India Ready To Boycott World Cup

i think this team is afraid
to face the Pakistani's...
we all know that they will badly loose...

Wo hee murghee kee eik tangh. Aab dheet insan ko tu koi kuch nahee keh sakta na. Well na mano but this can happen so watch it out. All i can say is Rassi jal gaee pur bul nahee gaya.

Note : Wasiey it took lot more time to come up with the story than the combine time your batsmen has spend on the wicket in 2 test :wink: :hehe:

**Note : Wasiey it took lot more time to come up with the story than the combine time your batsmen has spend on the wicket in 2 test **

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Re: India Ready To Boycott World Cup

I think they are preventing themselves of versing Pakistan.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by BrokenSky: *
i think this team is afraid
to face the Pakistani's...
we all know that they will badly loose...
[/QUOTE]

Let us see what happens. India generates 75% of the cricket revenues and it is right for us to pull the strings. No team in the world is playing for free, they all play because for Indian money. If we go out you have nothing left.

But let us see what BCCI will decide today.

By the by AQ bhai, can you please get me the Record of India Vs Pakistan in world cups. How many times did they face each other in WC and who won.

Seeing the enthu of the guys here, it seems India stands no chance to win against Pak in WC. Biggest Joke.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Victory: *

Let us see what happens. India generates 75% of the cricket revenues and it is right for us to pull the strings. No team in the world is playing for free, they all play because for Indian money. If we go out you have nothing left.

But let us see what BCCI will decide today.

By the by AQ bhai, can you please get me the Record of India Vs Pakistan in world cups. How many times did they face each other in WC and who won.

Seeing the enthu of the guys here, it seems India stands no chance to win against Pak in WC. Biggest Joke.
[/QUOTE]

Victory ,
Dont worry they always speak before a tournament. Right from Morocco ,Kenya and ICC trophy it was pakistan which was winning all of them.But they are never found when tournament finished.They are like Mushroom which we see everywhere during rainy seasons.Moment worlcup starts you will see them disappearing one by one..

lets give them chance....This is the only time they can speak.

One person here commented India is chickening out because She deosnt want to face pakistan.Dear, pakistan is not that important to India that we will make our decisions based on that.PCB has its own compulsions to do sucking up to ICC and Goras so let it do it.After all India doesnt play them and if Goras stop playing them they will be begging( which they are anyway doing).BCCI decides on its own what is best for its team,players and fans and stands by it.

We have already seen how much ground ICC has conceded .They will concede more grounds else they will become meaningles.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *
PCB has its own compulsions to do sucking up to ICC and Goras so let it do it.After all India doesnt play them and if Goras stop playing them they will be begging( which they are anyway doing).
[/quote]

Hilarious, you found that begging.

Anyway, what's your defence India not facing Pakistan in a Cricket Match for two years straight?

They arnt worth it.They arnt important enough.

What is your defence of begging by PCB and president of Pakistan to play with India after repeated refusal by Indians.

Do you know anything called self-respect?
:hehe:

Chill…ab sone jaana hai… Good night..

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *

They arnt worth it.They arnt important enough.
[/quote]

Aren't worth and important enough, YAWN?

[quote]
What is your defence of begging by PCB and president of Pakistan to play with India after repeated refusal by Indians.

Do you know anything called self-respect?
[/QUOTE]

Yep, I do know what Self-Respect is. Hilirious, recently Blind Cricket was held in India, and Pakistan was invited, which we won. On the other hand, India, Indians and BCCI refusal continues of Cricket, which I don't understand why. Both countries can compete in Sports on International levels except Cricket

Why not Cricket? Are you ready for Defence on that?

hmm… lets see

What ever happend to the self proclaimed best batting lineup in the world, 160, 121, 99, 160.
Weren’t you the same guy who dissappeared for 3 months after Pakistan thrashed Australia in Australia. Atleast we admit our mistakes, but you run faster than Agarkar before bowling. :hehe: :hehe:

Since when did money come before patriotisim, oh I get it only in India where the whole team puts money before their country, bunch of losers! :hehe: :hehe:

If PCB had sucked up to ICC, India wouldn’t be playing cricket. Its the decency of ICC and PCB who are allowing you to play cricket.

We all remember how Mr. Dalmiya and rest of BCCI begged ICC when Tendulkar got fined in South Africa, and please don’t include rest of India with your greedy minds, not everyone is low like you.

I still can’t believe you people are still saying that, the whole world is behind ICC, India is left alone, they have no choice but give into their demands, you people think you are bigger than the rest, i got news for you friend, India doesn’t control cricket ICC does and it would be pleasorous site when India loses its test status.
Which isn’t better than being thrashed at home at the hands of Pakistan. But anything put you greedy losers back in your place is a good thing.

Have a nice day. :slight_smile:

Umair, what ever it is, ICC can’t neglect India. So, there is nothing wrong if we pull the strings. What world cricket is seeing today is Indian Money. Just take India out and the world cricket body falls apart.

I am not speaking about patriotism or so. That’s a different issue. If any other country or players leveraged such money power then they will definitely try to make money from it.

What enrages me is ICC deciding which company you should advertise for and which company you should’nt.

In future they might even, tell which toothpaste, brush or shampoo a player has to use and which under garments his uncle or aunt should wear for say 30 days before and after a tournament.

These rules and regulations do not hurt any one in world cricket as much as the Indians. Hence I have strong reservations against these absurd rules.

by the way ..I have news for you…

**The Board of Control for Cricket in India rejected the ‘final offer’ of the International Cricket Council on the contract issue on Wednesday.
**

The board said it will back the players and called for scrutiny of the World Cup sponsorship agreements.

The special general meeting of the board, which deliberated on the contentious issue for nearly four hours at Kolkata, also decided to select the final squad of 15 players for the World Cup by the December 31 deadline while empowering president Jagmohan Dalmiya to take action in the matter.

“The board felt it was necessary to ascertain whether the rights given to the World Cup sponsors under the sponsorship agreements are in consonance with the decisions of the ICC Executive Board,” said Dalmiya after the meeting.

“If excessive rights are granted to the sponsors then BCCI, as a stakeholder, should not be called upon to suffer financial losses,” he said.

When reminded of the criticism of this stand of the BCCI by ICC president Malcolm Gray a couple of days ago, Dalmiya said, “These issues should not be brushed aside on the pretext of being ‘outdated’ and ‘irrelevant’. Rather it should face scrutiny.”
**
The board members also asked the Indian sponsors of the World Cup to “grant dispensations” to Indian cricketers so that they could participate in the tournament.

If “they do not look after the larger interest of the country and its cricket then BCCI would review its commercial relations with them in future”, they said.
** :wink: (what a better way to say Pull your socks)

Asked how the board would ensure that all the 15 selected players signed the World Cup contract before January 14 if the ICC refused to make more concessions, the BCCI president said, “Just wait and watch. There is a gap of two weeks between the selection of players and deadline for signing and anything can happen.”

He also hinted that the board was ready to take legal recourse, as “we have already taken legal opinion on the issue and we know we are on firm ground”.

The problem faced by the Indian players was unique in nature, as “our boys get millions of dollars under their existing contracts and it should be accordingly dealt with”, said Dalmiya.

Asked what sort of ‘dispensations’ were expected from the Indian sponsors of the World Cup, Dalmiya said, "The members hope that these sponsors and partners of the Global Cricket Corporation would rise to the occasion foregoing pecuniary considerations in the larger interests of the country and its cricket.

“This gesture will go a long way in continuing the commercial dealings between the BCCI and the sponsors.”

The board president also recalled the gesture of Sahara India, which decided to continue sponsoring the team despite objections from the ICC for use of its logo by the Indian cricketers in the Champions Trophy.

Incidentally, three out of the four official sponsors of the World Cup are Indian companies and some of them are also Indian partners of the Global Cricket Corporation, the company that markets the World Cup.

Dalmiya, who is also the member of an ICC panel to resolve the contract issue before the World Cup, said that the next round of teleconference with the ICC top officials is scheduled for Friday and the matter will be discussed again.

The ICC had earlier warned the BCCI that its failure to accept the final offer of concession in the players’ term and ensure participation of its best team to the World Cup beginning in South Africa on February 8 would evoke huge damage claim.

Dalmiya, however, expressed hope that the matter would be amicably settled.

“The ICC is our parent body and it is our topmost priority that everybody participates in the World Cup,” he said.

As per the final offer of the world body, the Indian players had to accept restrictions on personal endorsement in direct conflict with those of official sponsors for a period of 30 days before and five days after the World Cup, apart from the time when the tournament was on.

The official sponsors would also have the right to use the images of the players for three months after the World Cup.

The BCCI had already said that it would accept restrictions on personal endorsement only during the World Cup. It insisted that players with existing conflicting contracts should not be called for imaging and for others it should be only for two months after the World Cup.

Just to tell you what india controls in Cricket. It’s not abt patriotism or something like that..Cricket is controlled by india in terms of money and you would see why..

http://outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20021230&fname=Cricket+marketing+(F)&sid=1

please read the article..

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *

That coming from a Pakistani after Pakistan's recent performances.... :D

[/QUOTE]

Pakistans only losin to good teams like SA.....India lost to west indies n new zeland.....dont forget we beat Australia in June!
n we're still on number 3 in the ICC one day rankings!

Re: …

U are wrong… Cricket is not controlled by India… read the report… India is controlled by Cricket.

What the hell difference would it make to international sponsors if India doesn’t play… none. It would be a loss of billions of Rupees to Indian companies and TV channels, without any advertising.

Let them not come, un ke muun per jooti paray gee succesful World Cup se tau maza ayay ga… :smiley:

Re: Re: …

:hehe:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Bilal_Tarar: *

Pakistans only losin to good teams like SA.....India lost to west indies n new zeland.....dont forget we beat Australia in June!
n we're still on number 3 in the ICC one day rankings!
[/QUOTE]

Pakistan lost to Australia in Sharjah. Pakistan lost to South Africans in One dayers..Test matches are yet to played and you would get the results in the coming days..

As far as India is concerned, India lost to WI in test matches but defeated them in One day series when they last toured WI. also India has been comprehensively defeated by New Zealand in the test matches, and the result for the one dayers would be there.

Why do u guys only make comparisions between India pakistan..i don't know ifu get some kinda relief out of that, i personally can't figure out..

laterz

Re: Re: ....

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by pakistan99: *
U are wrong... Cricket is not controlled by India... read the report... India is controlled by Cricket.

What the hell difference would it make to international sponsors if India doesn't play... none. It would be a loss of billions of Rupees to Indian companies and TV channels, without any advertising.

Let them not come, un ke muun per jooti paray gee succesful World Cup se tau maza ayay ga... :D
[/QUOTE]

First of all i don' t think u read the article completely..and if u had, you wouldn't have replied like this mate..the major spenders or sponsors are companies which are operting in India. they can't make the same amt of money by spending their products in USA or can they? u tell me..it's the same way ESPN starts promoting American Football in pakistan or India and expects to have an increase in viewer rating..Well it's a simple technique of marketting and i hope u understand..and yeah all these Indian companies are the sponsors of the World Cup..

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Jind_Mahi: *

Pakistan lost to Australia in Sharjah. Pakistan lost to South Africans in One dayers..Test matches are yet to played and you would get the results in the coming days..

As far as India is concerned, India lost to WI in test matches but defeated them in One day series when they last toured WI. also India has been comprehensively defeated by New Zealand in the test matches, and the result for the one dayers would be there.

Why do u guys only make comparisions between India pakistan..i don't know ifu get some kinda relief out of that, i personally can't figure out..

laterz
[/QUOTE]

You are doing the same thing. Seems like u feel pretty bad when you see india going down day by day.

Look at the chart on cricinfo TOP 3 teams of ODI Aust, SA and PAK. If PAK is doing that bad then they shouldn't be in the top 3.

If you don't like to discuss PAK vs India then simply stay out of the discussion no one is forcing you.

Re: Re: Re: …

Ok consider this.

If India is out of cricket there will be no sponsors from India that means ICC will lose millions of dollars generated by Indian sponsors but that doesn’t mean ICC won’t get other sponsors around the world, sure they will and ICC will keep making money from sponsors around the world BUT Indian sponsor will surely get their a$$ kicked. That means it will effect India more as compare to ICC.

I think pakistan99 pointed a really good point and opened ur eyes :k: which you were unable to see.