Is this true?

[ZeeshanParvez]

Re: Is this true?

@vroom

Those references should have corrected you somewhat, I hope the reason why they did not correct you is not stubborn-ness. You are obviously displaying influence from a well known recent movement

Lets have a look at some subjects which you should have been corrected on:

On the topic of where help should be sought from - It should be sought from Allah Ta’ala, Allah Subhanahu is the Provider of Help. We can attain this help in one of the two permissible ways -1. Directly asking Allah Ta’ala, and 2. asking through an intermediary [living or passed on]

1. Now if you look back, you are saying help should be sought directly from Allah Ta’ala, and the Sahaba are turning to Hair Mubaraks, and Garment Sharifs. Clear difference there. A difference which should correct you on this point, after reflection

Once again you demonstrate your complete lack of ability to differentiate between subjects. Tabarruk and Istiagathaa are two completely different things. Once again first correcting your ignorance before misguiding others would be recommended.

2. A man came to RasoolAllah SallAllahu Alaihi wa Ahlihi wa Sallam for the cure of his sight. The Prophet SallAllahu Alaihi wa Ahlihi wa Sallam gave him a way for him to gain this help from Allah Ta’ala, and it included taking help from The Prophet SallAllahu Alaihi wa Ahlihi wa Sallam [from afar I might add]. This should correct you

Your inability to read Arabic, combined with your attitude with putting words in other peoples mouths as you did with me once again shines here. You once again show complete lack of knowledge when it comes to differentiating between Tawassul and Istigataatha. Thank God the people I have talked to in chat say you are not to be taken seriously.

3. You will have been influenced to the notion that dua is worship, and that this means all calling is worship. The ayat of The Quran should have corrected you

Had you known the grammatical positioning of the words in the Ayah of Surah Al-Fatiha you would have known how baseless your, and that unauthentic websites you use, stance is. Once again your inability to understand Balaagha shows you are just regurgitating what your sect has taught you.

Also at the middle of all your views on these subjects is death. Your view of death is too simplistic. It seems this is playing the pivotal role in your understanding. This needs further discussion, do not assume this, what seems like a, pillar of your belief is on firm ground till you have investigated. Remember our views should not merely be influenced by what seems the zahiri reality but we take input from islam for our beliefs. With the input of Islam your views on death will be less simplistic.

View of death in Islam is simple. You die and end up in a grave 6 feet below the ground. Everyone leaves you. You hear their footsteps go away. You are left with your deeds. You can’t help yourself anymore let alone anyone else.

I suggest you correct your Aqeedah and stop misguiding people.

And the ibn arabi you and your salafiaqeedah website love! Wonder where this guys istigathaa of his skehih took him!!

**The incident between Ibn Hajar and Ibn 'Arabi’s fan was reported by at least three students of Ibn Hajar in their books. One book is a biography of Ibn Hajar, one is in the takfeer of Ibn 'Arabi and Ibn al-Faridh, and one is in the history of Makka. All of three have described the same incident in slightly different words.

In the year 797 H, the ruler of Egypt was known as Zahir. There was a shaykh who was closely associated with Zahir. This shaykh threatened Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani that he will complain of him to Zahir that he (i.e. Ibn Hajar) criticized Ibn 'Arabi. Fearing this, Ibn Hajar proposed a mubahala with this shaykh to easily get rid of him, to which the shaykh accepted. “I asked him,” says Ibn Hajar, “to say 'O Allah, if Ibn ‘Arabi is on misguidance, curse me with Your curse.’, which he said, and I said, 'O Allah, if Ibn 'Arabi is on guidance, curse me with Your curse.” Then the two seperated.

Next month, during Ramadan, some soldier threw a party and invited the shaykh. Early in the night, the shaykh decided to leave them for some reason, and while he was on his way when lo! he felt something just passed over his legs, so he said to his companions, “Something soft just passed over my legs, look and see what it is.” (i.e. his feet became paralyzed). And they saw but found nothing. The shaykh then became blind and could not see anything as well.

He died before the next morning.

“Thus,” said Ibn Hajar, “I was relieved from the evil of this person, and became safe from the consequence of his deceiving.”**