Re: Intelligent Design…
you will be astonished to hear that even in science the most beautiful and logical explanations are those that are the simplest 
(will come back to the first post soon)
Re: Intelligent Design...
(will come back to the first post soon)
simplest do not mean simple!
cause simplest complex theories are still complex, otherwise everyone would be a rocket scientists!
why do we need dozens of years to get science phd before becoming researcher?? cause science ain't that simple!
what did humans took thousands of years to invent all things needed to walk on Moon?? cause science ain't that simple!
Re: Intelligent Design…
Shaikh Yusuf Estes explains Intelligent design in his talk in between
[gv]1552459742329449440[/gv]
Re: Intelligent Design...
I posted the following post on another thread (atheist explain), it is about intelligent design - universe theory: (MODs if you think it's irrelevent pls remove).
So now you are talking about the universe made by design: Which means everything in the world is made just so that we can manage to live in the world, and if the world was ever so little different, we could not manage to
live in it.
This is the argument from design. It sometimes takes a rather curious form; for
instance, it can be argued that rabbits have white tails in order to be easy to shoot. I do not know how rabbits would view that application. It is an easy argument to parody. Is sound to me like when Voltaire made the remark, that obviously the nose was designed to be such as to fit spectacles.
That sort of parody has turned out to be not nearly so wide of the mark as it might have seemed in the eighteenth century, because since the time of Darwin we understand much better why living creatures are adapted to their environment. It is not that their environment was made to be suitable to them, but that they grew to be suitable to it, that is the basis of adaptation.
There is no evidence of design about it.
When you come to look into this argument from design, it is a most astonishing thing that people can believe that this world, with all the things that are in it, with all its defects, should be the best that omnipotence and omniscience have been able to produce in millions of years. I really cannot believe it. Do you think that, if you were granted omnipotence and omniscience and millions of years in which to perfect your world, you could produce nothing better than the fanatics or the fascists?
Moreover, if you accept the ordinary laws of science, you have to suppose that human life and life in general on this planet will die out in due course: it is a stage in the decay of the solar system; at a certain stage of decay you get the sort of conditions and temperature and so forth which are suitable to protoplasm, and there is life for a short time in the life of the whole solar system. You see in the moon the sort of thing to which the earth is tending -- something dead, cold, and lifeless.