Is FIL considered Mehrem? [a split from :Covering head with dupatta ]

Re: Is FIL considered Mehrem? [a split from :Covering head with dupatta ]

why do people have problems with father-in-law being a mehram when it is clearly mentioned in the Quran????

do we have a new Quran revealed to someone now which has declared father-in-law as namehram for the daughter-in-law????

That's what my point is.

Now If you have knowledge about it please post.

Why I'm isisting because I know that very well you guys are confused about that.

I can't provide proof because I can't remember the exect word and thing.

I just remember kaha kia gia hai. That is the reason I'm asking you guys. As you guys are so knowledgeable than me and can post verses.

I can tell you this is in quran but can't tell you which sura and wich verse.

Re: Is FIL considered Mehrem? [a split from :Covering head with dupatta ]

I'm sure I'm not wrong.

Please guys help me to prove to them who are mis understanding that FIL and MIL are maharam and they are not.

FIL is mahram.

Ok very funny, joke's over

Sufficient proof has been posted numerous times to prove without a doubt that FIL is mahram and if this person had anything to back their position they would have bothered to post it by now. The truth is clear for those whose hearts is open for it. You dont have to accept it if you dont want to, but at least have the decency to pass your own personal opinion as what it truly is (nothing but your own personal opinion) instead of falsely trying to pretend it is a ruling in Islam. If you have something to say about what is or isnt correct in Islam, please at least have the common sense to bring valid proof to justify your claims

Mods I think this thread has served its purpose and it has become highly redundant now

Re: Is FIL considered Mehrem? [a split from :Covering head with dupatta ]

Would everyone please stop arguing with sister Gr8Heera ...

Re: Is FIL considered Mehrem? [a split from :Covering head with dupatta ]

Okay correct me if am wrong ... i heared that in old times the woman didnt have to cover her hair in front of her slave ! True ?