Code_Red brother....
sub say pehli baat to yeh hay keh tamam islamic history nay yeh baat record ki hay keh Rasool Allah s.a.w.a.w., kay wisaal kay foran baad taqreeban 700 say ziada huffaz-e-quran ko "munkireen-e-zakaat" keh kar tah-e-taigh kia gaya.
magar masala yeh hay keh sunni tradition mai'n 100% history ko na qabil-e-yaqeen gardana jaata hay or yeh uzar paish kia jata hay keh tareekh likhnay walay sub kay sub moarrikh "shia" thay.....
na maloom keh ghair shia moarrikh us waqt kahaa'n thay?
doosri baat yeh keh hairat un logo'n par hay jinho'n nay apni jaan to day di magar in logo'n ko zakat naa di, iss say kam az kam yeh to saaf pata chalta hay keh moaamlah 2.50 rupalli ka nahee'n tha bulkeh koi or moaamla tha jis ki wajah say unho'n nay jaan daina to gawara kia magar in logo'n ko zakat kay 2.50 rupay daina gawara nahee'n kia.
Brother you should admit the fact that this incident is recored in sunni traditions despite being very much against a very noble and high Ranking sahabi and Govt of that time.
Also if you study carefully , sunni tradition are full of incidents which highlight weakness of great sahabi's and people people freely criticising rulers of the time. Because of the core belief that Companions of the prophet are not infallible, yet they set best possible examples for us to follow. They strived hard to follow the footsteps of prophet(pbuh) and achieved excellence in love and devotion.
It would be wise to not involve countless other sectarian strifes, which are not under discussion in this thread.
Also please note that in case of this particular incident, the details are almost same as recorded in shia and sunni tradition. So , it might be cosidered a proof that sunni historian were not dishonest , by and large.
Also we should look in to this incident objectively.