Peace to you as well Psyah.
First of all its good what you said "optimal - not perfect" because these are two different things all togather. Now this is not the topic, the topic still claims it to be perfect.
You can open a thread on the point which you have brought forward. But truthfully speaking comparing religions is not my cup of tea. I feel its more like finding out who is more crippled among the two three different disabled persons, now one maybe less crippled than the other but its still disabled. As I said thats a whole different topic and another thread might be a better idea.
Peace Light Bearer
As I said in my first statement, the religion is perfect, I say this out of belief rather than proof, but I have plenty of evidence to suggest that my belief is true. What you are taking for religion is not the religion but how it is being implemented. The shortfalls you see you attribute to the religion rather than to the people.
In order to take this dicussion further we need to define the criteria for a perfect religion. So what is it?
Let me come up with a five point list and if you agree with the points then we can move forwards.
Criterion 1:
A religion will not be perfect if it does not promote the strict position of Monotheism
Criterion 2:
A religion will not be perfect if it fails to promote justice
Criterion 3:
A religion will not be perfect if it does not warn of the harms nor promote the benefits
Criterion 4:
A religion will not be perfect if it does not deal with both the rational and irrational aspects of life
Criterion 5:
A religion will not be perfect if it does not encourage human harmony or fails to do so based on inherent problems in doctrine that disallow that harmony to proliferate.
These are just 5 things that can used against any religion, some may pass, some may pass with flying colours. When I said BEST system I failed to understand your rather cynical perspective of the disabled analogy. In reality many systems WORK but some work better than others.
In order to determine an imperfect religion you will need to find a criterion that when observed falsifies the claim. Endless evidence will never prove Islam as perfect, but just one falsity based on an agreed criterion can deem it imperfect. So either you pick up the above 5 criteria and show how either:
a) Any system is better than Islam in those points or
b) That Islam does not meet them
Or you provide another criterion for the falsification test and after we accept it then you can go about showing how Islam falls short of it. This should be an acceptable scenario for your purposes, otherwise I can say nothing except that you will be as you were in the beginning of this discussion .... i.e. none the wiser, and myself too.