Re: Judges restoration, YES/NO? Clarification (Threads Merged)
Brother, be serious :). What taking oath on PCO is to do with being corrupt? Yaar, I am not born again Ganja the corrupt living in world of illusion or his supporter. 
… You should know that I doubt if there was any judge in Pakistan that did not took oath on PCO (think about it :)).
I consider Iftikhar corrupt because allegations were made against him and he did not defend the allegations like any honest and respectable man would have done, rather he used all tricks and tactics to avoid defending those allegations. Situation is that, even now I have no reason to believe that he was not guilty of all those allegations. If allegations were not made and in result of those allegations enquiry was not held, I would not have considered Iftikhar corrupt.
I consider other judges corrupt because they not only stopped the investigation of alleged corruption by SJC, but supported corrupt Iftikhar in every way showing partiality and shamefully used their office to stop investigation, in such way that any intelligent Pakistani would think about their verdict as illogical and supportive of corruption.
[Before that, when Iftikhar was suspended and allegations charges were sent to SJC for investigation, even though seeing the nature of allegations, I realised that Iftikhar was corrupt (as allegations were clear and obvious that could not be made if they were not true), still I used to write even on this forum that we could not call Iftikhar corrupt until investigation is done and judgment on his charges are made. At that time I did not knew that Iftikhar would make so much hue and cry and his corrupt colleague Supreme Court judges would stoop so low that they would stop even SJC investigating].
Of course he understands laws. But then all lawyers understand laws, still they contest in court on their own understanding, and have to abide by the judgments of Judges (even if judgements are wrong). Though, if judgements are obvious wrong and completely illogical, people have all right to consider that the judgments given are wrong and Judges made judgment because of their bias, because they were paid to be bias (making judgment by taking rushwat), or made judgment under pressure. In such situation, judgments get honoured by judges get tarnished (and it becomes duty of government to replace such tarnished judges).
Well, if you do not know the situation at that time than most likely you would never know or would never understand :).
If you really want to know what I understand and what I know, then from what I know, emergency was result of cumulative things. For instance, Media was paid by past corrupts like NS and BB and maybe foreign powers too, to create mischief and spread lies, what media on behalf of their pay masters were doing effectively to misguided already misguided and illiterate Pakistanis who are in abundance. Judiciary was also doing all to destabilise the country and were getting paid again by corrupts plus most likely some western interests. When masses did not sided with these evil forces to destabilise Pakistan, corrupts and foreign interests paid corrupt lawyers of Pakistan, NGOs, and some other vocal idiots to do all what they can and spread lies, so that government and country get destabilised.
All these factors and many other factors was hindering the ability of government not only in fighting terrorists but also in keeping law and order situation within country under control, stop spread of lies from media, stop population getting misguided and disillusioned, and stop past corrupts and foreign anti-Pakistan forces from interfering and trying to deteriorate Pakistan economical and social situation. Hence, emergency was introduced not only to show these forces that if government wants to they can use hard hand too, plus to use emergency laws to stop mischief that was spreading at that time.