Re: India kills 2 Pakistani rangers personals after requesting a flag meeting
I’ve heard this phrase mentioned on Pakistani talk shows like Morning with Farah but is it fair to generalise about a community based
on assumptions of what religion people who have done wrong are. Are the religion of these soldiers involved in this incident mentioned. They could be Sikh, Hindu, Muslim, Jain, Parsi. Such incidents also occurred under Sikh PM Manmohan Singh although more seem to be hapepning now. Even if they are doesn’t generalising people of any religion also affect the Hindus of Pakistan who are patriotic citizens. Similar generalisations about Muslims in India is incorrect as well.
Why should Pakistani Hindus who organise free medical camps for their fellow citizens with staff from abroad including India be tainted? Are these Indian doctors, which include Hindus, also included in this phrase.
Or maybe this news from 1st of Jan 2015 of a Pakistani child with heart condition operated in India has doctors who fit the phrase above?
City docs give a new lease of life to Pak, Afghan children
At a particular someone who might reply. The mention of the acts of these civilians is in response to someone mentioning candlelight vigils by other Indian civilians which is not related in any way. Border violence is to be condemned but neither Indian civilians are to be blamed if events like this occur out of their control and neither are Pakistani civilians are to be blamed for consequences of bail of LEJ leaders or consequences of blasphemy law. Anyway not meaning to stop the discussion but give my point of view. Don’t plan to return to this thread.
Stereotypes of people of number of religions happens worldwide when it shouldn’t.