Re: Jehad Against Fasadi Taliban
Armed Jihad as I have understood is for stopping injustices, persecution and repression and when you have leadership and power to fight. Why religious scholars don’t voice their condemnation of talibans has multiple reasons:
- fear
- As someone pointed out that they want some sort of revolution so that like minded people come in power and they could benefit from it. so political ambition since they have known that they have no place in democratic system so they are up for bringing about ‘Islamic revolution’ in a country whose very concept they use to label as ‘kafiristan’ or paleedistan and now they shamelessly claim that this country was founded on the ideology of Islam thus Islam should be ‘enforced’
- twisted concept of jihad. The very concept that the law of Allah has to be enforced and they have the responsibility of enforcing Allah’s law. Even bloodshed of innocent people is legitimate for their cause. That is why groups like sami-ul-haq and JI (esp. Munawar hassan) never condemn their actions and support them.
ulemas are not mere academics, they are opinion makers, and in our society have profound influence on the way people think so if they want they can make a lot of positive difference.
people try to legitimize actions of talibans by criminalizing armed forces and say that atrocities were committed on both sides. How can we equate guards and intruders/miscreants? Apart from pak army’s earlier mistakes, they are currently defending their state, performing their duty.