Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Society Pakistan & World Affairs
1

Now what? After spending billions of dollars and hundreds of “precious” American lives, Bush and Co. find out that people whom they liberated are supporting their enemy no. 1.

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) – Iran has a right to develop nuclear technology and the international community should drop its demands that Tehran prove it’s not trying to build a nuclear weapon, Iraq’s foreign minister said Friday.

“Iran doesn’t claim that they want to obtain a nuclear weapon or a nuclear bomb, so there is no need that we ask them for any guarantee now,” Hoshyar Zebari said after meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Manouchehr Mottaki.

Iran’s nuclear ambitions are “an international issue,” Zebari said. “In our beliefs, it is a matter of principle. Every country has the right to have its nuclear technology, every country like the Islamic Republic or any other country, since it is for peaceful purposes.”

Zebari did say that Iran’s nuclear program must be monitored by the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.

He also called for a diplomatic solution to the standoff between Iran and the West.

2

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

^^ Khawaja ka gawaah duddoo (Look who is talking).

Who knows it better than Iraqis that you can't threaten the world, and have nukie toys at the same time. Threatened people come after you and you lose your pants (remember Saddam's pics in underwear).

3

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Regardles of what this thread is about.

Please don't desecrate Pakistani people!
He does not represent Pakistani by any stretch. Only God/Allah( besides himself) knows who he represents.

4

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

tenu eik ustad pa lo english de waastey- grammer, tense ki maa-behan ek kar di apney!

5

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

And OBL thinks (and some other illiterate think) he represents muslims..........!

6

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Nothing wrong in what you wrote. You wanted to include all possibilities.

7

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

In fact Iraqis should send some pics of Saddam to this Nejad guy. Something like "before" and "after".

Before (making nukie threats), Nejad has his pants on. Even with beard, looking OK.
After (getting spanked for making nukie threats), Nejad has not pants (just bruned out undie).

8

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Can’t understand it. So no comments.
But by looks of it, my advice is please be civil.

There was no threat from Saddam to America. This war was started on all false pretexts.
Do you need a lesson on the reasons the Chacha of Zionists gave when attacking Iraq?
Please don’t look so ignorant.

9

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

The point of this thread is that Chacha Choudhry toppled Saddam not to bring any freedom or liberty, a well-known fact, but to remove an anti-Israel government. But it is now clear that no matter who comes in power in Iraq, the Iraqis are not going to play America's crony in Middle East.

10

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Oh Sahzada Ji, The pics-in-undie ex-President of Iraq used to f@rt on live TV against Western interests.

Sure Uncle Sam didn't find WMDs. Then what was this $tupid @$$ $addam trying to hide? Why did he kick out UN inspectors?

Now same $tupid mistakes are being repeated by Nejad guy. If Iran doesn't have nukes, then why is he making empty threats?

If on the other hand (worst case scenario), he has nukes, then this madman should be taken out ASAP.

11

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

If Chacha did not find any WMDs then why did you say that “threatened people comes after you”?
When was America thretened? Do you think just by throwing out inspectors once is ENOUGH reason for America to feel threatened? Was there intelligence from any other source than dumb CIA said that there is an eminent Iraqi threat for America?

He did not make threats. The neo-cons are only reading between the lines, and making wrong assumptions “intentionally”. Iran said that it is signatory to NPT, and as per NPT clause, every nation has the right to build nuclear energy for peaceful purpose under inspections, and hence it is Iran’s right to do it as well.
But Israelis are poking Chacha-ji to demand Iran to give up its right altogether. So who is unjustified in their demand, and where is the smoking gun?

You mean Bush. Right?
Of course. Who can disagree?

12

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Oh Bholay Shazadio, following Moolahs will certainly make one's intellect to hit the rock bottom.

Let me give you some examples from history.

  1. When Hujjaj bin Yousuf sent in Mohammad bin Qasim (and two prior campaigns), poor slob sitting in Debal (Raja Dahir) didn’t threaten Iraq. Dahir indirectly supported the pirates looting Arab trading ships. That resulted in an indirect threat to Iraqi interests.

  2. When Khairud Din Barbarosa destroyed Venus, and other European ports in the Mediterranean, no one was attacking Istanbul. Europeans simply posed an indirect threat to Ottoman interests.

  3. When Argentineans generals occupied Faulklands, they didn't threaten London, or your home in Luton's aloo store. They simply posed an indirect threat to British interests.

  4. In WWII, Germans did little damage to Mainland America. Yet Hitler was declared enemy #1 because he threatened US allies thus posing indirect threat to American interests.

I hope you can see that big powers of the time have to look beyond their immediate borders. Otherwise they will no long be big powers.

p.s. Again you didn't answer the Question. What was your chacha Saddam hiding from UN inspectors? His demagh choos (the Arab head covering), or toap (the long dressy gown of Arabs)?

How easy it is for you to
13

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

antiobl:

[quote]
I hope you can see that big powers of the time have to look beyond their immediate borders. Otherwise they will no long be big powers.
[/quote]

Big powers may have be looking beyond their borders, but they can not attack a country when it is unjustified. All examples you posted may or may not be true. If they are true then we will say that big powers of that time were bad as well.

It is an old saying that two wrongs don't make a right. Powers of past not behaving properly is not a justification for mass-murders of Powers of present.

I don't have any liking for murderers like Saddam. But it is the principle of attacking Saddam which was wrong, and this is what needs to be condemned.
Saddam was not hiding anything. He had left open the whole country for inspection from everyone. But the demands of jingoist neo-cons of Bush Administration could never be met. They were already determined to attack Saddam AT ANY COST. They hid those CIA intelligence reports which casted doubts on the existence of WMDs, and relied solely on dubious intelligence. They kept making one false claim after the other. Like I said, no one agreed with the "intentionally" dumb CIA/Mossad intelligence, that Saddam had WMDs.

14

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Then my friend, you are trying to rewrite history. You could do that if you had power to rewrite. However from the looks of it, your leader Nejad (with pants on so far), and your ex-leader Saddam (with no pants on) have very little chance of stopping father time.

One day when you grow up, you will either acquire a will to work hard and be something, or you may simply turn out like many Arabs or Iranians hell bent on burning down their own house.

15

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

lol, ahmedinijad will stay in power?

tell that to saadam, another one of the great islamic heroes now rotting away in jail eating his doritos chips

16

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

This is what Islamo-fascists used to say about Saddam insane as well. At one time, Saddam was the savior of all the Pakistani Moolahs. His posters went up in many cities, and he was the second coming of Saladin.

However no Moolah can match the intellect of Saladin. So the end of result of Saddam insane was pretty much predictable just like the ones for Noriega, Melosovic, and Hitler.

I hope and pray that nothing happens to Irani people. However nutcases like Nejad drive their people to death and destruction.

I cry in pain when I remember the the destruction of Hamburg, and Dresden, and Berlin the cities with so much civilization, so much art, so much knowledge.

Only if Hitler was killed by Germans, or Nazi party was overthrown by the German military, only if, only if, millions of Jewish and non-Jewish Germans would have been safe.

Similary, Nejad has chosen the path of Hitler, and God help us, he will lead his own people and the neighbors to death and destruction as well. I hope Iranian military realizes the danger in this madman and overthrows him and kills him.

i want to put custom avator...
17

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Iraq Poised to Become Main Iranian Ally
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/29/AR2006052900134.html

TEHRAN, Iran – To Iran’s west lies a natural ally and perhaps its most potent weapon in the international fray over its nuclear program. While Iran and Iraq were arch enemies during the rule of Saddam Hussein, all signs point to an increasingly robust relationship now that Shiites have achieved a dominant role in the Iraqi leadership.

The United States has acknowledged Iran’s influence in Iraq, publicly calling for talks between Iranian officials and Zalmay Khalilzad, Washington’s ambassador to Baghdad.
The Iranians, after initially warming to the possibility, have now declined, claiming the U.S. wants to expand the discussions beyond the mutual interest in Iraq to include the nuclear dispute.

After 26 years, the Iraq-Iran conflict has finally ended, with Iran emerging as a clear victor.

Cost of finishing phase of the war : $300 billion and rising
*Oil price hike as a result of this: $70 per barrel *
Human lives lost and the suffering caused: unquantifiable
The smell of ownage of newcons in the morning: priceless.

:hehe:
OWNED!!

18

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Saw a TV program on amreekan misadventure in Iraq.. Basically most widley accepted conclusion is that Amreeka got ambushed in Iraq. Amreekans were dreaming of Iraqis welcoming them with open arms and showering them with flowers but instead they got RPGs & IEDs and lots and lots of them.. Please watch Baghdad-ER it just boggles the mind how this nation is kept in the dark by a bunch of thugs and retards…

This most likely will be the last terrorist act by amreeka.. There is one great difference between Iraq and Vietnam, NK, Afghanistan and that is while the invaders/terrorist created this myth that the insurgents/freedom fighters were supported by another power in case of Iraq there is neither the myth nor any power supporting 6 million Sunnis. can you imagine if Shiits were to Join hands with Sunis.. Amreeka will run so fast that it will put their retreat from Vietnam/NK to Shame

OH BTW forget about Iran, Amreeka will do another table dance and move on to another club.

19

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

nice theory...

but USA is getting ready to leave by the end of 2007, Iraqi forces are being trained and ready to take over from the americans...

i know you are too dum to understand the full context of what is happening on the ground but the insurgency is losing....

20

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Look who is talking, US was also prepared to leave NK and Vietnam but only due to swinging chappal… But you are way too retard to comprehend…

Pictures for your type
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4173.htm