ISI Chief Zaher-ul-Islam wanted to take control of country by planning IK's Dharna

Jolie · August 15, 2015, 7:08pm

Re: ISI Chief Zaher-ul-Islam wanted to take control of country by planning IK’s Dharn

Welcome back from your chilla !

All this above really proves is that it is high time that ISI is decoupled from the army. Sure, you can appoint military people has head of ISI (or whatever new name the organization gets) like Israel does for Mossad, but the agency still isn’t a ***** for the army served by the butler of the israeli 3 or 4 star general. Army already has MI, so they don’t need two intelligence agencies.

As for the typical burgers who have gotten fat on army pork who’ll complain about bloody civilians not being “trustable”, please let me know what was ISI doing when thousands of pakistanis died at the hands of taliban over the last decade before the peshawar attack. Wasn’t ISI derelict in its duties of defending Pakistan (and by extension, Pakistanis) from harm?

To Imran’s credit, even he hasn’t said that ISI shouldn’t do intelligence operations against TTP etc. It is time that ‘bloody civilians’ who don’t live in DHAs also get protected by the agencies that they fund and who swear to protect Pakistan. I’ll support Imran khan with if he asks for the decoupling of ISI-army nexus and heck, even nawaz sharif if he says so…

Feeding on army’s Pork? Have some bloody shame! Sicko.

I’m not going to reply to any of your classist usual DHA living crap - whether I’m talking in support a a bloody civilian called Imran Khan or Army, you just have to shoot this lame dig to discredit any argument. Same old envious sheet.

Look around Karachi and see how the agencies and army are protecting the bloody civilians there - finally peace can be felt in the City. As with ISI not being able to protect citizens - maybe blame your favourite Military boy Mushy or oh so apolitical Kiyani for not providing the leadership. After all it is an organisation under a command.

Yes bloody civilians at power are not trustable as long as 98% of those bloody civilians are made up of criminals who abuse democracy to come in power . At least military men are loyal to their institution and superior command, who are these bloody civilians loyal too? Look how the bloody civilians i.e judges have screwed their own judiciary.

As with this whole ridiculous assertion of break ISI Military nexus- how and why? Britain has MI5, MI6 plus Defence Intelligence (DI) plus CGHQ, plus Joint Intelligence Services (JIC) - all interlinked with their military intelligence and command in one way or another. Heck even Israel also has central overreaching military intelligence Aman as well as Mossad so I really I don’t understand your grievance about Pak Army having ISI and MI! It’s like that in almost all Western countries.

So yes it’s only the Pakistani bloody civilians who cry about their own central agency and dream about diluting it because of their political pains. To break Military ISI is impossible and thankfully, it will never happen. You probably have no idea what ISI is all about and things it does. ISI is largely geopolitical research and policy making wing of Army: it aims to coordinate military intelligence from all three branches of forces. Clearly ISI also works as the principal defence and national assessment intelligence, perhaps better suggestion is to merge MI with ISI or dissolve IB!

I guess ISI should come under crooks and disloyal loons like NS and Zardari so they turn ISI into another good for nothing IB? Instead of crying about non-existent taxpayers money going into ISI, the better question whose money Ganjoo’s pouring in IB, and for what purposes.