Now India would pose it’s well known Governor rule. The unfortunate Occupied state has been under Governor rule for most of it’s history. This is after all “democracy”, “Indian Style”.
SRINAGAR: Ghulam Nabi Azad government in occupied Kashmir fell down on Monday when the Chief Minister opted to resign instead of seeking vote of confidence in State Assembly.
Azad government, who was facing massive protest by Kashmiris on Amaranth land transfer issue further weakened when Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) with 38 MLAs decided to withdraw support from the government on the issue.
On Monday, Ghulam Nabi Azad moved a motion to seek a vote of confidence in state assembly but later withdrew it and announced to tender resignation by saying he was in favour of “clean politics” and not horse-trading.
Later, Azad drove to the Governor House to tender resignation. State elections are due in October next.
What is better , governor rule on occupied people. Israel does the same with occupied Palestenians and in all its honesty, it looks like India is trying to follow Israeli foot steps by first trying to change the demographics of Kashmir and then saying we can not leave as we have vested interests in Kashmir.
The government of the Indian-administered province of Jammu and Kashmir has collapsed.
Ghulam Nabi Azad, the chief minister, resigned on Monday** after weeks of protests over the transfer of land to a Hindu shrine trust. Thousands of Muslims in the province protested against the move, which they called an effort to alter the region’s demographics.**
On July 1, the government revoked the land-transfer order, which defused tensions in predominantly Muslim Kashmir’s capital Srinagar but led to more violent protests in Jammu, a Hindu-majority area. Al Jazeera English - CENTRAL/S. ASIA - Indian Kashmir government collapses At least six people were killed and hundreds wounded in the protests.
The withdrawal of support from an alliance partner also played a role.
The government of the Indian-administered province of Jammu and Kashmir has collapsed.
Ghulam Nabi Azad, the chief minister, resigned on Monday** **.
Saad ... that is what happens in a democracy .... if the government of the day losses the confidence of people (meaning the members of legislative assembly) then they have to go.
You might be not aware of this concept ... in a democracy Army does not come and take over teh goverment. If you were waiting for that ... thensorry to disappoint . You
Now i can give a lesson on democracy 101 ..... Teggy ..... a new thread
^ So Indian democracy consists of years of oppression and "governor rule"(which is not elected by the populace), so that they can control an area by hook or crook. And i guess you want to tell us more about your Indian "ishtyle" democracy.
At least Indians are able to hold on to the areas … by hook or by crook … maybe we ought to be like Pakistan … surrender and run away…but then who will Indians surrender to
Governers rule is not that bad and does not last as long as the army rule in Pakistan … “the general hasn’t left the building”:biggthumb
What is better , governor rule on occupied people. Israel does the same with occupied Palestenians and in all its honesty, it looks like India is trying to follow Israeli foot steps by first trying to change the demographics of Kashmir and then saying we can not leave as we have vested interests in Kashmir.
what is occupied people, India can't impose Governer rule in POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir)
What is better , governor rule on occupied people. Israel does the same with occupied Palestenians and in all its honesty, it looks like India is trying to follow Israeli foot steps by first trying to change the demographics of Kashmir and then saying we can not leave as we have vested interests in Kashmir.
What.....does Isril rule Palestines thru Muslims.
Gulam Nabi Azad is a Muslim. Party PDP, that has brought him down is led by Muslims.
I want to ask all these junks how they judge these Muslims?
Gulam Nabi Azad is a Muslim. Party PDP, that has brought him down is led by Muslims.
I want to ask all these junks how they judge these Muslims?
Who cares? Muslims can't be sell-outs and traitors?
Once upon a time, the British colonized half of India through native-Indian stooges set up as Rajas and Nawabs. Today, India colonizes Kashmir though Jammuite and Kashmiri stooges propped up as "Chief Ministers" through sham elections.
. Today, India colonizes Kashmir though Jammuite and Kashmiri stooges propped up as "Chief Ministers" through sham elections.
Everyone that is part of the " struggle" participated in these election .... so when they loose they are sham ....
Dont know why the militants go out of their way to stop the elections ... why are they scared of people coming out to vote ...... the truth is you have to win the elections where people have to vote for you .... not like a shutdown where you can threaten people and get away with it
Anyway the situation in Kashmir has entered its last phase and peace will previal in the valley.
Everyone that is part of the " struggle" participated in these election
Has the Umar Farooq ever participated in an election? No.
Yasin Malik? No.
Abdul Ghani Bhat? No.
Abbas Ansari? No.
Shabbir Shah? No.
Bilal Lone? No.
Sajjad Lone? No.
Pandit Bhushan Bazaz? No.
I could go on...but I think all the non-bigoted readers get the point.
I love how Syed Geelani and Abdul Ghani Lone somehow constitute "everyone" in the separatist movement according to you.
so when they loose they are sham
Too bad it's pretty well documented fact that the elections held in Kashmir under occupation have been blatantly rigged.
Anyway the situation in Kashmir has entered its last phase and peace will previal in the valley.
From your lips to God's ears!
May the India be expelled from Kashmir as soon as possible so peace can prevail.
I don't think Indians have intent of leaving Kashmir and I don't see any appetite from Pakistani establishment to press on this decades old K in the name.
Has the Umar Farooq ever participated in an election? No.
Yasin Malik? No.
Abdul Ghani Bhat? No.
Abbas Ansari? No.
Shabbir Shah? No.
Bilal Lone? No.
Sajjad Lone? No.
Pandit Bhushan Bazaz? No.
I could go on...but I think all the non-bigoted readers get the point.
.
Umar Faoorq .... was too young in 1989 but all this political standing is because of his father .... remeber " double Farooq" .... Farooq Abdullah was good for his father ......
Yasin Malik ... again too young in 1989 but then he was part of MUF ..... tried to intimidate people
Abdul Ghani Bhat .... Abbbas Ansari ??????? If they even will a " mohallah" election they should thank their stars.
Lone brothers ...... taken over their fathers legacy, who again did take part in elections ..... now fighting over it .... that is why one of them had to bring his mother to support .... so much for leadership when you need to get your mother to vouch for you.
Salahudin alias Yusuf Shah ..... lost in 1987 ..... rest is history
But the biggest change that has taken place in the last 60 years is that Pakistan has realized the folly of fighting India over Kashmir. This will lead to an amicable solution on Kashmir .......... you can wish for anything you like .... you should buy a lottery ticket the odds are better.:)
Umar Faoorq .... was too young in 1989 but all this political standing is because of his father .... remeber " double Farooq" .... Farooq Abdullah was good for his father ......
Yasin Malik ... again too young in 1989 but then he was part of MUF ..... tried to intimidate people
Abdul Ghani Bhat .... Abbbas Ansari ??????? If they even will a " mohallah" election they should thank their stars.
Lone brothers ...... taken over their fathers legacy, who again did take part in elections ..... now fighting over it .... that is why one of them had to bring his mother to support .... so much for leadership when you need to get your mother to vouch for you.
Salahudin alias Yusuf Shah ..... lost in 1987 ..... rest is history
Ah...so now that your initial idiotic statement has been proven wrong, you're bringing up a whole new batch of allegations, many of which seem to be based on the farcical idea that the '87 elections were free & fair...an argument that only someone totally ignorant of the situation, or a complete Indian chauvinist/Hindu bigot would make.
But the biggest change that has taken place in the last 60 years is that Pakistan has realized the folly of fighting India over Kashmir. This will lead to an amicable solution on Kashmir .......... you can wish for anything you like .... you should buy a lottery ticket the odds are better.:)
Like the ignorant leadership of your nation, you seem to be under the impression that the people of Kashmir are opinionless chattel who will be lead one way or another once the government's of India & Pakistan work things out. You arrogant colonizers inevitably fail to factor in the fact that there can never be any lasting peace in Kashmir until the will of the people has been heard.
Hold whatever bilateral talks with Pakistan you want...fill your media with as much propaganda about "normalcy" as you please...none of it changes the fact that the Kashmiri people will never be satisfied with the constant oppression and humiliation of Indian occupation.
You dont want to belive that the present players in the " struggle" have been part of the political landscape .... well it is upto you . I dont have to convince you .... the facts are there. Right from Geelani, Lone, Maulvi Farooq, Salahudin have taken part in the elections and that is something no one can deny.
As for people of Kashmir ......... they have been mislead for a long time. They have seen and understood how people have played games in their name and made fortunes for themselves and their families.
With pakistan taking a back seat , now the new forces are those of independence . History has been created to show that Kashmir is this entity that had nothing to do with India and Pakistan. Well you can let that play also for sometime. After all it took almost 60 years for soem people to get Pakistan out of their system.
Geelnai sahab had left Hurriyat for that reason only .... he is back to the fold as he realizes that the ground realities have changed........ let them play this part of play also ....... let us see how long this phase lasts.
Right from Geelani, Lone, Maulvi Farooq, Salahudin have taken part in the elections and that is something no one can deny.
I see you're just resorting to making things up now.
Tell me...which election did Mirwaiz Mohammad Farooq run in? The man was briefly used by Farooq Abdullah to gain credibility in the '83 elections, but he never abandoned his pro-Plebiscite stance. In any case, the man died a few months after the the start of the uprising, so he can hardly be considered one of the main leaders of the current movement.
As for the other three...I love how they now constitute *"Everyone that is part of the 'struggle'" *according to you.
