So the point made flew over your racist head did it?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ohioguy: *
And AK47
The article you quote "Crimes no Punishment" was published in JEWISH newspaper! Funny, some editorial writer has the balls to speak out when things are wrong, calling for indictment of the IDF who commit crimes.
[/QUOTE]
Why are you repeating something i already mentioned in my post
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *
straight from the israeli news media commenting on amnesty report on current intifada:
[/QUOTE]
Your cuckooland where you live where everything according to right wing fanatics is black and white is not based on reality for rest of planet earth!
UTD
Please define Racist, so that I may respond accordingly.
It can be agued that the Jews are a race (another thread) and Israel is, you guessed it, a Jewish state ran by Jews. You said, "Israel are barbaric and always will be." Since Israel is nothing but land and can be neither barbaric nor passive, (unless you are talking about Israel’s climate and geographical conditions ie: Brutal heat of the sun, parch deserts, barbaric sting of the dead sea, etc) I assume you meant “Israelis are barbaric and always will be" hence the comment that you are racist.
UTD
Israel is not a race and neither is Judaism. Whether arguably or non arguably. Prejudicial is the word you should of been looking for. Not that you could prove it.
Regardless. Israel is barbaric and always will be. You need to step off the fence and look beyond the fields.
If Israel was such a darling, it wouldn't be fighting for it's survival since it's incarnation. Remember, Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in harmony for centuries, until USA butted in 50 odd years ago.
On a factual note, if the Jews can crucify their Lord, who the hell are Muslims!
Ouch.........
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
It can be agued that the Jews are a race (another thread) and Israel is, you guessed it, a Jewish state ran by Jews. You said, "Israel are barbaric and always will be." Since Israel is nothing but land and can be neither barbaric nor passive, (unless you are talking about Israel’s climate and geographical conditions ie: Brutal heat of the sun, parch deserts, barbaric sting of the dead sea, etc) I assume you meant “Israelis are barbaric and always will be" hence the comment that you are racist.
[/QUOTE]
What a convoluted argument. Saying Muslim States is generalisation as it encompasses several countries. Sholay is referring to one country, Israel, i.e. the actions of its administration. All you have to do is lift your head out of the sand to realize that what he is saying is completely justified. Don't agree? Try proving otherwise.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by skhan: *
Don't agree? Try proving otherwise.
[/QUOTE]
Didn't think so.
^ must be still sleeping undertherock
His statement made no sense to begin with, if I say "Pakistan are barbaric and always will be" that doesn't make sense, now saying ""Pakistani's are barbaric and always will be" does make sense and that would be prejudiced, do you understand now?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Agent Smith: *
^ must be still sleeping undertherock
[/QUOTE]
Good one Will, now go get Jiggy with it.
Are you implying a country cannot mentioned in a signular sense? Wow, to think all those news agencies are wrong. 
FYI usually it is a government is being referred when a country is being specified.
English 101
A country is a singular, therefore “is” would be used NOT “are”.
Now please, don’t embarrass yourself further.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by skhan: *
Are you implying a country cannot mentioned in a signular sense?
FYI usually it is a government is being referred when a country is being specified.
English 101
A country is a singular, therefore "is" would be used NOT "are".
Now please, don't embarrass yourself further.
[/QUOTE]
I think this is not his fault. We all know how bad English grammar of average Americans is who go to Public school.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by skhan: *
FYI usually it is a government is being referred when a country is being specified.
[/QUOTE]
"Is being referred to"
Haha, I should take English lessens from you??
Jackasses, it's "Israeli's are barbaric and always will be." Not "Israel are barbaric and always will be."
You know its pretty bad when you pick faults in the english and not the argument!
UTD & CO
Stop clutching at straws.
My statement was exactly what it stated. Whether you dispute, remove or manipulate any part of the sentence or try to implement a crash course in English Grammar will not change a thing.
The reality is that Israel will slaughter hundreds in retaliation for one, whereas, Muslims (individuals) will slaughter one in retaliation for hundreds. Go figure. Whether you look at it from a secular or religious point of view, the result will still remain the same.
I am pro Muslim and you are pro anything but Muslim.
Skhan, you were the one giving out faulty English lessons 6 posts up.
Jabaliya - Palestinians on Saturday surveyed the widespread devastation inflicted by Israeli troops during an 18-day military operation in the northern Gaza Strip, after the troops redeployed overnight - comparing the scene to the aftermath of an earthquake.
At least 129 Palestinians were killed in the operation, the deadliest in Gaza since the beginning of the intifada or uprising four years ago
Around 100 houses were levelled in the refugee camp of Jabaliya and neighbouring Beit Lahya
“This is worse than an earthquake. The Israelis threw out the Palestinians in 1948 and in 1967 and they’re trying to do the same thing now,” said Jamila Yehya, 54, a Jabaliya refugee whose home was destroyed on Friday.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel “Sharon is worse than the Nazis,” she continued, pointing to the ruin of her three-storey house in the Al-Sikka district, the most damaged in the camp.
Since the beginning of the intifada in September 2000 4 493 people have been killed, including 3 465 Palestinians and 954 Israelis.
Sharon the Butcher
ak-47 how come you ignore darfur
On Friday, the UN said that about 70,000 displaced people were thought to have died in the region since March.
The figure is much higher than previous estimates on Sudan’s conflict-torn region.
Most of the deaths were caused by disease and malnutrition.
David Nabarro, head of the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) health crisis group, said up to 10,000 people were still dying in refugee camps each month
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
ak-47 how come you ignore darfur
]
[/QUOTE]
This thread is not about darfur so please stick to the topic. There was other thread about darfur, so you can go there rant about it.