Re: Is a scantily dressed woman a “meat” responsible for her own rape?
mr fraudia, i know it was a tad long, but did you read all of my reply?
yes I did, and i found it flawed.
**firstly, the example of nice houses and shanty houses does not give, for one, because that would be talking about nice clothing, and horrible clothing. something that doesnt come up in the eyes of a rapist. **
If the nice house versus shanty house is not a good example the house with an open window versus not is also not a good example. Your are still laying the blame on the victim,
and you know what.. using your own example, when a burgular gets captured and gets chitrol at the police station, and then sentenced by the judge, no sane lawyer in the world would have a defense of, “but mi lord, this house had an open window .. it ignited the burgular’s greed, thus be lenient on him” similarly no matter what the girl is wearing, does not make her responsible for the criminal act of someone.
as I have pointd out before, so arab men in KSA who are used to seeing women in batman gear around them, when they go to a country like indonesia, and see some girl in hijab and a skirt and top, to them she is way too forward…now is it her fault in anyways?
**also the example of cats and meat was sickening to say the least but what i dont get is this, he asked his audience if meat is left outside and a cat eats it, whose fault is it, the cats or the meats? and audience replies, ‘the meats’. Like wha? 
**
he was pandering to his audience, he was appeasing them. The fact that they replied the meats shows the ingrained jahalat among many of us. Its that type of mentality that
**and then to justify it, he said he was taking about prostitues, **
u know he was lying, its obvious, he can bac peddle all he wants, but he knows what he said, and the context, especially bringing in reference to tough judge and to jail.