So who gave gays right to have children ?
Is this not child abuse, they hire a mom have child from her.
Now child is going to have no mother ???(not 100 fathers can compensate for a mother)
In case of to mother he/she is not going to have father ??
Should that not be stopped ??
If no, why not ??
@Southie what the ---- ?
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
good question
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
Is it child abuse if it’s not hurting the child??
As for ‘no mother’ or ‘no father’ have you not heard of divorce or single parents? And same-sex couples aren’t the only ones who use surrogates btw..
Are you going to call them all child abusers too? 
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
I guess his point is that since gay couples don't have a "mother" hence isn't it unfair for the child adopted by them.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
a male is not capable of taking care of the child by himself? There are plenty of single dads/divorced dads/widower dad who take care of their kids and their kids come out of just fine. Why would it be "abuse" if the kid is raised by two guys? And don't give me the crap that 'child needs mothers love and what not" because I have seen plenty of terrible moms and their kid would have been better off without one.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
But what would you rather have? Kids to keep changing foster homes and left to feel like disposable human garbage or have parents who can love him/her for life and be there for him/her.
@Monk
There are way more gay couples adopting kids than those paying thousands of dollars to hAve biological children. In both cases, intentions are good and couple is looking forward to having a happy healthy family life. And don’t worry they are not raising them to recruit more gays.
Having parents doesn’t guarantee an abuse free environment. You know what is abuse? When kids are left to fend for themselves because the parents are irresponsible or too young or just a&&holes. Bringing children into this world only to raise them and care for them is far from abuse.
How do you define abuse? Wtf?
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
a male is not capable of taking care of the child by himself? .
NO.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
NO.
thats just you then.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
Ok. You people are beyond repair.
Let me try. From what how I figured out some thing different.
I use to think why combat sports are bad, why people want to ban them, when people die in racing soccer etc.
Then It occurred to me, in combat sports you go out to hurt other. When racing soccer people get hurt as an accident.
Now families fall apart(I know), that is an accident. But should you plan an accident ?????
And get f--ing real. Would you wish your child not have mother?????
Why would wish some one else' child not to have it.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
You are just homophobic and thats your business. But don't just throw around the word "abuse", google the definition first.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
Adopting is fine. Since west has too many children with out families. And sort of calamity has struck the kid.
Now you find what ever you can.
That was not my point.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
You are just homophobic and thats your business. But don't just throw around the word "abuse", google the definition first.
Throwing around is, by definition, what you did... did not address the question... yet use token term "homophobic"
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
But were you 'abused' as a kid being raised by your dad? Its not ideal, its not easy for us as muslims and desi but its not abuse either.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
So do you feel only heterosexual couples should be allowed to adopt or try to have biological children? What if a guy wants to adopt a child or have a child of his own and raise the child by himself? Should he not be allowed then?
Some people are smart enough to justify their homophobic views. You aren't one of them.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
So do you feel only heterosexual couples should be allowed to adopt or try to have biological children? What if a guy wants to adopt a child or have a child of his own and raise the child by himself? Should he not be allowed then?
Basic idea is.
If gay or les. couple come to rescue child by adopting. That is fine. Perhaps noble.
But how could some one actually plan a child, and not give him/her both parents. Specially mother.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
But I would be mad if, what fate put me through...was instead my father plan for me. U see ?
You still didn't answer my question. Yea you would be mad (if you say so but I doubt it because you would never had a mom since the start so you wouldn't have anything to complain to start with) but its still not abuse is it?
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
Basic idea is. If gay or les. couple come to rescue child by adopting. That is fine. Perhaps noble. But how could some one actually plan a child, and not give him/her both parents. Specially mother.
Even that makes no sense! They are not bringing a child into this world to abuse it. Their intentions are good! If it weren't for the gay couple, the child wouldn't be born. How does this make sense to you? Only children raised by gay couples can tell you whether or not they feel they are abused or how badly they want a mother or a father. I bet you would find their answers surprising. I am sure every now and then they would wonder what things would be like if they had a mother or father but if they are raised in a happy healthy evironment, this wouldn't bother them they wat you think it would.
Re: Is this not child abuse ? (gay thing)
See drowning is not abuse its accident.
But planing it on some one is abuse. Well if they die its murder. But if the drown through out life its abuse.
Dont quote please.