Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Khan also said Woolmer had revealed frustrations to him that he never felt in control of the Pakistan team - with captain Inzamam-ul-Haq considered the main man.
“There were a few confrontations (between Bob and his players),” Khan told BBC Five Live’s Sportsweek programme.
"There was always a question mark regarding Bob Woolmer taking total control of the team.
"I think here there was resistance from Inzamam because Inzamam was the unquestioned leader of his team.
"They all fell in place around him and they were totally supportive of Inzamam.
"So I think Bob found it difficult sometimes if he was giving advice that may not be accepted at times by Inzamam. “Bob felt he should have had full control but perhaps didn’t.”

This suggests that Inzi was putting his ego before the interests of the team.

It is also believed there was an argument on the bus before the Ireland match.

Some members of the Pakistani team had changed rooms before the night of the murder…including Inzi.

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

jitnay moun , utnee batien !

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

Before the Ireland game, Woolmer had a clash with Inzi and Mushy. Inzy hadn't been practicing, and Woolmer wanted him to go practice, at which there was exchange of words. This was on Friday, the day before Ireland game.

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

Here is one more media report…looks like conspiracy, but who know?

LONDON: A cut mark on assistant coach Mushtaq Ahmed’s nose and team manager Talat Ali’s alleged using of a fake name to change hotel room prompted the sleuths to interrogate them again in connection with Bob Woolmer’s murder, claimed a media report.

Apart from Mushtaq and Talat, captain Inzamam-ul Haq was also questioned again before the team left Montego Bay for London.

According to “The Observer”, police asked Talat why he moved from the 12th floor of the team hotel to another suit on the 17th floor using the name “Newman” on the night after Woolmer was murdered in the hotel. Talat reportedly said “Because I was scared and everyone was scared.” The newspaper quoted unconfirmed reports claiming Mushtaq was asked “Why do you have a cut on your nose? Did you go to hospital?” Mushtaq said he was hit by a ball in the warm-up session before the Ireland match.

Inzamam was asked when he went to bed on the night of the murder, according to the newspaper report.

Media manager Pervez Mir, however, claimed that the sleuths had asked some “general questions” and even asked Inzamam for autograph.

Deputy Police Commissioner Mark Shields, a former Scotland Yard detective, told the newspaper that he was looking into the betting patterns, which might explain Pakistan’s surprise defeat against Ireland.

“One aspect is what were the odds on Ireland if Ireland won. I understand that they were extremely good if you bet on Ireland. The match-fixing thing is being looked at”, he said.

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

There was an argument on the bus on the way to the Ireland match. This may be another argument. It could also explain why the team played miserably in the Ireland match.

Inzi was also questioned, about why he decided to move from the 12th floor to the 5th floor the night before the murder. He said he wanted to be closer to the players. This was the reason that he was question for the second time.

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

Death of a decent man

By Andrew Alderson, and Simon Hart and Philip Sherwell in Kingston, Sunday Telegraph

Last Updated: 12:56am GMT 25/03/2007

The last moments of Bob Woolmer, the Pakistan cricket team coach murdered in extraordinary circumstances in Jamaica, remain shrouded in mystery. Now, as the sport’s links to corruption are examined, police are investigating whether an argument with his players may have played a part in the affair

Bob Woolmer was in a dark mood as he returned to the Pegasus hotel in New Kingston, Jamaica, last Saturday evening, after one of the most disastrous days of his long and distinguished sporting career. As he stepped off the team bus at 6.30pm, he brushed past cricket supporters and the local Rastafarian drug-pushers who hover outside the hotel to offer “ganja”, “white powder” or a visit to the nearby “titty bar”.
The precise movements of Mr Woolmer over the next hour are not known but, at about 7.30pm, he walked through the bustling lobby, entered the lift and pushed the button for the 12th floor of the 17-storey, 300-room hotel in the heart of the city’s commercial district.
During a career in cricket spanning 40 years, the former England international had enjoyed many successes on and off the pitch, but the events played out that day at the Sabina Park cricket ground were as grim as any he could recall.
Pakistan, the national side he had coached for the past three years, had been humiliated by Ireland, one of the “minnows” of the Cricket World Cup. Pakistan has long been one of the most formidable forces in international cricket, while the Irish team of part-timers - spurred on by the fact that it was St Patrick’s Day - seemed to be in the Caribbean only to make up the numbers.
advertisement

At the press conference after the match, Mr Woolmer had, typically, put on a brave face in front of the media, telling reporters that cricket was “only a game”. Yet those who knew him well could detect that the dents to his pride and professionalism meant he was in the depths of despair. “I am sure he was hurting inside much more than he let on,” said Richard Sydenham, a cricket journalist, who has been friends with Mr Woolmer for more than a decade.
It is thought that Mr Woolmer did not leave his room - number 12-374 - for the rest of Saturday evening, apparently ordering dinner and a drink from room service at about 9pm before turning in for the night. Yet, possibly troubled by Pakistan’s embarrassing exit from the World Cup and his own uncertain future, it seems he slept badly.
For at 3.12am local time, he pressed the “send” button on his laptop and dispatched an email to his wife, Gill, who, along with the wives and girlfriends of players and staff, had not been permitted to join the squad during the early stages of the tournament. In it, he poured out his feelings of disappointment at the result of the match against Ireland and dealt with some family matters, but there was nothing to shed any light on what would happen about seven hours later.
Later, probably at about 10am on Sunday morning, a man or men entered Mr Woolmer’s room. There was no sign of a break-in, so police suspect that there was a knock on the door and that Mr Woolmer let in the man or men, possibly because he knew him or them.
Only the killer or killers know what happened next. But, at some point, things turned violent and, after apparently forcing Mr Woolmer into the bathroom, the coach was attacked and strangled to death. A bone in his neck was broken and further tests will determine whether Mr Woolmer was also drugged or poisoned before or during the assault.
A hotel maid, using her master key to enter the room, found him slumped on the bathroom floor, with vomit at his side, at 10.45am. He was naked, open-mouthed and his face was angled towards the lavatory. There was no sign of a violent struggle, so she called for help, suspecting he had suffered a heart attack or a stroke. Even when news of Mr Woolmer’s death flashed around the world and the tributes to him poured in, there was nothing to suggest foul play.

Fans mourn Woolmer’s death. It would be another four days before police on the Caribbean island felt confident enough to confirm that the 58-year-old coach had, in fact, been murdered - strangled, according to Deputy Commissioner Mark Shields, the former Scotland Yard officer who is in charge of the investigation, in what he described as “extraordinary and evil circumstances”.
At the time of his death, Mr Woolmer was in the twilight of his career. He had first made his name as a batsman for Kent and England. He played for his county between 1968 and 1984 - his top score was 203 against Sussex in 1982 - and won 19 Test caps for his country between 1975 and 1981, with his top score of 149 coming against Australia in his first year as an international player.
As a right-handed batsman, he was known for his timing, touch and grace. In all first-class matches, he scored 15,772 runs at an average of 33.55, including 34 centuries and 71 half centuries. He was an occasional right-arm bowler, taking 420 wickets in first-class cricket at an average of 25.87.

He ended his England career by joining the rebel South African tour of 1981-2, which led to him being banned from Test cricket for three years. Yet, it was as a coach that he perhaps made his greatest impact on the game: he was one of the first to realise the value of new technology to iron out flaws in player’s batting and bowling techniques.
Mr Woolmer, who was widely credited with “bringing laptop computers into the dressing-room”, initially coached in South Africa, before becoming director of coaching for Warwickshire from 1991-94.
After that, he returned to South Africa and spent five years as coach of the national side until 1999. Once again, he was no stranger to controversy. A year after he stepped down as coach, Hansie Cronje, his friend and the South African captain, confessed to being involved with the largest match-fixing scandal in cricket, receiving gifts and money from bookmakers to fix the results of games. Mr Woolmer, however, was forgiving even thought the corruption had started in 1997 under his “watch”: indeed in 2001 he called for a life ban on Cronje to be overturned so the player could be “rehabilitated” into the game.
advertisement

Was such forgiveness spurred by the fact that he had known of, or even condoned, match-rigging? His friend Neil Manthorp, a commentator and journalist, insists the coach was “over-loyal” to his players, but not “bent”. "I would sometimes say to him: ‘Bob - with a coach-captain relationship - how could you not have known, or suspected? What have you done with your stash of [illegal] money?’ said Mr Manthorp, a South African. “But he always looked me in the eye, he didn’t shuffle his feet and he said: 'Call me stupid. Call me naive. Call me a big f***ing idiot. But I didn’t know.”
From 2002-04, Mr Woolmer returned to coach Warwickshire and then had two years as the International Cricket Council’s high-performance manager. It was in 2004 that he took over as the coach of Pakistan.
Friends of the former Test player, who described him as genial and a wonderful raconteur, say he had already decided his spell as national coach would end after the World Cup - even if Pakistan had enjoyed success on the pitch.
Yet, he had enemies as well as friends in the game. Critics saw him as over-sensitive to criticism, confident to the point of arrogance, and overtly ambitious. England officials disliked the way he made an open play for Duncan Fletcher’s job as national coach last year after England’s disastrous tour of Australia saw them lose the Ashes.
As a white non-Muslim, he also had a difficult relationship with some in the Pakistan team. Players respected his coaching skills and the younger ones looked at him as a “father figure”, but he was always an outsider, rarely socialising with the team members and often, while living out of a suitcase on lengthy tours, spending long periods alone in his hotel room.
At the time of his death, he was not in good health. He was overweight - more than 16 stone yet only a shade over 6ft tall - and a diabetic. Days before his death, he had complained of breathing difficulties and on the day before his body was found, he was suffering from a stomach upset.
His widow, Gill, the mother of his two grown-ups sons and who lives in Cape Town, said that the email he sent hours before he died had revealed that he was devastated by his team’s loss to Ireland. She said he was “really depressed and that he could not believe how Pakistan’s defeat to Ireland had happened”.
But who had wanted Bob Woolmer dead - and why?
It emerged last week that the coach had been writing a sequel to his biography - Woolmer on Cricket, published in 2000 -and that it allegedly contained sensational new claims about match-fixing. Not so, said Ivo Tennant, his friend and ghost writer. “A publisher had still to be found. He had written about 10,000 words, which did not include any mention of match-fixing, beyond what he gleaned from Hansie Cronje’s involvement during his time as coach of South Africa. There were no planned revelations to come,” Mr Tennant said.
Others, however, say that there were going to be new and important disclosures in the book - both about the Cronje betting scandal and his time as coach of Pakistan.
Mr Woolmer’s friend Richard Sydenham, who knows many of the world’s leading cricketers, said: “Bob told me he was going to write a book about the Hansie Cronje match-fixing scandal. He said there was more to come out, but he would not go into more detail.”
In an email to a Pakistani journalist, the coach said that he would tell the story of his time in charge of Pakistan after the World Cup. “I believe, regardless of the money, the story is worth telling, has to be told, and in the correct way. I am not a name-and-shame guy, just the honest facts. Let the punter make up his mind \u2026”

Even when his death was being treated as “suspicious” - rather than as murder - earlier this week, Sarfraz Nawaz, the former Pakistan bowler, was quick to link his death to corruption and match-fixing. “I surely feel that he has been bumped off,” he said. In the Far East, bookmakers - most of them operating illegally - take millions of pounds in bets daily on individual cricket matches. The temptation to offer - and receive - large bribes to fix matches is immense.
Once again, however, Mrs Woolmer was quick to dismiss any involvement by her husband in such shady activities. “He had not received any threats and had had no contact with anybody wanting to involve him in match-fixing or with bookmakers,” she said. Mrs Woolmer added that if her husband had been approached by a bookmaker or match-fixer "he would have shown themthe Those who know him well are convinced that his death must have been linked to the events at the World Cup - and was probably linked to the Ireland game itself.
Neil Manthorp, who had known Mr Woolmer for 16 years and regularly played golf with him, said: “It’s not coincidence that Bob was murdered just hours after the Ireland game. In soccer terms, it is like Manchester United losing to Shrewsbury Town 7-0. You have to wonder: how could it possibly happen?”

Mr Manthorp said that Mr Woolmer could accept a fair-and-square defeat, but would have been angry if he felt his players had deliberately thrown the game. “I definitely think he would have confronted the players if he had suspicions. He would have wanted to know the truth,” he said. There were unconfirmed reports yesterday that Mr Woolmer had clashed with one or more players in the team coach on the way back from the Ireland match.
Police are now investigating whether an argument with one of the team may have played a part in his subsequent murder. The police took statements and DNA samples from each of the players before they returned home to Pakistan yesterday. Officers are also poring over CCTV footage, as well as the coach’s mobile records and emails for clues.
The reputation of international cricket has been harmed as never before. Lord MacLaurin, the former chairman of the England and Wales Cricket Board, called yesterday for a major review of the ruling body of world cricket, the International Cricket Council, which already has its own anti-corruption unit.
“When you’ve got something like this happening, which has really besmirched this world cup, we’ve got to look at absolutely everything in cricket and make sure no stone is unturned to make sure we do the very, very best for cricket around the world,” he said.
As Mrs Woolmer and her sons, Dale and Russell, come to terms with their grief this weekend, they are determined that some good will come out of the tragedy that has befallen their family. They have released a statement describing Mr Woolmer as “a unique character. He had a cheerful nature, positive outlook on life and a ‘never-give-up’ attitude.”
The statement said that he would have wanted the Cricket World Cup to continue and it announced that a trust fund had been established “to preserve Bob’s cricketing legacy”.
Friends say the coach had intended to set up the Bob Woolmer Cricket Academy in South Africa after stepping down as Pakistan’s coach - now it may be set up, instead, in his memory.
As the mystery over his death intensifies, it is impossible not to be astonished by how prophetic Mr Woolmer’s mantra has become in the light of the sinister events of the past week. His view on life - published on his website - reads: “Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, today is the present - a gift to make the most of.”

Woolmer inquiry focuses on team dispute

By Simon Hart and Philip Sherwell in Kingston and Andrew Alderson, Sunday Telegraph

Last Updated: 2:28am BST 25/03/2007

Detectives are investigating whether Bob Woolmer was murdered after a fall-out with his Pakistani players over their dismal performance against Ireland in the cricket World Cup.

Woolmer’s relationships with some players were already strained in the build-up to the tournamentOfficers suspect that an explosive argument - rather than a hitman - was behind the murder of the former England batsman hours after Pakistan had crashed out of the contest following an unexpected defeat by Ireland eight days ago.
Mr Woolmer died after being found unconscious in his Jamaica hotel room at 10.45am last Sunday. It was confirmed on Thursday that he had been strangled.
There were widespread rumours yesterday of an angry clash between Mr Woolmer, who coached the Pakistan team, and a player, or players, on the bus back to the hotel after the match.
Friends of the 58-year-old Briton are convinced that he would have confronted individual players if he felt they had thrown the game as part of a betting scandal.

His relationships with some players were already strained in the build-up to the tournament.
Pervez Mir, the spokesman for the Pakistan team, revealed last night that Mr Woolmer had been due to see Inzamam-ul-Haq, the team captain, on the day he died, but the meeting never took place. It had been arranged to discuss the player’s future, but he had already decided he intended to step down as captain of the one-day team. Inzamam and the team’s bowling coach, Mushtaq Ahmed, were spoken to by detectives last night, only hours before they were due to fly home.
Police arrived at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Montego Bay as the team finished lunch under palm trees around the swimming pool.
The pair were taken aside to a player’s room for 30 minutes at the five-star hotel to talk to officers.
Inzamam had already checked out of his room and had his luggage with him when the police arrived. The Pakistani team spokesman said the officers were simply trying to cover a few routine questions not previously dealt with.
Later, Inzamam laughed off suggestions that they may not be returning home. He said: “There is nothing special and we shall be going home.”
It emerged last night that Mr Woolmer had offered his resignation as Pakistan’s coach - a post he had held for three years - only hours before he was strangled.
He sent an email from his laptop in Jamaica to Nasim Ashraf, the Pakistan cricket board chairman, saying he wanted to retire to spend the rest of his life with his family in Cape Town.
Neil Manthorp, a cricket broadcaster and journalist who had known Mr Woolmer for 16 years, is convinced the Ireland match was central to his friend’s murder. “I definitely think he would have confronted the players if he had suspicions. He would have wanted to know the truth,” said Mr Manthorp.
Detectives in Jamaica have concentrated their inquiries on the Pakistan squad since the police announced that Mr Woolmer had been murdered in “extraordinary and evil circumstances”.
Officers have taken statements and DNA samples from the players, who were staying at the Jamaica Pegasus hotel in Kingston where Mr Woolmer was found unconscious.
Two Pakistani diplomats arrived from Washington yesterday to handle the fallout from the murder. Police are also thought to be investigating whether Mr Woolmer’s killer, or killers, used a spare or stolen key card to get into his 12th floor room.
Deputy Commissioner Mark Shields, a former Scotland Yard officer who is heading the murder inquiry, said yesterday: “This is a unique investigation in that most of the witnesses are leaving the jurisdiction very shortly.”
There is no extradition treaty between Pakistan and Jamaica.

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

“A gentle man, a superb coach” - Shaharyar
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/current/story/287218.html
The news of Bob Woolmer’s murder deeply shocked me and I have written this appreciation in the memory of a dedicated professional and a superb human being. I had met Bob Woolmer cursorily before deciding, as chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board, to appoint him national coach. I had based the decision on the advice of Ramiz Raja, then chief executive, and on Bob’s outstanding reputation as coach with Warwickshire and South Africa. I had also consulted the ICC, where Woolmer served as High Performance Director of Coaching.
To my pleasant surprise, Woolmer readily agreed and, at a meeting in a London hotel, we quickly agreed to the terms. I recall that at the meeting Woolmer demonstrated immediately his ability to interact sensitively with even the most difficult of players. Shoaib Akhtar had at the time adopted a position of non-cooperation with the PCB and had refused to join the national camp but Woolmer picked up the phone at the hotel and spoke to Shoaib in a most persuasive manner and obtained from him a commitment.
When Bob took over as coach, Pakistan were languishing in the lower levels of both Test and ODI rankings of the ICC tables. There was demoralisation, controversy and disunity among the players. Bob immediately addressed the issues of morale and performance in the team and worked assiduously to reverse these negative trends.
At a time of our lamentable exit from the World Cup, when the entire cricketing establishment is being blamed for Pakistan’s failure, it is worth recording that during Woolmer’s tenure Pakistan’s performance led to the rise in its rankings to second and third spots in the ICC tables. Apart from the obvious improvement in performance, Woolmer was able to instil unity and a fighting spirit in the team that saw Pakistan succeed at home and abroad. Even when Pakistan lost to Australia and England, a fighting spirit was apparent with many a rearguard action and an ability to bounce back from reverses.
Bob Woolmer was not an authoritarian coach. He believed in gentle and sensitive persuasion of the players, spending hours with individuals demonstrating weaknesses of technique and even of attitude. He was an innovative coach and a master of developing coaching techniques to improve performance. He was opposed to dull routine and insisted on advanced fitness levels - an area he found shockingly inadequate when he took over coaching Pakistan.
Woolmer was also a modest and sensitive human being. He decided with his colleagues to live in simple accommodation at the National Academy even though he was entitled to a more luxurious lifestyle. He accepted remuneration at a lower level than he would have found in the international market and his main ambition was to meet the challenge of making Pakistan’s talented team a winning outfit. His emoluments were almost the same as for Javed Miandad whom he replaced as coach and about a third of the salary contracted by India with its foreign coach.
There were also several occasions when players, senior and junior, had differences with Bob. He never took umbrage at these outbursts and always went round later to the player to sit and rationally discuss the issue. He was nearly always successful and left the aggrieved player realising that facing disappointment equably was part of the game.
**Woolmer also believed that the coach’s role ended with the toss of the coin. He maintained that on the field, the captain was fully in charge of strategy and the players. After the game, he would return to the helm to analyse and advise. I recall that sometimes this stand-back role led to problems. For instance, in the vital Bangalore Test against India, the captain was batting and was expecting advice from the coach as to when the crucial declaration should be made. Bob felt that this decision was solely for the captain to make. I know that Inzamam was disappointed and I told Bob that perhaps he had on this occasion taken his non-interference too far. **
Woolmer faced two major problems during his tenure. First, though he knew of my full support, he felt that senior officials in the Board were out to undermine his authority. On October 6, the day I resigned, Bob came to me with red eyes and said that he would also resign. I persuaded him not to do so, assuring him that I knew the new chairman would give him his full backing. **I told Bob that the patron greatly appreciated his contribution in raising the team’s performance and had on several occasions expressed this appreciation and had reiterated the need to support the coach. **
Two days before leaving for the Caribbean, Bob came to see me saying he would be prepared to serve Pakistan even after the World Cup but the continuous sniping and harassment from PCB’s senior elements would have to stop. He felt that it had been hugely disruptive to preparations and team morale. I again advised Bob to place his trust in the new chairman before making a decision. **‘Bob’s emoluments were almost the same as for Javed Miandad whom he replaced as coach and about a third of the salary contracted by India with its foreign coach’ **
**The second obstacle that Bob faced was control of the team. Here he found that the captain’s spiritual hold on the team prevented his holding full sway with the players, especially the senior members. Bob had some cricketing differences with Inzamam-ul-Haq but these were addressed through dialogue and mutual understanding, even though for days the captain would go into a brooding silence while Bob attempted to overcome the problem through rational discussion. **
**The more serious issue was that Inzamam was not only the cricketing leader but the spiritual talisman of the team who expected - and was mostly given - total obeisance by his team-mates. I recall Bob telling me, several months before the England tour, that he was severely hampered in addressing team issues because the players were constantly at joint prayers - at lunch, tea and after play. He said he never got a chance to coach the team. I advised him not to interfere in religious matters and to work round the issue. Several weeks later he came to me and said that he had appreciated my advice and added that he had found that praying together several times a day had let to bonding and a welcome team spirit in the team. **
I will always remember Bob as a superb innovative coach who dedicated himself to harnessing Pakistan’s wayward talent and transforming it into a successful motivated unit. To a large extent he had been successful despite the very real obstacles that he had faced. He was a modest, generous and warm-hearted man who gave his life for Pakistan. I cannot believe that anyone but a raving lunatic would have deliberately caused his death. His murder is a tragedy for Pakistan cricket.
I immensely appreciated Bob Woolmer’s dedication as the national coach but beyond his professional abilities, I regarded Bob as a friend and a superb human being. I deeply mourn his death and consider it a national and personal tragedy.

Re: Inzi/Woolmer clash

what a bunch of idiots these people are… Mushtaq’s nose cut came on the field way before ireland’s match and it was on the field… CRICINFO is filled with the picture when it happened on the ground from a ball.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

^ As a matter of fact, a thread about Mushtaq suffering a bloody nose during practice was opened here and well before Woolmer’s day of passing…

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=247437

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Here is my problem with Shahrayar Khan, when he saw these things happening, why he did not intervene? Why he as a Chairman never made a decision that yes, spirituality and joint prayers are important but, should never be obstacles to your training? Those joint prayers and spirituality reading is not the reason we lost and performed so badly. This is not the reason why our batsmen played poor shots.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Shahrayar Khan was a career diplomat....but in his column published on Cricinfo - he appears to be anything but that. He comes across as your regular Pak official/player bad-mouthing other Pak officials/players.

Well, may not be that straight-forward cause-and-effect....but in the larger scheme of things, I believe, it does matter.
Osman Saimuddin quoted Woolmer (on Cricinfo) as saying that he had to work with a Pak team that had a very hierarchical culture...where the power distance between the Captain (Inzi) and a new player was substantial.
That, coupled with the fact that Inzi has come to be some kind of a spiritual leader of the team...means that any player who did not tow a certain line of thinking would feel very uneasy in the team.
Of course, I am just guessing.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Tell me what captain has not been labeled as a ‘dictator’? You have to be a dictator, have some belief that you think can make your team better. Cricket board officials make the law and interfere when Captain, player and Coach step over the line. Shahrayar should have done exactly, but he enjoyed sitting, reading newspaper and than bad mouth when team and players are down and in a very emotional state of mind.

Bravo! You have solved our problem.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Well, I agree that it was not very smart of Shaharyar Khan to come out with stories about Woolmer-Inzi clashes and further add fuel to all the speculations about the cause of Woolmer's murder.

That said...there is one thing about being an authorative Captain...and quite another being a Captain who displays leadership qualities more off-the-field (through religion) than on the field. Anybody who has seen Inzi's body language on the field can say that he is not the man you would want as your Captain. This is nothing against Inzi personally - it is just that not all of us are born with leadership traits.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

It is not a Breaking News that Inzi never had an idea how to step up field, be aggressive and change bowlers, everyone knew about it. Again when Board Officials came to term, why they did not tell him that he sucks as an aggressive captain? It seems that all these years, if there was anyone who gave a dam about these players it was Inzi, Younis, Bob and board officials just sat there and did nothing.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Yes, Khan sahib sud have said or done something when he was in charge but chose not to, thus shares some of the blame.

Too much time on the mat or attending religious sermons when they sud have been practicing in the nets or playing cricket as paid professionals. Players with flowing beards cud not resist playing poor shots indicates lack of preparation, no motivation or passion to play for the country. The mind was somewhere else OR Money exchanged hands and they threw these matches. Take your pick.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

Yes you are right. Again, stated before 'Inzi' was a dictator and a coward as a captain. I hope he has no role in future of Pakistan cricket and that includes him not becoming a 'religious coach'.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

The players need to be subordinate to the PCB rather than the other way round. The Chairman of PCB needs to exercise leadership. The team needs to disciplined. The players must put the interests of the team before their own.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

This is bcoz Khan saehb himslef had no sense of cricket or managment at all and he is now crying after he's been shown the door.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

The Jamaican police are saying that they have not eliminated anyone yet....this seems to suggest that the Pakistani team is not in the clear yet. Police are confident that whoever murdered Bob Woolmer knew him. It is slightly difficult to believe that Inzi and the high ups are totally clueless as to who could have murdered Bob Woolmer. Unless some random person murdered Bob Woolmer there is more to the story than meets the eye.

The Pakistani manager is also quoted as complaining that the police did not inform him that it was murder, and he heard it on TV. Well thats why they had a press conference to make that announcement.

Re: Inzi-Woolmer clash / Shaharyar Khan pays tribute to Bob Woolmer

^ tum kiya Jamaican police detective kay office say kaan lagayay bethay ho....?