Is it better to be...

Is it better to have had your heart ripped out and be heartbroken and single

or

To be in a relationship where you feel miserable and feel no solution is helping turn things around?

Re: Is it better to be...

first one.

You're gonna be miserable either way so might as well be single innit

Re: Is it better to be...

option first

Re: Is it better to be...

the first one ofcourse...

Re: Is it better to be...

Definitely the first.

I dread the thought of being in a relationship where forget about not being in love with my husband, I fear not even liking him and not knowing how to end the relationship. A lot of people from the older generations managed such relationships and kudos to them, but I'm not such a person.

Re: Is it better to be...

first one.

Re: Is it better to be...

Oh well thought I'd try to change things around on here from the usual stuff, but seems there is a consensus on this matter. Let's try some trollololing now.

Re: Is it better to be...

speaking of trolling - tonight is gonna be boring as hell

Re: Is it better to be...

I don't know. I really dn't know.

Re: Is it better to be...

'I pick the second option. In a relationship were you feel miserable you can atleast WALK OUT.
You cant walk out on a broken heart.

Re: Is it better to be...

^ and to add....in a crappy relationship, at least there are some bright spots and good times... not sure how it is in the 1st situation

Re: Is it better to be...

So there you go, 2 dissenting replies :p

Re: Is it better to be...

Agreed!.
Well trust me you dont wanna know about the first situation. It sucks if you have to go trough that.

Re: Is it better to be...

first one for me, because with that you always have the freedom to do whatever you please, where you can finally breathe but if you're in a relationship where nothing is getting better and every day seems like torture with abuse and pain, it's best to have the situation of being single/divorced/separated then atleast you can keep your sanity rather than put all your hope in things changing in a go nowhere, torturous, dead relationship

Re: Is it better to be...

Been through both, I'll still take # 1.

Re: Is it better to be...

a broken heart will get better though because it's something you yourself can work on, the only person that needs to change their thinking is you but in a miserable torturous abusive relationship as much as you change to make things better you can't force or make the other person wake up to some of their faults. you can always get yourself to change especially when you know you need to make it happen, broken hearts get better with time with relationships two have to make the effort and if it's one sided, get ready to be in the same hell for the next 50yrs...hey some people can handle that....I don't think i would be able to.

we die alone, that partner in life even if it's a great life with them doesn't come with us

Re: Is it better to be...

1st. don't want relationships for the sake of having relationships. that includes moonh boley mamu, chacha, khala, dosts, bhai.

Re: Is it better to be...

First option please

In the first option...your heartbreak will soon pass and you will be ready for bigger and better things again.

In the second...its a dead end.

Re: Is it better to be...

First one !

I was in "second one" for quite sometime believe me it is horrible and painful and once you get out of it you start loving and cherishing simple & smallest things in life which u never did before. No body deserves to live like that.