less fifty: but the deluge overwhelmed them while they (persisted) in sin. But we saved him and his companions of the ark, and we made the (ark) a sign for all peoples!’ (Quran, 29:14-5) and also ‘At length, behold! There came our command, and the fountains of the earth gushed forth! We said: Embark therein, of each kind, two, male and female, and your family – except those whom against the word has already gone forth – and the believers. But only a few believed in him. So he said: Embark ye on the ark in the name of God, whether it move or be at rest! For my Lord is, be sure, Oft forgiving, Most Merciful!. (Quran, 11:40-1)

And the words of the Prophet:

Behold! My ahl al bayt are like the Ark of Noah. Whoever embarked in it was saved, and whoever turned away from it was perished.
7
 al-Mustadrak, al-Hakim, v2, p343, v3, pp 150-151 on the authority of Abu Dhar. al-Hakim said this tradition is authentic (sahih).
 Fadha’il al-Sahaba, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p786
 Tafsir al-Kabir, Fakhr al-Razi, under the commentary of verse 42:23, Part 27, p167
 al-Bazzar, on the authority of Ibn Abbas and Ibn Zubair with the wording “drowned” instead of “perished”.
 al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar Haithami, Ch. 11, section 1, p234 under Verse 8:33. Also in section 2, p282. He said this tradition has been transmitted via numerous authorities.
 Tarikh al-Khulafaa and Jami’ al-Saghir, al-Suyuti
 al-Kabir, al-Tabarani, v3, pp 37,38
 al-Saghir, al-Tabarani, v2, p22
 Hilyatul Awliyaa, Abu Nu’aim, v4, p306
 al-Kuna wal Asmaa, al-Dulabi, v1, p76
 Yanabi al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, pp 30,370
 al-Durr al-Manthur, al-Hafidh al-Suyuti, v9, p115
 Kanz al Ummal, Muttaqi al Hindi, v6 p216, tradition: 3772
 Dhakha’ir al-Uqba, Muhibb al-Tabari, p20
 Tarikh, al-Khateeb Baghdadi, v12, p19

The above tradition is also narrated by Ibn Abbas, Anas ibn Malik, Abu Said al Khudri, Abdullah bin Zubair. It affirms the understanding that those who adopt and turn towards the school of ahl al bayt and follow them, will be ranked among the righteous ones.

It is this message that is echoed again by the Prophet

Do not be ahead of them for you will perish, do not turn away from them for you will perish, and do not try to teach them since they know more than you do!

 al-Durr al-Manthur, al-Suyuti, v2, p60
 al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar al-Haithami, Ch. 11, section 1, p230, quoted from al-Tabarani, also in section 2, p342
 Usudul Ghaba, Ibn al-Athir, v3, p137
 Yanabi’ al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, p41, and P335
 Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, v1, p168
 Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haithami, v9, p163
 Abaqat al-Anwar, v1, p184
 A’alam al-Wara, pp 132-133
 Tadhkirat al-Khawas al-Umma, Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi al-Hanafi, pp 28-33
 al-Sira al-Halabiyya, Nur al-Din al-Halabi, v3, p273

Ahl al Bayt and similitude to the Gate of Repentance
A Quranic reference to this is: ‘And remember when We said: Enter this town, and eat of the plenty therein as ye wish, but enter the gate with humility, in posture and in words, and We shall forgive you your faults and increase (the portion of) those who do good.’ (Quran, 2:58)

The Prophet in his tradition also speaks of in the same vein:

My ahl al bayt are like the gate of repentance of the children of Israel; whoever entered therein was forgiven.

 Majma’ al-Zawa’id, by al-Haithami, v9, p168
 al-Awsat, by al-Tabarani, tradition: 18
 Arba’in, by al-Nabahani, p216
 al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, by Ibn Hajar al-Haithami, Ch. 11, section 1, pp 230,234
 Another fairly similar tradition was recorded by al-Darqunti as well as Ibn Hajar in his al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ch. 9, section 2, p193 where the Prophet said: “Ali is the gate of repentance, whoever entered therein was a believer and whoever went out was an unbeliever.”

The above tradition was in connection with verses 2:58 and 7:161 of Quran which describes the gate of repentance of Bani Israel. Those of the companions of Moses who did not enter the gate of the repentance were lost in the desert for forty years, while those who did not enter the ark of Noah were drowned. Ibn Hajar concludes that:

The analogy of the ark of Noah signifies that those who love and honor the ahl al bayt and derive from their guidance will be rescued from the darkness of opposition, and those who will turn against them will be drowned in the sea of ingratitude and will perish in the desert of insubordination and rebellion. (al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, by Ibn Hajar, p91)

Different chains of the tradition of two weighty things (al-thaqalayn) prove conclusively that it is a matter very dear to the Prophet and hence, the repetition on the authority of more than thirty of the companions through various sources, attests to its importance. The Prophet repeated these words over and over again (and not merely in one isolated instance but on several occasions) publicly to stress its importance. He made the announcement during the farewell pilgrimage, on the day of Arafat, on the day of Ghadir Khum, on the return from Ta’if, also in Medina from the pulpit, and in his deathbed when the room was packed with his disciples, he said:

O folk! I am soon going to depart from here, and although I have already told you, I repeat once more that I am leaving with you two things, namely, the Book of God and my descendants, that is, my Ahlul-Bait." Then he lifted Ali by the hand and said: "Behold! this Ali is with the Quran and the Quran is with him. These two shall never separate from each other until they come to me at the Pool of Kawthar. (al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, by Ibn Hajar, Ch. 9, section 2)

Ibn Hajar al-Haithami wrote:

The traditions of adherence has been handed down through a large number of sources and more than twenty of the disciples have related it.

And further,

Here a doubt arises, and it is that while the tradition has come down through various sources, some say that the words were spoken during the last pilgrimage, others that they were spoken at Medina when he lay on his deathbed and the room was packed with his disciples, yet another saying that he spoke these words at Ghadir Khum, or in another hadith, on the return from Ta’if. But there is no inconsistency in these, since having regards to the importance and greatness of the Quran and the pure ahl al bayt, and with a view of emphasizing the point before the people, the Holy Prophet might have repeated these words on all these occasions so that any one who had not heard them before might hear them now." (al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, by Ibn Hajar al-Haithami, Ch. 11, section 1, p230)

Thus the prophetic instructions were clear in urging muslims to follow the interpretation of Quran and his sunnah as transmitted through the channel of ahl al bayt whose in-errancy, purity, and righteousness is confirmed by the Quran (the last sentence of verse 33:33).

Suggestion for further reading

al Tawhid Quarterly Journal of Islamic Studies, Hadith al Thaqalayn: A Study of its Tawatur, Parts I, II, III, IV, The Islamic Republic of Iran. A detailed discussion on hadith al thaqalayn, with a focus on the different versions of the same tradition, various occasions related to its mentioning, chain of narrators of the hadith, it’s meaning, and lastly, a comparison against those traditions that conflict with hadith al thaqalayn. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp

Mohammad Jawad Chirri, The Brother of the Prophet Mohammad (The Imam Ali), The Islamic Center of America, Detroit Michigan, 1988. Chapter: The House of the Prophet Mohammad. A book that imparts an understanding of the position of the Shi’a, through the authentic and reliable works of hadiths from the Sunni works, covering aspects of the life of the fourth rightly guided for the Sunni’s and the first Imam of the Shi’ites with an emphasis on the household (ahl al bayt) of the Prophet.

---- Inquiries about Islam, The Islamic Center of America, 1986 Revised Edition. Chapter: 21, Differences among Muslims. An undertaking of the author to highlight the differences among the muslims, with a specific note to it’s relevance in a contemporary society. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp

Sayyid Mujtaba Musavi Lari, Imamate and Leadership, Lessons on Islamic Doctrine (Book Four), translated by Hamid Algar, Sayyed Mojtaba Musavi Lari Foundation of Islamic C.P.W, 12 Entezam St, Qom, I.R Iran, 1996. Lesson Six, The Relationship between the Quran and the Progeny of the Prophet, Lesson Thirteen, The True Nature of the Holders of Authority. This books outlines the concept of leadership as understood by the Shi’ites with a specific emphasis at explaining the foundations of one of the principle of faith as held by the Shi’ites, namely ‘Imamate’, loosely translated as Leaderhip. Covers an extensive portion on Shi’ism and its development in history.

Ideals and Realities of Islam, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, George Allen and Unwin (1966), Chapter VI, Sunnism and Shi’ism - Twelve Imam Shi’ism and Isma’ilism. Treats the subject of the division within Islam into Sunnism and Shi’'ism from a religious and historical perspective, on the question of successorship of the Prophet, and with a specific emphasis on the exoteric and esoteric aspects of religion as viewed by the Shi’ites.

Shi’a, S. M. H Tabatabai, translated by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Ansariyan Publications, Iran, Chapter VI, On the Knowledge of the Imam (Imamology). A book which treats the historical reality of Shi’ism within Islam, her contribution to the spread of the Quranic message, and her existence as a possibility within the Islamic revelation itself. The chosen chapter, specifically focusses on the role of the imams of the ahl al bayt, in the exposition of the divine sciences, that again goes back to the underlying wisdom of treating the ahl al bayt with the Quran (thus the hadith al thaqalayn).

Islamic Spirituality Foundations (vol I of II), edited by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1997. Chapter 9, Twelve Imam Shi’ism, Syed Husain M. Jafri, A dicsussion on Twelve Imam Shi’ism, with an extensive discussion on the role of the Imam and the significance of their lives, with a specific treatment of the Shi’ite piety and practices.

The Right Path, 'Abd al Husayn Sharaf al Din al Musawi, Zahra Publications, 1986, Letter 8: Failure to appreciate my former letter. Petitio Principii does not arise. The tradition of the ‘two weighty things’ …. A book consisting a series of letters in the form of questions and answers, seeks to explain, justify and uphold the raison d’etre of Shi’ism, between a Sunni and a Shi’a scholar, Salim al Bishri and the aforementioned name. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp.

Shi’as are the Ahl al Sunnah, al Tijani al Samawi, Vantage Press Inc, 1996. Chapter: Is it “the book of Allah and my Progeny” or “the Book of Allah and my Sunnah?”. A book that explores the delicate, yet essential question of: “Who is better qualified to the claim of being a followers of Islam’s Prophet in spirit and practice?”. The selected chapter further elaborates on the Tradition of the ‘Quran and my Sunnah’.

ya ya all of you are AALims.

Assalam O Alaikum

Brother Imran
First of all i want to make a thing very much clear to you, I do not follow (do taqleed) of any imams you have mentioned. I am not a hanafi or shafaee or from any other firqa. I just follow what Allah SWT has told us to follow, i.e. Quran and Sunnah of Prophet SAW. I do respect all the imams, May Allah shower his blessings on them. They did too much for the religion but as far as Taqleed is concerned i just follow what is stated in Quran.

You see the advantages in following Quran and Sunnah directly are no one can challenge you for the validity of your faith. Like if someone asks me why i do so and so act, i tell him so and so hadith tells me to do it, but had i been following a imam, like imam malik, or imam Hanifa or imam jafar or any other imam, i would have said that so and so imam has told us to do without knowing the source of it.

For example let us take a very simple example basically all my family are sunni, hanafi, they do not say ameen loudly or do not do Rafayadain. But i found sahih ahadith in which it is very very clearly mentioned that we should say ameen loudly and should do rafayadain.

As far as validity of Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim is concerned, ya ibn halal, its the most authentic book and i do not have any knowledge of any invalid hadith. so far.

Now lets start discussing the basic thing that is our faith. Shia aqeeda allows to do Sajda on holy shrines also. Now this is a very very big issue which can make a Muslim mushrik.

Would you like to throw some light on it?

Brother Ali Abbas
You are welcome to the thread but please refarin from pasting such long messages.

I am sure that our discussions will be in a very friendly and brotherly environment. May Allah show us all the right way and fill our hearts with His love and minds with the right knowledge of His deen.

Assalam O Alaikum

Brother Abdullah,

Okay so you don't follow four Imams that majority of muslims do. As for Brother Abbas's reply, I think you started this discussion for "Imran and others", so he had chosen a topic and provided his logic with many referrences from your authoritive sahih books. I would be glad to answer your question about hold shrines, but if you could reply to Brother Abbas's topic inquiry I would be very grateful. In other words, if you can verify the stuff he mentioned had gotten from sahih books??? Then we can move to more secondary nature questions like Holy shrines etc etc.

Assalam O Alaikum

Brother Imran and Ali
I wanted to discuss the most important issue i.e. shirk with you, a shirk being the sin which will not be forgiven by Allah SWT as He says "Inna Allaha Yaghfiru … " Allah SWT will forgive all sins except Shirk. Whereas, the subject you want to discuss i.e. the first Khalifa being Hazrat Ali or Ahl-e-Bait is not as important as discussing shirk. But still I will go your way.

Now I have read the topic by brother Ali Abbas, and the answer lies in there it self.

  1. All people in the eyes of God are equal, for the Quran declared: O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, that Ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honored of you in the sight of God is (he who is) most righteous of you. And God has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). (Quran, 49:13)

  2. God does not penalize or reward a servant of His for the sins or good deeds of his parents or his close and distant relatives, as He, states in the Quran: O mankind! Do your duty to your Lord and fear a day when no father can avail aught for his son, nor son avail aught for his father. Verily the promise of God is true: let not then this present life deceive you. Nor let the chief deceiver deceive you about God. (Quran, 31:33)

The above ayats can act as the Law in deciding anything. So it is final that the best among the people is the one who has the most amal saleh.

Now just see these ahadith from Sahih Bukhari :

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 6: Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
Allah's Apostle addressed the people saying, "Allah has given option to a slave to choose this world or what is with Him. The slave has chosen what is with Allah." Abu Bakr wept, and we were astonished at his weeping caused by what the Prophet mentioned as to a Slave ( of Allah) who had been offered a choice, (we learned later on) that Allah's Apostle himself was the person who was given the choice, and that Abu Bakr knew best of all of us. Allah's Apostle added, "The person who has favored me most of all both with his company and wealth, is Abu Bakr. If I were to take a Khalil other than my Lord, I would have taken Abu Bakr as such, but (what relates us) is the Islamic brotherhood and friendliness. All the gates of the Mosque should be closed except the gate of Abu Bakr."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 7: Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
We used to compare the people as to who was better during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle . We used to regard Abu Bakr as the best, then 'Umar, and then 'Uthman .

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 22: Narrated Abu Said:
The Prophet said, "Do not abuse my companions for if any one of you spent gold equal to Uhud (in Allah's Cause) it would not be equal to a Mud or even a half Mud spent by one of them."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 42: Narrated Abu Musa:
While I was with the Prophet in one of the gardens of Medina, a man came and asked me to open the gate. The Prophet said to me, "Open the gate for him and give him the glad tidings that he will enter Paradise." I opened (the gate) for him, and behold! It was Abu Bakr. I informed him of the glad tidings the Prophet had said, and he praised Allah. Then another man came and asked me to open the gate. The Prophet said to me "Open (the gate) and give him the glad tidings of entering Paradise." I opened (the gate) for him, and behold! It was 'Umar. I informed him of what the Prophet had said, and he praised Allah. Then another man came and asked me to open the gate. The Prophet said to me. "Open (the gate) for him and inform him of the glad tidings, of entering Paradise with a calamity which will befall him. " Behold ! It was 'Uthman, I informed him of what Allah's Apostle had said. He praised Allah and said, "I seek Allah's Aid."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 93: Narrated 'Uqba bin Al-Harith:
I saw Abu Bakr carrying Al-Hasan and saying, "Let my father be sacrificed for you; you resemble the Prophet and not 'Ali," while 'Ali was laughing at this.

Brothers, Prophets never differed his family from other Muslims, you must have heard that hadith in which a woman's hand had to be cut because she stole (theft) and at that time he said if it was Fatima Bint Mohammed, she would have had the same punishment. So He never differed among his family and other Muslims. And why would he, when Allah SWT has not made a difference.

About the hadith you have mentioned, the word is Sunnah and not Ahl-e-Bayyt. Just think for a moment, if its Ahl-e-Bayyt and not Sunnah then thousands of ahadith today become invalid and of now use because they were not transmitted by a member of the family of Prophet SAW. I will ask you a question, Is Quran and ahadith (sunnah) more important for you or is Quran and Ahly-e-Bayyt. Ahlay-Bayt is just a group of very highly respected people like other sahaba. In Quran Allah SWT says

Atiullah wa iti urrasool "Follow Allah SWT i.e. Quran and follow Rasool (Prophet SAW).

Now how can we follow Prophet SAW, we can follow him by his sunnah, isn't it. We cannot follow him by Ahyl-e-Bayt, because in that case, we have to do what ever is transmitted by Ahl-e-bayyt only and the hadiths transmitted by other sahaba becomes invalid as they are not from ahl-e-bayt.

Sahih Bukhari
Volume 9, Book 92, Number 381:
Narrated Hudhaifa:
Allah's Apostle said to us, "Honesty descended from the Heavens and settled in the roots of the hearts of men (faithful believers), and then the Quran was revealed and the people read the Quran, (and learnt it from it) and also learnt it from the Sunna." Both Quran and Sunna strengthened their (the faithful believers') honesty. (See Hadith No. 208)

Why Abu Bakr RAA made first Khalifa

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 8: Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
The Prophet said, "If I were to take a Khalil, I would have taken Abu Bakr, but he is my brother and my companion (in Islam)."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 11: Narrated Jubair bin Mutim:
A woman came to the Prophet who ordered her to return to him again. She said, "What if I came and did not find you?" as if she wanted to say, "If I found you dead?" The Prophet said, "If you should not find me, go to Abu Bakr."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 14: Narrated 'Amr bin Al-As:
The Prophet deputed me to read the Army of Dhat-as-Salasil. I came to him and said, "Who is the most beloved person to you?" He said, " 'Aisha." I asked, "Among the men?" He said, "Her father." I said, "Who then?" He said, "Then 'Umar bin Al-Khattab." He then named other men.

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 16: Narrated Abu Huraira:
I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "While I was sleeping, I saw myself standing at a well, on it there was a bucket. I drew water from the well as much as Allah wished. Then Ibn Abi Quhafa (i.e. Abu Bakr) took the bucket from me and brought out one or two buckets (of water) and there was weakness in his drawing the water. May Allah forgive his weakness for him. Then the bucket turned into a very big one and Ibn Al-Khattab took it over and I had never seen such a mighty person amongst the people as him in performing such hard work, till the people drank to their satisfaction and watered their camels that knelt down there."

Volume 1, Book 2, Number 22:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
Allah's Apostle said, "While I was sleeping I saw (in a dream) some people wearing shirts of which some were reaching up to the breasts only while others were even shorter than that. Umar bin Al-Khattab was shown wearing a shirt that he was dragging." The people asked, "How did you interpret it? (What is its interpretation) O Allah's Apostle?" He (the Prophet ) replied, "It is the Religion."

Brothers, In the name of Allah please keep one thing in your mind that Hazrat Abu Bakr, Umar, Usman, Ali were all Jalil ul Qadr Sahaba and there names are in ashra mubassar (people informed in their life that they will go to Jannah) so how can you point a finger on those characters. Please refrain from it as Prophet SAW loved them very much.

Please let me know if you have any difficulty understanding the above.

Assalam O Alaikum

Abdulla > Assalam O Alaikum
Abdulla > Brother Imran

Dear br. Abdulla
'Assalam o alaikum.

Abdulla > First of all i want to make a thing very much clear to you, I do not follow (do taqleed) of any
Abdulla > imams you have mentioned. I am not a hanafi or shafaee or from any other firqa. I just follow
Abdulla > what Allah SWT has told us to follow, i.e. Quran and Sunnah of Prophet SAW. I do respect all
Abdulla > the imams, May Allah shower his blessings on them. They did too much for the religion but as
Abdulla > far as Taqleed is concerned i just follow what is stated in Quran.

Even though this post is addressed to br. Imran, I shall take the liberty of sharing some thoughts, and more so will add credence to what I have to say from material that is common between us.

The Quran states: O' you who believe! Obey Allah, and Obey Apostle and those from among you who are given authority * (by Allah). (Quran 4:59) Even though you have denied to accept the authority of the Ahl al Bayt, as the ulil amr (those given authority) as was evident from my article, and I shall repeat that tradition here

It is narrated by Abul Husain Muslim b. al Hajjaj al Nisapuri (also known as Muslim) in his work Sahih Muslim (as well as many other sources) that:

Someday (after his last pilgrimage) the Messenger of God, stood to give us a speech beside a pond, which is known as Khum (Ghadir Khum), located between Mecca and Medina. Then he praised God and reminded of Him, and then said: "O' people! Behold! It seems the time approached when I shall be called away (by God) and I shall answer that call. Behold! I am leaving for you two precious things. First of them is the book of God in which there is light and guidance ... The other one is my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God about my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God about my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God about my ahl al bayt. (three times)."

Sahih Muslim, Chapter: The virtues of the companions, Section: The virtues of 'Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1873, tradition: 36. For English version, Chapter CMXCVI, v4, p1286, tradition: 5920

While muslims do not dis-agree with the following of the Quran and the Sunnah, the question, thereat lies at the "source" from where the sunnah reached us. As you have succintly and sufficently shared with us, the source of your sunnah comes from the ashab (i.e the companions). So your statement that you follow only the 'Quran and Sunnah' is false, mis-leading and denies the precedent set by the aya (verse) I shared. In the foregoing para I shall share with you, why the ashab are not the 'ulil 'amr.

My brother also wrote:

Abdulla > About the hadith you have mentioned, the word is Sunnah and not Ahl-e-Bayyt. Just think for a
Abdulla > moment, if its Ahl-e-Bayyt and not Sunnah then thousands of ahadith today become invalid
Abdulla > and of now use because they were not transmitted by a member of the family of Prophet SAW.
Abdulla > I will ask you a question, Is Quran and ahadith (sunnah) more important for you or is Quran
Abdulla > and Ahly-e-Bayyt. Ahlay-Bayt is just a group of very highly respected people like other
Abdulla > sahaba. In Quran Allah SWT says
Abdulla >Atiullah wa iti urrasool "Follow Allah SWT i.e. Quran and follow Rasool (Prophet SAW).

Abdulla > Now how can we follow Prophet SAW, we can follow him by his sunnah, isn't it. We cannot
Abdulla > follow him by Ahyl-e-Bayt, because in that case, we have to do what ever is transmitted by
Abdulla > Ahl-e-bayyt only and the hadiths transmitted by other sahaba becomes invalid as they are not
Abdulla > from ahl-e-bayt.

The Quran and the Ahl al Bayt are important to me, since the Prophet [saw] emphasized it, as evident from Sahih Muslim, and since the Ahl al Bayt are the source of the "authentic" sunnah. Also note, that while there are traditions transmitted on the authority of the ashab, they do not become invalid, but when compared to the traditions narrated by the Imams of the Ahl al Bayt, they do not come close to the essence and the authority carried by them. The very inclusion of the Quran and the Ahl al Bayt in the hadith al thaqalayn speaks of this principle.

While your statement that the Ahl al Bayt are "just is just a group of very highly respected people like other sahaba" is also mis-leading, since the Prophet never ever equated the ashab (companions) with the Quran. On the contrary there are traditions in the works of Bukhari that implicate the ashab (companions) to mis-guidance and deviancy, and thus their eventual earning of displeasure of Allah, subhanahu. This is why they can not be 'Ulil 'amr [those vested with authority as in Quran 4:59] . The evidence is as follows:

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.578 Narrated 'Abdullah: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount." 'Abdullah added: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount, and some of you will be brought in front of me till I will see them and then they will be taken away from me and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You do not know what they did after you had left.'

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.584 Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, 'My companions!' Then it will be said, 'You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you." (also Sahih Muslim, part 15, pp 53-54)

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.585 Narrated Abu Hazim from Sahl bin Sa'd: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor (forerunner) at the Lake- Fount, and whoever will pass by there, he will drink from it and whoever will drink from it, he will never be thirsty. There will come to me some people whom I will recognize, and they will recognize me, but a barrier will be placed between me and them." Abu Hazim added: Nu'man bin Abi 'Aiyash, on hearing me, said. "Did you hear this from Sahl?" I said, "Yes." He said, " I bear witness that I heard Abu Said al-Khudri saying the same, adding that the Prophet said: 'I will say: They are my companions. Then it will be said to me, 'You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left'. I will say, 'Far removed, far removed (from mercy), those who changed after me." Abu Huraira narrated that the Prophet said, "On the Day of Resurrection a group of companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the Lake-Fount, and I will say, 'O Lord (those are) my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from the true Islam)."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.586 Narrated Ibn al-Musaiyab: "Some men from my companions will come to my Lake-Fount and they will be driven away from it, and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'You have no knowledge of what they innovated after you left: they turned APOSTATE as renegades (reverted from true Islam)." (also Sahih Muslim, part 10, p64, also P59)

Sahih Bukhari Hadith: 8.587 Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "While I was sleeping, a group (of my followers were brought close to me), and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from amongst (us) me and them, he said (to them), 'Come along.' I asked, 'Where?' He said, 'To the (Hell) Fire, by Allah' I asked, 'what is wrong with them?' He said, 'They turned APOSTATE as renegades after you left.' Then behold! (Another) group (of my followers) were brought close to me, and when I recognized them, a man (an angel) came out from (me and them) he said (to them); Come along.' I asked, "Where?' He said, 'To the (Hell) Fire, by Allah.' I asked, What is wrong with them?' He said, 'They turned APOSTATE as renegades after you left. So I did not see anyone of them escaping except a few who were like camels without a shepherd."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.592 Narrated Asma 'bint Abu Bakr: The Prophet said, "I will be standing at the Lake-Fount so that I will see whom among you will come to me; and some people will be taken away from me, and I will say, 'O Lord, (they are) from me and from my followers.' Then it will be said, 'Did you notice what they did after you? By Allah, they kept on turning on their heels (turned away from true Islam).' " The sub-narrator, Ibn Abi Mulaika said, "O Allah, we seek refuge with You from turning on our heels, or being put to trial in our religion."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 9.172 Narrated Asma': The Prophet said, "I will be at my Lake-Fount (Kauthar) waiting for whoever will come to me. Then some people will be taken away from me whereupon I will say, 'My followers!' It will be said, 'You do not know they turned APOSTATES as renegades (deserted their religion).'" (Ibn Abi Mulaika said, "Allah, we seek refuge with You from turning on our heels from the (Islamic) religion and from being put to trial").

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 9.173 Narrated 'Abdullah: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar) and some men amongst you will be brought to me, and when I will try to hand them some water, they will be pulled away from me by force whereupon I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' Then the Almighty will say, 'You do not know what they did after you left, they introduced new things into the religion after you.'"

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 9.174 Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd: I heard the Prophet saying, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar), and whoever will come to it, will drink from it, and whoever will drink from it, will never become thirsty after that. There will come to me some people whom I know and they know me, and then a barrier will be set up between me and them." Abu Sa'id al- Khudri added that the Prophet further said: "I will say those people are from me. It will be said, 'You do not know what changes and new things they did after you.' Then I will say, 'Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed after me!' "

Abdulla > You see the advantages in following Quran and Sunnah directly are no one can challenge you
Abdulla > for the validity of your faith. Like if someone asks me why i do so and so act, i tell him so and
Abdulla > so hadith tells me to do it, but had i been following a imam, like imam malik, or imam Hanifa
Abdulla > or imam jafar or any other imam, i would have said that so and so imam has told us to do
Abdulla > without knowing the source of it.

The Prophet also stated that

Whoever wishes to live and die like me, and to abide in the Garden of Eden after death, should acknowledge Ali as WALI after me, and take his WALI (i.e., Imams after him) as WALI, and should follow the Imams after me for they are my Ahlul-Bayt and were created from my clay and are gifted with the same knowledge and understanding as myself. Woe unto those who deny their virtues and those who disregard their relationship and affinity with me, for my intercession shall never reach them. ( Hilyatul Awliyaa, by Abu Nu'aym, v1, pp 84,86 , al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p128 , al-Jami' al-Kabir, by al-Tabarani , al-Isabah, by Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani , Kanz al-Ummal, v6, p155 , al-Manaqib, by al-Kharazmi, p34 , Yanabi' al-Mawaddah, by al-Qundoozi al-Hanafi, p149 , History of Ibn Asakir, v2, p95 )
Abdulla > As far as validity of Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim is concerned, ya ibn halal, its the most
Abdulla > authentic book and i do not have any knowledge of any invalid hadith. so far.

That is a false statement. Since this is a different matter, I shall discuss it seperately.

Abdulla > Now lets start discussing the basic thing that is our faith. Shia aqeeda allows to do Sajda on
Abdulla > holy shrines also. Now this is a very very big issue which can make a Muslim mushrik.

To have a fruitful dialogue we need to tackle the issues, on a one to one basis. The question of leadership is the subject of our discussion, and hence I shall stick to this for now.

Abdulla > You are welcome to the thread but please refarin from pasting such long messages.

My post was not a "paste". I have authored the article, with the grace of Allah, subhanahu, and assistance of devoted friends and followers of the Ahl al Bayt. We ascribe and expect the same level of scholarship when it comes to a discussion and I hope that we can expect the same from you, insha 'Allah.

My next post shall be on the issue of taqlid and its place within the domain of the Islamic shariah, insha 'Allah. How-ever, I look forward to your response, insha 'Allah!

Abdulla > I am sure that our discussions will be in a very friendly and brotherly environment. May Allah
Abdulla > show us all the right way and fill our hearts with His love and minds with the right knowledge
Abdulla > of His deen.

Abdulla > Assalam O Alaikum

'Amen,

Abbas, Ali
[email protected]*

'Bismhi Ta'la
'Assalam o alaikum

This is a tradition from the much reverred work from the Ahlal Sunna, sahih al Bukhari. The hadith suggests that the Prophet [saw] attempted to commit suicide, not once, not twice, but thrice. Sufficent is to say that no book other than the book of Allah, subhanahu is authentic, and others need to be assesed in the light of what the Quran has to offer.

If the need so arises, there are many a traditions that refer to the same absurdity.

Iltimase duas,

Abbas, Ali
[email protected]

Volume 9, Book 87, Number 111:

Narrated 'Aisha:

The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah's Apostle was in the form of good righteous (true) dreams in his sleep. He never had a dream but that it came true like bright day light. He used to go in seclusion (the cave of) Hira where he used to worship(Allah Alone) continuously for many (days) nights. He used to take with him the journey food for that (stay) and then come back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food like-wise again for another period to stay, till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him in it and asked him to read. The Prophet replied, "I do not know how to read." (The Prophet added), "The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and again asked me to read, and I replied, "I do not know how to read," whereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it anymore. He then released me and asked me again to read, but again I replied, "I do not know how to read (or, what shall I read?)." Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me and then released me and said, "Read: In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists). Has created man from a clot. Read and Your Lord is Most Generous...up to..... ..that which he knew not." (96.15)

Then Allah's Apostle returned with the Inspiration, his neck muscles twitching with terror till he entered upon Khadija and said, "Cover me! Cover me!" They covered him till his fear was over and then he said, "O Khadija, what is wrong with me?" Then he told her everything that had happened and said, 'I fear that something may happen to me." Khadija said, 'Never! But have the glad tidings, for by Allah, Allah will never disgrace you as you keep good reactions with your Kith and kin, speak the truth, help the poor and the destitute, serve your guest generously and assist the deserving, calamity-afflicted ones." Khadija then accompanied him to (her cousin) Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin 'Abdul 'Uzza bin Qusai. Waraqa was the son of her paternal uncle, i.e., her father's brother, who during the Pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the Arabic writing and used to write of the Gospels in Arabic as much as Allah wished him to write. He was an old man and had lost his eyesight. Khadija said to him, "O my cousin! Listen to the story of your nephew." Waraqa asked, "O my nephew! What have you seen?" The Prophet described whatever he had seen.

Waraqa said, "This is the same Namus (i.e., Gabriel, the Angel who keeps the secrets) whom Allah had sent to Moses. I wish I were young and could live up to the time when your people would turn you out." Allah's Apostle asked, "Will they turn me out?" Waraqa replied in the affirmative and said: "Never did a man come with something similar to what you have brought but was treated with hostility. If I should remain alive till the day when you will be turned out then I would support you strongly." But after a few days Waraqa died and the Divine Inspiration was also paused for a while and the Prophet became so sad as we have heard that he intended several times to throw himself from the tops of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would appear before him and say, "O Muhammad! You are indeed Allah's Apostle in truth" whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down and would return home. And whenever the period of the coming of the inspiration used to become long, he would do as before, but when he used to reach the top of a mountain, Gabriel would appear before him and say to him what he had said before. (Ibn 'Abbas said regarding the meaning of: 'He it is that Cleaves the daybreak (from the darkness)' (6.96) that Al-Asbah. means the light of the sun during the day and the light of the moon at night).


'Bismihi Ta’la
'Assalam o alaikum

Please find this article on “Taqlid: Its Meaning and Reality” by S. Muhammad Rizvi. at

http://www.al-islam.org/beliefs/practices/taqlid.html

Please note, that since this is not an original contribution, I have shared the URL and not pasted.

'wa alaikum as salam’s

Abbas, Ali
[email protected]

Assalam O Alaikum

Brother, thank you for your post and I have opened this thread not to discuss with a single person, anyone can come and take part in the discussion. So you are most welcomed.

Now lets go to our discussion, I thought for a while and then decided that since our source of ahadiths are different because the ones I have mentioned you say those are invalid and some of those you have mentioned I am sure are not valid (the last one specially), but some are authentic and I do believe in them like the one you said about some of the sahaba who would come to the lake … . So let us restrict ourselves to Quran only i.e. all proofs and evidences will be given from Quran.

Let me start with the Ayat you have mentioned, i.e.

Surah Alnisa - 004.059

Ya ayyuhallazina amanu …… wa aulil amri minkum ……

O you who believe! obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority from among you; then if you quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the last day; this is better and very good in the end.

The meaning of aulil amri minkum is those in authority from AMONG YOU, i.e. the Khalifa or the ruler. Now it is totally false to say these are Ahyl-e-bayt. Because its clearly mentioned "Minkum" from AMONG YOU and not Min Ahly-e-Bayt. If at all it was meant Ahlay-Bayt then Allah SWT would have used the same word Ahly-e-Bayt.

Now lets forget for a moment about ahadith. You had mentioned some ayats in your first post.

  1. All people in the eyes of God are equal, for the Quran declared: O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, that Ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honored of you in the sight of God is (he who is) most righteous of you. And God has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). (Quran, 49:13)

  2. God does not penalize or reward a servant of His for the sins or good deeds of his parents or his close and distant relatives, as He, states in the Quran: O mankind! Do your duty to your Lord and fear a day when no father can avail aught for his son, nor son avail aught for his father. Verily the promise of God is true: let not then this present life deceive you. Nor let the chief deceiver deceive you about God. (Quran, 31:33)

Now let me make two points clear from the above ayats.

  1. All people are equal, no one has preference on the other but on the basis of his good deeds. So that means Ahl-e-Bayt has no preference on the other muslims but on the basic of deeds. So Ulil Amri cannot be translated as Ahyl-e-Bayt.

  2. God will not reward a servant for the good deeds of his parents or his close distant relatives, So the Ahyl-e-bayt will not get the reward for the good deeds of their forefathers.

From the description of the above two ayats it is crystal clear that Ahyl-bayt has no preference over other Muslims but on the basis of good deeds (personal good deeds)

Not to mention again and again the Ahlay-Bayt i.e. Hazrat Ali RAA, Hazrat Fatima RAA, Hazrat Hussain RAA Hazrat Hassan are all very highly respectable personalities in the eyes of all the Muslims.

So without going into any hadith it is as clear as it can be that No one is better than the other, all are equal in the eye of Allah SWT. Hence the basic faith of shiasm that Ruling is only the right of Ahly-e-Bayt is therefore FALSE.

The hadith you mentioned about the Prophet being at the Lake and … is true. But my friend are you accusing Sahaba like Hazrat Abu Bakr RAA or Hazrat Umer RAA or Hazrat Usman RAA ? I would like to know the answer of this question please.

Wa ma alaina illal balagh.
Assalam O Alaikum.

Dear br. Abdulla
'wa alaikum as salam's

Assalam O Alaikum
Brother, thank you for your post and I have
opened this thread not to discuss with a single
person, anyone can come and take part in the
discussion. So you are most welcomed.

Now lets go to our discussion, I thought for a
while and then decided that since our source of
ahadiths are different because the ones I have
mentioned you say those are invalid and some of
those you have mentioned I am sure are not valid
(the last one specially), but some are authentic
and I do believe in them like the one you said
about some of the sahaba who would come to the
lake. So let us restrict ourselves to Quran only
i.e. all proofs and evidences will be given from Quran.

May I ask, why you have refrained to treat the subject
of the apostacy of the sahaba, and resorted to the
Quran only method? Doesn't the sunna and the hadith
explain the Quran? From your previous postings, we all
have gathered your treatment of Sahih al Bukhari is an
authentic book.

In any case, I'll continue.

Let me start with the Ayat you have mentioned, i.e.

Surah Alnisa - 004.059

Ya ayyuhallazina amanu …… wa aulil amri minkum ……

O you who believe! obey Allah and obey the Messenger
and those in authority from among you; then if you
quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah and the
Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the last day;
this is better and very good in the end.

The meaning of aulil amri minkum is those in authority
from AMONG YOU, i.e. the Khalifa or the ruler. Now it
is totally false to say these are Ahyl-e-bayt. Because
its clearly mentioned "Minkum" from AMONG YOU and
not Min Ahly-e-Bayt. If at all it was meant Ahlay-Bayt
then Allah SWT would have used the same word Ahly-e-Bayt.

The Ulil amr, are not the rulers or even the Caliphs,
since the present day rulers of the muslims are tyrants
and oppressors. By your logic, Saddam Hussein is the
Ulil amr to the Iraqi people, since he is their ruler,
and more so Saddam will be very pleased to know, that
his rulership finds its sanctity in the Quran. What a
false understanding. Surely, Yazid will also be very
pleased, since he was from "among you", and Imam
Husain [a] did not understand this relatively simple
concept, Allah forbid! What rubbish. Also the Quran is
full of verses that forbid obedience to the unjust and
the oppresors. It would have been impossible for Allah
to order us to obey them, after all the prohibition [due
to their tyranny], and then go to a step fruther and join
their obedience with His and the Messengers obedience.

If the Quran enjoins on the believers to obey Allah, the
Messenger and the 'Ulil 'amr it becomes more so understand-
able, that they ought to be identified, and this brings us
to the question, why doesn't the verse say 'Ahl al Bayt',
and how does the Messenger of Allah identify the 'Ulil 'amr?
I state these observations:

  1. Allah revealed the order of salah to the Messenger,
    but he did not name three or four, until it was the
    Messenger of Allah, who explained it.

  2. Allah revealed the order of hajj, and did not reveal
    the circumamulation of it seven times, since the Messenger
    of Allah, explained it.

  3. Allah also revealed the exoneration of Bibi 'Aisha
    from the slander of the hypocrites, yet the Quran does
    not make a reference to her name, since the life of the
    Messenger of Allah reveals it.

Thus, in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

Someday (after his last pilgrimage) the Messenger of God,
stood to give us a speech beside a pond, which is known as
Khum (Ghadir Khum), located between Mecca and Medina. Then
he praised God and reminded of Him, and then said: "O'
people! Behold! It seems the time approached when I shall
be called away (by God) and I shall answer that call. Behold!
I am leaving for you two precious things. First of them is
the book of God in which there is light and guidance ...
The other one is my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name
of God about my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of
God about my ahl al bayt. I remind you in the name of God
about my ahl al bayt. (three times)."

Sahih Muslim, Chapter: The virtues of the companions,
Section: The virtues of 'Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi
Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1873, tradition: 36. For
English version, Chapter CMXCVI, v4, p1286, tradition:
5920

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

It seems the time approached when I shall be called away
(by Allah) and I shall answer that call. I am leaving for
you two precious things and if you adhere both of them,
you will never go astray after me. They are the Book of
Allah and my progeny, that is my Ahlul-Bayt. The two
shall never separate from each other until they come
to me by the Pool (of Paradise).

Then the Messenger of Allah continued: "Do I not have
more right over the believers than what they have over
themselves?" People cried and answered: "Yes, O' Messenger
of God." Then Prophet (PBUH) held up the hand of Ali and
said: "Whoever I am his leader (Mawla), Ali is his
leader (Mawla). O' God, love those who love him, and be
hostile to those who are hostile to him.

Sahih Tirmidhi, v2, p298, v5, p63
Sunan Ibn Maja, v1, pp 12,43
Khasa'is, by al-Nisa'i, pp 4,21
al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v2, p129, v3, pp 109-110,116,371
Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v1, pp 84,118,119,152,330, v4,
pp 281,368,370, 372,378, v5, pp 35,347,358,361,366,419
(from 40 chains of narrators)
Fada'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, pp 563,572
Majma' al-Zawa'id, by al-Haythami, v9, p103 (from several
transmitters)
Tafsir al-Kabir, by Fakhr al-Razi, v12, pp 49-50
Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthur, by al-Hafiz Jalaluddin al
Suyuti, v3, p19
Tarikh al-Khulafa, by al-Suyuti, pp 169,173
al-Bidayah wal-Nihayah, by Ibn Kathir, v3, p213, v5, p208
Usdul Ghabah, by Ibn Athir, v4, p114
Mushkil al-Athar, by al-Tahawi, v2, pp 307-308
Habib al-Siyar, by Mir Khand, v1, part 3, p144
Sawaiq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, p26
al-Isabah, by Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, v2, p509; v1,
part1, p319, v2, part1, p57, v3, part1, p29, v4,
part 1, pp 14,16,143
Tabarani, who narrated from companions such as Ibn Umar,
Malik Ibn al-Hawirath, Habashi Ibn Junadah, Jari, Sa'd
Ibn Abi Waqqas, Anas Ibn Malik, Ibn Abbas, Amarah,
Buraydah,...
Tarikh, by al-Khatib Baghdadi, v8, p290
Hilyatul Awliya', by al-Hafiz Abu Nu'aym, v4, p23, v5,
pp26-27 al-Istiab, by Ibn Abd al-Barr, Chapter of word "ayn"
(Ali), v2, p462
Kanzul Ummal, by al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, v6, pp 154,397
al-Mirqat, v5, p568

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

I am leaving for you two precious and weighty Symbols
that if you adhere to both of them you shall not go
astray after me. They are: the Book of God and my progeny,
that is my ahl al bayt. The Merciful has informed me that
these two shall not separate from each other till they
come to me by the Pool (of Paradise).

Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 662-663,328
al-Mustadrak, al-Hakim, Chapter: Understanding
(the virtues) of Companions, v3, pp 109,110,148,533
who wrote this tradition is authentic (sahih) based
on the criteria of the two shaykhs (Bukhari and Muslim).
Sunan, Daarami, v2, p432
Musnad, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v3, pp 14,17,26,59, v4, pp 366,
370-372,v5, pp 182,189,350,366,419
Fadha’il al-Sahaba, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p585,
tradition: 990
al-Khasa’is, al-Nisa'i, pp 21,30
al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar Haithami, Ch. 11,
section 1, p230
al-Kabir, al-Tabarani, v3, pp 62-63,137
Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Chapter
al-I'tisam bi Habl Allah v1 p44.
Tafsir, Ibn Kathir (complete version), v4, p113,
under commentary of verse 42:23 of Quran (four traditions).
al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Ibn Sa'd, v2, p194, Pub. Dar
al-Sadr, Lebanon.
al-Jami' al-Saghir, al-Suyuti, v1, p353, and also in v2
Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haithami, v9, p163
al-Fatih al-Kabir, al-Binhani, v1, p451
Usudul Ghaba fi Ma'rifat al-Sahaba, Ibn al-Athir, v2, p12
Jami' al-Usul, Ibn al-Athir, v1, p187
History, Ibn Asakir, v5, p436
al-Taj al-Jami' Lil Usul, v3, p308
al-Durr al-Manthur, al-Hafidh al-Suyuti, v2, p60
Yanabi al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, pp 38,183

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

Behold! My ahl al bayt are like the Ark of Noah. Whoever
embarked in it was saved, and whoever turned away from it
was perished.

al-Mustadrak, al-Hakim, v2, p343, v3, pp 150-151 on the authority
of Abu Dhar. al-Hakim said this tradition is authentic (sahih).
Fadha’il al-Sahaba, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p786
Tafsir al-Kabir, Fakhr al-Razi, under the commentary of verse
42:23, Part 27, p167
al-Bazzar, on the authority of Ibn Abbas and Ibn Zubair with the
wording "drowned" instead of "perished".
al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar Haithami, Ch. 11, section 1, p234
under Verse 8:33. Also in section 2, p282. He said this tradition
has been transmitted via numerous authorities.
Tarikh al-Khulafaa and Jami' al-Saghir, al-Suyuti
al-Kabir, al-Tabarani, v3, pp 37,38
al-Saghir, al-Tabarani, v2, p22
Hilyatul Awliyaa, Abu Nu'aim, v4, p306
al-Kuna wal Asmaa, al-Dulabi, v1, p76
Yanabi al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, pp 30,370
al-Durr al-Manthur, al-Hafidh al-Suyuti, v9, p115
Kanz al Ummal, Muttaqi al Hindi, v6 p216, tradition: 3772
Dhakha'ir al-Uqba, Muhibb al-Tabari, p20
Tarikh, al-Khateeb Baghdadi, v12, p19

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

Do not be ahead of them for you will perish, do not turn away
from them for you will perish, and do not try to teach them
since they know more than you do!

al-Durr al-Manthur, al-Suyuti, v2, p60
al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar al-Haithami, Ch. 11,
section 1, p230, quoted from al-Tabarani, also in section 2, p342
Usudul Ghaba, Ibn al-Athir, v3, p137
Yanabi’ al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, p41, and P335
Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, v1, p168
Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haithami, v9, p163
Abaqat al-Anwar, v1, p184
A'alam al-Wara, pp 132-133
Tadhkirat al-Khawas al-Umma, Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi al-Hanafi, pp 28-33
al-Sira al-Halabiyya, Nur al-Din al-Halabi, v3, p273

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

My ahl al bayt are like the gate of repentance of the children
of Israel; whoever entered therein was forgiven.

Majma’ al-Zawa’id, by al-Haithami, v9, p168
al-Awsat, by al-Tabarani, tradition: 18
Arba'in, by al-Nabahani, p216
al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, by Ibn Hajar al-Haithami, Ch. 11,
section 1, pp 230,234
Another fairly similar tradition was recorded by al-Darqunti
as well as Ibn Hajar in his al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ch. 9,
section 2, p193 where the Prophet said: "Ali is the gate of
repentance, whoever entered therein was a believer and whoever
went out was an unbeliever"

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

The matter (life) will not end, until it is passed by twelve
Caliphs. He then whispered a sentence. I asked my father what
the Prophet said. He said, the Prophet added: "All of them
will be from Quraish."

Sahih Muslim, Arabic version, Kitab al-Imaarah, 1980
Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, v3, p1452, Tradition #5
Sahih Muslim, English version, Chapter DCCLIV (titled:
The People are subservient to the Quraish and the Caliphate
is the Right of the Quraish), v3, p1009, Tradition #4477

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

The affairs of people will continue to be conducted (well)
as long as they are governed by the twelve men.

Sahih Muslim, Arabic version, Kitab al-Imaarah, 1980 Edition
Pub. in Saudi Arabia, v3, p1453, Tradition #6
Sahih Muslim, English version, Chapter DCCLIV (titled:
The People are subservient to the Quraish and the Caliphate
is the Right of the Quraish), v3, p1010, Tradition #4478

and in respect of the 'ulil amr, the Messenger of
Allah said,

The Islamic religion will continue until the Hour (day of
resurrection), having twelve Caliphs for you, all of them
will be from Quraish.

Sahih Muslim, Arabic version, Kitab al-Imaarah, 1980 Edition
Pub. in Saudi Arabia, v3, p1453, Tradition #10
Sahih Muslim, English version, Chapter DCCLIV (titled:
The People are subservient to the Quraish and the Caliphate
is the Right of the Quraish), v3, p1010, Tradition #4483

Now lets forget for a moment about ahadith. You had
mentioned some ayats in your first post.

  1. All people in the eyes of God are equal, for the
    Quran declared: O mankind! We created you from a single
    (pair) of male and female, and made you into nations
    and tribes, that Ye may know each other (not that ye
    may despise each other). Verily the most honored of
    you in the sight of God is (he who is) most righteous
    of you. And God has full knowledge and is well
    acquainted (with all things). (Quran, 49:13)

  2. God does not penalize or reward a servant of His
    for the sins or good deeds of his parents or his close
    and distant relatives, as He, states in the Quran: O
    mankind! Do your duty to your Lord and fear a day when
    no father can avail aught for his son, nor son avail
    aught for his father. Verily the promise of God is
    true: let not then this present life deceive you. Nor
    let the chief deceiver deceive you about God.
    (Quran, 31:33)

Now let me make two points clear from the above ayats.

  1. All people are equal, no one has preference on the
    other but on the basis of his good deeds. So that means
    Ahl-e-Bayt has no preference on the other muslims but
    on the basic of deeds. So Ulil Amri cannot be translated
    as Ahyl-e-Bayt.

  2. God will not reward a servant for the good deeds
    of his parents or his close distant relatives, So the
    Ahyl-e-bayt will not get the reward for the good
    deeds of their forefathers.

From the description of the above two ayats it is
crystal clear that Ahyl-bayt has no preference over
other Muslims but on the basis of good deeds (personal
good deeds)

Not to mention again and again the Ahlay-Bayt i.e.
Hazrat Ali RAA, Hazrat Fatima RAA, Hazrat Hussain RAA
Hazrat Hassan are all very highly respectable
personalities in the eyes of all the Muslims.

You also respect the sahaba, yet you follow them, right?
What prevents you from following the Ahl al bayt, even
when their are EXPLICIT traditions from the Prophet [saw]?

So without going into any hadith it is as clear as
it can be that No one is better than the other, all
are equal in the eye of Allah SWT. Hence the basic
faith of shiasm that Ruling is only the right of
Ahly-e-Bayt is therefore FALSE.

I had also stated in my first post, and my brother
failed to read it, let alone acknowledge what I
wrote, and I quote myself again

Abbas > Is the honor due to relationship?
Abbas > It may appear that the selection of the
Abbas > members of the house of the Prophet as
Abbas > a source of guidance is due to their
Abbas > blood relationship. If so, then it would
Abbas > not be in accord with the spirit of the
Abbas > Islamic teachings. To bestow on them
Abbas > such a unique honor, is in conflict
Abbas > with the following principles,

Abbas > 1. All people in the eyes of God are equal,
Abbas > for the Quran declared: O mankind! We created
Abbas > you from a single (pair) of male and female,
Abbas > and made you into nations and tribes, that
Abbas > Ye may know each other (not that ye may
Abbas > despise each other). Verily the most honored
Abbas > of you in the sight of God is (he who is)
Abbas > most righteous of you. And God has full
Abbas > knowledge and is well acquainted (with
Abbas > all things). (Quran, 49:13)

Abbas > 2. God does not penalize or reward a servant
Abbas > of His for the sins or good deeds of his
Abbas > parents or his close and distant relatives,
Abbas > as He, states in the Quran: O mankind! Do
Abbas > your duty to your Lord and fear a day when
Abbas > no father can avail aught for his son, nor
Abbas > son avail aught for his father. Verily the
Abbas > promise of God is true: let not then this
Abbas > present life deceive you. Nor let the chief
Abbas > deceiver deceive you about God. (Quran, 31:33)

Abbas > Kinship to the Prophet, does not mean
Abbas > acceptance by God, nor does it secure
Abbas > for his relatives a place in paradise
Abbas > or insure them against divine punishment.
Abbas > God, according to Islamic teachings has
Abbas > created paradise for whoever obeys Him
Abbas > and the place of punishment for whoever
Abbas > dis-obeys him, regardless of family
Abbas > affiliation, nationality or race. The
Abbas > Quran even contains a chapter defaming
Abbas > Abu Lahab who was an uncle of the Prophet:
Abbas > Perish the hands of Abu Lahab, perish
Abbas > he … (Quran, 111:1).

Abbas > Thus the truth is that the word 'ahlal
Abbas > bayt' means only the chosen relatives
Abbas > of the Prophet. These chosen individuals
Abbas > are not chosen or honored because of
Abbas > their relationship to the Prophet, but
Abbas > because of their virtues.

Does my brother understand the import of the
statement that "they are chosen individuals
because of their VIRTUES". I implore you to
acquaint yourself with their [other] virtues
other than the ones I listed above.

The hadith you mentioned about the Prophet being
at the Lake and … is true. But my friend are you
accusing Sahaba like Hazrat Abu Bakr RAA or Hazrat
Umer RAA or Hazrat Usman RAA ? I would like to
know the answer of this question please.

My answer to this, is an imperative NO. I am simply
challenging the much accepted, much proclaimed and
much debated topic on the sanctity of ALL the
sahaba, that surely is a false belief.

Will look forward to hear from you, then.

Abbas, Ali
[email protected]

Wa ma alaina illal balagh.
Assalam O Alaikum.

Assalam O Alaikum

First of all please refrain from pasting the whole thing again, it will unnecessarily increase the size of the thread, resulting in time loss.

I do not know how you got an idea that I am refraining to treat the subject of the apostasy of the sahaba, I already told you that I believed in the hadith you have presented about some of the sahaba. The main discussion here is about the Sahaba who are among the Ashra Mubashir. But I do asked you to resort to the Quran only? Because most of the ahadiths you are presenting are invalid and I cannot agree with them plus the ahadith I am producing you will not agree with that isn't it ??? If yes, then please see these ahadiths :-

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 7: Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
We used to compare the people as to who was better during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle . We used to regard Abu Bakr as the best, then 'Umar, and then 'Uthman .

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 8: Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
The Prophet said, "If I were to take a Khalil, I would have taken Abu Bakr, but he is my brother and my companion (in Islam)."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 11: Narrated Jubair bin Mutim:
A woman came to the Prophet who ordered her to return to him again. She said, "What if I came and did not find you?" as if she wanted to say, "If I found you dead?" The Prophet said, "If you should not find me, go to Abu Bakr."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 14: Narrated 'Amr bin Al-As:
The Prophet deputed me to read the Army of Dhat-as-Salasil. I came to him and said, "Who is the most beloved person to you?" He said, " 'Aisha." I asked, "Among the men?" He said, "Her father." I said, "Who then?" He said, "Then 'Umar bin Al-Khattab." He then named other men.

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 16: Narrated Abu Huraira:
I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "While I was sleeping, I saw myself standing at a well, on it there was a bucket. I drew water from the well as much as Allah wished. Then Ibn Abi Quhafa (i.e. Abu Bakr) took the bucket from me and brought out one or two buckets (of water) and there was weakness in his drawing the water. May Allah forgive his weakness for him. Then the bucket turned into a very big one and Ibn Al-Khattab took it over and I had never seen such a mighty person amongst the people as him in performing such hard work, till the people drank to their satisfaction and watered their camels that knelt down there."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 22: Narrated Abu Said:
The Prophet said, "Do not abuse my companions for if any one of you spent gold equal to Uhud (in Allah's Cause) it would not be equal to a Mud or even a half Mud spent by one of them."

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 42: Narrated Abu Musa:
While I was with the Prophet in one of the gardens of Medina, a man came and asked me to open the gate. The Prophet said to me, "Open the gate for him and give him the glad tidings that he will enter Paradise." I opened (the gate) for him, and behold! It was Abu Bakr. I informed him of the glad tidings the Prophet had said, and he praised Allah. Then another man came and asked me to open the gate. The Prophet said to me "Open (the gate) and give him the glad tidings of entering Paradise." I opened (the gate) for him, and behold! It was 'Umar. I informed him of what the Prophet had said, and he praised Allah. Then another man came and asked me to open the gate. The Prophet said to me. "Open (the gate) for him and inform him of the glad tidings, of entering Paradise with a calamity which will befall him. " Behold ! It was 'Uthman, I informed him of what Allah's Apostle had said. He praised Allah and said, "I seek Allah's Aid."

All these ahadiths are taken from Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Bukhari is considered by majority of the Scholars today to be the most authentic book of Sunnah and then Sahih Muslim follows and so on. Do you say all the above ahadiths are invalid ?????

And for the invalidity of some hadiths in Sahih Bukhari (the one about suicide you had mentioned in your previous post) can you please provide me the exact hadith reference from Sahih Bukhari???

One hadith you mentioned is ""Do not be ahead of them for you will perish, do not turn away
from them for you will perish, and do not try to teach them since they know more than you do!""

Now lets say there is a person who is from ahly-e-bayt but he does not pray, does not perform any of the duties from Allah SWT and does not care about it and kills innocent people, do zinah, do shirk and etc. etc. BUT as I said he is from Ahly-e-Bayt, So do you think any Muslim in the World is not better than him. The Common Sense you were talking about should be applied here and you will get your answer OR ARE YOU SAYING AHYL-E-BAYT cannot do a bad deed and will go direct to Jannat. This very clearly shows the validity of the above hadith you have produced.

You said ""Thus the truth is that the word 'ahlal bayt' means only the chosen relatives of the Prophet. These chosen individuals are not chosen or honored because of their relationship to the Prophet, but because of their virtues."" Please answer the below :-

Who selected them?
Who all are selected ones (mention clearly with names)?
Who selects the Ahl-e-Bayt now a days?
If they were selected on the basis of virtues, so doesn't it mean relationship is not important?
Depending on virtue can a Muslim (who is not from Ahl-e-Bayt) be dearer to Allah SWT then a Ahl-e-Bayt Muslim??

I will wait for your answers.

Assalam O Alaikum

Assalam O Alaikum

Still waiting.

Assalam O Alaikum.

Dear br. Abdulla
wa alaikum as salam’s

Abdulla > Assalam O Alaikum

Please bear patience with me. I have work, family and my
community to attend to. I do not check the boards on the
weekends (Sat and Sun) since family and community get the
preference.

Abdulla > First of all please refrain from pasting the whole
Abdulla > thing again, it will unnecessarily increase the
Abdulla > size of the thread, resulting in time loss.

My efforts were simply directed to bring to my brothers
attention what you had previously missed, and its repetition
thereof, was to stress the importance.

Abdulla > I do not know how you got an idea that I am refraining
Abdulla > to treat the subject of the apostasy of the sahaba, I
Abdulla > already told you that I believed in the hadith you have
Abdulla > presented about some of the sahaba. The main discussion
Abdulla > here is about the Sahaba who are among the Ashra Mubashir.

Tha names of these also include Talha and Zubair and their
conduct against Imam Ali [a] during his caliphate is evident to
its fabrication, and hence their inclusion.

Check out:
Talha and Zubair confront Ali at Basra
Mu’awiya and ‘Amr As used to curse and abuse Ali
Sources of hadith “my companions are like stars” are weak
Companions were not infallible
Taking wine by ten companions in a secret meeting
Companions’ breaking pledge

http://www.al-islam.org/peshawar/8.3.html

While I have restricted the discussion to the ashab and also
the Ahl al Bayt, please bar in mind that the Ahl al Bayt are
those who were Imam Ali [a], Imam Hasan [a], Imam Husayn [a],
Lady Fatima [a] and the rest of the remaining Imams [a]. Some
of the questions you asked below were irrelevant to the nature
of the discussion and your very restriction to the ashab
bears evidence to it as well.

Abdulla > But I do asked you to resort to the Quran only? Because
Abdulla > most of the ahadiths you are presenting are invalid and
Abdulla > I cannot agree with them plus the ahadith I am producing
Abdulla > you will not agree with that isn’t it ??? If yes, then please

I HAVE YET TO SEE ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE WHERE YOU HAVE
DENIED THE VALIDITY OF HADITHS. WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? DO
NOT REPLY ON SUBJECTIVE AND PERSONAL MATERIAL. I ASK FOR
BOOKS?REFERENCES.

Also for your information, only an ignorant can deny the
validity of hadith al thaqalayn, please check

A STUDY OF THE TAWATUR OF HADITH AL THAQALAYN

http://www.al-islam.org/thaqalayn/nontl/index.HTM

Abdulla > see these ahadiths :-

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 7: Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
Abdulla > We used to compare the people as to who was better during
Abdulla > the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle . We used to regard Abu
Abdulla > Bakr as the best, then 'Umar, and then 'Uthman .

Bogus. The name of Imam Ali [a] is deliberately left out. You
might want to read Khilafat wa Mulukiyat, by your own scholar,
Syed Abul Ala Maududi, where he explains how the categorization
of the Caliphs, as the four rightly guided caliphs was rightly
so a historical development. Besides Abu Hanifa held that Imam
Ali [a] was superior to the Uthman and much so due to the lack
of political acumen on his behalf. Also check out the history
work titled, Tarikhul Khulafa, by as Suyuti and a reference
to the historical development and the subsequent categorization
of the superiority of the first three Caliphs. Little did
the fabricators realize that by leaving the name of the fourth
caliph out they were enforcing the theory of historical
development.

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 8: Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
Abdulla > The Prophet said, “If I were to take a Khalil, I would
Abdulla > have taken Abu Bakr, but he is my brother and my companion
Abdulla > (in Islam).”

Interesting. Consider how the Quran hails the relations among the
believers and accords “brotherhood” among them, in many an ayas. As
to the reference to brotherhood, of course it was Imam Ali [a] who
was styled as the Brother of the Prophet when the Ansar and
the Muhajireen were related together, following the hijra. This is
an un-deniable fact in history.

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 11: Narrated Jubair bin Mutim:
Abdulla > A woman came to the Prophet who ordered her to return to
Abdulla > him again. She said, “What if I came and did not find you?”
Abdulla > as if she wanted to say, “If I found you dead?” The Prophet
Abdulla > said, “If you should not find me, go to Abu Bakr.”

Characteristics of the Companions
Hadith in praise of Abu Bakr
Abu Huraira’s character and his condemnation
Ibn Abd Rabbih’s slanders against the Shias
Slanders by Ibn Hazm
http://www.al-islam.org/peshawar/5.2.html

and also consider

Slanders by Abu Taimiyya
Abu Huraira’s character and ahadith calling for his condemnation
Reply to the supposed hadith that Allah said “I am pleased with
Abu Bakr ­ is he also pleased with Me?”
Ahadith in praise of Abu Bakr and Umar and their disqualification
Hadith that both Hasan and Husain are foremost of youth of paradise

http://www.al-islam.org/peshawar/5.3.html

The nature of the fabrications are self evident. Also consider

http://www.al-islam.org/thaqalayn/nontl/Traditions.htm

for a list of fabricated traditions.

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 14: Narrated 'Amr bin Al-As:
Abdulla > The Prophet deputed me to read the Army of Dhat-as-Salasil.
Abdulla > I came to him and said, “Who is the most beloved person to
Abdulla > you?” He said, " 'Aisha." I asked, “Among the men?” He
Abdulla > said, “Her father.” I said, “Who then?” He said, “Then
Abdulla > 'Umar bin Al-Khattab.” He then named other men.

'Amr bin al As never approved of Imam Ali [a] and hence I am not
surprised of this tradition. A little reading into history and
the subsequent rivalries that these people held against Imam Ali [a]
prevented them from narrting traditions in praise of Imam Ali [a]
and praise of the Imams [a] opponents. Also can you tell me from
history if Imam Ali [a] participated in the battle or not?

Besides, Bibi 'Aisha always favored her father when it came
to traditions. Her name and the name of Urwa al Zubayr are
too obvious to notice these biases.

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 16: Narrated Abu Huraira:
Abdulla > I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “While I was sleeping,
Abdulla > I saw myself standing at a well, on it there was a bucket.
Abdulla > I drew water from the well as much as Allah wished. Then
Abdulla > Ibn Abi Quhafa (i.e. Abu Bakr) took the bucket from me
Abdulla > and brought out one or two buckets (of water) and there
Abdulla > was weakness in his drawing the water. May Allah forgive
Abdulla > his weakness for him. Then the bucket turned into a very
Abdulla > big one and Ibn Al-Khattab took it over and I had never
Abdulla > seen such a mighty person amongst the people as him in
Abdulla > performing such hard work, till the people drank to
Abdulla > their satisfaction and watered their camels that knelt
Abdulla > down there.”

Again, notice how in ALL THE TRADITIONS you shared, the name of
Imam Ali [a] is DELIBERATELY LEFT OUT. Is that a coincidence? Can
you offer me some explanation?

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 22: Narrated Abu Said:
Abdulla > The Prophet said, “Do not abuse my companions for if any
Abdulla > one of you spent gold equal to Uhud (in Allah’s Cause)
Abdulla > it would not be equal to a Mud or even a half Mud spent
Abdulla > by one of them.”

Read these topics under the URL!

Difference between Islam (submission) and Iman (faith)
Association of Shia’ism with Imam Ja’far Sadiq
Criticizing the companions does not mean infidelity
According to Abu’l­Hasan Ash’ari even calling Allah or Holy
Prophet by evil names is not infidelity
Most companions abused one another but not regarded as infidels
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Holy Prophet of Islam knew all good and bad actions of Sahaba

http://www.al-islam.org/peshawar/8.1.html#1

Abdulla > Volume 5, Book 57, Number 42: Narrated Abu Musa:
Abdulla > While I was with the Prophet in one of the gardens of
Abdulla > Medina, a man came and asked me to open the gate. The
Abdulla > Prophet said to me, “Open the gate for him and give
Abdulla > him the glad tidings that he will enter Paradise.” I
Abdulla > opened (the gate) for him, and behold! It was Abu Bakr.
Abdulla > I informed him of the glad tidings the Prophet had said,
Abdulla > and he praised Allah. Then another man came and asked me
Abdulla > to open the gate. The Prophet said to me “Open (the gate)
Abdulla > and give him the glad tidings of entering Paradise.” I
Abdulla > opened (the gate) for him, and behold! It was 'Umar.
Abdulla > I informed him of what the Prophet had said, and he
Abdulla > praised Allah. Then another man came and asked me to
Abdulla > open the gate. The Prophet said to me. "Open (the gate)
Abdulla > for him and inform him of the glad tidings, of entering
Abdulla > Paradise with a calamity which will befall him. " Behold !
Abdulla > It was 'Uthman, I informed him of what Allah’s Apostle
Abdulla > had said. He praised Allah and said, “I seek Allah’s Aid.”

The number of verses that were revealed for the praise of Imam Ali [a]
are listed as more than three hunderd, as testified to this work

300 Hundred verses in praise of Ali
Ali first to declare belief in Prophet of Allah
Ali excelled all other companions and the whole community in merit
Qur’anic verse in praise of Ali on his sleeping in the Prophet’s
bed on the night of Hijra

http://www.al-islam.org/peshawar/6.1.html#1

Abdulla > All these ahadiths are taken from Sahih Bukhari and Sahih
Abdulla > Bukhari is considered by majority of the Scholars today
Abdulla > to be the most authentic book of Sunnah and then Sahih
Abdulla > Muslim follows and so on. Do you say all the above ahadiths
Abdulla > are invalid ???

I am saying that the possibility of their fabrication is evident.
Besides, read on the section on History of Tabari, vol on the
Caliphate of Muawiyah and how he advised people to praise the
caliphs and abuse the Ahl al bayt. This evidence and the tyranny
exercised by Muawiya lend more credence to the fabrications of
such traditions. I take the praise of the first three Caliphs
with a grain of salt, as per how the traditions got compiled.

This is my reference:

In the days of the first four Caliphs, Islamic jurisprudence
and traditions were widely studied. They were also taught by
a number of teachers. All this was however done orally: and
nothing was reduced to writing. The Umayyads were the first
to order muslims to write. Ibn ‘Abd al Barr, in his book Jami’
bayan al ‘ilm, has quoted the Imam al Zuhri as saying: We did
not like to transfer knowledge to paper, but at last a time
came when men in authority compelled us to do so. (Jami’ bayan
al ‘ilm, Cairo edition., p.136).

Muawiya was the first to encourage writings. He invited Ubaid
ibn Sharya to come from Yemen and compile a history of the
ancients. The book is named Akhbar la Madiyin. (Fihrist of
Ibn Nadim, p.244).

Next to Muawiya came ‘Abd al Malik ibn Marwan, who ascended
the throne in the year 65 A.H (684 C.E). He ordered the
scholars to write books of every type and every topic.
Said ibn Jubair, the greatest scholar of the day was ordered
to write a tafsir (commentary of the Quran). This, the Imam
did and the tafsir was deposited in the state library. The
tafsir considered to have been written by ‘Ata ibn Dinar, is
the same that Said had written. ‘Ata had somehow, secured it
from the royal library. (Mizan al I’tidal, Ata Ibn Dinar’s version).

The reign of ‘Umar bin Abd al Aziz gave a fresh impetus
to literary activity. Orders were promulgated all over
the empire for sayings of the Prophet to be complied into
the form of books. Sad bin Ibrahim who was a famous
traditionist and Qadhi (judge) of Medina, was asked to
write into books a very large number of traditions: and
they were all sent to various parts in the Muslim empire.
Ibn ‘Abd al Barr, in his Jami’ Bayan al ‘Ilm, quoted ibn
Ibrahim as saying: Umar ibn Abd al Aziz ordered us to
collect the traditions. We did so and wrote a large number
of volumes; and Umar ibn Abd al Aziz sent one set to each
of the parts of his empire. (Jami’ Bayan al ‘ilm, Cairo
edition, p. 36)

Siratun Nabi, The Life of the Prophet, Shibli Numani,
Chapter: Biography and Ilm al Kalam, Section: Written
Literature Under State Patronage, v1 pp17-18

Abdulla > And for the invalidity of some hadiths in Sahih Bukhari
Abdulla > (the one about suicide you had mentioned in your previous
Abdulla > post) can you please provide me the exact hadith reference
Abdulla > from Sahih Bukhari???

Sure. I downloaded it from the MSA UC Site. If you are looking for
a book check Sahih al Bukhari, English Arabic, Vol. 9 Book: The
Interpretation of Dreams.

Interpretation of Dreams
Volume 9, Book 87, Number 111:
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/087.sbt.html

Abdulla > One hadith you mentioned is ““Do not be ahead of them for
Abdulla > you will perish, do not turn away from them for you will
Abdulla > perish, and do not try to teach them since they know more
Abdulla > than you do!””

Abdulla > Now lets say there is a person who is from ahly-e-bayt
Abdulla > but he does not pray, does not perform any of the duties
Abdulla > from Allah SWT and does not care about it and kills
Abdulla > innocent people, do zinah, do shirk and etc. etc. BUT as
Abdulla > I said he is from Ahly-e-Bayt, So do you think any Muslim
Abdulla > in the World is not better than him. The Common Sense you
Abdulla > were talking about should be applied here and you will
Abdulla > get your answer OR ARE YOU SAYING AHYL-E-BAYT cannot do
Abdulla > a bad deed and will go direct to Jannat. This very clearly
Abdulla > shows the validity of the above hadith you have produced.

Lets us say that we are talking about “THE AHL AL BAYT”, those
who were with the Prophet [saw]. We are discussing the question of
leadership brother, or am I missing something here? What does this
have to do with a man who is from the Ahl al bayt in the present
day and age? You talk about ashab and then reverto to divert the
topic to something irrelevant.

I am talking about Imam Ali [a] and his right to the Caliphate. The
hadith was in reference to Imam Ali [a], Imam Hasan [a], Imam
Husayn [a], Lady Fatima [a] and not King Hussein or the Guardian
of the Two Holy Mosques! But to answer your question, and what I
had repeated and you had difficutly understanding, the Ahl al Bayt

  • and the rest of the Imams [a]] were chosen
    by the dint of their VIRTUES!!! What you have shared is true,
    but we are not talking about any Tom, Dick or Harry.

Abdulla > You said ““Thus the truth is that the word ‘ahlal bayt’
Abdulla > means only the chosen relatives of the Prophet. These
Abdulla > chosen individuals are not chosen or honored because of
Abdulla > their relationship to the Prophet, but because of their
Abdulla > virtues.”” Please answer the below :-

Abdulla > Who selected them?

The Prophet did.

Abdulla > Who all are selected ones (mention clearly with names)?

Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Prophet’s cousin and son in law, 2. al Hasan
ibn Ali, the Prophets grandson through his daughter Lady Fatima
(Ali’s wife), 3. al Husayn ibn Ali, al Hasan’s brother, 4. Ali
ibn al Husayn (also known as Zayn al Abidin), 5. Muhammad ibn
Ali al Baqir, 6. Jafar ibn Muhammad al Sadiq, 7. Musa ibn Jafar
al Kazim, 8. Ali ibn Musa al Rida, 9. Muhammad ibn Ali al Taqi
(also known as al Jawad and Ibn al Rida), 10. Ali ibn Muhammad
al Naqi (also known as al Hadi), 11. Al Hasan ibn Ali al Askari
and 12. the promised Mahdi, the son of al Askari, usually mentioned
by his titles, al Hujjah (the proof), Imam al Asr (the Imam of the
Era) and Sahib al Zaman (the Master of the Age). In accordance
with Shi’i history and belief, there is no doubt that each one
of these personalities did make a claim to the imamah, that is
the station envisioned by the hadith al thaqalayn. Although every
one of these Imams of the ahl al bayt is held in unusual esteem
even by the non Shi’is, only the Shi’ah accord to them the station
of imamate, as a sacred office of unparalleled authority.

Abdulla > Who selects the Ahl-e-Bayt now a days?

They were already selected by the Prophet [pbuh&hf]. Consult
Yanibul Muwaddah, Qundoozi Hanafi and since you know Urdu there
is an urdu translation for it as well, where the names are
mentioned in line with what I had shared.

Abdulla > If they were selected on the basis of virtues, so doesn’t
Abdulla > it mean relationship is not important?

The relationship of the Ahl al Bayt with the Prophet is unique
and from the words of the Prophet [pbuh&hf],

Any relation will end on the day of Judgment except my relation.
And the root (identification) of every one is his father, except
the progeny of Fatima, since I am their father and their root
(identification).

al Mustadrak, al Hakim, v2 p251
Iqd al Farid, v2 p38
al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar al-Haithami, Ch. 11,
section 1, p239
Manaqib, Ibn Maghazli, p108
Tabaqat al Kubra, Ibn Sa’d, v8 p463. An abridged version
in english is also available, by Ta ha Publishers, London,
transl. by Aisha Bewley. The above tradition is not to be found.
Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haithami, v9, p173
Ihya al Mayyat, Suyuti, p 52
Tarikh, al Khateeb al Baghdadi, v6 182
Sunan, al Baihaqi, v7 p63

Abdulla > Depending on virtue can a Muslim (who is not from Ahl-e-Bayt)
Abdulla > be dearer to Allah SWT then a Ahl-e-Bayt Muslim??

As I had mentioned, the Ahl al Bayt that I am referring to are those
who were contemporaries of the Prophet [pbuh&hf], and since our issue
is pertinent to the disucssion of caliphate your questions make no
sense, no relevance to the discussion at hand.

May I suggest you visit the drawing board again.

Abdulla > I will wait for your answers.

Abdulla > Assalam O Alaikum

Iltimase duas*

In the name of the Most High

WHY SCHOOL OF AHL AL BAYT?

The Quran recognizes the Prophet to have had the functions of ruler (hakim), and judge (qadhi), for it addresses him as follows: ‘And this (He commands): Judge thou between them what God hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires … ’ (Quran, 5:49). The prophets were the founders of divine government on earth, and they constituted the principal resource for establishment of a righteous government that would serve the broad masses of the people.

The Quran assigns rulership not only to the prophet of Islam, but also to Yusuf: ‘When Yusuf reached maturity, We bestowed on him rulership and knowledge; thus do We reward the doers of good.’ (Quran, 12:22) The Quran addresses Dawud as follows: ‘O David! We did indeed make thee a Vicegerent on earth: so judge thou between men in truth (and justice), nor follow thou the lusts (of thy heart), for they will mislead thee from the path of God … ’ (Quran, 38:25).

Thus the function of prophethood would include the creation of a suitable environment for the strengthening of Islamic summons, expounding divine laws and ordinances for mankind, and inculcating in men the concepts of God’s book so that they may attain the lofty goals that Islam has prescribed. The Quran says the following with respect to this aspect of Prophet Muhammad’s task: ‘It is He who has sent amongst the un-lettered a messenger from among themselves, to rehearse to them His signs, to sanctify them, and to instruct them in scripture and wisdom – although they had been, before in manifest error.’ (Quran, 62:2)

The Quran, cites the superior strength and capacity of Prophet Talut as a reason for his being chosen as a fit leader of his people: ‘Their prophet said to them: God hath appointed Prophet Talut as king over you. They said: How can he exercise authority over us when we are better fitted than he to exercise authority, and he is not even gifted with wealth in abundance? He said: God hath chosen him above you, and hath gifted him abundantly with knowledge and bodily prowess: God granteth His authority to whom He pleaseth. God is All embracing, and He knoweth All things.’ (Quran, 2:247).

In just the same way, the Prophet exercised two offices: an inner (esoteric) dimension of connectedness with God which is bestowed by God Himself in His grace, and an outer dimension (exoteric) of leadership and rule. These two are inseparable, and the leadership of the ummah cannot be based on one alone; political and social leadership must go together with spiritual guidance. The Quran, also testifies to this as: ‘Or do they envy mankind for what God hath given them of His bounty? But We had already given the people of Abraham, the book and wisdom, and conferred upon them a great kingdom.’ (Quran, 4:54)

Specifically, in Islam the door of prophecy closed with Muhammad. He was both the exoteric and esoteric source of the revelation but in his function as a revealer of Divine legislation he represents the exoteric aspect. After him there must be those who inherited his esoteric function, whose duty is to expound the inner meaning of the Divine Law, and interpret the religious sciences. Just as the function of Prophecy, in as much as it concerns the bringing of Divine Legislation, which is called nubuwwah, so is the function of interpreting its inner meaning to men thus preserving the link with the source of revelation, along with the implementation of the shariah, which is called wilayah. (this has been derived from the root word w-l-y. The original meaning of this root word as mentioned by Raghib in his lexicon, is proximity, both physical as well as figurative. That is why the derivatives of this root are used in the sense of friendship, love, patronage, guardianship, control etc., for all these conceptions involve some sort of contact and proximity.)

The arguments that prove the existence of prophethood and the continuity of the religious laws, also prove the existence and the continuity of the system of wilayat (in its esoteric as well as exoteric dimension). How can it be imagined that the tenents and laws have a real existence, but the inner reality should not exist or the contact of the human world with it severed? The chief holder of this wilayat, who maintains this contact has been called Imam by the Quran, as is borne out of this verse: ‘And remember that Abraham was tried by His Lord with certain commands, which he fulfilled. He said: ‘I will make thee an Imam to the nations. He pleaded: And also (Imams) from my offspring! He answered: But my promise is not within the reach of the evildoers.’ (Quran, 2:124)

It is the wilayat of imamate, signifying religious authority, that is a position which makes the imam a model for others who have to follow him and take instructions from him. Such a position automatically implies him as model par excellence. It is the same position about which the Quran says: ‘We have indeed in the messenger of God, a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in God and the final day. And who engages much in the praise of God.’ (Quran, 33:21) and also ‘Say: If ye do love God, follow me: God will love you and forgive you your sins; for God is Oft forgiving. Most merciful.’ (Quran, 3:31). These verses of the Quran, put forth the Prophet as a model for others who are required to mould their conduct according to his, and to follow in his footsteps.

After the Prophet the ahl al bayt succeeded to this position. The tradition of the two weighty things (al-thaqalayn), associates the ahl al bayt with the Book of God. In respect of the Quran, God says: ‘No falsehood can approach it from before or behind it: it is sent down by One full of wisdom, worthy of all praise.’ (Quran, 41:42). If false-hood could come to the ahl al bayt, how could they be its co-equal?

Now, wilayat in the sense of leadership, means the right of political and social leadership. Indeed a society must have a leader. The person qualified to take charge of the social affairs of the people and to administer them is called the Waliyy u al Amir al Muslimin. During his life time, the Prophet held this position which was granted to him by God. Following his death it was attained by the ahl al bayt, as evident from the tradition of the two weighty things (al-thaqalayn). Besides, this tradition (and others), the Quran, points out this kind of wilayah: ‘O ye who believe! Obey God and obey the Messenger, and those charged with authority among you.’ (Quran, 4:59) and in another instance: ‘The Prophet is closer (awla) to the believers than their own selves … ‘ (Quran, 33:6).

THE NEED FOR INTERPRETER OF QURAN

The Quran is a sacred text that communicates its meanings through the medium of language. Like every authoritative text it needs an authorized exponent to interpret and expound its statements. This also holds in the case of man made laws, particularly constitutional law. In all countries the right to interpret the law resides in some authority which is considered fully competent to interpret the spirit of the law and declare its true intent concerning any particular constitutional or legal issue. According to the Quran, it was the duty of the Prophet to expound and interpret the text of the scripture for the people.

We have sent down to the remembrance that thou mayest expound it to the people what was sent down to them; and so helpy they will reflect. (Quran, 16:44)

In the following citation from a sermon recorded in the Nahj al Balaghah, Imam Ali, points out in very clear terms the necessity of there being authoritative exponents of the Quran. In this sermon, made after the episode of the arbitration (tahkim) [afterthe battle of Siffin], he also declares that the ahl al bayt, were the most competent authority to expound and interpret the Quran and the Prophet’s sunnah. Therein he also meets the objection of some people concerning the appointment of the arbiters to give a judgement based on the Quran, concerning two warring parties of Muslims,

We did not appoint men as arbitrators; rather it was solely the Quran that we had made our arbiters. This Quran is only a writing between two flaps and it does not speak. It is inevitable that some person should be its interpreter. When those people (i.e. Muawiya and his party) invited us to make the Quran an arbiter between us, we could not turn our back on the Book of God, subhanaha wa ta’ala, and, verily, God, subhanahu, has said: If you dispute about anything, refer it to God and to the Prophet (Quran, 4:59). Referring to God means judging accordance with the Book, and referring to the Prophet means that we follow his sunnah. Now, if judgement is to be made in accordance to the Book of God, we of all people, have the greatest right to make it; and if a ruling is to be given according to the sunnah of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and his household, then (too) we, if all people, have the greatest right to give it (i.e such a ruling). (Nahj al Balaghah, Sermon 125, p182, parts of this sermon are also cited in al Tabari, Tarikh, v6, events of the year 37 A.H, Sibt ibn al Jawzi, Tadhkirah, p100, al Shaykh al Mufid, al Irshad, p157, al Tabarsi, al Ihtijaj, v1 p275)

Thus the Imams of the ahl al bayt, have a pre-eminent position in the ummah of Islam, in the sense that they are interpreters par excellence of the Quran and the Prophet’s sunnah. In accordance with Islamic history and tradition, there have been certain individuals from the Prophet’s family who did make such a claim repeatedly throughout their lives and there claims were recognized and affirmed by their followers who came to be known as the shi’ah (lit. followers). These personalities were: 1. Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Prophet’s cousin and son in law, 2. al Hasan ibn Ali, the Prophets grandson through his daughter Lady Fatima (Ali’s wife), 3. al Husayn ibn Ali, al Hasan’s brother, 4. Ali ibn al Husayn (also known as Zayn al Abidin), 5. Muhammad ibn Ali al Baqir, 6. Jafar ibn Muhammad al Sadiq, 7. Musa ibn Jafar al Kazim, 8. Ali ibn Musa al Rida, 9. Muhammad ibn Ali al Taqi (also known as al Jawad and Ibn al Rida), 10. Ali ibn Muhammad al Naqi (also known as al Hadi), 11. Al Hasan ibn Ali al Askari and 12. the promised Mahdi, the son of al Askari, usually mentioned by his titles, al Hujjah (the proof), Imam al Asr (the Imam of the Era) and Sahib al Zaman (the Master of the Age). In accordance with Shi’i history and belief, there is no doubt that each one of these personalities did make a claim to the imamah, that is the station envisioned by the hadith al thaqalayn. Although every one of these Imams of the ahl al bayt is held in unusual esteem even by the non Shi’is, only the Shi’ah accord to them the station of imamate, as a sacred office of unparalleled authority.

KNOWLEDGE OF THE IMAMS

IMAMS AND THE CONCEPT OF GOD

Imam Ali, the first Imam of the Shi’ites, and the fourth and last of the rightly guided caliphs for the Sunnis, had embraced Islam at a very early age, having been adopted by the Prophet during his childhood, grew up under his personal care and guardianship of the recipient of Divine Revelation, the founder of Islam. These circumstances gave him a unique authority to speak for Islam, its beliefs, its thought and fundamental concepts, its theories and practices, its principles and ideals, and to interpret the Quran and the sunnah in all cases of conscience.

The following lines on the concept of God from the very first sermon of the Nahj al Balaghah, will give some idea of how Ali’s sagacious and philosophical mind was formed by Islamic teachings, which he expressed with unparalleled eloquence, (Taken from A Shi’ite Anthology, Selections from S. M. Husayn Tabatabai, p29-30)

Praise belongs to God, whose laudation is not rendered by speakers, whose bounties are not counted by reckoners, and whose rightfully due (haqq) is not discharged by those who strive. Grand aspirations perceive Him not and deep diving perspicacities reach Him not. His attributes (sifah) possess no determined limits (hadd mahdud), no existing description (nat mawjud), no fixed time (waqt madud) and no extended term (ajal mamdud). He originates the creatures by His power, looses the winds by His mercy, and fastens the shaking of His earth with boulders.

The first step in religion is knowledge (marifah) of Him. The perfection of knowledge of Him is to confirm Him (tasdiq). The perfection of confirming Him is to profess His unity (tawhid). The perfection of professing his Unity is sincerity (ikhlas) towards Him. And the perfection of sincerity towards Him is to negate attributes (nafy al sifat) from Him, because of the testimony of every attribute that it is not which possess the attribute (al mawsuf) and the testimony of everything that possesses attributes that it is not the attribute.

So whoso describes God-glory be to Him-has given Him a comrade (i.e the description). Whoso gives Him a comrade has declared Him to be two (tathniyah). Whoso declares Him to be two has divided Him. Whoso divides Him is ignorant of Him (whoso is ignorant of Him points to Him). Whoso points to Him has delimited Him. Whoso delimits Him has numbered Him. Whoso says, ‘In what is He’, has enclosed Him. Whoso says ‘On what is He’, has excluded Him (from certain things).

He is being (kaen) not as the result of temporal origin (hadath), an existent (mawjud) not (having one) from nonexistence (‘adam). He is with every thing, not through association (muqaranah); and He is other than everything, not through separation (muzaylah). He is active (fa’il), not in the sense of possessing movement and instruments. He was seeing when there was none of His creatures to be observed by Him. He was ‘alone’ (mutawahhid) when there was none with whom to be intimate and at whose loss to feel lonely.

He originated creation and gave to it its beginning without employing deliberation, profiting from experience, occasioning movement (harakah, i.e in Himself), or being disrupted by the cares of the soul (hamamah nafs). He delays things to their (appointed) times, mends their discrepancies, implants (in them) their natural dispositions, and makes these (dispositions) adhere to their objects. He has knowledge of them before their beginning, encompasses their limits (hudud) and their end (intiha) and knows their relationships (qarain) and aspects (ahna).

As for the importance of Nahj al balaghah, it may suffice to point out that all later works of the Shi’ites, whether in the field of Quranic commentary, hadith, jurisprudence and law, or in theology, philosophy, sufism, and ethics were immensely influenced by it. The impact of Ali’s thought is also clearly evident in Sunni works, especially those of ethics, philosophy, sufism and theosophy. Moreover the Nahj al Balaghah, effects on Arabic philology and literature has been most conspicuous.

Imams and their devotional prayers/supplications

Recognizing God as the Merciful, the Forgiving, the sole Creator and the sole Sustainer, a muslim is concomitantly required to express these beliefs by making God the only object of worship. This worship in its outward dimension expresses itself in prescribed prayers, fasting etc, but in its inward dimension it finds expression in touching supplications and moving devotional prayers. Supplications and devotional prayers are thus the most profound form of a muslims confession of his/her surrender to the will of the Almighty.

The Prophet of Islam and the twelve Imams from among his descendants, with their esoteric knowledge of the Godhead, their spirituality of the highest level, their purified souls, their ethical and moral ethos, their love and unceasing remembrance of God, their self denial and complete resignation to His will, left for us some of the most illuminating devotional prayers. These supplications reveal mans urgency of poverty, prostration of humility, the fervor penitence, the firmness of trust. They are not just eloquence, but earnestness; not figurs of speech, but compunction of soul and the cry of unshakable faith to the ear of mercy. These are the finest spiritual literature of Islam.

Some of the prayes of Ali ibn Abi Talib are not only the masterpieces of devotional literature but also the fountainhead of philosophical, metaphysical, ethical and theological concepts of Islam. Such fundamental topics as those relating to God’s unity, Eternity, and Creativity, His Power and Majesty, His Mercy and Forgiveness, God in Himself and God in relation to mankind are dealt with in these prayers with devotional fervor and eloquence of exposition.

A few lines of the supplication that he wrote for one of his disciples, Kumayl ibn Ziyad, demonstrates these qualities, (Ali ibn Abi Talib, Supplications, translated by William C. Chittick, p3-4)

Oh God, I ask Thee by Thy Mercy,
		Which embraces all things;
by Thy strength,
		through which Thou dominatest all things;
		toward which all things are humble
		and before which all things are lowly;
	by Thy invincibility,
		through which Thou overwhelmest all things;
	by Thy might, which nothing can resist;
	by Thy tremendousness, which has filled all things
	by Thy force, which towers all things
	by Thy face
		which have filled the foundation of all things
	and by Thy knowledge, which encompassess all things;
	and by the light of Thy face
		through which all things are illumined! …

Another important collection of supplications is Sahifat al Sajjadiyyah or al Sahifat al Kamilah of the fourth Imam, Zayn al Abidin, also called al Sajjad, the leader of the worshippers. This collection is known as the Psalms of the Family of the Holy Prophet. The only son of the martyr of Karbala, Zayn al Abidin witnessed the massacre of his father and eighteen male members of his family, which left a deep impression on his soul. In these prayers, one finds in the din and bustle of life, in the clash of emotions and interests, in the stress and strain of immediate surges, in the calamities and tensions of existence, and above all, in the search for spiritual satisfaction, a man lonely and helpless stands before his Creator in direct communication with Him and calls Him from the depth of his heart. Thus, the supplications of the Sahifah are the best expression of the relationship between man and God, between the worshipper and the Worshipped, between the slave and the Master, between the lover and the Beloved, between the distressed and the Comforter, and indeed, between the individual soul and the universal Soul. The following passage may give some idea of the beauties enshrined in his prayers (The Sahifat ul Kamilah (Psalms of Islam), Imam Zayn al Abidin, translated by William C. Chittick, Supplication No. 16, p55 )

O God,
	O He through whose Mercy sinners seek aid!
	O He to the remembrance of whose beneficence the distressed flee!
	O He in fear of whom the offenders weep!
	O Comfort of every lonely stranger!
	O Relief of all who are downcast and distressed!
	O Aid of everyone abandoned and alone!
	O Support of every needy outcast!
Thou art He
	who embracest everything in mercy and knowledge (Quran, 40:7)
Thou art He
	who hast appointed for each creature a share of Thy favors!
Thou art He
	whose pardon is higher then His punishment!
Thou art He
	whose mercy runs before His wrath!
Thou art He
	whose bestowal is greater than His with holding!
Thou art He
	by those mercy all creatures are embraced!
Thou art He
	who desires no repayment by hum upon whom He bestows!
Thou art He
	who does not overdo the punishment of him who disobeys Thee!
And I, my God, am Thy servant
	whom Thou commanded to supplicate
And who said:
	I am at Thy service and disposal!
Here am I, my Lord,
	thrown down before Thee,
I am he,
	whose back offenses have weighed down!
I am he,
	whose lifetime sins have consumed!
I am he,
	who was disobedient in his ignorance,
	while Thou didst not deserve that from Him …..

Imams and their instructions concerning government and its role in society

One of the frequently discussed issues in the Nahj al balaghah is that of government and justice. To anyone who goes through the book, it is evident to what extent Imam Ali is sensitive to the issues related to government and justice. In the famous letter to Malik al Ashtar, which contains elaborate instructions about various aspects of government, he writes:

Awaken your heart to kindness and mercy for the people (ra’iyyah) and love and tenderness for them. Never, never act with them like a predatory beast which seeks to be satiated by devouring them, for the people fall into two categories: they are either your brethren in faith or your kindred in creation … Do not ever say, ‘I have been given authority’ or ‘My command should be obeyed’, because it corrupts the heart, consumes one’s faith, and invites calamities.

There is another letter in the Nahj al balaghah consisting of instructions to the collectors of zakat, and is entitled: To the officials assigned to the job of collecting zakat. Here are Imam Ali’s instructions

Set out with the fear of God, Who is One and has no partner. Do not intimidate any muslim. Do not tresspass upon his land so as to displease him. Do not take from him more than God’s share in his property. When you approach a tribe, at first come down at their watering place, stay there instead of entering their houses. Approach them with calm and dignity and salute them when you stand amongst them, grudge not a proper greeting to them. Then say to them 'O servants of God, the Wali and Khalifah of God has sent me to you to collect from you God’s share in your property. Is there anything of His share in your property? If there is, return it to His Wali.

If someone says ‘No’, then do not repeat the demand. If someone answers in the affirmative, then go with him without frightening, threatening or compelling him. Take whatever gold and silver he gives you. If he has cattle or camels, do not approach them save with his permission, because the major part belongs to him. When you arrive (into the cattle enclosure), do not enter upon them in a bossy and rude manner … (Nahj al balaghah, Sermons 25, 26, 27 and 46)

Imams of the ahl al bayt and the leaders of the Juristic Schools

As far as the knowledge of the Imams (who were contemporary to the founders of the Sunni schools) of ahl al bayt is concerned, it is sufficient to say that Ja’far al-Sadiq was the teacher of the two founders, i.e., Abu Hanifa al-Nu’man, and Malik Ibn Anas. (Shariah: The Islamic Law, Chapter: The four Schools of Fiqh and their leaders, Abdur Rahman I. Doi, p87)

“ÉCǯËÂB ÀÃÏ ÉCXËtÂB ÙÒ” :з×Ëc ÒQF ÁCº

Abu Hanifa said: “Except for the two years Nu’man would have starved,” referring to the two years he had benefited from the knowledge of [Imam] Ja’far al-Sadiq. Malik also confessed straightforwardly that he had not met anyone learned in Islamic Jurisprudence better than [Imam] Ja’far al-Sadiq.

Abu Hanifa described his feelings (when he entered the palace of al-Mansur and found [Imam] Ja’far al-Sadiq sitting with him) by saying: When I saw Imam Ja’far, I felt his personality commands more respect than that of the Caliph himself. Yet the Caliph was ruling the muslim World, and Imam Ja’far was a private citizen. (al-Imam al-Sadiq, Muhammad Abu Zahrah in his book , p27)

On another occasion he (Abu Hanifa) says:

I have never seen [a person] of deeper authority [of religion] than Jafar ibn Muhammad. When Mansur summoned him, he also sent for me and said: O Abu Hanifah, the people are infatuatted with Jafar ibn Muhammmad, so, prepare for him some difficult problems. He sent for me in al Hirah. I came, entered, and saw Jafar ibn Muhammad sitting on his right side. As soon as I saw Jafar ibn Muhammad, I dreaded him more than I dreaded Abu Jafar [al Mansur]. I greated him, he nodded to me and I sat down. Then he [al Mansur] turned to him and said: ‘O Abu Abdillah! This is Abu Hanifah’. Jafar said: ‘Yes’, then added: ‘he did come to us’, (as if he did not like the gossip about his reocgnizing a man on seeing him.) al Mansur turned to me and said: ‘O Abu Hanifah! Ask Abu Abdillah of your questions. ‘I began asking him my questions and receiving his answers: ‘You say so and so and the Madinians say so and so, and we are so and so, sometimes you agree and sometimes you disagree with them’, untill I asked all forty problems.’ Then Abu Hanifah added: ‘Did not we narrate that the most learned is the one who knows better where people differ.’ (Manaqib Abi Hanifah, Muawffaq, v1 p173, Jami Asanid Abi Hanifah, v1, p222, Tadhkirat ul Huffaz, ad Dhababi, v1 p157)

Malik said, as quoted by Muhammad Abu Zahrah

I used to come to Ja’far Ibn Muhammad and went to him for a long time. Whenever I visited him, I found him praying, fasting, or reading the Quran. Whenever he reported a statement of the Messenger of God, he was with ablution. He was a distinguished worshipper who was unconcerned with the material world. He was of the God fearing people. (al-Imam al-Sadiq, p66)

Continuing,

The muslim scholars of various Islamic schools never agreed unanimously on a matter as much as they agree on the knowledge of Imam Ja’far and his virtue. The Sunni Imams who lived during his time were his students. Malik was one of them and those who were as contemporary as Malik such as Sufyan al-Thawri and many others. Abu Hanifa also was his student in spite of their being close in age, and he considered Imam Ja’far the most knowledgeable in the muslim World. (Ibid, p66)

While, there are differences and dis-agreements in the pronouncements on various issues pertaining to the shar’ia, the disagreement between the various schools of the Sunnis, is by no means less than the lack of conformity between the Shi’i and the Sunnis. A large number of writings of scholars of both sides will bear this out. (See, Encyclopedia of Islamic Law. A Compendium of the Major Schools. Adapted by Laleh Bakhtiar, and Fiqh us Sunnah, as Sayyid Sabiq).

Since based on the tradition of two weighty things (hadith thaqalayn) ahl al bayt carry as much weight in the eyes of God as the Quran, the former have the same qualities as the latter. Just as the Quran is true from beginning to end without any shadow of doubt, and just as it is incumbent upon every Muslims to obey its commandments, so are ahl al bayt perfect and sincere guides whose commands must be followed by all. Therefore there can be no excuse to escape from accepting their leadership and following their creed and their faith. Just as it is impossible for any muslims to turn away from the Quran or to adopt any set of rules which is at variance with it, so when the ahl al bayt have been unequivocally described as equal in weight and importance to the Quran, the same attitude has to be adopted with regard to their orders, and it cannot be permissible to turn away from them in order to follow other persons. After mentioning the tradition of two weighty things (al-thaqalayn), Ibn Hajar Haythami holds that:

These words show that those members of the ahl al bayt who posed these distinctions were superior to all the people." (al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar, p136)

The Prophet said:

Whosoever wishes to live and die like me and enter that heaven (after death), which my lord has promised me, namely, the ever lasting heaven should acknowledge 'Ali as his master after me, and after him he should acknowledge the sons of 'Ali, because they are the people who will never leave you outside the door of guidance nor will they let you enter the door of misguidance. (Kanz al-Ummal, al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, v6, p155, tradition: 2578, and also abridged Kanz al-Ummal on the margin of Musnad, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v5, p32)

Again the significance of leadership of ahl al bayt has been confirmed by the following beautiful analogy of the Prophet:

The Prophet said: “Regard the ahl al bayt among you as the head to the body, or the eyes to the face, for the face is only guided by the eyes.” (Is’af al-Raghibin, al-Saban, and al-Sharaf al-Mua’abbad, Shaikh Yusuf al-Nabahani, p31, more than one authority )

Also:

The Messenger of God said: "My ahl al bayt are the protected place of refuge about the dispute in religion. (al Mustadrak, Hakim)

These traditions, therefore, leave no room for any doubt. There can be no other way except to follow the ahl al bayt and give up all opposition to them.

The Messenger of God said: “Acknowledgment of ale Muhammad (the family of Muhammad) means salvation from the fire, and love for them is a passport for crossing the bridge of the sirat, and obedience to them is a protection from divine wrath.” (Kitab al-Shafa, Qadhi 'Iyad, published in 1328 AH, v2, p40 [Arabic] and p241 [English] , Yanabi al-Mawadda, al-Qunduzi al-Hanafi, section 65, p370)

Abdullah Ibn Hantab related:

The Messenger of God addressed us at Juhfa saying: “Do I not have authority over you more than yourselves?” They all said, “Yes of course.” Then he said: “I shall hold you answerable for two things, namely, the Book of God and my descendants.” (Ihyaa al-Mayyit, al-Hafidh Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, Arba’in al-'Arbain, Allama al-Nabahani)

Therefore the reason why the Shi’is have adopted the faith of the ahl al bayt to the exclusion of all others is that God himself has given preference to them only. It is sufficient to quote the poem of al-Shafi’i (one of the founders of the Sunni school of thought) about ahl al bayt which goes as follows:

Members of the house of the Prophet your love is a divine duty on mankind. God revealed it in His Quran. It is enough among your great privileges that whoever does not bless you, his prayer is void. If the love of the members of the house of the Prophet is rafdh (rejection), let mankind and the jinns testify that I am a rafidhi (rejector). (Tafsir al-Kabir, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, v27, p166, under the commentary of verse 42:23 of Quran, al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa, Ibn Hajar, p88, in connection with the verse 33:33 of Quran)

Suggestion for further reading

Supplications (Du’a), Ali ibn Abi Talib, translated by William C. Chittick, Ansariyan Publications, Iran. A collection of supplications from the first Imam of the Shi’ites, Ali ibn Abi Talib, covering the supplication of Kumayl, the supplication of the morning and many more. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp

----- The Nahj al balaghah (The Peak of Eloquence), translated by Sayed Ali Reza, Tahrike Tersile Quran, 1984. A collection of sermons, letters and sayings of the first Shi’ite Imam, Ali ibn Abi Talib, embracing themes of theology and metaphysics, mystic path and worship, government and social justice, the ahl al bayt and the issue of the caliphate, wisdom and admonition, the world and worldliness, heroism and bravery, eschatology, prayers and invocations, critique of contemporary society, social philosophy, islam and the Quran, morality and self discipline of the self. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp

The Psalms of Islam (al Sahifat al Sajadiyya), Imam Zayn al Abidin, translated with an Introduction and annotation by William C. Chitttick, Ansariyan Publications, Iran. A testament to the supplications transmitted from one of the most venerated religious authorities of early Islam, Ali b. al Husayn b. Ali b. Abi Talib, better known as Zayn al Abidin (‘the ornament of the worshippers’). Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp

A Shi’ite Anthology, S. M. Husayn Tabatabai, translated by William C. Chittick under the direction of Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Ansariyan Publications, Iran. A collection of sermons, prayers and writings from a cross section of Shi’ite religious thought, with an emphasis on three basic dimensions of the Shi’ite tradition, 1. The profession of Unity (al tawhid), or the metaphysical and theological principles of the faith, 2. The political, moral and social teachings, and lastly 3. The inward, spiritual and devotional life of a community. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp

Shi’ism, Doctrines, Thought and Spirituality, edited, annotated and with an Introduction by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Hamid Debashi and Seyyed Vali Reza Nasr, State University of New York Press, 1988. An anthology of the most significant writing on the doctrinal, intellectual and spiritual dimensions of Shi’ism.

The Right Path, 'Abd al Husayn Sharaf al Din al Musawi, Zahra Publications, 1986, Letter 110: Shi’i religion is based on the teachings of the ahl al bayt. Shi’is were pioneers of literary activity among the muslims and they wrote and compiled books in the days of the sahabah …. A book consisting a series of letters in the form of questions and answers, seeks to explain, justify and uphold the raison d’etre of Shi’ism, between a Sunni and a Shi’a scholar, Salim al Bishri and the aforementioned name. Also available on the internet at http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/dilp.

Sayyid Mujtaba Musavi Lari, Imamate and Leadership, Lessons on Islamic Doctrine (Book Four), translated by Hamid Algar, Sayyed Mojtaba Musavi Lari Foundation of Islamic C.P.W, 12 Entezam St, Qom, I.R Iran, 1996. Lesson Twenty, The Imam’s Comprehensive Knowledge of the Islamic Sciences.. This books outlines the concept of leadership as understood by the Shi’ites with a specific emphasis at explaining the foundations of one of the principle of faith as held by the Shi’ites, namely ‘Imamate’, loosely translated as Leaderhip. Covers an extensive portion on Shi’ism and its development in history.

Shi’a, S. M. H Tabatabai, translated by Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Ansariyan Publications, I.R Iran, The Spiritual Message of Shi’ism. A book which treats the historical reality of Shi’ism within Islam, her contribution to the spread of the Quranic message, and her existence as a possibility within the Islamic revelation itself.

Astaghfirullah Al Azeem, La haulawala quwwata illa billa al aleeulazeem.

Dear
I think this discussion cannot continue like this, because for the sahih ahadith i presented and you used words like bogus. May Allah ask you for this.

And your comments about ummul momeneen, Hazrat Aisha RAA are shameful that she favoured her father, astaghfirulla, if you had considered her your mother you would not have talked like that. The wives of the Prophet are the Mothers of Muslims, and a person who can use such comments against his mother can say anything to Sahaba or anybody.

This is Fitna, yesterday i was reading a book about start of Shiasm, and no doubt it is a fitna in ummat-e-muslims.

PLEASE WAKE UP!! You are on the wrong path.

Hazrat Ali RAA or his Sons (RAA) never wanted the khilafat so why are you producing this fitna. They (RAA) are baree ul zimma from your evils. You will have to answer to Allah SWT.

Prophet SAW told them (Abu Bakr RAA, Umer RAA, Usman RAA, Ali RAA and six others Ashab RAA) that they will go to Jannah. How dare you are not respecting them, whome Allah SWT has selected to go in Paradise, this is Ilzam on them.

For God Sake stop this, i agree that some ashab will be the losers on the day of judgement, but naozobilla how can you think of Abu Bakr RAA Umer RAA or Usman RAA to be one of them. Those were the beloved one of Prophet Mohammed PBUH.

The answers you gave to my questions are all false without any authenticity and irrelevant to the questions.

Prophet SAW never selected Hazrat Ali RAA to be the Khalifa after him. But he did selected indirectly Abu Bakr RAA to be the Khalifa after him. And for your information Hazrat Abu Bakr was selected by the group of Sahaba after the death of Prophet SAW.

As a result of diverting of the right path, shiasm has gained a lot of wrong believes with time.

Just think from your mind if God has said everybody is equal among Muslims then why and how Prophet SAW can say that His Ahly-e-Bayt is superior to everybody.

I more false thing is the promised Mahdi, Prophet SAW has clearly said that the Hazrat Eisa AS will come before the Qayama and you are naming some on else, see th ahadith i have posted in ahmedis thread.

Believe me Shiasm is not the rite Islam and there are so many false believes in it starting from the base, my duty was to inform you and to warn my brothers and sisters who are on the wrong path.

Wa ma alaina illalbalagh
Assalam O Alaikum

Bismihi Ta'la
'Assalam o alaikum

Brother Abdulla, you have made your position clear, and hence we have nothing to discuss. A resortment to petitio principe (that is sharing references only suitable to your mind set and position) never avails in a discussion. We need to share what is common between us, and not necessarily what you think to be correct and sahih. Is that hard to understand?

I will leave it to the readers to judge the validity of our claims, surely self praise and critique is of no use. I have amply demonstrated a point by point rebuttal of your own sources, something that was lacking in my brothers responses.

Perhaps when you can shred off all emotional baggage, we can thus evaluate if further discussion is futile.

I have taken note of your points and will share seperate posts, on the forum for the benefit of other readers.

I bid you and other believers a fruitful and much striving month of fasting.

Much need of prayers,

In Islam,

Abbas, Ali

[This message has been edited by AliAbbas (edited December 23, 1998).]

Who is the successor of the Prophet (PBUH&HF)?

Once a person told me that Abu Bakr is more knowledgeable than Prophet
Muhammad (PBUH) (Na'oozo Billah)! I asked him how come?! He said because
Abu Bakr understood that he should assign a person as his successor to keep
the system and community working in order. As it is well-known Abu Bakr
assigned Umar as his successor. But the Prophet failed to realize this
important task that the Islamic community needs a qualified leader after
him, or perhaps it was not important for the prophet that who is going to
take over the power after him!

When I heard that, I started asking the following question from myself: Is
it possible that the Prophet of Islam who has tried hard to implement
Islam, and tolerated a lot of problems, disasters, and paid big price to
establish Islam in Arabian peninsula, leaves people without assigning any
person to keep this religion alive after him?! The religion that is to be
the last religion of God for this world; the religion that was supposed to
be for every nation all over the world both inwardly and outwardly
(political authority). What happened that we Muslims are in this miserable
situation in the world for centuries? What happened that the chain of
successors/rulers (Ulul-Amr) has reached to people like King Fahd, King
Husain, Saddam Husain, Husni Mubarak, ...? Something is terribly wrong!

Yes, The problem is leadership and Guardianship. Was this problem not so
important for prophet or he didn't take it serious? Of course, he did
take it serious and he must have assigned a chain of successors (Caliphs)
who where the most qualified as the head of Islamic state and as the
guardian of Shari'ah (divine law).

Another question that came out to my mind was that: Are Allah and His
prophet more qualified to assign the Caliphs, or people? Is Islam on the
basis of democracy (government of people over people) or on the basis of
theocracy (Kingdom of Allah over the earth)? The history of Islam
testifies that the government after the death of prophet was neither
democratic nor theocratic. Just a few people gathered in "Saqifah bani
Saaedah" and assigned Abu Bakr as Caliph while Imam Ali was busy of the
burial of the holy prophet in Medina.

Is it our choice as to whom should be a Prophet or it is Allah's choice?
Can we select Prophet by Shura? The same goes for assigning the successor
of Prophet, for Allah knows best who is the most qualified for this
position. It seems very strange that a deputy of a chief is assigned by any
person other than him. Deputy of God (or prophet) is only assigned by God
(or prophet), and it is not people's business! There are many examples in
Quran where Allah states that He is the one who assigns a successor on the
earth. Allah, Exalted He is, states in Quran:

 "O' David, we assigned you as Caliph (successor) on the earth ..."
 (Quran 38:26)

He also states:

 "... We have assigned you (Abraham) as Imam (leader) for people ..."
 (Quran 2:124)

As we see, Caliph/Imam for the mankind is assigned by Allah. See also 2:30
(about Adam). Even Prophet Moses, when he wanted to go to Miqaat, did not
ask people to form a Shura to assign a Caliph for him. Quran tells us that:

 (Moses said: "O' Allah) assign me a vizier from my family, (that is)
 my brother Aaron (Haroon) ...," (Allah) said: "We granted your
 requests, O' Moses." (Quran 20:29-36).

Allah, Exalted, also said:

 "Surely We gave the book to Moses and assigned his brother Aaron as
 his vizier." (Quran 25:35).

Allah also said:

 "... And Moses said unto his brother Aaron: Take my place among the
 people." (Quran 7:142).                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Notice that "Ukhlufni" and "Khalifa" (Caliph) are exactly from the same
root.

In this connection, let us take a look at the following interesting
tradition in Sahih al-Bukhari:

 The Messenger of Allah said to Ali: "Your position to me is like the
 position of Aaron (Haroon) to Moses, except that there shall be no
 Prophet after me"

(1) Sahih al-Bukhari, Arabic-English version, Traditions 5.56, 5.700
(2) Sahih Muslim, Arabic, v4, pp 1870-71
(3) Sunan Ibn Majah, p12
(4) Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v1, p174
(5) al-Khasa'is, by al-Nisa'i, pp 15-16
(6) Mushkil al-Athar, by al-Tahawi, v2, p309

The Prophet (PBUH&HF) thereby meant that as Moses had left behind Aaron to
look after his people when he went to Miqaat (meeting Allah), in the same
way he was leaving Ali behind to look after the affairs of Islam after he
met Allah (i.e., his death). Let this reminder be food of thought for the
possessors of pure heart and open mind.

The above verses of Quran concerning Aaron show that even the prophet does
not assign his deputy/successor, and it is rather Allah who does that.
Prophet Moses prayed to Allah and requested that Aaron becomes his deputy,
and Allah approved the suggestion/request of Prophet Moses (AS).

[This message has been edited by AliAbbas (edited December 23, 1998).]

The Promised Ten
By Shaun Astarabadi
August 19, 1996

Ten of the companions are claimed to have been promised Paradise
during their lives. They are:

1) Abu Bakr
2) Omar
3) Uthman
4) Ali
5) Talha
6) al-Zubair
7) Saad bin Abi Waqqass
8) Saeed bin Zaid
9) Abdulrahman bin
Awf and
10) Abu `Ubaida binal-Jarrah

Note the placement of the Imam Ali is, conveniently, the fourth in a group
which does not contain a single supporter of the Imam from among the
companions of the prophet (s). Accordingly, the people of the Sunna
have agreed on holding these ten in high regard. Clearly, the nine
mentioned with the Imam are his adversaries and none were on his
side.

This suspicious hadeeth was not even mentioned by Bukhari or Muslim,
but it was narrated within al-Tirmithi's, abu- Daoud's, and Ibn
Maja's collections in two flavors. Let's take a look at the hadeeth
to see the extent of amplifying selected personalities.

  1. Abu Daoud in his book , narrates from "Saeed bin Zaid said: I bear
    witness, I heard the messenger of Allah (s) say: Ten are in Paradise:
    The prophet is in Paradise, Abu Bakr in Paradise, Talha in Paradise,
    Omar in Paradise, 'Uthman in Paradise, Saad bin Malik in Paradise,
    and AbdulRahman bin `Awf in Paradise. If you wish I could tell you the
    tenth? He said. They said: Who is he? He said: Saeed bin Zaid." (The
    same hadeeth but a variation in wording #3748 in al-Tirmith, but
    different people!)

  2. al-Tirmithi in his book under #3747**, narrates from "AbdulRahman
    bin Awf said: The prophet (s) said: Abu Bakr in Paradise, Omar in
    Paradise, 'Uthman in Paradise, Ali in Paradise, Talha in Paradise, al-
    Zubair (bin al-'Awwam) in Paradise, AbdulRahman bin
    Awf in Paradise,
    Saad (bin Abi Waqqass) in Paradise, Saeed (bin Zaid), and abu 'Ubaida
    bin al- Jarrah in Paradise." (Saad is not in Abu Daoud's book.)

  3. al-Tirmithi , under #3748**, narration by "Saeed bin Zaid, that the
    prophet (s) said in a number of people, ten are in Paradise: Abu Bakr
    in Paradise, Omar in Paradise, 'Uthman, Ali, al-Zubair, Talha,
    AbdulRahman, Abu 'Ubaida, and Saad bin Abi Waqqass. He counted these
    nine and was quite about the tenth. They said: By Allah, abu-alAawar
    (i.e. Saeed), who is the tenth? He said: You swore by Allah -
    abu-alAawar is in Paradise." al-Tirmithi commented that abu-alAawar
    is Saeed bin Zaid bin Amr bin Nawfal.

Ref.:
al-Tirmithi, v5, p605, #3747 and #3748
abu Daoud, #4649 and #4650

Several things raise the doubts about these traditions and supports
the belief that they were fabricated forgeries for political reasons
to elevate the adversaries of the Imam Ali and the remainder Family
of the Household of the prophet (s), as follows.

  • They struggle in narrowing down who the ten are. One time they
    insert Saad bin Abi Waqqass and another they put Saad bin Malik in
    his place.

  • The first of the hadeeths did not mention Imam Ali, nor Ibn
    al-Jarrah; yielding only seven promised Paradise, of course, not
    counting the prophet (s).

  • The first and third are essentially the same hadeeth, by the same
    person, but the order of those in Paradise is different, one person
    added and another dropped, and only seven people are listed in Abu
    Daouds'.

  • Listing of the prophet (s) among those promised Paradise is
    something that confirms forgery! Does anyone really believe that his
    companions enter Paradise and he will be left behind? He need not
    advertise that - it is a given!

  • Both narrators are telling the hadeeth about themselves! See
    praising one's self, below.

  • The history of the so called ten does not mandate this great
    reward, at the expense of exclusion of other pious companions, who in
    fact remained unblemished till their demise.

  • The narrator of the tradition is one of those promised Paradise,
    this way he is bringing good tidings to himself!

  • Bukhari and Muslim did not even set aside a virtues section on
    neither Saad bin Zaid nor AbdulRahman bin Awf, while Bukhari has a
    sections for Mu'awiya, one hadeeth for Khalid bin al-Waleed and just
    a section heading for Mus'ab bin
    Umair (see volume 5, Book of
    Virtues).

  • Saad bin Malik, in fact, is not among the 10 highly regarded by
    the people of the Sunna.

  • The second narration only named nine persons in addition to
    dropping out Saad bin Abi Waqqass.

  • Bukhari adds to the suspicion, by considering only three to have
    been promised paradise by the prophet (s): Abu Bakr, Omar and `Uthman
    (see Bukhari, v5, p68, #194). Nevertheless, the narrator "Mohammed
    bin Miskeen is weak, not well known," ..etc. (Lisan al-Mizan, al-
    'Asqalani, v5, p380, #1233).

    Praising One's Self

According to Islamic law, when someone praises others by praising
himself, it is disregarded altogether. The same is true if someone
bears witness for someone else, while at the same time, even
partially selfserving, his testimony is rejected.

"Therefore justify not yourselves; He knows best who it is that
guards against evil." [53:53]

  Logic and Reason

A reasonable person can not judge, unconditionally, that an ordinary
fallible human being is guaranteed paradise, therefore, is immune
from Hell Fire. One who is open to the possibility of committing
sinful acts, by his nature, can not be predictable. Especially, if
promised paradise while not infallible, he would have the tendency to
act freely due to his feeling of assurance that his acts will have no
bearing on his outcome.

It is, therefore, not logical nor reasonable that the prophet (s)
would promise such an outcome early on to people of an unknown
future.

If this hadeeth were indeed true, then how come one did not see the
khalifa `Uthman use it in protest against those who found it lawful
to murder him. Nor did any of his companions come to his aid,
protesting the unlawfulness of killing someone who is guaranteed
paradise. Actually, it would have been unlawful for them to stay
silent in this matter. The fact of the matter is: the hadeeths were
fabricated at a later date.

If one accepts the hadeeth to be true, one must also accept that other
than these ten from among the companions of the prophet (s) are all in
Hell Fire, because there is no in-between on the day of judgment. And
this is, by necessity, is wrong by reasoning and religion.


** Narrators of al-Tirmithi are as follows:

3747: Qutaiba, Abdul Aziz bin Muhammad, Abdul Rahman bin Hameed, his

father (Hameed), Abdul Rahman bin 'Awf. Al-Tirmithi said: We were
told one by: Abdul Aziz bin Mohammad, Abdul Rahman bin Hameed, his
father, from the prophet (s) where "Abdul Rahman bin 'Awf" was not
listed. And another like it has been narrated by (adding) Saeed bin
Zaid t othe chain.

3748: Salih bin Mismar al-Marrouzi, Ibn Abi Fudaik, Musa bin

Yaaqoub, Omar bin Saeed, Abdul Rahman bin Hameed, from his father,
from Saeed bin Zaid.


General References:
1. Saheeh al-Bukhari
2. Saheeh Muslim
3. Sunan al-Tirmithi
4. Sunan Abi Daoud
5. Munadharat `Aqaediyya, Ameer al-Kadhimi al-Qazwini
6. al-Khud'a, Salih al-Wardani
7. Lisan al-Mizan, Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani