Re: Judges restoration, YES/NO? Clarification (Threads Merged)
Brother, be serious :). What taking oath on PCO is to do with being corrupt? Yaar, I am not born again Ganja the corrupt living in world of illusion or his supporter.
Why don’t you tell us the relationship between corruption and taking oath as you keep parroting the word “corrupt” everytime you talk about Ch Iftikhar refusing to take oath on 2nd PCO?
I consider Iftikhar corrupt because allegations were made against him and he did not defend the allegations like any honest and respectable man would have done, rather he used all tricks and tactics to avoid defending those allegations. Situation is that, even now I have no reason to believe that he was not guilty of all those allegations. If allegations were not made and in result of those allegations enquiry was not held, I would not have considered Iftikhar corrupt.
Why is he not being prosecuted in a court now for the crimes he committed? Please no BS about “reconciliation” or “forgiving nature” etc.?
I consider other judges corrupt because they not only stopped the investigation of alleged corruption by SJC, but supported corrupt Iftikhar in every way showing partiality and shamefully used their office to stop investigation, in such way that any intelligent Pakistani would think about their verdict as illogical and supportive of corruption.
Who is responsible for calling a Judicial council, is it President’s responsibility or PM’s? or is it upto SC bench to decide whether to invoke a SJC or not?
[Before that, when Iftikhar was suspended and allegations charges were sent to SJC for investigation, even though seeing the nature of allegations, I realised that Iftikhar was corrupt (as allegations were clear and obvious that could not be made if they were not true), still I used to write even on this forum that we could not call Iftikhar corrupt until investigation is done and judgment on his charges are made. At that time I did not knew that Iftikhar would make so much hue and cry and his corrupt colleague Supreme Court judges would stoop so low that they would stop even SJC investigating].
Who was on the SJC bench? How did they “stop” SJC?
Of course he understands laws. But then all lawyers understand laws, still they contest in court on their own understanding, and have to abide by the judgments of Judges (even if judgements are wrong). Though, if judgements are obvious wrong and completely illogical, people have all right to consider that the judgments given are wrong and Judges made judgment because of their bias, because they were paid to be bias (making judgment by taking rushwat) , **or made judgment under pressure. **In such situation, judgments get honoured by judges get tarnished (and it becomes duty of government to replace such tarnished judges ).
Who paid these judges? Is there a proof or just fabrication? Who pressurised them?
For the last bolded part, I thought you said govt didn’t “replace” the judges rather the judges refused to be on SC bench by not taking oath, so which is it?
**All these factors and many other factors was hindering the ability of government not only in fighting terrorists but also in keeping law and order situation within country under control, **stop spread of lies from media, stop population getting misguided and disillusioned, and stop past corrupts and foreign anti-Pakistan forces from interfering and trying to deteriorate Pakistan economical and social situation. Hence, emergency was introduced not only to show these forces that if government wants to they can use hard hand too, plus to use emergency laws to stop mischief that was spreading at that time.
yes sir! After announcing emergency, removing “corrupt judges” everything was fine and dandy in Pakistan… by the way the judges who freed “terrorists” took oath on 2nd PCO and are sitting in SC 