Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
democracy is dead and proof of it is in the muslim world the ones inflicting most violence is your bagwan US military occupiers they cannot make the people accept democracy and secularism because it is clear kufr. Now they have resorted to force by using their tanks,bullets, occupation and militias and you openly support this making you with the retarded ones who forcing violence on the people.
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
^Case in point…
I wont even bother trying to reason with you anymore. I thought it was because your just uneducated, but now I realize your probably just born this way.
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
[note]Gentlemen, please avoid getting personal with each other. Respect each other’s views, and have the courtesy to tolerate the others’ point of view.[/note]
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
Just because people want to replace their corrupt leaders, does not mean that they want democracy as understood in the west.
The people of the Middle East want change, but not a system which goes against their Islamic values.
Do you see the masses calling for their countries to become liberal to the extent that nightclubs become the norm, where anything can be insulted under the guise of freedom of expression?
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
^ Democracy = night clubs, kinky sex, morality going to Hell?
What’s the Arab Awakening about? Replacing corrupt dictatorship with what? Representative politics. Are people protesting the lack of Shariah rule, or are they calling for freedom of the press, freedom of expression, freedom of movement, for the dismantling of police states? How are democratic values related to being socially and sexually ‘liberal’?
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
The people are not calling for their socities to become like those in the west.
Yes they want the things you outlined, many of which are found within the Islamic Sharia.
Democratic socities allow individuals to live life as they please, just take a look at socities in the west and you can conclude the type of behaviour allowed within democratic societies and protected under the guise of freedom.
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
An important question to this discussion should be, ’ If the people were given a choice between Khilafah ( Islamic Sharia ) or Democracy ( The law of humans ), which one will any Muslim who understands that his belief is comprehensive choose?
One which contradicts his creed, or one that is from his creed?
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
Actually, the Taliban’s Mullah Omar never claimed the title of Khalif. The Taliban considered themselves to have established the Nizam-i-Mustafa, not the Khalifat.
The last person to claim the Khalifat and have it accepted by the people he ruled was King Husain of the Hijaz. He was rewarded by being invaded, overthrown and exiled by the Saud family.
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
Democracy can exist in an islamic state, however when you clamour for khilafah, which one you mean the Islamic khlafah or the non islamic khilafah propagated by Hizb ul tahrir. Funny people living in democratic west clamouring for sharia.
Re: Khilafat movement is dead - why can’t people move on
Muslims can’t even agree which day should be Eid and they are going to agree on a system of government and pick the supreme chancellor who is going to rule them? Dream on.
Besides, don’t you need nabuwwat before khilafat? Khalifa is a successor to the prophet isn’t he?