Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

IRAN BUILDS FIRST NAVAL DESTROYER
April 19, 2007

**NICOSIA **[MENL] – Iran has reported the completion of its first naval destroyer.

Officials said the Defense Ministry has administered a project to build a naval destroyer. They said the vessel was completed and would be launched over the next few weeks.

“Soon, the first Iranian-made destroyer will be launched and will surprise the world’s military community with its facilities, equipment, capabilities and technology,” Rear Adm. Darioush Ebrahimnejad, a naval commander said.

On Tuesday, Ebrahimnejad told a news conference that the destroyer would be one of the most modern in its class. He did not provide any details or say when the ship would be deployed.

Middle East News

Alhamdu’lillah. History made: Another warship attributed to Muslim enginners.

A few of these should be enough to fend off any enemy naval build-ups against Iran!

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

I'm sure Muslim Engineers did not originallly deisgn it.. its probably a resutl of re-engineering and a few additios.. in EITHER CASE.. its not a good idea to ignite a debate of MUSLIM ENGINEERS Vs NON MUSLIM ENGINEERS... bcoz Jewish Engineers wud kick any1s ass lol.. Kafir Engineers and Scientists get the credit for most of today's amazing technology.. including the computer screen you're reading this message on..

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

well all that sciences you spoke about are built on the work of muslim Scientists.
If you don't know it already tell me I send you some links to study

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^^ No thanks I dont need to read your "ISLAM MADE EVERYTHING" propoganda.. I've came acccross that stuff before and it has very little credibililty and a LOt of exaggerations..:)

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^^ A lot of good this Naval Destroyer will do....

The last State of the Art Destroyer that Iran had was annhiliated by the USA in 1988

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^^ haha.. yeah.. the US Army is soooo strong its actuallly very sad.. whenever they attack FULL THROTTLE they can annahilate any coutry within hours.. you should see this show on discovery "Future Weapons".... its totaly shocking the kind of technology they have.. (and revealed, not to mention they might have a lot more that is NOT on discovery lol)...

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^ Seen the program. It usually shows out-dated weaponary.

I mean Iran has 3,000 km KH-55 cruise missiles, as well as guided missiles/bombs. Only this month an Iranian drone was flying over Yemen. And I hope you've seen the footage of the Iranian UAV spying on a US aircraft carrier on youtube.

You probably also know Iran was the first country in the world to fire on enemy forces with from a UAV well back in 1987.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

outdated machinery? dude.. wtF lol those toys they got in that show r SIckkkkk !! blahhhhhhh who am i talkin to ... ejihadi.. yuor right man.. Iran's forces are t he BESt... they r gonna rape USA and make em their biatch. I agree.. :/

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^ When did you see all the weapons in that program belonging to the US only? They show weapons being designed in the entire Western world plus Zion.

Cruise missiles were first used in 1991 in the Gulf War and they're showing them as some kinda future weapon to come. (Even Pakistan & Hindustan have them now).

They show F-35 (JSF) as some kinda superior stealth fighter but even your own Hindustan is developing the MCA, China's buisy with J-XX and Russia's making the Pak-Fa.

As regards to those so called superior American tanks, over 100 of them have already been destroyed by an untrained army in Iraq alone. You probably also remember watching scores of Zionist tanks being fried by Hezbollah last year.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^^ Dude.. I've told you enough times before that I am not Indian... Get it in your head.. I'm half indian half pakistani.. If I was more inclined towards India I wouldn't be a regular at a Pakistani forum... think for yourself.

As for future weapons, I thik you shud see t he show again.. bcoz its not about the things you are talking about.. they have stuff like jets which flythemselves.. super strong new cannons.. bombing techniues which can penetrate multiple brick layers and aLOT more that other countires do not have..the US army is technologically a LOT more superior than any1..

you shudt compare the US IRAQ war.. that is not a conventonal war.. bcoz 1) the US army does not have its full strength down ther.. not even close.. and 2) its not realy a ground to ground war.. the problem they are hving is not defeating weapons.. they captured the areas in a matter of horus.. they are jut having troublles controllling it... and that is bcoz of innovative techniques of the militants over ther.. credit to them.. in either case.. what I said orignally is true.. they can wipe out any army very easily if they bring anywhere close to their full strength

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

Since Iran doesn't have them, it doesn't matter

What you are forgetting is these Cruise missiles can carry a larger payload, travel faster and hit their targets more accurately than before. And have also employed stealth technology on them so they are undetectable on Radar. What Pakistan and India have made are Cruise Missile Technology is at least 25 years behind USA.

India's LCA air-craft was a colossal flop. China is busy making its J-XX but so far with testing and development, it is atleast 10-15 years from serial production and by that time USA would have moved on to 6th Generation fighter.

Well thats Asymmetric Warfare in which these kinds of things happen. But if you compare on a tank by tank basis, US and Israeli tanks are among the best in the world.

The Israeli Tanks that were lost in Lebanon, took at least 4-5 missile hits before being disabled. Its another thing that they were used and deployed terribly by the Israeli Army.

In a similar situation the Pakistan Army would have fared no better nor the Iranian Army who just recently lost 12 Elite Al Quds Force Troops in an Insurgent bomb attack on their convoy near Pakistani border.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

The way I see it. The last time America invaded a strong country was during WW2. Since then they’ve never fought/invaded a nation on their own whose armed forces are ready for any eventuality.

They invaded Korea (with 18 other countries) and ended up with two of them. They invaded Vietnam, a country which had just gained independence, no proper regular armed forces for years and still lost to them. They attacked Iraq but with 40 other countries. They attacked Serbia with Nato fully behind them.

In this century, they’ve attacked Afghanistan (the poorest country on earth at the time) still needing Nato to support them. They attacked Iraq after eroding it’s entire armed forces for 12 years under sanctions.

What i’m saying is, Americans only attack countries which are weak, fighting a civial war or are at war with some other country.

To think that an ever powerfull and proud Iran is one of those weak countries is nonsence.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

Americans are not that advanced with cruise missiles. It’s just because they’ve used them more than any other nation, people tend to think, only they have them and they’re also far ahead of others in this field:Cruise missile categories

F-35 (JSF) project will be until 2050, so far costing $50 billion. It’s not a 20 year contract because Americans are assuming noone will catch up with them. What makes you think America will still be some sort of a superpower by then once they’ve been kicked outta Iraq & Afghanistan?

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

That is because the only country that could challenge was the USSR and any war between USSR and USA would lead to a nuclear war which would destroy both sides.

Your history is wrong. Korea was divided into two parts in 1945. North Korea with the backing of China and USSR invaded South Korea. USA and its allies rallied and forcing China and USSR to ask USA for a ceasefire and not the other way around.

Again your history is wrong. They didn't invade any country. After the French left, Vietnam was divided into two parts, North Vietnam and South Vietnam. Just like during the Korean War, the communist north sought to unite the two Vietnam. South Vietnam asked for military assistance and USA gave it.

The General mis-conception is that USA lost in Vietnam which is not true.

From 1963-1968, USA pretty much destroyed the Viet Cong and the climax came during the December 1968 Tet Offensive in which the Viet Cong lost over 100,000 men.

After that the North Vietnamese Army got directly involved in the War.

From 1968-1971, USA and South Vietnam held back North Vietnam.

By this time, USA started to withdraw its forces from Vietnam and giving the lead to the South Vietnamese Army. It held on its own when it beat back another invasion by North Vietnam in 1972.

But in 1973, everything changed.

The Yom Kippur War between Israel and Arabs lead to Oil prices to sky rocket. With the withdrawal of most US forces, the South Vietnamese economy collapsed. High Oil prices limited operations. With a collapsed economy led to high amounts of corruption and thus some Generals and top echelon leaders in South Vietnam defected.

In 1975, North Vietnam launched another invasion of South Vietnam. They expected the campaign to last 2 years, but in 2 months South Vietnam collapsed.

So its not exactly an American defeat.

The only reason for that was that George Bush Sr. knew global diplomacy and thus was successful in building a coalition where as the amount of fighting the coalition did was negligible. If it wasn't for USA, the Coalition allies would not have been able to push Saddam from Kuwait.

Why not. USA has friends, so why not use them as well ?

Maybe you don't understand the doctrine of NATO. If any country declares war on a NATO country, then its like declaring war on all of them. When Osama attacked usa on 9/11, it was like attacking all of NATO and thus their response.

Yup they did. USA doesn't want to see its soldiers coming home in body bags. And I don't think any other country on the planet does as well.

America does stuff in what its own vested interests. If that means it is going to attack Iraq and negotiate with North Korea then thats the way its going to be. But don't mistake this bellicose posturing by USA. USA still has the most powerful Military on the planet.

Iran's Army is obselete. Its Tanks are basically patched up M-60 and T-55 Tanks. Its Air force is totally obselete and it still flies the F-14 Fighters given to it by USA in the 70's. Its Navy has heavily destroyed in 1988 and is no match for the US Navy.

Iran's options are to send suicide bombers and fighters into Iraq and Afghanistan. Use oil as a weapon and use Hezbollah to launch terrorist attacks around the world.

That is the military power of Iran.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

](Cruise missile - Wikipedia)

Actually it is. It is very advanced. I have already told you the new improvements that USA has made to its cruise missile arsenal.

F-35 Project will be until 2050 just as F-teen series was started in the 70’s and is still going. But that doesn’t mean it can’t improve on it.

From F-14 to F-15 to F-16 to F-18. It has continued to make modifications.

Well, USA left Vietnam and is still a global superpower.

Well Iraq is a non-issue. Even if America leaves, the turmoil in the middle east will benefit no one. And thus no country can emerge superior to challenge USA.

As for Afghanistan, Pakistan is increasingly making forays into this tribal areas and slowly but surely this tribal menace will come to an end and thus Afghanistan will be stabilized.

USA will remain a global superpower throughout this century and will be one of the main powers into the next century onwards.

China and Russia could emerge as a new power block, same goes with Europe.

But with China’s massive population, communist regime, more people immigrating to USA for a better life than leaving it.

I can safely say that USA will continue to be the most dominating superpower in the world.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

^ What nonsence.

Since world war 2, America has attacked 20 countries. All of them tiny, extremely poor and weak nations.

The Americans just do not have the strength to attack a well trained armed force. If they were so powerfull, they would had openely confronted Russia/China.

We have still yet to see America fight a full scale war one-on-one with a well trained armed force.

Watching fictitious American moves all the time, and reading their books bragging about their own history all the time doesn't make their armed forces powerfull.

And I don't know which Zion channels you've been watching to have views on Iran like those.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

I think i'll let you live your fantasies.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

Maybe you forgetting the part that both Russia and China have nuclear weapons. Confront them would lead to a nuclear war.

American Armed forces are the most powerful thats why countries like Pakistan are begging for American weaponry. Same goes for Arab countries.

And I don't know what mullah run television shows you have been watching on Iran.

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

and I will let you live in yours

Re: Iran builds first Naval Destroyer

haha! mercenary, good posts.. I hope you know that all the efforts u put in these posts wud not affect the way PD thinks.. but it will definitely give any reader the idea that you are the sensible one with acccurate knowledge and PD is the biased ejihadi living in denial...