Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Society Pakistan & World Affairs
21

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

hahaahahahahahah:)
hahahahahahahahaha:)
hahahahahahahahaha:)

You are obviously educated in the madrassa curriculum and have no remote concept of history…

US defeated the North Koreans and drove the Chinese to accept an armstice or otherwise USA would launch a new offensive against them. It was the Chinese who contacted the Americans for a cease-fire.

As for Vietnam. USA accomplished its objectives in Vietnam. It trained the South Vietnamese Army, defeated the Gureilla forces of the Viet Cong.

But there was rampant corruption amongst the ranks of the South Vietnamese Generals, the Yom kippur War of 1973 had hampered oil supplies to the south Vietnamese Army meaning their large number of tanks, apc, helicopters can only move at the most urgent of situations because due to the high cost of gas. When the Americans left, the South Vietnamese Economy which was enjoying a boom also collapsed.

This all lead to South Vietnam being defeated in April 1975.

USA didnt lose the war in Vietnam, it accomplished its objectives, South Vietnam lost.

as for those pics.

USA has lost 2,300 troops in Iraq. How exactly are war dead suppose to look like?

USA lost 450,000 men World War II, why dont you go dig those up and show that USA lost that war as well.

I really didn’t know that some pakistanis were this stupid…
awaiting your retarted reply:D

22

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

At the expense of death of thousands of children, malnutrition of 50% of Iraqi children?

23

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Sadly that is true. Remember if you follow Palestinian ways, you will suffer just like Palestinians. That unfortunately is how dumb nations get punished.

24

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

^ I am in no love for Palestinians, but pray tell what other way they shud have adopted?

25

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Insurgent attacks in Iraq at highest level in 2 years
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2006/05/31/insurgent_attacks_in_iraq _at_highest_level_in_2_years/
WASHINGTON – The Pentagon reported yesterday that the frequency of insurgent attacks against troops and civilians is at its highest level since American commanders began tracking such figures two years ago, an ominous sign that, despite three years of combat, the US-led coalition forces haven’t significantly weakened the Iraq insurgency.

In its quarterly update to Congress, the Pentagon reported that from Feb. 11 to May 12, as the new Iraqi unity government was being established, insurgents staged an average of more than 600 attacks per week nationwide. From August 2005 to early February, when Iraqis elected a parliament, insurgent attacks averaged about 550 per week; at its lowest point, before the United States handed over sovereignty in the spring of 2004, the attacks averaged about 400 per week.

The vast majority of the attacks – from crude bombing attempts and shootings to more sophisticated, military-style assaults and suicide attacks – were targeted at US-led coalition military forces, but the majority of deaths have been of civilians, who are far more vulnerable to insurgent tactics.

Overall, average weekly attacks during this `Government Transition' period were higher than any of the previous periods," the report states. Reasons for the high level of attacks may include terrorist and insurgent attempts to exploit a perceived inability of the Iraqi government to constitute itself effectively, the rise of ethno sectarian attacks . . . and enemy efforts to derail the political process leading to a new government."
As if to underscore the grim report, a spate of violence swept Iraq yesterday. Bombs and other attacks killed 54 people, including an American soldier, according to wire reports. The deadliest bombing, in a popular market in a town about 20 miles north of Baghdad, killed at least 25 people and wounded 65

Filling up world affairs with irrelevant facts: = $100
Jabbering big words : $50
Employing " I know a lot of Americans, so I am now an expert on them" tactic: $0
Calling someone dumb and getting owned immediately afterwards : PRICELESS

Never post here again. Your credibility = zero. :blush:

26

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

Tribal Arabs could not have adopted any other way. And you have a point there.

However for non-tribal people, there are plenty of examples where peaceful negotiations work like a charm. Read a bit more about the life of Jinnah and see how he was able to "neogitate" (read non-violently) get the objective.

27

Re: Iraqi minister defends Iranian nuclear program

The US is probably going to be tied down in Iraq for a long, long, long time. Why else would we building military bases with car dealerships in Iraq? I think withdrawal in 2007 is going to be impossible because the situation is getting worse, not better.

Dick Cheney claimed this as well when he said that the insurgency was in its "last throws" in Iraq. That was more than a year ago. The violence has become worse since then, so I don't know how you can say that they're losing.

By the way, I don't think you understand the situation as well as you may think.** In this type of warfare, the insurgency does not have *to win to succeed, it just has to keep the other guy from winning.*

Finally, I do hope that the insurgency is defeated by 2007 and our troops are able to come back home then. But I don't think anybody really believes, perhaps you excluded, that is going to happen anytime soon.