Ok.. LETS ME GET THIS STRAIGHT…
Human rights violations in occupied Kashmir are a common occurence and are reported on a regular basis.
People of occupied Kashmir protest despite the threat of being killed by live rounds…
Supposed Human rights violations in Azad Kashmir are answered without any protest and protests on the scale of Indian occupied Kashmir are unheard off.
You claim that the lack of protests is due to the threat of bombing, as in Balochistan etc. Yet the same people on the Occupied Kashmrir side are willing to risk being shot by live rounds to protest… Somehow, risking death doesnt stop Occupied Kashmiris from protesting, yet the fear of death prevents the ones in Azad Kashmir refuse out of fear. GREAT LOGIC…
Fact is, India refuses any outside involvement in Occupied Kashmir. And I doubt the EU was given any kind of access that wasnt monitored by the Indians.
As for Azad Kashmir, there are a good number of Kashmiris there who are pro independance, More power to them.
Atleast their mothers and sisters arent being raped…
I assume that in you pathetic way, you are refering to AZAD Kashmir as PoK.
And perhaps ancedotal meeting with however many people of Azad Kashmir isnt evidence, but we acknowledge that. We need to have a referanddum to ascertain their wishes… Which ofcourse India refuses.
Bottom line, you dont even have ancedotal evidence…
We have a Kashmiri from Srinaher denouncing you. The news is filled with Kashmiris denouncing India…
The problem is your refusal to wake up and smell reality.
What does Pak have to hide. If there were human rights vilation as there are in Occupied Kashmir, they could never hide them.
Some points from the article…
The EU parliament says the Azad Kashmir is not democratically ruled. This is an issue concerning all of Pakistan.
But for there part, Azad Kashmir is not considered a part of Pakistan offcicialy. This is why the N Areas does not have a voice, as its not a part of the country offcially. This is a recognized problem and needs to be addressed.
The report says India should allow Human rights groups in Occupied Kashmir..
I WONDER WHY INDIA DOES NOT ALLOW HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS INTO KASHMIR?
The report does not mention any specific violations in Azad Kashmir other then to say that Gilgit and Baltistam are not represented properly… As regard to occupied Kashmir, it mentions dissapearances and extra judicial morders specifically.
The problem in Azad Kashmir is one of lack of represtation, while in India its everything..