I didn't say all Pakistanis were like that bro. I was talking about those Salahu and Abdulsaleyki guys.
Abdelyuuki isn't Pakistani. He's Kashmiri.
Being from Indian-occupied Kashmir valley, and as such not giving two hoots about either countries,
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
^^ thank you for correcting me. he is not a biased pakistani, he's a biased kashmiri.
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
^
Why do you call him biased?
For [correctly] pointing out the utter absurdity of a nation that's home to 1/3 of the world's poor, and has higher rates of childhood malnourishment than even Sub-Saharan Africa bragging about how they have "marched far ahead" of anyone?
^ Why do you call him biased?
For [correctly] pointing out the utter absurdity of a nation that's home to 1/3 of the world's poor, and has higher rates of childhood malnourishment than even Sub-Saharan Africa bragging about how they have "marched far ahead" of anyone?
Still people work hard and trying to make things better rather than becoming bombers.
Open trade will definitely help (I think at this point it will help Pakistan more than India) which is why I said we should be like USA and Canada with free trade agreements.
Open trade will not help Pakistan. All papers on trade creation and diversion actively prove that.
Still people work hard and trying to make things better rather than becoming bombers.
Thank you for that pointless and irrelevant (not to mention ridiculous) comment.
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
Bomb has been exploded Chintu 
^ Why do you call him biased?
For [correctly] pointing out the utter absurdity of a nation that's home to 1/3 of the world's poor, and has higher rates of childhood malnourishment than even Sub-Saharan Africa bragging about how they have "marched far ahead" of anyone?
Country A = Developing nation with high growth rates sustained over a decade, positive future, great economical uplift for most of its population but still suffering from poverty, corruption and communal tension... but overall has shown positive development and definitely has a good future, acknowledged by experts all around the world.
Country B = Has been under military rule for majority of its existence, is acknowledged as the global HQ of terrorism, bombs explode every day, govt. has no control over a significant part of its territory, volatile political and economic environment, serious islamic extremist problems..
Country A FAAAARR ahead of Country B.
You're dissing of Country A is only because of your biased and hatred towards it.
I don't see much point going back and forth again on the definition of whats 'ahead' and whats 'faar ahead'. There is only so much time I can waste.
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
Country A has:
- Been dealing with multiple simultaneous separatist movements since the day it was created, and has only managed to keep itself together though frank military suppression.
- Has significant problems with homegrown terrorism as well, with everyone from the Naxalites and Upper Caste militants to SIMI working to make it one of the top terrorist targets in the world.
- Is one of the only countries of the world with an elected official banned from entering the US on charges of sponsoring religious genocide.
- For all its talk of rapid economic growth, still can't manage to feed over 40% of its children (a rate higher than that of even Bangladesh, let alone Pakistan)...not surprising when nearly 80% of the population survives on less than $2/day.
- And for all its talk "great economical uplift for most of its population," actually has had a significantly slower rate of poverty decline over the past 15 years than in previous decades.
The only reason you're bragging so much about Country A is because of your personal biases against Country B.
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
You are picking facts to suit your case of exaggerating Country A's problems. I have already acknowledged these problems. This doesn't change the fact that A is in a lot better position than B. I see you have not commented on Country B's sad (er) state?
I don't hate Country B, I want them to get their act together and get on the path of development like Country A is. Hence my comment that the goal should be to have a USA-Canadaish kind of environment.
You are picking facts to suit your case of exaggerating Country A's problems.
You mean the same way you're picking facts/exaggerating to suit your allegations of Country B's relative backwardness?
I never claimed Pakistan didn't have plenty of problems. I'm just pointing out how ridiculous your delusions about India are. At the end of the day, both countries are dirt poor third world nations with very little to brag about.
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
^^ with A being far ahead of B :D
Re: Is India not a threat to Pakistan? (Split from AAZ interview to WSJ thread)
Indians are free to gloat about how far they are in WA or some other place, this is Pakistan Affairs, that much should be understandable to peope who think of being "far ahead".