Which of the two do you think will have less negative impact on kids??
A- Parents divorce…and kids live with one of the parents…and don’t have the other parent in their life
B-Parents stay married…both parents just continue to live together in a bad marriage…but the kids get to live with BOTH the parents…and have them in their life..
life is not as black and white as portrayed in this hypothetical question. Beside other things it also depends on the eduction of parents, their economic condition and social status.
It's a matter of perspective like Decent said. Kids from the same family, and each with internalize the impact of a parent's bad marriage differently.
For one child, having a conflict-free home is best, hence will prefer that parents are divorced/separated. For another child, having an intact but dysfunctional family unit is better, since all of the members of the family are "together" in the same household.
And then moving on to: what if after the parents divorce, one parent doesn't financially or emotionally support the children because he/she is living away from the kids. In that case, wouldn't the children have been better off with the parent staying in the marriage. In the opposite situation, what if the parents stay together for the sake of the children, but the children see infidelity or emotional/physicial abuse - aren't those parents setting a bad example or pattern of behaviour for their children?
What situation has the least negative impact differs from one family to the next and from one child to the next.