'In The Line Of Fire' (Merged)

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Read some of the interesting comments from both Pakistanis and Indians

http://www.amazon.com/Line-Fire-Memoir-Pervez-Musharraf/dp/0743283449

S. Nayak

Pakistan cooperated in the war on terror because it happens to border Afghanistan (the focus of America’s war on terror).
America knows that Pakistan is the primary sponsor of terrorism in the world and a great example of the Islamo-fascism that endangers the world. America’s partnership with Pakistan is temporary and superficial. Musharraf did not have a choice in deciding to help America, against Pakistan’s direct interests in Afghanistan. Whether Musharraf has made the right gestures to get the most of the partnership is the question. Kowtowing to US might is hardly courageous. Musharraf might just have saved Pakistan, however, because Pakistan has more to lose than Afghanistan (in infrastructure and people) and facing our military would have devastated Pakistan.

Facing the US military would have obliterated India too :slight_smile:

In keeping with their obsession with Pakistan ‘In The Line Of Fire’ is a best-seller in India

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

I just had to meet a group of Indian businessmen at a reception in my hotel in Cairo, and guess what? They all had copies of Musharraf’s ‘In the Line of Fire’ with them. :hehe:

Re: 'In The Line Of Fire' (Merged)

^:D

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Its 2nd best seller at Amazon and run away hit in India… Me ordering a copy soon :slight_smile:

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Post your review of the great man’s book, when you manage to read it. :k:

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Another thought provoking article

http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/opinion.cfm?id=1451712006

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Now that all the ‘hype’ by Mush/Pak govt is over, the majority of neutral commentators have dismissed the book:


*Commentators, though, have been scathing about the contents. *
*“The book reveals that he’s a military dictator, a mediocre man, and intellectually of low calibre,” Mohammed Ziauddin, Islamabad editor for the Dawn newspaper, told the BBC. *

*“He is actually trying to make his own history. Perhaps he has a fiction of history in his mind.” *

*Columnist Kamila Hyat says the president portrays himself as a kind of khaki superman rescuing Pakistan from peril. “A man who honestly believes all this to be true cannot comprehend why he should be subjected to criticism or understand why at times it may be wise to enter into a process of consultation and discussion, rather than charging ahead with unilateral decisions,” she writes in The News. *

Re: 'In The Line Of Fire' (Merged)

A case study in narcissism...

On a serious note, mushie has through his book and subsequent foot in mouth comments and interview reminiscent of one Donald Rumsfeld, has reinforced all the misperceptions and negative stereotypes that are prevalent abroad...that is he is the only sane individual in a massive sea of extremism, that his intelligence agencies, defense and nuclear establishments are infiltrated and operated by rouge elements that have their own agendas...that Pakistan is the source, the ground zero of international terrorism...that Pakistani pubic is ignorant...that all of our leader are power hungry totalitarian womanizing drunkards…that Pak Army is let by a bunch of incompetent drunks…

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Another general and former colleague of Mush has spoken out..

*(http://www.thenews.com.pk)

By Rahimullah Yusufzai

PESHAWAR: Lt-Gen (retd) Ali Kuli Khan Khattak has disputed President General Pervez Musharraf’s claim in his book, In the Line of Fire, that he advocated imposition of martial law when then-prime minister Nawaz Sharif forced General Jehangir Karamat, army chief at the time, to resign.

Kuli told The News he never made a case for military rule. “My view was that the Army should be firm and fair in dealing with all situations. I certainly advised General Jehangir Karamat not to resign as Army chief but I didn’t ask him to stage a coup and impose martial law,” he maintained.

Lt-Gen (retd) Ali Kuli and General Musharraf were batch-mates, having joined the 29th Pakistan Military Academy (PMA) course in Kakul and then becoming involved in an often bitter competition.

“I can say we were friends until I was made Chief of General Staff (CGS). Musharraf was very unhappy that he couldn’t make it,” Kuli recalled. Reached in Karachi for his reaction to the observations made by Musharraf about him in the book, Kuli argued it was a one-sided version of events in which facts have been misrepresented and half-truths inserted to make General Musharraf look good.

“I am reading the book and preparing a rejoinder. Some of the references about me are not true,” he stressed. Keen to refute the claim that he advocated imposition of martial law, Kuli said as CGS to Karamat he was aware that prime minister Nawaz Sharif was angry about Karamat’s speech at the Naval War College in which he had recommended reforms such as formation of National Security Council to improve the government’s working.

“I also knew that Karamat had written a letter to Sharif to explain his thinking and had spoken about the need for reforms in a meeting of the defence committee. Sharif later told Karamat that he should have pointed out these things to him alone instead of raising them in presence of others in the defence committee meeting,” he explained.

Furious PM: Continuing, Kuli said: “General Karamat told me that Sharif was furious and the situation was worse than he had told me. In presence of ISI Chief Lt-Gen Nasim Rana, the question of General Karamat’s resignation also came up for discussion. I told him don’t even think of resigning because the verdict that you would receive would be so damning that you would not be able to live with it. This is what I said and I own it even now. But at no stage, whether it was the corps commanders’ conference or that of the principal staff officers, I asked him to stage a coup,” he contended.

Kuli also denied the president’s assertion about having a small run-in with him for having advocated removal of (elected prime minister) Nawaz Sharif. “I don’t remember having any run-in with him. Also, I never reported on him and would like him to show me one instance of any such thing,” he said.

“By the way, it was Musharraf who subsequently removed the elected prime minister, i.e. Nawaz Sharif, from power,” he argued. He pointed out that Musharraf met Prime Sharif without obtaining Army Chief General Jehangir Karamat’s permission.

“A serving soldier must always obtain the army chief’s permission for such meetings. Musharraf first met Sharif who told him that he was being made army chief and later called on Karamat,” he alleged.

Kuli stated that he resigned from the Pakistan Army when Sharif appointed General Musharraf as the army chief.

“I and Lt-Gen Khalid Nawaz quit our jobs in keeping with the highest traditions of Pakistan Army when we were superceded,” he stated.

Whole truth: “Musharraf in his book hasn’t told the whole truth with regard to our telephonic conversation after he became the army chief. I rang him twice and was able to talk to him on the second try. I congratulated him on becoming the army chief and wished him good luck. I told him I was travelling to Peshawar to attend a wedding in the family. I also informed him that I was going to resign in line with the high traditions of Pakistan Army,” he said.

“In fact, Lt-Gen Ziauddin as the Adjutant General asked me whether I would be coming to the GHQ the next day to attend the reception for General Musharraf on his promotion. I told him I wasn’t going to come. I put in my resignation and never stepped foot in the (General headquarters (GHQ) again,” he remembered.

Kuli claimed that General Musharraf during their phone conversation uttered only two words, “thank you” and “ok.”

“I was surprised to read in the book that General Musharraf said “bad luck” to me for having missed the chance to become the army chief. He also didn’t ask me to stay on in the army. I am amazed that he has written things that never happened,” he complained.

“Musharraf once complained to a common friend that I didn’t felicitate him on becoming the army chief. I felicitated him after hearing the news of his promotion in the 9 pm news on television. I am not a hypocrite and it is true that I wasn’t at all happy that Musharraf had overtaken me and become the army chief. I had been a better officer than him throughout our careers but now I had lost out to him. But it didn’t mean that I didn’t congratulate him or stopped talking to him,” he said.

“In fact, I have met Musharraf on quite a few occasions in recent years, sometimes at weddings and other social occasions, and exchanged pleasantries. I visited the Army House to offer Fateha when his father died. We also met at our PMA course get-togethers. Once, I attended a dinner at the Army House to which I was invited by the NCHD head Dr Nasim Ashraf and shared table with the president. He was very gracious to me on that occasion,” he recalled.

Front-runner: The retired, 63-year-old general claimed he was ahead of General Musharraf throughout their military careers. “I was commissioned as number one in PMA Kakul while Musharraf was at 11th position. Khalid Nawaz, Shabbir Sharif Shaheed and others were also ahead of him. I and Khalid Nawaz did the Staff College course in 1973 while Musharraf could do it a year later in 1974. I topped the Army Aviation course and was declared the best flier. I also served as commandant, Staff College, Quetta, commanded the 10th Corps, and got the most prized appointment as CGS,” he said.

Lt-Gen (retd) Ali Kuli Khan said he was sent to Sandhurst in UK as the top cadet on PMA Kakul. “Each of the four companies at the PMA was asked to recommend four top names. I, Khalid Nawaz, Shabbir Sharif and Zaheerul Islam Afridi were listed. Musharraf may have been in the list of his company but he was never sent to Sandhurst,” he pointed out.

Kuli also found fault with some of Musharraf’s policies. He accused him of mishandling the situation in Waziristan and Balochistan and ordering the bombing and killing of our own people. He felt both issues ought to have been resolved politically.

“I know from my sources that five to six military officers including colonels were court-martialled for refusing to fire on our people in Waziristan,” he claimed.

Kargil capers: Describing the Kargil operation as disastrous, Kuli argued it was flawed in terms of its conception, tactical planning and execution.

“It was an unprofessional decision by someone, who has served in the Pakistan Army for 40 years. As the architect of Kargil, he must answer critical questions for sacrificing so many soldiers. I am sure Kargil would continue to haunt him for the rest of his life,” he maintained.

While still on Kargil, Kuli challenged the president’s claim that it had revived the Kashmir issue.

“I would say Kargil has damaged the Kashmir cause. It was a disaster bigger than the East Pakistan tragedy. At that time, Pakistan at least had some friends but on Kargil we were friendless. There was no way we could defend this tactless move,” he contended.

Describing Musharraf as “Mr General U-turn,” Kuli said: “His seven-year rule has been characterized by U-turns on policy matters. This president cannot hold on to anything. He is impulsive. He took decisions on Kargil, Waziristan, Balochistan and a host of other issues and then backtracked on most of them,” he alleged.

Kuli, who belongs to a well-known family from Karak district in NWFP and is related to certain influential politicians, said he had confined himself to running the family business after retirement.

“I have no interest in politics. A number of politicians wanted me to join their parties in any capacity that I wished but I declined the offers,” he recalled. He said he refrained from commenting on government policies until now to avoid confrontation with General Musharraf.

“I could have pinpointed the flaws in the tactical planning for Kargil. There are holes that are obvious. But sometimes one has to keep quiet to avoid harming national interest,” he added.*

Re: 'In The Line Of Fire' (Merged)

Everybody is a good guy now, contradicting what Mush said. What a bunch of spineless cowards and sell-outs!

Re: 'In The Line Of Fire' (Merged)

saaray dil jalay ba jamaat bol rahay hain aaj kal :)

Re: Musharraf memoirs set for best-seller list in India

[quote=Reza Pahlavi]
The President’s book has sure fired up the Indian’s. :k: :jhanda:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060926/wl_asia_afp/indiapakistanmusharraf_060926142146

The book has been banned in India

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Another example of Indian obsession with Pakistan


Musharraf edges out Manmohan on Indian TV
NEW DELHI: Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf overshadowed Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Indian TV news channels last week, getting thrice the attention on prime time bulletins, according to a survey.

Between Sep 21-28-the week when Musharraf released his memoirs in New York, six New Delhi-based Hindi news channels devoted 378 minutes of their prime-time bulletins to the Pakistani president against 114 minutes to Manmohan Singh, the survey by the Centre for Media Studies (CMS) found. Of the six, NDTV India devoted 164 minutes to Musharraf against just four minutes to the Indian prime minister.

The other channels surveyed were DD News, Zee News, Sahara Samay, Star News and Aaj Tak. Overall, the Doordarshan news channels devoted 94 minutes to Manmohan Singh against 35 minutes to Musharraf. On an average, Musharraf got 10 minutes of prime time coverage a day per channel against hardly three minutes for Manmohan Singh. “No Indian prime minister would have ever got such coverage in the Pakistani news media as Musharraf often gets in India,” a CMS release said on Tuesday.

On Sep 25, the day Musharraf released In The Line of Fire: A Memoir, the six channels devoted 227 minutes to him, and 102 minutes in the four days preceding this. This included Musharraf’s meeting with Manmohan Singh on the sidelines of the Non-Aligned Summit in Havana and the Pakistani leader’s meeting with US President George W Bush in New York, the CMS survey said.

Manmohan also lost out on his birthday – Sep 26 – to veteran actor Dev Anand, who was born the same day. Dev Anand got 34 minutes in the prime-time bulletins of the six Hindi channels against two minutes and 30 seconds of Manmohan Singh. While NDTV India devoted 24 minutes to the actor, it ignored the prime minister.

Doordarshan was the only saving grace for Manmohan Singh, giving him a minute and 50 seconds against 30 seconds to Dev Anand, even as Zee devoted 30 seconds to the prime minister against seven minutes to the actor. Interestingly, both Aaj Tak and Star News did not cover either of the two birthdays in their prime-time news bulletins, CMS noted. Online

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\10\04\story_4-10-2006_pg1_4

Re: 'In The Line Of Fire' (Merged)

Great they ban the book; it's bound to become more popular!

Re: Musharraf memoirs set for best-seller list in India

[quote=nstar777]

Great!!!
It means I did not make a wrong decision to buy this book on the 4th day of release. It must have some sort of information unacceptable for Indians. I am gonna read it more carefully now.
:jhanda:

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Well said LI :k:

True PirJi :smiley:

Re: Musharraf memoirs set for best-seller list in India

[quote=nstar777]

:hehe: I hope that is a joke, because if they have then it will make India look so foolish.

Re: Musharraf memoirs set for best-seller list in India

u r rite. they did honour their fallen ones but only after they were MADE to admit that these were their own SOLDIERS and NOT mujahideen.
I still remember the remarks by one of indian politicians when sheikh rashid sahib taunted abt the lack of coffins for indian soldiers and indians had responded with saying..
please take away ur soldiers' bodies coz they r still lying there..
so it was quite shamefull but its for those who have some shame :)

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

Atfter barely a week, Amazon has already put it on sale, almost 50% off

List Price:$28.00 Price:$16.80

Despite spending so much govt money to promote the book, even promoting it in the White House, no one wants the dictators book of lies :cb:

Re: ‘In The Line Of Fire’ (Merged)

People who were going to buy the book have already bought it. But to the charge that NO ONE wants to buy his book:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5398678.stm