Israel likely to attack Iran's N-sites / How Tehran outmaneuvered Washington (MERGED)

Anyone have other verifications of this story? If it is indeed true, the region can be in flames. With Iraq & Afghanistan under US control, is this the end of Great Iran, as well?

I hope the Paks. are ready..

Source: http://www.dawn.com/2004/05/09/top17.htm

Israel likely to attack Iran’s N-sites: report

By Anwar Iqbal

WASHINGTON, May 8: Israel may be preparing to attack Iranian nuclear facilities within the year, according to US administration assessments reported on Israeli Army Radio on Saturday.

The report was first released by an American wire service, which said President George W. Bush and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had discussed the issue during Mr Sharon’s visit to the White House on April 14.

The possibility of an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities came up when the two leaders were discussing a likely Israeli response to the completion of an Iranian nuclear bomb, the wire service said.

Following the meeting, Mr Bush said it was inconceivable for the Middle East that Iran acquired nuclear weapons.

The news agency and the Israeli Army Radio quoted US and Israeli officials as saying that the attempt to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons had been discussed at various levels, as well as the effects such an attack would have on US efforts in Iraq and in the Persian Gulf.

The wire service report said: “US authorities have extensively considered the possibility that Israel will attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, perhaps this year”.

IRAN’S REASSURANCE: Meanwhile, Iran has said it has no more secrets to reveal to the UN’s nuclear watchdog.

The IAEA is probing allegations that Iran has secret plans to make nuclear weapons and has urged Tehran to make a full declaration of its nuclear assets early next month.

Iranian officials told reporters in Tehran it was not true that Iran had a secret programme to make a nuclear bomb.

Paks are ready for what?>Recognizing Israel? Yeah they are ready...ask mushy.

^ you mean after giving away nuclaar oops I mean unclear technology.. yeah sure ask Mushy hes got bushys touchys for sure.. :rotfl:

israel.... what are they.. the enforcement division of iaea or something?

'it was inconceivable for the Middle East that Iran acquired nuclear weapons' ... farmayya maulana bush nay. kyun bhayee? israel kiya paidaish pe allah mian ki permission lay ke aaya tha atom bum ki?

Iran actively supports terrorism against Israel. If Iran had a nuclear program it would be Israelis responsibility to act. Israel wouldn't act unless they had intel telling of an Iran nuke program. Iran has said they have no program so they needn’t worry assuming they are telling the truth.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Iran actively supports terrorism against Israel. If Iran had a nuclear program it would be Israelis responsibility to act. Israel wouldn't act unless they had intel telling of an Iran nuke program. Iran has said they have no program so they needn’t worry assuming they are telling the truth.
[/QUOTE]

Ah yes but they don't tell the truth now do they. :D ... Israel is a ticking time bomb no matter how you cut the cake.... LOL.... The holy Bushehr dome is right there courtesy of Russkies....

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Iran actively supports terrorism against Israel. If Iran had a nuclear program it would be Israelis responsibility to act.

[/QUOTE]
responsibility? so, if pakistan thinks that india 'actively supports terrorism' against pakistan, then it is pak's responsibility to act? it can be called an 'excuse', but hardly a 'responsibility'. iran is not likely to lob a nuke in the direction of israel, anyway. its all an eye-wash.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Prism Man: *
responsibility? so, if pakistan thinks that india 'actively supports terrorism' against pakistan, then it is pak's responsibility to act? it can be called an 'excuse', but hardly a 'responsibility'. iran is not likely to lob a nuke in the direction of israel, anyway. its all an eye-wash.
[/QUOTE]

Agree.

But Israel isn't likely to tolerate possibility of Nukes nearby.

What they experienced in the 1940's developed the need they have of [protectionism?] if thats a word.

And the lengths taken toward defense today.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Prism Man: *
responsibility? so, if pakistan thinks that india 'actively supports terrorism' against pakistan, then it is pak's responsibility to act? it can be called an 'excuse', but hardly a 'responsibility'. iran is not likely to lob a nuke in the direction of israel, anyway. its all an eye-wash.
[/QUOTE]

Pakistan and Indian have shown that they are smart enough to diplomatically work out there differences. It is Israel’s responsibility to protect its citizens, currently Iran actively supports terrorism against Israel. Would an Iran possessing a nuke directly attack Israel? The answer is likely no. What we do know is that Iran transfers weapons and know how to terrorists fighting against Israel, thus one has no choice but to assume that there is a possibility, even a remote one, that Iran may transfer WMD to such terror organizations. The days of allowing such transfers to occur without massive repercussions are over. That said the future of Iran is a successful and strong one if those Iranians in power allow the great people of Iran to take control of their government rather than suppressing them.

How dare another Muslim nation join the elite 'non muslims nuclear club'?

One has already slipped through the net and we will make sure it doesn't happen again. This is the reality.

Instead of concentrating on Iran, Israel should concentrate on signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Iran actively supports terrorism against Israel. If Iran had a nuclear program it would be Israelis responsibility to act. Israel wouldn't act unless they had intel telling of an Iran nuke program. Iran has said they have no program so they needn’t worry assuming they are telling the truth.
[/QUOTE]

Of course when Iran defends and openly supports groups like Hamas and Al Aqsa Brigade, they are promoting terrorism...:D

And when other countries try to develop Nuclear Weapons, it's a threat? ****, what about when America bombed the hell outta Japan in the second WW? You wanna tell me who's the 'responsible' one around here with that kinda technology/weaponry? [Here's a hint, it ain't America, and it sure as hell ain't Israel].

Everyone's [in general, don't try to jump on me for saying this-back up:o] hoping to see Pakistan and India nuke each other, so we'd have another Japan, but this time, it'd be Hindushima and Pakisaki...get real man, nukes ain't the answer to nobody's problems. PERIOD.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by AvgAmericanGirl: *

Agree.

But Israel isn't likely to tolerate possibility of Nukes nearby.

What they experienced in the 1940's developed the need they have of [protectionism?] if thats a word.

And the lengths taken toward defense today.
[/QUOTE]

Skrew that, if I was some Arab living in a country nearby Israel, I'd be paranoid and sleep with one eye open-you never know when this ******* country will blow up and take everyone down with 'em...

Israel actively supports terrorism against the Palestinians and Muslim states. It is only right that glorious Iran has a nuclear program that will put that little demographically-doomed zionist entity in it's place. We all know that whenever Israel has dared take any on Iranian interests i.e. Hezbollah, it has been left with a huge bloody nose. :)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Israel actively supports terrorism against the Palestinians and Muslim states. It is only right that glorious Iran has a nuclear program that will put that little demographically-doomed zionist entity in it's place. We all know that whenever Israel has dared take any on Iranian interests i.e. Hezbollah, it has been left with a huge bloody nose. :)
[/QUOTE]

^
Which supports my statement that Israel isn't likely to tolerate remote possibility of Nukes nearby.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by AvgAmericanGirl: *

^
Which supports my statement that Israel isn't likely to tolerate remote possibility of Nukes nearby.
[/QUOTE]

Vice versa as well.

Based on your logic, then Rwandan Tutsi's should also have nuclear weapons as well. After all 75% of their people were wiped out in the 1995 genocide...

Glorious Iran, Great China, Malik are you a fan of Little Kims North Korea as well?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *

Glorious Iran...
[/QUOTE]

Thank you, I am glad you agree with me. :)

I think the young people of Iran are wonderful.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
I think the young people of Iran are wonderful.
[/QUOTE]

Yes, they did a wonderful job in 1979. :)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *

Yes, they did a wonderful job in 1979. :)
[/QUOTE]

Did they?