Islam and Peace cont.

anand.....

Sorry...I missed your reply about Muhammad Bin Qasim...nevermind we can discuss Ghauri.

Good

You know about Pirthivi Raaj. you might be right in saying that he won 17 times....but infact Ghauri couldn't win over him 17 times, Pirthivi Raaj just defended himself didn't win over Ghauri.

Now...when Ghauri had beaten him 18th time and gained full control over India.....your history should also tell about Ghauri rule. How he treated Indian people. How he treated war prisoners.
Is it not right that Ghauri gave those rights to Indian Hindus which their own Pirthivi Raaj never gave them.

Is it not true, during Ghauri Raaj there wasn't one better than other. Shudars and Barhamans were equal.

Although Muslims were in command but a Muslim wouldn't get any concession due to being a Muslim.

I would be happy if you could collect figures of the last battle which Ghauri won. What was the number of Indian army and Muslim army.

Why Ghauri attacked 18 times....did he want money, women or anything else.....if so
then did he actually do that after winning?

[quote]
Originally posted by anand:
**Friend Wasir,

In the above massage we were talking at length with Nadia, and you may again miss my reply.
I told you earlier, I have no knowledge of that period. Better you tell us a little or may be our friend rvizk may enlighten us.
Prithvi Raj Chauhan has high regards in Indian history. There are raso, Rajisthan folklores say that he had 18 battles against Gaury (am I not wrong, Gaury?) and 17 he won, the last one he lost.
In fact he had only two battles. Second one he lost.
I do not think that Indian history has correctly analyzed Prithvi Raj. He kidnapped his nice, a minor most probably, daughter of his cousin Jai Chand. And in the coming next battle Jai Chand forces were on the side of Gaury.

It is Prithvi Raj Chauhan who introduced an era of foreign rule to India.

Best regards.**
[/quote]

Terrorist attacks on American soil; it could be handiwork of some satanic or fascist sects, organizations existing in America. Some Japan organization ‘red army’ might have revenged for ww atomic attacks.
But, no. From the very beginning press in different sectors raised fingers at Islamic terrorism. Why? Who is to blame for this glory?
What force energizes a suicide squad from Islamic world if it is not the same Lailahi?

Majority of Muslim community have condemned this way of killing innocents.

And Wasir, the medieval centuries were an era of dictatorship. We need a total generation of stupids and to make them further believe that all those invaders from central part of Asia were very kind, gentle and peace loving rulers.

Dear anand.........I would be happy if you could find something bad about Ghauri. You don't know the meaning of dictatorship. Anyway.....
Tell me one thing if you were alive in Pithivi Raaj's time and you were from a low cast.
Would you like to live an unhuman life as a "NEECh" under Pirthvi Raaj where you have no rights against high class and rich people.

Or would you like to live under Ghauri rule where no "Barhman" would dare to raise his voice over any "Shudar".

Does your existing Indian "Democratic" govt. give those rights to low casts(Shudars) which they had during Ghauri's so called dictatorship.

**
[/QUOTE]

Dear anand........
Its very simple. If any damage happens to you or your family, the most first thing which would go through your mind would be the name of any of your enemies......either they did it or not.

Same is true with Americans, they don't accept it but potentially they consider Muslims as their enemies.

[This message has been edited by wasir (edited September 13, 2001).]

[This message has been edited by wasir (edited September 13, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by anand:
*....
Majority of Muslims preferred to stay in India. Is it a news for you that many Muslim families migrated from Pak territory to India, rejected the idea of Pakistan? Film actor Sharukh Khan family is one of them. One section of Mussharraf family did not go along with Muslim League. .....
*

[/quote]

if SOME families moved, it does not necessarily mean that they rejected idea of Pakistan there could have been reasons, anyhow THE NET RESULT was that many people moved into Pakistan whoever could make it. it was not possible for everyone to move. other reason is that not 100% of Muslim population agreed with formation of Pakistan because the areas they resided in was not part of Pakistan. want more reasons? just think and you'll get more


We oughta be Changez like, don't we?

Dear Changez,

This is for you information that from India no Muslim family migrated to Pakistan after 1950, whereas minority migration from Pakistan to Indian soil continued till 1975. Pls go thru your official datas. One hindu family even migrated in 1999, now settled in Haryana.

Aan Wasir, You do not understand written something in simple words. We need an entire generation of stupids to believe the history taught in Pakistan, and I assure you that we Indians do not want to compete you people in stupidity.

Rgds

Islam has a very wide scope for manufacturing fanatics. US may attack Afghanistan and finish some of them but we are going to leave apart the ideology behind. It is rather hypocrisy not to touch Islam being a religion.
It is high time that the world communities come together and analyzes the structure of Islam.

[quote]
Originally posted by anand:
It is high time that the world communities come together and analyzes the structure of Islam.
[/quote]

Yeah? and what are you going to do? Wage war against the 2 billion of us?

[This message has been edited by Astronut (edited September 16, 2001).]

=============================================
Quote:
Tell me one thing if you were alive in Pithivi Raaj's time and you were from a low cast.
Would you like to live an unhuman life as a "NEECh" under Pirthvi Raaj where you have no rights against high class and rich people.

Or would you like to live under Ghauri rule where no "Barhman" would dare to raise his voice over any "Shudar".

Does your existing Indian "Democratic" govt. give those rights to low casts(Shudars) which they had during Ghauri's so called dictatorship.

=============================================
Wasir
I would like to tell U some facts, these are the things which U might not get in the pakistani history books,
Firstly, The caste discrimination in India started only after Manu wrote ManuSmrithi and classified people based on their work. If you read the Mahabharatha U will find that Krishna was an Yadava and not a Brahmin. The position or power any one enjoyed depended upon his self intellect and hardwork.

During Prithvi Raj Chauhan's regime Brahmins were in the top of the hierarchy and they exploited the lower caste, but that is again politics and it is similar to Many Muslim countries using Islam for their needs.

What ghauri did to India is well known. It is said that they went on looting and raping the entire sind area. This unabated rape of women continued until they died. There are few barbarians in the world of the stature of Gauri.

I have read the teachings of many sufi saints and know the followers of them. The simplistic principle of their life is great. So, whenever You want to compare or quote example, it would be better to use the names of saints like Chisti and Kabir and not Barbarians like Gazni and gauri. It is discrediting all Islam.
I think U should know that Indian Government does provide security measures for all the daliths. Indian constitution provides 50% of reservation in educational institutions and jobs for all the backward and poor people. How far the government has succeeded is a measure of the effectiveness. We know that caste is an age old concept and it will take time before it is eradicated. But today there is no untouchability in cities and towns and it exists in far flung areas where the fruits of civilisation and democracy havent reached yet.

The greatness of Hinduism lies in its flexibility. Any religion from time immemorial is bound to have some drawbacks. Remember Hinduism did not start by one man or person, it is existent since humans existed. We had many drawbacks in the society like Sati and Child Marriages but reformers like RajaRam Mohan roy, Dayananda Saraswati have eradicated the practice.

Today anyone in the country can come up stand speak out against anyform of injustice or discrimination in the religion / society with out the fear of reprisals.

Do you think that it is possible in Islam?
A great Hindu going says like this:
"Change is the essence of life,
as without the old leaves falling off there are no new leaves, "
"History is a remainder to the fact that whoever have changed and adopted have survived, Others PERISHED"

Any more clarifications???

[quote]
Originally posted by anand:
Islam has a very wide scope for manufacturing fanatics. US may attack Afghanistan and finish some of them but we are going to leave apart the ideology behind. It is rather hypocrisy not to touch Islam being a religion.
It is high time that the world communities come together and analyzes the structure of Islam.

[/quote]

Nur-e-Khuda hai kuffar ki harkat pay khandazan
Phunkon Sey ye chiragh bhujhaia na jayga

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
Firstly, The caste discrimination in India started only after Manu wrote ManuSmrithi and classified people based on their work.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; This is naive and shows how little you know what Hinduism teaches . caste system is not based on work it is based on birth. The reason why even today dalits are changing their faith is not because of their work, (for some of them are better educated than Brahmins) it is because of their birth.

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
If you read the Mahabharatha U will find that Krishna was an Yadava and not a Brahmin. The position or power any one enjoyed depended upon his self intellect and hardwork.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; This is another misconception . Read what Krishna taught!!!

CASTE IN THE GITA
There is ample justification in the Gita alone to maintain caste divisions & oppressions; here are Lord Krsna's words:

"It is far better to perform one's svadharma (prescribed duties), even though faultily, than another's duties perfectly. Destruction in the course of performing one's own duty is better than engaging in another's duties, for to follow another's path is dangerous." -- Bhagavad-Gita 3:35.

"According to the three modes of material nature (goodness, passion, ignorance) and the work associated with them, the four divisions of human society(Brahmin/Ksatriya/Vaisya/Sudra) are created by Me. And although I am the creator of this system, you should know that I am yet the non doer, being unchangeable." -- Bhagavad-Gita 4:13.

"It is better to engage in one's own svadharma (occupation), even though one may perform it imperfectly, than to accept another's occupation and perform it perfectly. Duties prescribed according to one's nature are never affected by sinful reactions." -- Bhagavad-Gita 18:47.

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
. But today there is no untouchability in cities and towns and it exists in far flung areas where the fruits of civilisation and democracy havent reached yet.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Another outright lie, dalits are beings tortured even as we speak by upper castes across the board in India.

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
The greatness of Hinduism lies in its flexibility. Any religion from time immemorial is bound to have some drawbacks.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; You mean you can do anything you like and have no one to account to? Or you mean the scriptures have conveyed you can do what you like?

Frankly speaking Hinduism is out right inhumane in my view on account of what hindus do and practice.

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
Remember Hinduism did not start by one man or person, it is existent since humans existed.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Who compiled the Vedas and wrote the Mahabaratha?

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
We had many drawbacks in the society like Sati and Child Marriages but reformers like RajaRam Mohan roy, Dayananda Saraswati have eradicated the practice.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; another unsound statement!! , do you want me to prove that these practices are still prevalent in hindu society?

[quote]
Originally posted by Victory:
Today anyone in the country can come up stand speak out against anyform of injustice or discrimination in the religion / society with out the fear of reprisals.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Another LIE , for in India they are people who live in fear because of what Hinduism teaches and what Hindus practice to this day.

** Hinduism preaches Terrorism **

In Rig Veda III:34:9 Indra killed the Dasyus (dark skinned natives) and “gave protection to the Aryan color.”

Not only did the Aryans shamelessly pray for booty in war but they based their militarily won supremacy on the lightness of their skin color compared to the dark colors of the native Dasyus. They arrogantly proclaim,

“Let those who have no weapons suffer sorrow.” (Rig Veda IV:5:14.)]

“Renowned is he when conquering and when slaying:
'tis he who wins cattle in the combat.
When Indra hardens his indignation
all that is fixed and all that moves fear him. Indra has won all kine, all gold, all horses, - Maghavan, he who breaks forts in pieces;” --Rig Veda IV:17:10-11.

Indra is praised for killing thousands of the abject tribes of Dasas with his arrow and taking great vengeance with “murdering weapons.” (Rig Veda IV:28:3-4)

One hymn mentions sending thirty thousand Dasas “to slumber” and another hymn sixty thousand slain. A hymn dedicated to the weapons of war (Rig Veda VI:75) refers to a warrior “armed with mail,”
using a bow to win cattle and subdue all regions, “upstanding in the car the skillful charioteer guides his strong horses on whithersoe’er he will.” The arrows had iron mouths and shafts “with venom smeared” that
“not one be left alive.” Hymn VII:83 begins, “Looking to you and your alliance, O ye men, armed with broad axes they went forward, fain for spoil. Ye smote and slew his Dasa and his Aryan enemies.”

Only occasionally did the authors of these hymns look to their own sins.
“Free us from sins committed by our fathers,
from those wherein we have ourselves offended.
O king, loose, like a thief who feeds the cattle,
as from the cord a calf, set free Vasishtha.
Not our own will betrayed us, but seduction,
thoughtlessness, Varuna! wine, dice or anger.
The old is near to lead astray the younger:
even sleep removes not all evil-doing.” --Rig Veda VII:86:5-6.

A hymn to the frogs compares the repetitions of the priests around the soma bowl to the croaking of the frogs around a pond after the rains come. (Rig Veda VII:103)

The basic belief of the prayers and sacrifices is that they will help
them to gain their desires and overcome their enemies, as in Rig Veda VIII:31:15: “The man who, sacrificing, strives to win the heart of deities will conquer those who worship not.”

[VERY TOLERANT VEDIC-HINDUS??]

Furthermore, the prayers for riches continue, and Indra is thanked for
winning wealth in horses, cattle, and gold by his chariot. Agni helps to
slay the many in war by the hands of the few, “preserving our wealthy
patrons with thy succors, and ourselves.” (Rig Veda I:31:6, 42)

Indra helped win the Aryan victory:
“He, much invoked, hath slain Dasyus and Simyus, after his wont, and laid them low with arrows.
The mighty thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters.” --Rig Veda I:100:18.

Control of the waters was essential for agricultural wealth. Indra is praised for crushing the godless races and breaking down their forts. (Rig Veda I:174) [Again, the “tolerant” & “holy” scriptures speak.]

In the tenth and last book of the Rig Veda some new themes are explored,
but the Dasyus are still condemned for being “riteless, void of sense,
inhuman, keeping alien laws,” and Indra still urges the heroes to slay
the enemies; his “hand is prompt to rend and burn, O hero thunder-armed:
as thou with thy companions did destroy the whole of Sushna’s brood.”
(Rig Veda X:22)

Obviously, the “myth” that the current “evils” of the Hindu system such as the caste system, etc. are all corruptions of later Hindus & all the clean values
of the ancient Hindus illustrated in the Vedas were much purer, peaceful & more spiritual…

RIGHT…WHATEVER.

Moreover, as one can see, Hitler’s view of the Aryans & choice of the swas-tika
symbol was not entirely inappropriate for his genocidic tendencies.

I have seen propaganda like this only few times in my life. This little passage out of the Rig Veda is absolutely nowhere near any mention of the war of the Aryans - it is the middle of a hymn on sacrifice. “Let these who have no weapons” of sacrifice - if you cannot sacrifice your attachments, and renounce material things for the glory of God (in the form of Agni for this particular hymn), then you will suffer sorrow, where sorrow is an agitation of the mind, where frustrations lie and bliss is not forthcoming.

Let me guess, you got your booty whipped at hindunet.com and had to hide here?

It is the same old song - again & again!

Our Muslims on this Board are convinced that Islam really means Peace - Unconditionally! (note - the word, unconditionally and ponder upon it).

Here's a test for our muslim friends:
If Fundamentalist/Extremist Islam stands for Peace and Tolerance, Where & in which muslim country may I find this?

Re: Kafirs:

Islam, in its extremist interpretation, is pretty clear about Kafirs and that is:
i) People of the Book may pay the Jizzya so they may be humiliated and made to live within prescribed limits set upon them and if they trangress those limits then protection to their life & property is no longer available .

ii) For the Polytheists( other than Jew or Christian) the Jizzya is not acceptable.
EITHER THEY ACCEPT ISLAM OR BE KILLED!

Finally, a word of advise to my muslim friends:
If you do not like the current practise of Islam then endeavour to have it "relaxed" . Pls do not insult intelligence of people by presenting Fundamentalist Islam as a Religion of Unconditional Peace, Compassion & Tolerance because you 'll have a tough time proving it or identifying its existence.

Ibrahim says: No ! I may be partly responsible for the closer of hinduUnity.org (Islamic hate forum) and many threads in hindu monitored web sites which have been spreading falsehood about Islam and slandering its prophets. But I don’t waste my time on hindunet.com. Hindus are allowed to delude themselves as much as they want in their own environment But when they start abusing other religions in public domains or Indian/ Pakistan forums( where other religionists are also present) , they should be taught what their religion actually teaches. That is why I am here on this forum for now.

If you like, feel free to find out who gets whipped when it comes to rational discussions on Hinduism.

Here Read some more of your scriptures, it helps in understanding what it teaches and why hindus have preferred to hide them in shame and lie that they do not follow any scripture.

ARYAN SAVAGERY & THE VEDIC DARK AGES

Whether the Aryan tribes (Hindus) originated along with other tribes (Dasas/Panis/etc.) in Hindustan (Aryavarta/Bharat/India) or invaded Hindustan is besides the point. The point is that the Hindus’ sacred & eternal Vedas are littered with hymns of savagely murdering other innocent tribes of Hindustan just for riches, praising the soma drug, etc.; the following are just a few examples:

“For success in this battle where there are prizes to be won, we will invoke the generous Indra, most manly and brawny, who listens and gives help in combat, who kills enemies and wins riches.” – Rig Veda 3:31:22.

“You (Indra) scattered to every side the ones that did not press Soma; as Soma-drinker you are supreme.” – Rig Veda 8:14:15.

“He who killed the serpent and loosed the seven rivers, who drove out the cows that had been pent up by Vala, who gave birth to fire between two stones, the winner of booty in combats – he, my people, is Indra. He by whom all these changes were rung, who drove the race of Dasas down into obscurity, who took away the flourishing wealth of the enemy as a winning gambler takes the stake – he, my people, is Indra. He about whom they ask, ‘Where is he?’, or they say of him, the terrible one, ‘He does not exist’, he who diminishes the flourishing wealth of the enemy as gambling does – believe in him! He, my people, is Indra… He without whom people do not conquer, he whom they call on for help when they are fighting, who became the image of everything, who shakes the unshakeable – he, my people, is Indra.” – Rig Veda 2:12:3-9.

“Indra and Agni, ye cast down the ninety forts which Dasas held, together, with one mighty deed.” – Rig Veda 3:12:6.

The ninety forts: ninety is used indefinitely for a large number. The forts are quite probably the strongholds of the non-Aryan tribes/inhabitants of Hindustan.

“In aid of Abhyavartin Cayamana, Indra destroyed the seed of Varasikha. At Hariyupiya he smote the vanguard of the Vrcivans, and the rear fled frighted.” – Rig Veda 6:27:5.

It is believed that Hariyupiya is very likely the Harappa of the Indus Valley. By the way, in the Valmiki Ramayana, after Lord Rama & Laxman mock and savagely mutilate Surpanakha, Rama remarks casually to his brother, krurair anaryaih saumitre parihaso na karyah, “Saumitri (Laxman), one really shouldn’t joke with these savage non-Aryans.”

Ibrahim

I notice you like to talk about SLAVERY.

Care to enlighten us about SLAVERY in our Islam. You are aware that Slavery is a valid Sharia'h under Islam. It never got abrogated as who could abrogate the word of Allah.

Sure, Quran talks about freeing the slaves but one has to have/own slaves to free them.

So, when Saudi Arabia abolished Slavery in 1962 it went against the Sharia'h of Slavery in the Quran. So, one may say, the Saudis bowed to world pressure on Slavery; similarly, the Saudia & Other Muslim states will be to "tow the line" on matters of Human Rights and Civilized Behaviour.

Wa Salaam!

[quote]
Originally posted by logical:
I notice you like to talk about SLAVERY.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; hmm..I wonder If that is all that you noticed or maybe you found it the best angle to argue depending on your intention. ( Allah (swt) know best)

[quote]
Originally posted by logical:
Care to enlighten us about SLAVERY in our Islam.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says: I guess you want us to believe that you are Muslim, so be it! but your statements shows that you lack knowledge hence

Read what Islam teaches before you make a mockery of yourself…………

Qur'an 2:177 Surah Al-Baqarah (The Cow)

It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces to the East and the West; but righteous is he who believeth in God and the Last Day and the angels and the Scripture and the Prophets; and giveth his wealth, for love of Him, to kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and to those who ask, ** and to set slaves free; ** and observeth proper worship and payeth the poor due. And those who keep their treaty when they make one, and the patient in tribulation and adversity and time of stress. Such are they who are sincere. Such are the God fearing.

Qur'an: Surah 90 Al-Balad (The City)

Nay, I swear by this city... We verily have created man in an atmosphere... But he hath not attempted the Ascent, Ah, what will convey unto thee what the Ascent is! ** It is to free a slave, ** And to feed in the day of hunger, An orphan near of kin, Or some poor wretch in misery. And to be of those who believe and exhort one another to perseverance and exhort one another to pity.

Qur'an 24:27-34 Surah An-Nur (Light)

** And such of your slaves as seek a writing of emancipation, write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of God which He hath bestowed upon you. ** Force not your slave girls to whoredom that ye may seek enjoyment of the life of the world, if they would preserve their chastity. And if one force them, then (unto them), after their compulsion, Lo! God will be Forgiving, Merciful...

Qur'an 5:89 Surah Al Ma'idah (The Table Spread)

God will not take you to task for that which is unintentional in your oaths, but He will take you to task for the oaths which ye swear in earnest. The expiation thereof is the feeding of ten of the needy with the average of that wherewith ye feed your own folk, or the clothing of them, ** or the liberation of a slave, ** and for him who findeth not (the wherewithal to do so) then a three day fast. This is the expiation of your oaths when ye have sworn; and keep your oaths...

Need more ??? Here read!

58:3 But those who divorce their wives by Zihar then wish to go back on the words they uttered (it is ordained that such a one) ** should free a slave ** before they touch each other: this are ye admonished to perform: and Allah is well-acquainted with (all) that ye do.

There are more…try and find out, before you end up making unsound comments like below.

[quote]
Originally posted by logical:
You are aware that Slavery is a valid Sharia'h under Islam. It never got abrogated as who could abrogate the word of Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Here is where you exposed yourself, either you are a hindu or a non Muslim trying to spread your ignorance. I feel sorry for you But I hope you will learn some time soon.

[quote]
Originally posted by logical:
Sure, Quran talks about freeing the slaves but one has to have/own slaves to free them.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Have you any idea as to where and whom and at what time frame the Qur’an was revealed to? THINK !!! and THINK hard.

The middle east people were the original people who had received the message from Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) aka Brahma in Hinduism . Yet although all of this world had practiced Prophet Ibrahim’s teachings it got corrupted even in Arabia as generations passed/evolved/progressed. What remains of that corrupted teachings is what the hindus are holding on to as the veda and currently called Hinduism.

Hence the Arabs were practicing slavery in those days prior to the establishing of Islam just as the hindus were and are doing to this day with the dalits . That is why the message was removed from the Arabs and revealed to the Jews, after the revelation was revealed to the Jews and they too failed in keeping it intact , the message was reestablished through the final Prophet to the Arabs again, as prophesied (which appears in the hindu scriptures too)

Hence slavery was abolished gradually in Islam , similar to alcohol being abolished in Islam, for this are matters that had been practiced and accepted by the community and will take time to eradicate . hence the message was given over and over again ( as quoted above) that slavery was Not the way and slaves should be treated with kindness and it was better not to have them.

Here again the term slavery includes bonded labor and laborers who lived and worked for food and lodging . Thus at those times, there was no such term as employment or employee hence workers were generally called “slave” and employers were called masters.

So Please get educated before you try to compare or measure things with the same yard stick, not knowing what were ancient practices and how they are to be measured or understood.

Now let me educate you as to what was the practice in ancient times

HINDUISM & SLAVERY (BY CASTE) ( actual verse as appearing in hindu scared scripture)

"(The king) should make a Vaisya engage in trade, lend money, farm the land, or keep livestock; and (he should make) the Sudra the slave of the twice-born. A Brahmin should out of mercy support both a Ksatriya and a Vaisya if they are starved for a livelihood, and have them carry out their own innate activities. But if a Brahmin, out of greed and a sense of power, makes twice-born men who have undergone the transformative rituals do the work of slaves against their will, the king should make him pay a fine of six hundred (pennies). ** He may, however, make a Sudra do the work of a slave, whether he is bought or not bought; for the Self-existent one created him to be the slave of the Brahmin. Even if he is set free by his master, a Sudra is not set free from slavery; ** for since that is innate in him, who can take it from him?

Ibrahim says; HENCE until the Qur’an was revealed these people (hindus) , Arabs and globally all people had practiced slavery without any pity or release from slavery since it was believed to be commandment for the Brahmins (believers) .

Lets continue the passage, to understand the kind of definition slavery referred to ………….

** There are seven ways that slaves come into being: **

1) taken under a flag (of war),
2) becoming a slave in order to eat food,
3) born in the house,
4) bought,
5) given,
6) inherited from ancestors,
7) or enslaved as a punishment.

Ibrahim says; hence this is why Arabs had slaves in the first place and it was an accepted practice in those days. Now, take note , those taken in war (No: 1), enslaved as a punishment (No:7) cannot be released easily, unless there have fulfilled a certain commitment or have been seen to be of good moral conduct and can be trusted. This is like having prisoners of war and criminals under your care ( since there was no jail or penal system slavery was the only solution in those days)

** Those becoming a slave in order to eat ( No: 2) are actually “employees” or workers in out current context but in those times they were all considered slaves . **

Those who were bought, would be the slaves that you may be arguing about and have knowledge about in our current time frame.

anyway lets continue this passage…………..

A wife, a son, and a slave: these three are traditionally said to have no property; whatever property they acquire belongs to the man to whom they belong. A Brahmin may with confidence take away any possession from a Sudra; for since nothing at all can belong to him as his own, his property can be taken away by his master. (The king) should make the Vaisya and the Sudra carry out their own innate activities diligently; for if the two of them should slip from their own innate activities, they would shake this universe into chaos." -- Manusmrti 8:410-418.

Ibrahim says Hence it was because of Islam, Slavery was abolished in this planet but those who practiced it after the Prophet had gone astray in the sense that they bought or enslaved others. ( Muslims too can go astray and that is why there is hell and heaven)

** But those who had workers ( also called salves at that time frame) had done nothing wrong in Islam or otherwise for the term slave applied to bonded workers and workers too. **

so wake up !!!

Snipped the rest of your unsound remarks made out of ignorance.

Ibrahim suggests that

"Slavery was gradually phased out"

I didn't think any words of quran are to be altered, or 'gradually phased out' as Ibrahim is indicating here. Are they (the words of quran) not for all eternity?

Slavery was & still is a valid shariah in the quran and according to the majority of muslims that believe in Quran in its "literal" transliteration - slavery is alive just like degradation of muslim women is alive and is a valid shariah.

May I suggest that you refer to Quran 2:223.

Under the sharia'h of Quran a muslim can trade slaves and breed with them and this is for all perpetuity or eternal.

Sure, the Quran talks about freeing slaves but it also talks about not "transgressing limits" with kafirs. Talking about Freeing slaves is not same as Abolishing Slavery, just like 'not transgressing limits with kafirs' is not same as embracing the kafirs.

The only reason Saudi Arabia abolished slavery in 1962 was due to world pressure. The same pressure will be applied to the other injunctions of Sharia'h like JIHAD, Women status, Apostasy laws, Blasphemy laws, Penal codes - Gee, that's almost the whole Quran.

[quote]
Originally posted by logical:

rambling
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; READ THE ABOVE POST AGAIN AND ANSWER OR REFUTE THEM IF YOU HAVE THE BRAINS.

BETTER CHANGE YOUR HANDLE TO "ILLOGICAL" suits you best.

PS: NOT SHOUTING BUT MAKING IT CLEAR SINCE YOU WERE UNABLE to understand the above post which provides clear evidence against your follies and misconceptions.

What the hell slavery has to do with any religion. Whoever had any possibility enslaved the weaker. Scientific progress, civilization have made a better impact.

Hence the question is peace or no peace?
Religions like Hindus, Christians or Buddhists produce very little quantity of suicidal fanatics, that is not more than two or three in a century.
What is wrong with the ideology of Islam?

asslam brothers and welcome non muslims
The subject of peace.
Y es Islam does mean peace,but it is not a stupid religion and it does say "fight those who fight you".
So people like Anand should ask himself why do the likes of America hate Islam so much.
Lets look at the last event of this Islamaphobia,The U.S had allready planed on entrying Afghanistan before the suspect was even annonced.
The Taliban and Osama Bin Laden have been thorns i the side of U.S and U.K since th beging and this is the perfect time to KILL two birds with one stone,at the same time India will take Kashmir from the Pakistan when they are at their weakest.
So Anand dont come on here and tel us how Islam has never told about peace when the world want us all dead.